Advertisement

AAPS PharmSciTech

, 20:77 | Cite as

Effect of Mild Hyperthermia on Transdermal Absorption of Nicotine from Patches

  • Apoorva Panda
  • Purnendu Kumar Sharma
  • S. Narasimha MurthyEmail author
Research Article
  • 158 Downloads

Abstract

Application of heat (hyperthermic conditions) on skin is known to enhance drug transfer and facilitate skin penetration of molecules. The aim of this work was to study the effect of hyperthermia on the drug release and skin permeation from nicotine transdermal patches. The drug release and skin permeation were characterized by in vitro release test and in vitro permeation test. The temperature was maintained at 32 °C as control (simulating normal physiological skin temperature) and 42 °C as hyperthermia condition. The in vitro release test was carried out using USP apparatus 5-Paddle over disk method for a transdermal patch. Skin permeation study was carried out across porcine skin using the flow through cells (PermeGear, Inc.) with an active diffusion area of 0.94 cm2. Mechanistic studies (parameters such as partition coefficient, TEWL and electrical resistivity) were also performed to understand the mechanisms involved in determining the influence of hyperthermia on drug delivery from transdermal patches of nicotine. The rate and extent of drug release from nicotine patch was not significantly different at two temperatures (Cumulative release after 12 h was 43.99 ± 3.29% at 32 °C and 53.70 ± 5.14% at 42 °C). Whereas, in case of in vitro permeation studies, the nicotine transdermal permeation flux for patch was threefold higher at 42 °C (100.1 ± 14.83 μg/cm2/h) than at 32 °C (33.3 ± 14.83 μg/cm2/h). The mechanistic studies revealed that the predominant mechanism of enhancement of drug permeation by hyperthermia condition is by the way of increasing the skin permeability. There is a potential concern of dumping of higher dose of nicotine via transdermal route.

KEY WORDS

nicotine hyperthermia transdermal patch skin permeation study mechanistic study 

Abbreviations

HPLC

High performance liquid chromatography

UV

Ultraviolet

PBS

Phosphate buffer saline

TEWL

Trans epidermal water loss

RL

Load resistor

VO

Voltage drop across entire circuit

Vep

Voltage drop across skin

Rep

Skin resistance

USP

United States Pharmacopeia

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Petersen KK, Rousing ML, Jensen C, Arendt-Nielsen L, Gazerani P. Effect of local controlled heat on transdermal delivery of nicotine. Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol. 2011;3(3):236–42.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vanakoski J, Seppälä T, Sievi E, Lunell E. Exposure to high ambient temperature increases absorption and plasma concentrations of transdermal nicotine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1996 Sep 1;60(3):308–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rose PG, Macfee MS, Boswell MV. Fentanyl transdermal system overdose secondary to cutaneous hyperthermia. Anesth Analg. 1993;77:390–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vanakoski J, Seppala T. Heat exposure and drugs. A review of the effects of hyperthermia on pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1998;34:311–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA issues second safety warning on fentanyl skin patch. Deaths and serious injuries from improper use; 2007; Available from: https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/2007/ucm109046.htm.
  6. 6.
    Newshan G. Heat-related toxicity with the fentanyl transdermal patch. J Pain Symptom Manag. 1998;16:277–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barkve TF, Langseth-Manrique K, Bredesen JEandGjesdal K. Increased uptake of transdermal glyceryl trinitrate during physical exerciseand during high ambient temperature. Am Heart J. 1986;112:537–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sindali K, Sherry K, Sen S, Dheansa B. Life-threatening coma and full-thickness sunburn in a patient treated with transdermal fentanyl patches: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2012;6:220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shin SH, Ghosh P, Newman B, Hammell DC, Raney SG, Hassan HE, et al. On the road to development of an in vitro permeation test (IVPT) model to compare heat effects on transdermal delivery systems: exploratory studies with nicotine and fentanyl. Pharm Res. 2017;34(9):1817–30.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-017-2189-0.
  10. 10.
    Moore KT, Sathyan G, Richarz U, Natarajan J, Vandenbossche J. Randomized 5-treatment crossover study to assess the effects of external heat on serum fentanyl concentrations during treatment with transdermal fentanyl systems. J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;52:1174–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Forster M, Bolzinger MA, Fessi H, Briancon S. Topical delivery of cosmetics and drugs. Molecular aspects of percutaneous absorption and delivery. Eur J Dermatol. 2009;19:309–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paudel KS, Milewski M, Swadley CL, Brogden NK, Ghosh P, Stinchcomb AL. Challenges and opportunities in dermal/transdermal delivery. Ther Deliv. 2010;1:109–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wiedersberg S, Guy RH. Transdermal drug delivery: 30+ years of war and still fighting! J Control Release. 2014;190:150–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Park J-H, Lee J-W, Kim Y-C, Prausnitz MR. The effect of heat on skin permeability. Int J Pharm. 2008;359:94–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shomaker TS, Zhang J, Ashburn MA. Assessing the impact of heat on the systemic delivery of fentanyl through the transdermal fentanyl delivery system. Pain Med. 2000;1:225–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thong HY, Zhai H, Maibach HI. Percutaneous penetration enhancers: an overview. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2007;20:272–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hafeez F, Chiang A, Hui X, Maibach H. Role of partition coefficients in determining the percutaneous penetration of salicylic acid and formaldehyde under varying occlusion durations. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2014;40(10):1395–401.  https://doi.org/10.3109/03639045.2013.828218.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Manda P, Angamuthu M, Hiremath SR, Raman V, Murthy SN. Iontophoretic drug delivery for the treatment of scars. J Pharm Sci. 2014;103(6):1638–42.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.23946.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Noubigh A, Mgaidi A, Abderrabba M. Temperature effect on the distribution of some phenolic compounds: an experimental measurement of 1-octanol/water partition coefficients. J Chem Eng Data. 2010;55(1):488–91.  https://doi.org/10.1021/je900271h.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Noubigh A, Abderrabba M, Provost E. Temperature and salt addition effects on the solubility behaviour of some phenolic compounds in water. J Chem Thermodyn. 2007;39:297–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Plessis J d, Stefaniak A, Eloff F, John S, Agner T, Chou T, et al. International guidelines for the in vivo assessment of skin properties in non-clinical settings: part 2. Transepidermal water loss and skin hydration. Skin Res Technol. 2013;19(3):265–78.  https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12037.
  22. 22.
    Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Racial differences in sodium lauryl sulphate induced cutaneous irritation: black and white. Contact Dermatitis. 1988a;18:65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mathias CGT, Wilson D, Maibach HI. Transepidermal water loss as a function of skin temperature. J Invest Dermatol. 1981;77:219–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rogiers V, EEMCO Group. EEMCO guidance for the assessment of transepidermal water loss in cosmetic sciences. Skin Pharmacol Appl Ski Physiol. 2001;14(2):117–28.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000056341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Sodiumlauryl- sulphate-induced cutaneous irritation: comparison of white and Hispanic subjects. Contact Dermatitis. 1988b;19:136–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Berardesca E, Maibach H. Ethnic skin: overview of structure and function. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48:S139–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Narasimha Murthy S, Sen A, Zhao Y, Hui SW. Temperature influences the postelectroporation permeability state of the skin. J Pharm Sci. 2004;93(4):908–15.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.20016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Prausnitz MR. The effects of electric current applied to skin: a review for transdermal drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1996;18(3):395–425.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-409X(95)00081-H.

Copyright information

© American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Apoorva Panda
    • 1
  • Purnendu Kumar Sharma
    • 1
  • S. Narasimha Murthy
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Pharmaceutics and Drug DeliveryUniversity of MississippiOxfordUSA
  2. 2.Institute for Drug Delivery & Biomedical ResearchBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations