In recent years, several mathematical models have been developed for analysis of drug dissolution data, and many different mathematical approaches have been proposed to assess the similarity between two drug dissolution profiles. However, until now, no computer program has been reported for simplifying the calculations involved in the modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles. The purposes of this article are: (1) to describe the development of a software program, called DDSolver, for facilitating the assessment of similarity between drug dissolution data; (2) to establish a model library for fitting dissolution data using a nonlinear optimization method; and (3) to provide a brief review of available approaches for comparing drug dissolution profiles. DDSolver is a freely available program which is capable of performing most existing techniques for comparing drug release data, including exploratory data analysis, univariate ANOVA, ratio test procedures, the difference factor f 1, the similarity factor f 2, the Rescigno indices, the 90% confidence interval (CI) of difference method, the multivariate statistical distance method, the model-dependent method, the bootstrap f 2 method, and Chow and Ki’s time series method. Sample runs of the program demonstrated that the results were satisfactory, and DDSolver could be served as a useful tool for dissolution data analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Lu DR, Abu-Izza K, Mao F. Nonlinear data fitting for controlled release devices: an integrated computer program. Int J Pharm. 1996;129:243–51.
Phaechamud T. Variables influencing drug release from layered matrix system comprising hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2008;9:668–74.
Di Colo G, Baggiani A, Zambito Y, Mollica G, Geppi M, Serafini MF. A new hydrogel for the extended and complete prednisolone release in the GI tract. Int J Pharm. 2006;310:154–61.
Papadopoulou V, Kosmidis K, Vlachou M, Macheras P. On the use of the Weibull function for the discernment of drug release mechanisms. Int J Pharm. 2006;309:44–50.
Orelli JV, Leuenberger H. Search for technological reasons to develop a capsule or a tablet formulation with respect to wettability and dissolution. Int J Pharm. 2004;287:135–45.
Moore JW, Flanner HH. Mathematical comparison of dissolution profiles. Pharm Technol. 1996;20:64–74.
Rescigno A. Bioequivalence. Pharm Res. 1992;9:925–8.
Polli JE, Rekhi GS, Augsburger LL, Shah VP. Methods to compare dissolution profiles and a rationale for wide dissolution specifications for metoprolol tartrate tablets. J Pharm Sci. 1997;86:690–700.
Yuksel N, Kanik AE, Baykara T. Comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles by ANOVA-based, model-dependent and -independent methods. Int J Pharm. 2000;209:57–67.
Tsong Y, Hammerstrom T, Sathe P, Shah VP. Statistical assessment of mean differences between two dissolution data sets. Drug Inf J. 1996;30:1105–12.
Sathe PM, Tsong Y, Shah VP. In-vitro dissolution profile comparison: statistics and analysis, model dependent approach. Pharm Res. 1996;13:1799–803.
Higuchi T. Rate of release of medicaments from ointment bases containing drugs in suspension. J Pharm Sci. 1961;50:874–5.
Costa P, Sousa Lobo JM. Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2001;13:123–33.
Siepmann J, Siepmann F. Mathematical modeling of drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2008;364:328–43.
Gurny R, Doelker E, Peppas NA. Modelling of sustained release of water-soluble drugs from porous, hydrophobic polymers. Biomaterials. 1982;3:27–32.
Borodkin S, Tucker FE. Linear drug release from laminated hydroxypropyl cellulose-polyvinyl acetate films. J Pharm Sci. 1975;64:1289–94.
Phaechamud T, Pitaksantayothin K, Kositwattanakoon P, Seehapong P, Jungvivatanavong S. Sustainable release of propranolol hydrochloride tablet using chitin as press-coating material. Silpakorn Univ Int J. 2002;2:147–59.
Tsong Y, Hammerstrom T, Chen JJ. Multipoint dissolution specification and acceptance sampling rule based on profile modeling and principal component analysis. J Biopharm Stat. 1997;7:423–39.
Berry MR, Likar MD. Statistical assessment of dissolution and drug release profile similarity using a model-dependent approach. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2007;45:194–200.
Tarvainen M, Peltonen S, Mikkonen H, Elovaara M, Tuunainen M, Paronen P et al. Aqueous starch acetate dispersion as a novel coating material for controlled release products. J Control Release. 2004;96:179–91.
Ford JL, Mitchell K, Rowe P, Armstrong DJ, Elliott PNC, Rostron C et al. Mathematical modelling of drug release from hydroxypropylmethylcellulose matrices: effect of temperature. Int J Pharm. 1991;71:95–104.
Korsmeyer RW, Gurny R, Doelker E, Buri P, Peppas NA. Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. Int J Pharm. 1983;15:25–35.
Peppas NA. Analysis of Fickian and non-Fickian drug release from polymers. Pharm Acta Helv. 1985;60:110–1.
Hixson AW, Crowell JH. Dependence of reaction velocity upon surface and agitation. Ind Eng Chem. 1931;23:923–31.
Mollo AR, Corrigan OI. An investigation of the mechanism of release of the amphoteric drug amoxycillin from poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) matrices. Pharm Dev Technol. 2002;7:333–43.
Enscore DJ, Hopfenberg HB, Stannett VT. Effect of particle size on the mechanism controlling n-hexane sorption in glassy polystyrene microspheres. Polymer. 1977;18:793–800.
Pillay V, Fassihi R. In vitro release modulation from crosslinked pellets for site-specific drug delivery to the gastrointestinal tract. I. Comparison of pH-responsive drug release and associated kinetics. J Control Release. 1999;59:229–42.
Baker RW, Lonsdale HS. Controlled release of biologically active agents. New York: Plenum; 1974.
Makoid MC, Dufour A, Banakar UV. Modelling of dissolution behaviour of controlled release systems. STP Pharma. 1993;3:49–58.
Peppas NA, Sahlin JJ. A simple equation for the description of solute release III. Coupling of diffusion and relaxation. Int J Pharm. 1989;57:169–72.
Langenbucher F. Linearization of dissolution rate curves by the Weibull distribution. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1972;24:979–81.
Koizumia T, Ritthidej GC, Phaechamud T. Mechanistic modeling of drug release from chitosan coated tablets. J Control Release. 2001;70:277–84.
Costa FO, Sousa JJ, Pais AA, Formosinho SJ. Comparison of dissolution profiles of Ibuprofen pellets. J Control Release. 2003;89:199–212.
Pabón CV, Frutos P, Lastres JL, Frutos G. Matrix tablets containing HPMC and polyamide 12: comparison of dissolution data using the Gompertz function. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1994;20:2509–18.
Nelder JA, Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J. 1965;7:308–13.
Motulsky HJ, Ransnas LA. Fitting curves to data using nonlinear regression: a practical and nonmathematical review. FASEB J. 1987;1:365–74.
Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Control. 1974;19:716–23.
MicroMath. Scientist User Handbook. Salt Lake: MicroMath; 1995.
Mollo AR, Corrigan OI. Effect of poly-hydroxy aliphatic ester polymer type on amoxycillin release from cylindrical compacts. Int J Pharm. 2003;268:71–9.
Mayer BX, Mensik C, Krishnaswami S, Hartmut D, Eichler HG, Schmetterer L et al. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profile of systemic nitric oxide-synthase inhibition with L-NMMA in humans. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999;47:539–44.
Yamashita F, Hashida M. Mechanistic and empirical modeling of skin permeation of drugs. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003;55:1185–99.
O'Hara T, Dunne A, Butler J, Devane J. A review of methods used to compare dissolution profile data. Pharm Sci Technol Today. 1998;1:214–23.
FDA. Guidance for Industry: Dissolution Testing of Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms. Rockville: FDA; 1997.
Liu JP, Ma MC, Chow SC. Statistical evaluation of similarity factor f2 as a criterion for assessment of similarity between dissolution profiles. Drug Inf J. 1997;31:1255–71.
Shah VP, Tsong Y, Sathe P, Liu JP. In vitro dissolution profile comparison–statistics and analysis of the similarity factor, f2. Pharm Res. 1998;15:889–96.
Chow SC, Ki YCF. Statistical comparison between dissolution profiles of drug products. J Biopharm Stat. 1997;7:241–58.
Anderson NH, Bauer M, Boussac N, Khan-Malek R, Munden P, Sardaro M. An evaluation of fit factors and dissolution efficiency for the comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1998;17:811–22.
Pinto JF, Podczeck F, Newton JM. The use of statistical moment analysis to elucidate the mechanism of release of a model drug from pellets produced by extrusion and spheronization. Chem Pharm Bull. 1997;45:171–80.
Podczeck F. Comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles by calculating mean dissolution time (MDT) or mean residence time (MRT). Int J Pharm. 1993;97:93–100.
Brockmeier D. In vitro/in vivo correlation of dissolution using moments of dissolution and transit times. Acta Pharm Technol. 1986;32:164–74.
Rodriguez Cruz MS, Gonzalez Alonso I, Sanchez-Navarro A, Sayalero Marinero ML. In vitro study of the interaction between quinolones and polyvalent cations. Pharm Acta Helv. 1999;73:237–45.
Khan KA. The concept of dissolution efficiency. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1975;27:48–9.
Gohel MC, Panchal MK. Comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles using a novel, model-independent approach. Pharm Technol. 2000;24:92–102.
Chow SC, Shao J. On the assessment of similarity for dissolution profiles of two drug products. J Biopharm Stat. 2002;12:311–21.
Ma MC, Wang BB, Liu JP, Tsong Y. Assessment of similarity between dissolution profiles. J Biopharm Stat. 2000;10:229–49.
Tsong Y, Sathe PM, Shah VP. In vitro dissolution profile comparison: Encyclopedia of Biopharmaceutical Statistics. London: Informa Healthcare; 2003. p. 456–62.
Adams E, Coomans D, Smeyers-Verbeke J, Massart DL. Application of linear mixed effects models to the evaluation of dissolution profiles. Int J Pharm. 2001;226:107–25.
Comets E, Mentre F. Evaluation of tests based on individual versus population modeling to compare dissolution curves. J Biopharm Stat. 2001;11:107–23.
Peh KK, Lim CP, Quek SS, Khoh KH. Use of artificial neural networks to predict drug dissolution profiles and evaluation of network performance using similarity factor. Pharm Res. 2000;17:1384–9.
Lee JC, Chen DT, Hung HN, Chen JJ. Analysis of drug dissolution data. Stat Med. 1999;18:799–814.
Bartoszynski R, Powers JD, Herderick EE, Pultz JA. Statistical comparison of dissolution curves. Pharmacol Res. 2001;43:369–87.
The authors would like to thank International Science Editing, Compuscript Ltd. for improving the English language of the manuscript. The authors thank partial financial support from Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China under project 2009ZX09310-004 and the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Advanced Education of China (No. 200803161017).
Yong Zhang and Meirong Huo contributed equally to this work.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Y., Huo, M., Zhou, J. et al. DDSolver: An Add-In Program for Modeling and Comparison of Drug Dissolution Profiles. AAPS J 12, 263–271 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-010-9185-1
- computer program
- dissolution similarity
- drug dissolution
- drug-release model