Skip to main content

The Anti-Melanoma Efficiency of the Intratumoral Injection of Cucurbitacin-Loaded Sustained Release Carriers: In Situ-Forming Implants

Abstract

Our previous studies revealed that the PLGA-based particulate systems loaded with cucurbitacin showed limited anti-melanoma efficiency in xenograft animal models after intratumoral injection, which was due to the undesirable initial burst release and the leakage of the particulate carriers from the injection site through the pinhole. In this paper, two categories of in situ-forming implants (ISFIs) for intratumoral injection, PLGA ISFIs and SAIB ISFIs, were systemically evaluated for their potentials for on solid tumor treatment via intratumoral injection. The in vitro drug release profiles of these two ISFIs were different due to the different sol–gel transition properties. The pharmacodynamics results revealed that SAIB ISFIs displayed obvious therapeutic efficiencies to melanoma, and multi-points injection of SASIB ISFIs displayed better efficiency than single-point injection. The different sol–gel transition properties and mechanism for PLGA ISFIs and SAIB ISFIs affected both the drug release and strongly impacted the pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacodynamic effectiveness. Also, the adhesive property of SAIB to the local tissue could extend the retention and inhibit the leakage of the SAIB ISFIs, thus enhanced the anticancer effectiveness. Comparison of the various intratumoral injection systems, appropriate drug release profiles (lower initial burst and steady release) and good retention (minimum leakage from the injection site) would benefit to the antitumor effects of the intratumoral depots.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

References

  1. Guo JB, Li X, Yu HD, Tang ZH, Tang X, Cai CC, et al. The anti-melanoma efficiency of the intratumoral injection of cucurbitacin-loaded sustained-release carriers: A PLGA particle system. J Pharm Sci. 2013;102:2550–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dunn RL, Cowsar DR, Vanderbilt DP. Biodegradable in situ forming implants and methods of producing the same. 1990;U.S. Patent 4,938,763.

  3. Shively ML, Coonts BA, Renner WD, Southard JL, Bennett AT. Physico-chemical characterization of polymeric injectable implant delivery system. J Control Release. 1995;33:237–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dunn RL, Tipton AJ. Polymeric compositions useful as controlled release implant. 1997; U.S. Patent 5,702,716

  5. Eliaz RE, Kost J. Characterization of a polymeric PLGA-injectable implant delivery system for the controlled release of proteins. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;50:388–96.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang L, Kleiner L, Venkatraman S. Structure formation in injectable poly(lactide-co-glycolide) depots. J Control Release. 2003;90:345–54.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mank R, Rafler G, Nerlich B. Parenterale Depotarzneiformen auf der Basis von biologisch abbaubaren Polymeren. Pharmazie. 1991;46:9–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kempe S, Mäder K. In situ forming implants-an attractive formulation principle for parenteral depot formulations. J Control Release. 2012;161:668–79.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rhee YS, Park CW, DeLuca PP, Mansour HM. Sustained release injectable drug delivery systems. Pharm Tech. 2010;11(1):s6–s13.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chandrashekar G, Udupa N. Biodegradable injectable implant system for long term drug delivery using poly (lactic-co-glycolic) acid copolymers. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1996;48:669–74.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tang Y, Singh J. Controlled delivery of aspirin: effect of aspirin on polymer degradation an in vitro release from PLGA based phase sensitive systems. Int J Pharm. 2008;357:119–25.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ravivarapu HB, Moyer KL, Dunn RL. Sustained activity and release of leuprolide acetate from a situ forming polymeric implant. AAPS Pharm Sci Technol. 2000;1(1):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lambert WJ, Peck KD. Development of an in situ forming biodegradable poly-lactide-co-glycolide system for the controlled release of proteins. J Control Release. 1995;33:189–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lu Y, Yu Y, Tang X. Sucrose acetate isobutyrate as an in situ forming system for sustained risperidone release. J Pharm Sci. 2007;96:3252–62.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Franklin WO, Dao LN, Fielderb PJ, Dybdalb N, Brooksa D, Sanea S, et al. Sustained delivery of human growth hormone from a novel gel system: SABER™. Biomaterials. 2002;23:4353–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Royals MA, Fujita SM, Yewey GL, Rodriguez J, Schultheiss PC, Dunn RL. Biocompatibility of a biodegradable in situ forming implant system in rhesus monkeys. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;45:231–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dong Xiaohui, The preparation of Cuc liposomes, The Master degree thesis of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, 2008

  18. Pechenov S, Shenoy B, Yang MX. Injectable controlled release formulations incorporating protein crystals. J Control Release. 2004;96:149–58.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang L, Wang A, Zhao X, Liu X, Wang D, Sun F, et al. Design of a long-term antipsychotic in situ forming implant and its release control method and mechanism. Int J Pharm. 2012;427:284–92.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin X, Yang S, Gou J, Zhao M, Zhang Y, Qi N, et al. A novel risperidone-loaded SAIB-PLGA mixture matrix depot with a reduced burst release: effects of solvents and PLGA on drug release behaviors in vitro/in vivo. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012;23:443–55.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schoenhammer K, Petersen H, Guethlein F, Goepferich A. Poly-ethyleneglycol 500 dimethylether as novel solvent for injectable in situ forming depots. Pharm Res. 2009;26:2568–77.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kranz H, Bodmeier R. Structure formation and characterization of injectable drug loaded biodegradable devices: in situ implants versus in situ microparticles. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2008;34:164–72.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chakravarthi SS, De S, Miller DW, Robinson DH. Comparison of anti-tumor efficacy of paclitaxel delivered in nano- and microparticles. Int J Pharm. 2010;383:37–44.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Quinn ME. Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients (6th edition), Pharmaceutical Press and the American Pharmacists Association, USA. 2009; pp. 17 (ethanol), 233 (DMSO), and 601 (NMP).

  25. Chhabra S, Sachdeva V, Singh S. Influence of end groups on in vitro release and biological activity of lysozyme from a phase-sensitive smart polymer-based in situ gel forming controlled release drug delivery system. Int J Pharm. 2007;342:72–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu Q, Zhang H, Zhou G, Xie S, Zou H, Yu Y, et al. In vitro and in vivo study of thymosin alpha1 biodegradable in situ forming poly(lactide-co-glycolide) implants. Int J Pharm. 2010;397:122–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Luan X, Bodmeier R. Influence of the poly (lactide-co-glycolide) type on the leuprolide release from in situ forming microparticle systems. J Control Release. 2006;110:266–72.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lambert WJ, Peck KD. Development of an in situ forming biodegradable poly-lactide-coglycolide system for the controlled release of proteins. J Control Release. 1995;33:189–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hatim A, Catherine O, Somnath S. In vitro-controlled release delivery system for hydrogen sulfide donor. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2014;15(4):910–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Graham PD, Brodbeck KJ, McHugh AJ. Phase inversion dynamics of PLGA solutions related to drug delivery. J Control Release. 1999;58:233–45.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Luan X, Bodmeier R. In situ forming microparticle system for controlled delivery of leuprolide acetate: influence of the formulation and processing parameters. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2006;27:143–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tarek AA, Hany MI, Ahmed MS, Alaa K, Mohammad T, Nutan H, et al. Biodegradable injectable in situ implants and microparticles for sustained release of montelukast: in vitro release, pharmacokinetics, and stability. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2014;15(3):772–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Dong WY, Körber M, Esguerra VL. Stability of poly (d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) and leuprolide acetate in situ forming drug delivery systems. J Control Release. 2006;115:158–67.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Brodbeck KJ, DesNoyer JR, McHugh AJ. Phase inversion dynamics of PLGA solutions related to drug delivery-part II. The role of solution thermodynamics and bath-side mass transfer. J Control Release. 1999;62:333–44.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Frank A. Factors affecting the degradation and drug-release mechanism of poly (lactic acid) and poly [(lactic acid)-co-(glycolic acid)]. Polym Int. 2005;54:36–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gao ZB, Ding PT, Zhang L. Study of a Pingyangmycin delivery system: Zein/Zein–SAIB in situ gels. Int J Pharm. 2007;328:57–64.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yu J, Yin D, Min X, Guo Z, Zhang J, Wang Y, et al. [188Re] Rhenium sulfide suspension: a potential radiopharmaceutical for tumor treatment following intra-tumor injection. Nucl Med Biol. 1999;26:573–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ewelina K, Sin YY, Sophie S, Daisy WJ, Boekhovena RW, Raymond MS, et al. Anti-tumor activity of liposomal glucocorticoids: the relevance of liposome-mediated drug delivery, intratumoral localization and systemic activity. J Control Release. 2011;151:10–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Deng Yihui, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, for his helpful comments on animal studies, Mr. Tian Han, Zhongshan School of Medicine, SUN YAT-SEN University, for his help on cellular experiments and results explanations, and Prof. Takshi Ikejima, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, who kindly provided the A375.S2 human melanoma cell.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Xu.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Figure 1

(DOC 1644 kb)

Supplementary Figure 2

(DOC 50 kb)

(AVI 670 kb)

(AVI 831 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, J., Wang, J., Cai, C. et al. The Anti-Melanoma Efficiency of the Intratumoral Injection of Cucurbitacin-Loaded Sustained Release Carriers: In Situ-Forming Implants. AAPS PharmSciTech 16, 973–985 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-015-0292-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-015-0292-2

KEY WORDS

  • anti-melanoma efficiency
  • cucurbitacin
  • drug release
  • in situ-forming implants (ISFIs)
  • intratumoral injection