Skip to main content
Log in

A Step-wise Approach for Transfer of Immunogenicity Assays during Clinical Drug Development

  • Research Article
  • Published:
The AAPS Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We designed a three-step statistical approach to transfer bioanalytical assays (ELISA and Biacore) which evaluates the (1) average equivalence between the two labs (2) concordance in individual sample results between the two labs, and (3) long-term stability of assay performance. Each experimental design evaluated the contribution of four critical variables to the overall variability. Two lots of each variable were examined in a controlled experiment. The variables tested for ELISA were analyst, plate washer, biotinylated-therapeutic protein, and streptavidin–horseradish peroxidase; and for Biacore were analyst, instrument, chip lot, and conjugation chemistry reagent lots. Equivalence in the mean signal to noise (S/N) or mean relative units (RU) between the two labs was established through statistical evaluation of the assay performance characteristics across multiple assay variables. Concordance between the two labs in the individual sample results was subsequently verified both quantitatively and qualitatively. The long-term maintenance of assay stability was monitored by performance testing of a predefined set of samples which were prepared in sufficient quantities to last several years. The process of method validation for biomarker testing in clinical trials is to analyze the variability of the assay performance. However, different factors contribute to this variability and need to be evaluated when the method is transferred to another site/lab. Lack of understanding the critical variables can potentially result in unexpected problems and delays. The three-step statistical approach of assay transfer provides a robust process for transferring complex biological assays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CCC:

coefficient of concordance correlation

SAHRP:

streptavidin-conjugated horse radish peroxidase

B-panitumumab:

biotin-conjugated panitumumab

RU:

relative units

S/N :

signal to noise ratio

References

  1. Benson C. Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Recommendations for Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) Waiver Applications for Manufacturers of In Vitro Diagnostic Devices. www.fda.gov; 2008.

  2. Bland X, Altman X. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods for clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;8:307–10.

    Google Scholar 

  3. de Fontenay G. Analytical method transfer: new descriptive approach for acceptance criteria definition. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2008;46:104–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. FDA. Question to the Sponsor. http://www.fda.gov/CbER/products/pentacel/pentacel060707L.htm; 2007.

  5. Lin L. Assay validation using the concordance correlation coefficient. Biometrics. 1992;48:599–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin L. A note on the concordance correlation coefficient. Biometrics. 2000;56:324–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lofgren, Dhandhapani S, Pennucci JJ, Abbot CM, Mytych DT, Kaliyaperumal A, et al. Comparing ELISA and surface plasmon resonance for assessing clincial immunogenicity of panitumumab. J Immunol. 2007;178:7467–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schuirmann D. A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1987;15:6570680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schwenke JR, O'Connor DK. Design and analysis of analytical method transfer studies. J Biopharm Stat. 2008;18:1013–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhong J, Lee K, Tsong Y. Statistical assessment of analytical method transfer. J Biopharm Stat. 2008;18:1005–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the scientists at Amgen (Sarah Hoofring, Jim Lofgren, and Michelle Wu) for performing the assays; Marta Starcevic, Troy Barger, and Dan Mytych for helpful comments and experiences from previous assay transfer methods. This work was done at Amgen and all the authors hold company stock.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Narendra Chirmule.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tatarewicz, S., Moxness, M., Weeraratne, D. et al. A Step-wise Approach for Transfer of Immunogenicity Assays during Clinical Drug Development. AAPS J 11, 526–534 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-009-9130-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-009-9130-3

Key words

Navigation