AAPS PharmSci

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 17–26 | Cite as

Evaluation of the potential use of poly(ethylene oxide) as tablet- and extrudate-forming material

  • João F. Pinto
  • Kathrin F. Wunder
  • Andrea Okoloekwe


The purpose of this study was to assess the potential use of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) as matrix-forming mate-rial for tablets and extrudates. Raw materials were characterized for size, size distribution, and shape. Tablets with 2- and 10-mm diameter were prepared by direct compression at both 13 and 38 MPa from mixtures with poly(ethylene oxide)s, a model drug (propranolol hydrochloride) and lactose. To these mixtures water was added (16%–43%) prior to extrusion in a ram extruder fit with different dies (1-, 3-, 6-, and 9-mm diameter and 4-mm length). Tablets and extrudates were characterized for work of compression or extrusion, respectively, relaxation, tensile strength, friability, and drug release. Both PEOs produced tablets easily and with different properties. Some relaxation was observed, particularly for tablets with higher amounts of PEOs. Release of the drug occurred after swelling of the matrix, and between 10% and 70% drug released, a quasi zero-order release was observed for large tablets. Extrusion was possible for formulations with PEO only with amounts of water between 16% and 50%. Both radial and axial relaxation of both plugs and extrudates were observed. Moreover, different extrusion profiles reflected the different behaviors of the different formulations. The model drug was released in the same fashion as observed for the tablets. It was possible to produce tablets by direct compression and extrudates or pellets from those extrudates from different formulations with PEO. Tablets and pellets have shown distinct properties depending upon the PEO considered. Extrusion was particularly complex with different formulations with PEO.

Key words

extrusion minitablet, pellet poly(ethylene oxide) tablet 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Witt C, Mader K, Kissel T. The degradation, swelling and erosion properties of biodegradable implants prepared by extrusion or compression moulding of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) and ABA triblock copolymers. Biomaterials. 2000;21:931–938.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Washburn NR, Simon CG, Tona A, Elgendy HM, Karim A, Amis EJ. Co-extrusion of biocompatible polymers for scaffolds with co-continuous morphology. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;60:20–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rades T, Mueller-Goymann CC. Interactions between fenoprofen sodium and poly(ethylene oxide). Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 1998;46:51–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Efentakis M, Koutlis A, Vlachou M. Development and evaluation of oral multiple-unit and single-unit hydrophilic controlled-release systems. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2000; article 34. Available at: Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lim LX, Khang JM, Rhees JM, Lee HB. Monolithic osmotic tablet system for nifedipine delivery. J Control Release. 2000;67:309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Repka MA, McGinity JW. Influence of Vitamin E TPGS on the properties of hydrophilic films produced by hot-melt extrusion. Int J Pharm. 2000;202:63–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pillay V, Fassihi R. Electrolyte-induced compositional heterogeneity: a novel approach for rate-controlled oral drug delivery. J Pharm Sci. 1999;88:1140–1148.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fuller CS, MacRae RJ, Walther M, Cameron RE. Interactions in poly(ethylene oxide)-hydroxypropyl methylcellulose blends. Polymer. 2001;42:9583–9592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Razaghi AM, Schwartz JB. Release of cyclobenzaprine hydrochloride from osmotically rupturable tablets. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2002;28:695–701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yang L, Eshraghi J, Fassihi R. A new intragastric delivery system for the treatment of Helicobacter pilori associated gastric ulcer: in vitro evaluation. J Control Release. 1999;57:215–222.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim CJ. Drug release from compressed hydrophilic polyox-WSR tablets. J Pharm Sci. 1995;84:303–306.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Repka MA, Prodduturi S, Stodghill SP. Production and characterisation of hot-melt extruded films containing clotrimazole. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2003;29:757–765.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crowley MM, Zhang F, Koleng JJ, McGinity JW. Stability of polyethylene oxide in matrix tablets prepared by hot-melt extrusion. Biomaterials. 2002;23:4241–4248.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fell JT, Newton JM. Determination of tablet strength by the diametral-compression test. J Pharm Sci. 1970;59:688–691.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yang L, Venkatesh G, Fassihi R. Compaction simulator study of a novel triple layer tablet matrix for industrial tableting. Int J Pharm. 1997;152:45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tomer G, Newton JM. Water movement evaluation during extrusion of wet powder masses by collecting extrudate fractions. Int J Pharm. 1999;182:71–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • João F. Pinto
    • 1
  • Kathrin F. Wunder
    • 1
  • Andrea Okoloekwe
    • 1
  1. 1.Dep Tecnologia FarmacêuticaFaculdade de Farmácia da Universidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations