The AAPS Journal

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp E600–E608 | Cite as

Lung microdialysis—A powerful tool for the determination of exogenous and endogenous compounds in the lower respiratory tract (mini-review)

  • Markus Zeitlinger
  • Markus Müller
  • Christian Joukhadar
Article

Abstract

In vivo measurement of concentrations of drugs and endogenous substances at the site of action has become a primary focus of research. In this context the minimal invasive microdialysis (MD) technique has been increasingly employed for the determination of pharmacokinetics in lung. Although lung MD is frequently employed to investigate various drugs and endogenous substances, the majority of lung MD studies were performed to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of antimicrobials that can be related to the importance of respiratory tract infections. For the lower respiratory tract various methods, such as surgical collection of whole lung tissue and bonchoalveolar lavage (BAL), are currently available for the determination of pharmacokinetics of antimicrobials. Head-to-head comparison of pharmacokinetics of antibiotics in lung revealed high differences between MD and conventional methods. MD might be regarded as a more advantageous approach because of its higher anatomical resolution and the ability to obtain dynamic time-vs-concentration profiles within one subject. However, due to ethical objections lung MD is limited to animals or patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery. From these studies it was speculated that the concentrations in healthy lung tissue may be predicted reasonably by the measurement of concentrations in skeletal muscle tissue. However, until now this was only demonstrated for β-lactam antibiotics and needs to be confirmed for other classes of antimicrobials. In conclusion, the present review shows that MD is a promising method for the determination of antimicrobials in the lung, but might also be applicable for measuring a wide range of other drugs and for the investigation of metabolism in the lower respiratory tract.

Keywords

lung microdialysis pharmacokinetic antibiotic 

References

  1. 1.
    Muller M. Microdialysis in clinical drug delivery studies.Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2000;45:255–269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    de la Pena A, Liu P, Derendorf H. Microdialysis in peripheral tissues.Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2000;45:189–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ungerstedt U. Microdialysis—principles and applications for studies in animals and man.J Intern Med. 1991;230:365–373.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Muller M, Haag O, Burgdorff T, et al. Characterization of peripheral-compartment kinetics of antibiotics by in vivo microdialysis in humans.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:2703–2709.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Joukhadar, C, Derendorf H, Muller M. Microdialysis. A novel tool for clinical studies of anti-infective agents.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;57:211–219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chalmers GW, Thomson L, Macleod KJ, et al. Endothelin-1 levels in induced sputum samples from asthmatic and normal subjects.Thorax. 1997;52:625–627.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Conte JEJr, Golden JA, Kipps J, McIver M, Zurlinden E. Intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of itraconazole and 14-hydroxyitraconazole at steady state.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:3823–3827.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ingvast-Larsson C, Appelgren LE, Nyman G. Distribution studies of theophylline: microdialysis in rat and horse and whole body autoradiography in rat.J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 1992;15:386–394.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tomaselli F, Dittrich P, Maier A, et al. Penetration of piperacillin and tazobactam into pneumonic human lung tissue measured by in vivo microdialysis.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;55:620–624.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herkner H, Muller MR, Kreischitz N, et al. Closed-chest microdialysis to measure antibiotic penetration into human lung tissue.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:273–276.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tomaselli F, Maier A, Matzi V, Smolle-Juttner FM, Dittrich P. Penetration of meropenem into pneum onic humanlung tissue as measured by in vivo microdialysis.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:2228–2232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu P, Muller M, Grant M, Webb AI, Obermann B, Derendorf H. Interstitial tissue concentrations of cefpodoxime.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;50:19–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grubb BR, Jones JH, Boucher RC Mucociliary transport determined by in vivo microdialysis in the airways of normal and CF mice.Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2004; 286:L588-L595.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eichler W, Bechtel MJ, Klaus S, et al. Na/H+ exchange inhibitor cariporide: effects on respiratory dysfunction after cardiopulmonary bypass.Perfusion.. 2004;19:33–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Larsson CI. The use of an “internal standard” for control of the recovery in microdialysis.Life Sci. 1991;49:PL73-PL78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    De La Pena A, Dalla Costa T, Talton JD, et al. Penetration of cefaclor into the interstitial space fluid of skeletal muscle and lung tissue in rats.Pharm Res. 2001;18:1310–1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eisenberg EJ, Conzentino P, Eickhoff WM, Cundy KC. Pharmacokinetic measurement of drugs in lung epithelial lining fluid by microdialysis: aminoglycoside antibiotics in rat bronchi.J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 1993;29:93–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    DeGuchi Y, Terasaki T, Yamada H, Tsuji A. An application of microdialysis to drug tissue distribution study: in vivo evidence for free-ligand hypothesis and tissue binding of beta-lactam antibiotics in interstitial fluids.J Pharmacobiodyn. 1992;15:79–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vincent JL, Bihari DJ, Suter PM, et al. The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. Results of the European, Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. EPIC International Advisory Committee,.JAMA. 1995;274:639–644.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bartlett JG Mundy LM. Community-acquired pneumonia.N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1618–1624.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zeitlinger MA, Dehghanyar P, Mayer BX, et al. Relevance of soft-tissue penetration by levofloxacin for target site bacteria killing in patients with sepsis.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:3548–3553.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Joukhadar C, Frossard M, Mayer BX, et al. Impaired target site penetration of beta-lactams may account for therapeutic failure in patients with septic shock.Crit Care Med. 2001;29:385–391.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lambert HP. Clinical significance of tissue penetration of antibiotics in the respiratory tract.Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1978;14:262–266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Craig WA. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men.Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:1–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Drusano GL, Craig WA. Relevance of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in the selection of antibiotics for respiratory tract infections.J Chemother. 1997;9:38–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schentag JJ. Correlation of pharmacokinetic parameters to efficacy of antibiotics: relationships between serum concentrations MIC values, and bacterial eradication in patients with gram-negative pneumonia.Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1990;74:218–234.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    EMEA. Points to consider on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in the development of antibacteiral medicinal products. Available at: http://www.emea.en.int/pdfs/human/ewp/265599en.pdf. Accessed October 11, 2005.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    FDA. Guidance for Industry. Developing antimicrobial drugs—general considerations for clinical trials. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/2580dft.pdf. Accessed October 11, 2005.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bergogne-Berezin E. New concepts in the pulmonary disposition of antibiotics.Pulm Pharmacol. 1995;8:65–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gail DB, Lenfant CJ. Cells of the lung: biology and clinical implications.Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983;127:366–387.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Marlin GE, Burgess KR, burgoyne J, Funnell GR, Guinness MD. Penetration of piperacillin into bronchial mucosa and sputum.Thorax. 1981;36:774–780.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Klastersky J, Thys JP, Mombelli G. Comparative studies of intermittent and continuous administration of aminogly cosides in the treatment of bronchopulmonary infectiosn due to gram-negative bacteria.Rev Infect Dis. 1981;3:74–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Brun Y, Forey F, Gamondes JP, Tebib A, Brune J, Fleurette J. Levels of erythromycin in pulmonary tissue and bronchial mucus compared to those of amoxycillin.J Antimicrob Chemother. 1981;8:459–466.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jehl F, Muller-Serieys C, de Larminat V, Monteil H, Bergogne-Berezin E. Penetration of piperacillin-tazobactam, into bronchial secretions after multiple doses to intensive care patients.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:2780–2784.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bergogne-Berezin E, Muller-Serieys C, Aubier M, Dombret MC. Concentration of meropenem in serum and in bronchial secretions in patients undergoing fibreoptic bronchoscopy.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1994;46:87–88. Erratum in. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1994;46;282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cole DR, Pung J. Penetration of cefazolin into pleural fluid.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977;11:1033–1035.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Byl B, Jacobs F, Roucloux I, de Franquen P, Cappello M, Thys JP. Penetration of meropenem in lung, bronchial mucosa, and pleural tissues.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999; 43:681–682.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Reynolds HY. Use of bronchoalveolar lavage in humans—past necessity and future imperative.Lung.. 2000;178:271–293.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Valcke Y, Pauwels R, Van der Straeten M. The penetration of aminoglycosides into the alveolar lining fluid of rats. The effect of airway inflammation.Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990;142:1099–1103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Panteix G, Harf R, Desnottes JF, et al. Accumulation of pefloxacin in the lower respiratory tract demonstrated by bronchoalveolar lavage.J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994;33:979–985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Allegranzi B, Cazzadori A, Di Perri G, et al Concentrations of single-dose meropenem (1 g iv) in bronchoalveolar lavage and epithelial lining fluid.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000;46:319–322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Harf R, Panteix G, Desnottes JF, Diallo N, Leclercq M. Spiramycin uptake by alveolar macrophages.J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988;22:135–140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Le Conte P, Potel G, Peltier P, et al. Lung distribution and pharmacokinetics of aerosolized tobramycin.Am Rev. Respir Dis. 1993;147:1279–1282.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wollmer P, Pride NB, Rhodes CG, et al. Measurement of pulmonary erythromycin concentration in patients with lobar pneumonia by means of positron tomography.Lancet. 1982;320:1361–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Allegranzi B. Concentrations of single-dose meropenem (1 g iv) in bronchoalveolar lavage and epithelial lining fluid.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000;46:319–322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Baldwin DR, Honeybourne D, Wise R. Pulmonary disposition of antimicrobial agents: in vivo observations and clinical relevance.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36:1176–1180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Decre D, Bergogne-Berezin E. Pharmacokinetics of quinolones with special reference to the respiratory tree.J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993;31:331–343.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Braude AC, Hornstein A, Klein M, Vas S, Rebuck AS. Pulmonary disposition of to bramycin.Am Rev Respir Dis 1983;127:563–565.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kunin CM. Clinical significance of protein binding of the penicillins.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1967;145:282–290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tulkens PM. Intracellular pharmacokinetics and localization of antibiotics as predictors of their efficacy against intraphagocytic infections.Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1990;74:209–217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Boselli E Breilh D Cannesson M, et al. Steady-state plasma and intrapulmonary concentrations of piperacillin/tazobactam 4 g/0.5 g administered to critically ill patients with severe nosocomial pneumonia.Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:976–979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Nix DE, Goodwin SD, Peloquin CA, Rotella DL, Schentag JJ. Antibiotic tissue penetration and its relevance: impact of tissue penetration on infection response.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;35:1953–1959.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zeitlinger M, Graninger W, Joukhadar C. Pharmacokinetics of the macrolides azithromycin, clarithromycin and roxithromycin in plasma and tissue—are there significant differences? In:Wien Klin Wochenschr. vol. 11–12a. 2004:18–24.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rodvold KA, Gotfried MH, Danziger LH, Servi RJ. Intrapulmonary steady-state concentrations of clarithromycin and azithromycin in healthy adult volunteers.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:1399–1402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Poulin P, Theil FP. A priori prediction of tissue: plasma partition coefficients of drugs to facilitate the use of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models in drug discovery.J Pharm Sci. 2000;89:16–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Joukhadar C, Klein N, Mayer BX, et al. Plasma and tissue pharmacokinetics of cefpirome in patients with sepsis.Crit Care Med. 2002;30:1478–1482.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Joukhadar, C, Stass H, Muller-Zellenberg U, et al. Penetration of moxifloxacin into healthy and inflamed subcutaneous adipose tissues in humansAntimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:3099–3103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    LeBel M. Fluoroquinolones in the treatment of cystic fibrosis: a critical appraisal.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1991;10:316–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Mendelman PM, Smith AL, Levy J, Weber A, Ramsey B, Davis RL. Aminoglycoside penetration, inactivation, and efficacy in cystic fibrosis sputum.Am Rev Respir Dis. 1985;132:761–765.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Barza M, Cuchural G. General principles of antibiotic tissue penetration.J Antimicrob Chemother. 1985;15:59–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Muller-Serieys C, Bancal C, Dombret MC, et al. Penetration of cefpodoxime proxetil in lung parenchyma and epithelial lining fluid of noninfected patients.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36:2099–2103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Prokesch RC, Hand WL. Antibiotic entry into human polymorphonuclear leukocytes.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982;21:373–380.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Forsgren A, Bellahsene A. Antibiotic accumulation in human polymorphonuclear leucocytes and lymphocytes.Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1985;44:16–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Peck CC, Nichols AI, Baker J, Lenert LL, Ezra D. Clinical pharmacodynamics of theophylline.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1985;76:292–297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Devarajan PV, Sule PN, Parmar DV. Comparative pharmacodynamic.-pharmacokinetic correlation of oral sustained-release theophylline formulation in adult asthmatics.Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1999;25:529–534.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Glynn-Barnhart A, Hill M, Szefler SJ. Sustained release theophylline preparations Practical recommendations for prescribing and therapeutic drug monitoring.Drugs. 1988;35:711–726.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Hook GE, Bend JR. Pulmonary metabolism of xenobiotics.Life Sci. 1976;18:279–290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Robertson CS, Gopinath SP, Uzura M, Valadka AB, Goodman JC. Metabolic changes in the brain during transient ischemia measured with microdialysis.Neurol Res. 1998;20:S91-S94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Frykholm P, Hillered L, Langstrom B, et al. Increase of interstitial glycerol reflects the degree of ischaemic brain damage: a PET and microdialysis study in a middle cerebral artery occulusion-reperfusion primate model.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;71:455–461.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Parkin M, Hopwood S, Jones DA, et al. Dynamic changes in brain glucose and lactate in pericontusional areas of the human cerebral cortex, monitored with rapid sampling on-line microdialysis: relationship with depolarisation-like events.J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2005;25:402–413.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Taggart DP, el-Fiky M, Carter R, Bowman A, Wheatley, DJ. Respiratory dysfunction after uncomplicated cardiopulmonary bypass.Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56:1123–1128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Theroux P, Chaitman BR, Danchin N, et al. Inhibition of the sodium-hydrogen exchanger with cariporide to prevent myocardial infarction in high-risk ischemic situations. Main results of the GUARDIAN trial. Guard during ischemia against necrosis (GUARDIAN) Investigators.Circulation. 2000;102:3032–3038.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Afzelius BA. A human syndrome caused by immotile cilia.Science. 1976;193:317–319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Robinson M, Bye PT. Mucociliary clearance in cystic fibrosis.Pediatr Pulmonol. 2002;33:293–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markus Zeitlinger
    • 1
  • Markus Müller
    • 1
  • Christian Joukhadar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Clinical PharmacokineticsMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations