Advertisement

AAPS PharmSciTech

, 20:84 | Cite as

Methods to Assess Mixing of Pharmaceutical Powders

  • Allison Crouter
  • Lauren BriensEmail author
Review Article Theme: Advances in PAT, QbD, and Material Characterization
  • 40 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Theme: Advances in PAT, QbD, and Material Characterization

Abstract

The pharmaceutical manufacturing process consists of several steps, each of which must be monitored and controlled to ensure quality standards are met. The level of blending has an impact on the final product quality; therefore, it is important to be able to monitor blending progress and identify an end-point. Currently, the pharmaceutical industry assesses blend content and uniformity through the extraction of samples using thief probes followed by analytical methods, such as spectroscopy, to determine the sample composition. The development of process analytical technologies (PAT) can improve product monitoring with the aim of increasing efficiency, product quality and consistency, and creating a better understanding of the manufacturing process. Ideally, these are inline methods to remove issues related to extractive sampling and allow direct monitoring of the system using various sensors. Many technologies have been investigated, including spectroscopic techniques such as near-infrared spectroscopy, velocimetric techniques that may use tracers, tomographic techniques, and acoustic emissions monitoring. While some techniques have demonstrated potential, many have significant disadvantages including the need for equipment modification, specific requirements of the material, expensive equipment, extensive analysis, the location of the probes may be critical and/or invasive, and lastly, the technique may only be applicable to the development phase. Both the advantages and disadvantages of the technologies should be considered in application to a specific system.

Key Words

mixing pharmaceuticals monitoring methods 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Debotton N, Dahan A. Applications of polymers as pharmaceutical excipients in solid oral dosage forms. Med Res Rev. 2017;31(1):52–97.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Armstrong B. The study of pharmaceutical powder mixing through improved flow property characterization and tomographic imaging of blend content uniformity. PhD thesis, The University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaye BH. Powder mixing. Berlin: Springer Science and Business Media; 1997.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mathews L, Chandler C, Dipali S, Adusumilli P, Lech S, Daskalakus S, et al. Monitoring blend uniformity with effusivity. Pharm Technol. 2002;26:80–4.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leonard G, Bertrand F, Chaouki J, Gosselin PM. An experimental investigation of effusivity as an indicator of powder blend uniformity. Powder Technol. 2008;181:149–59.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vergote GJ, De Beer TRM, Vervaet C, Remon JP, Baeyens WRG, Diericx N, et al. In-line monitoring of a pharmaceutical blending process using FT-Raman spectroscopy. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2004;21:479–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hausman DS, Cambron RJ, Sakr A. Application of Raman spectroscopy for on-line monitoring of low dose blend uniformity. Int J Pharm. 2005;298:80–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Muzzio FJ, Robinson P, Wightman C, Brone D. Sampling practices in powder blending. Int J Pharm. 1997;155:153–78.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) [Internet]. Silver Spring: Division of Drug Information; c2009 [revision 2 2009 Nov]. Guidance for Industry Q8 Pharmaceutical Development; [29 pages]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm073507.pdf. Accessed 31 Oct 2011
  10. 10.
    Asachi M, Nourafkan E, Hassanpour A. A review of current techniques for the evaluation of powder mixing. Adv Powder Tech. 2018;29:1525–49.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berntsson O, Danielsson LG, Lagerholm B, Folestad S. Quantitative in-line monitoring of powder blending by near-infrared reflection spectroscopy. Powder Technol. 2002;123:185–93.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koeller DM, Posch A, Hori G, Voura C, Radl S, Urbanetz N, et al. Continuous quantitative monitoring of powder mixing dynamics by near-infrared spectroscopy. Powder Technol. 2011;205:87–96.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bakri B, Weimer M, Hauck G, Reich G. Assessment of powder blend uniformity: comparison of real-time NIR blend monitoring with stratified sampling in combination with HPLC and at-line NIR chemical imaging. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015;97:78–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bellany LJ, Nordon A, Littlejohn D. Effects of particle size and cohesive properties on mixing studied by non-contact NIR. Int J Pharm. 2008;361:87–91.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Besseling R, Damen M, Tran T, Nguyen T, van den Dries K, Oostra W, et al. An efficient, maintenance free and approved method for spectroscopic control and monitoring of blend uniformity: the moving F-test. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2015;114:471–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Blanco M, Coello J, Iturriaga H, Maspoch S, de la Pezula C. Effect of data preprocessing methods in near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for the determination of the active compound in a pharmaceutical preparation. Appl Spectrosc. 1997;51:240–6.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Blanco M, Gozalex Bano R, Bertran E. Monitoring powder blending in pharmaceutical processes by use of near infrared spectroscopy. Talanta. 2002;56:203–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Blanco M, Cueva-Mestanza R, Cruz J. Critical evaluation of methods for end-point determination in pharmaceutical blending processes. Anal Methods. 2012;4:2694–703.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ciurzack EW. Following the progress of pharmaceutical mixing study via near-infrared spectroscopy. Pharm Technol. 1991;15:140–5.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cuesta Sanchez F, Toft J, van den Bogaert B, Massart DI, Dive SS, Hailey P. Monitoring powder blending by NIR spectroscopy. Fresenius J Anal Chem. 1995;352:771–8.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    De Maesschalck R, Cuesta Sanchez F, Massart DL, Doherty P, Hailey P. On-line monitoring of powder blending with near-infrared spectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc. 1998;52:725–31.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    El-Hagrasy AS, Morris HR, D’Amico F, Lodder RA, Drennen JK. Near-infrared spectroscopy and imaging for the monitoring of powder blend homogeneity. J Pharm Sci. 2001;90:1298–307.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    El-Hagrasy AS, D’Amico F, Drennen JK. A process analytical technology approach to near-infrared process control of pharmaceutical powder blending. Part 1: D-optimal design for characterization of powder mixing and preliminary spectral data evaluation. J Pharm Sci. 2006;95:392–406.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    El-Hagrasy AS, Delago-Lopez M, Drennen JK. A process analytical technology approach to near-infrared process control of pharmaceutical powder blending. Part 2: qualitative near-infrared models for prediction of blend homogeneity. J Pharm Sci. 2006;95:407–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    El-Hagrasy AS, Drennen JK. A process analytical technology approach to near-infrared process control of pharmaceutical powder blending. Part 3: quantitative near-infrared calibration for prediction of blend homogeneity and characterization of powder mixing kinetics. J Pharm Sci. 2006;95:422–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hailey PA, Doherty P, Tapell P, Oliver T, Aldridge PK. Automated system for the on-line monitoring of powder blending processes using near-infrared spectroscopy. Part 1: system development and control. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1996;14:551–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Igne B, Talwar S, Drennen JK, Anderson CA. Online monitoring of pharmaceutical materials using multiple NIR sensors—part II: blend end-point determination. J Pharm Innov. 2013;8:45–55.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jaumot J, Igne B, Anderson CA, Drennen CA, de Juan A. Blending process modeling and control by multivariate curve resolution. Talanta. 2013;117:492–504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liew CV, Karande AD, Heng PWS. In-line quantification of drug and excipients in cohesive powder blends by near infrared spectroscopy. Int J Pharm. 2010;386:138–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lin Y, Li W, Xu J, Boulas P. Development of a NIR-based blend uniformity method for a drug product containing multiple structurally similar actives by using the quality by design principles. Int J Pharm. 2015;488:120–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Martinez L, Peinado A, Liesum L, Betz G. Use of near-infrared spectroscopy to quantify drug content on a continuous blending process: influence of mass flow and rotation speed variations. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2013;84:606–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Moes JJ, Ruijken MM, Gout E, Frijlink HW, Ugwoke MI. Application of process analytical technology in tablet process development using NIR spectroscopy: blend uniformity, content uniformity, and coating thickness measurement. Int J Pharm. 2008;357:108–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Murayama K, Ishikawa D, Genkawa T, Sugino H, Komiyama M, Ozaki Y. Image monitoring of pharmaceutical blending processes and the determination of an end point by using a portable near-infrared imaging device based on a polychromator-type near-infrared spectrometer with a high-speed and high-resolution photo diode array detector. Molecules. 2015;20:4007–19.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Scheibelhofer O, Balak N, Wahl PR, Koller DM, Glasser BJ, Khinast JG. Monitoring blending of pharmaceutical powders with multipoint NIR spectroscopy. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2013;14:234–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sekulic SS, Ward HW, Brannegan DR, Stanley ED, Erans CL, Sciavolino ST, et al. On-line monitoring of powder blend homogeneity by near-infrared spectroscopy. Anal Chem. 1996;68:509–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sekulic SS, Wakeman J, Doherty P, Hailey PA. Automated system for the on-line monitoring of powder blending process using near-infrared spectroscopy. Part 2: qualitative approaches to blend evaluation. J Pharm Sci. 1998;17:1285–309.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shi Z, Cogdill RP, Short SM, Anderson CA. Process characterization of powder blending by near-infrared spectroscopy: blend end-points and beyond. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2008;47:738–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sibik J, Chalus P, Maurer L, Murthy A, Krimmer S. Mechanistic approach in powder blending PAT: bi-layer mixing and asymptotic end point prediction. Powder Tech. 2017;308:306–17.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sulub Y, Konigsberger M, Cheney J. Blend uniformity end-point determination using near-infrared spectroscopy and multivariate calibration. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2011;55:429–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tewari J, Strong R, Boulas P. At-line determination of pharmaceuticals small molecule’s blending end point using chemometric modeling combined with Fourier transform near infrared spectroscopy. Spectrochim Acta A. 2017;173:886–91.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wargo DJ, Drennen JK. Near-infrared spectroscopic characterization of pharmaceutical powder blends. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1996;14:1415–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rinnan A, van den Berg F, Engelsen SB. Review of the most common pre-processing techniques for near-infrared spectra. Trends Anal Chem. 2009;28(1):1201–22.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Heise HM, Winzen R. Chemometrics in near-infrared spectroscopy. In: Siesler HW, Ozaki Y, Kawata S, Heise HM, editors. Near-infrared spectroscopy. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2002. p. 125–62.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Vanarase AU, Alcalà M, Jerez Rozo JI, Muzzio FJ, Romañach RJ. Real-time monitoring of drug concentration in a continuous powder mixing process using NIR spectroscopy. Chem Eng Sci. 2010;65:5728–33.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Dunn K Process improvement using data. 2018. Available through download at https://learnche.org/pid/PID.pdf?430-0461. Accessed 6 Nov 2018
  46. 46.
    Ma H, Anderson CA. Characterization of pharmaceutical powder blends by NIR chemical imaging. J Pharm Sci. 2008;97:3305–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Osorio JG, Stuessy G, Kemeny GJ, Muzzio FJ. Characterization of pharmaceutical powder blends using in situ near-infrared chemical imaging. Chem Eng Sci. 2014;108:244–57.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Allan P, Bellamy LJ, Nordon A, Littlejohn D. Non-invasive monitoring of the mixing of pharmaceutical powders by broadband acoustic emissions. Anal. 2010;3:518–24.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rantanen J. Process analytical applications of Raman spectroscopy. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2007;59:171–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Allan P, Bellamy LJ, Nordon A, Littlejohn D, Andrews J, Dallin P. In situ monitoring of powder blending by non-invasive Raman spectrometry with wide area illumination. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2013;76:28–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Rantanen J, Wikstrom H, Rhea FE, Taylor LS. Improved understanding of factors contributing to quantification of anhydrate/hydrate powder mixtures. Appl Spectrosc. 2005;59:942–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sasic S, Clark DA, Mitchell JC, Snowden MJ. A comparison of Raman chemical images produced by univariate and multivariate data processing—a simulation with an example from pharmaceutical practice. Anal. 2004;129:1001–7.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Breintenbach J, Schrof W, Neumann J. Confocal Raman-spectroscopy: analytical approach to solid dispersions and mapping of drugs. Pharm Res. 1999;16:1109–13.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    De Beer TRM, Bodson C, Dejaegher B, Walczak B, Vercryysse P, Burgraeve A, et al. Raman spectroscopy as a process analytical technology (PAT) tool for the in-line monitoring and understanding of a powder blending process. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2008;48:772–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Brouillette C, Huang H, Smith W, Farquharson S. Raman spectroscopy using 1550 nm (retina-safe) laser excitation. Appl Spect. 2011;65(5):561–3.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lai CK, Holt D, Leung JC, Cooney CL, Raju GK, Hansen P. Real time and noninvasive monitoring of dry powder blend homogeneity. AICHE J. 2001;47:2618–22.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Lai CK, Cooney CC. Application of a fluorescence sensor for miniscale on-line monitoring of powder mixing kinetics. J Pharm Sci. 2004;93:60–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Karumanchi V, Taylor MK, Ely KJ, Stagner WC. Monitoring powder blend homogeneity using light-induced fluorescence. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2011;12:1031–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Guay JM, Lapointe-Garant PP, Gosselin R, Simard JS, Abatzoglou N. Development of a multivariate light-induced fluorescence (LIF) PAT tool for in-line quantitative analysis of pharmaceutical granules in a V-blender. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2014;86:524–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Bulent Koc A, Silleli H, Koc C, Dayioglu MA. Monitoring of dry powder mixing with real-time image processing. J Appl Sci. 2007;7:1218–23.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Realpe A, Velazquez C. Image processing and analysis for determination of concentrations of powder mixtures. Powder Technol. 2003;134:193–200.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Le Coent AL, Rivoire A, Briancon S, Lieto J. An original image-processing technique for obtaining the mixing time: the box-counting with erosions method. Powder Technol. 2005;152:62–71.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Chen CC, Yu CK. Two-dimensional image characterization of powder mixing and its effects on the solid-state reactions. Mater Chem Phys. 2004;85:227–37.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Remy B, Canty TM, Khinast JG, Glasser BJ. Experiments and simulations of cohesionless particles with varying roughness in a bladed mixer. Chem Eng Sci. 2010;65:4557–71.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Broadbent CJ, Bridgewater J, Parker DJ, Keningley ST, Knight P. A phenomenological study of a batch mixer using a positron camera. Powder Technol. 1993;76:317–29.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Fan LT, Chen SJ, Sckhoff ND, Watson CA. Evaluation of a motionless mixer using a radioactive tracer technique. Powder Technol. 1971;4:345–50.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Portillo PM, Vanarase AU, Ingram A, Seville JK, Ierapetritou MG, Muzzio FJ. Investigation of the effect of impeller rotation rate, powder flow rate, and cohesion on powder flow behaviour in a continuous blender using PEPT. Chem Eng Sci. 2010;65:5658–68.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Perrault M, Bertrand F, Chaouki J. An investigation of magnesium stearate mixing in a V-blender through gamma-ray detection. Powder Technol. 2010;200:234–45.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Ashton MD, Schofield C, Valentin FHH. The use of a light probe for assessing the homogeneity of powder mixtures. Chem Eng Sci. 1966;21:843–9.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Harwood CF, Davies R, Jackson M, Freeman E. An optic probe for measuring the mixture composition of powders. Powder Technol. 1971/72;5:77–80.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Kaye BH, Brushenko A, Ohlhaber RL, Pontarelli DA. A fiber optic probe for investigating the internal structure of powder mixtures. Powder Technol. 1968/69;2:243–5.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Oki K, Akehata T, Shirai T. A new method for evaluating the size of moving particles with a fiber optic probe. Powder Technol. 1975;11:51–7.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Alonso M, Satoh M, Miyanami K. Influence of rocking motion on the mixing of powders. Powder Technol. 1989;59:65–7.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Alonso M, Satoh M, Miyanami K. Recent works on powder mixing and powder coating using an optical measuring method. Kona. 1989;7:97–105.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Poux M, Lescure M, Steinmetz D, Bertrand J. Optical sensors for the characterization of powder mixtures. Sensors Actuators. 1995;46(/47):494–6.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Gratton-Liimatainen JL. Characterizing the structure of cohesive powder mixtures by optical methods [Master’s Thesis]. Sudbury (ON): Laurentian University; 1995.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Mavros P. Flow visualization in stirred vessels. A review of experimental techniques. Chem Eng Res Des. 2001;79:113–27.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Darelius A, Rasmuson A, Bjorn IN, Folestad S. LDA measurements of near wall powder velocities in a high shear mixer. Chem Eng Sci. 2007;62:5770–6.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Hao T, Tukianen J, Nivorozhkin A, Landrau N. Probing pharmaceutical powder blending uniformity with electrostatic charge measurements. Powder Tech. 2013;245:64–9.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Pingali KC, Shinbrot T, Hammond SV, Muzzio FJ. An observed correlation between flow and electrical properties of pharmaceutical blends. Powder Tech. 2009;192:157–65.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Bharvada E, Shah V, Misra M. Exploring mixing uniformity of a pharmaceutical blend in a high shear mixture granulator using enthalpy values obtained from DSC. Powder Tech. 2015;276:103–11.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Mahmood S, Hilmi NNB, Husain NKB, Chatterjee B, Mandal UK. Differential scanning calorimetric characterization of pharmaceutical blend uniformity in a laboratory-scale V-blender. Powder Tech. 2016;287:152–9.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Saberian M, Segonne Y, Briens C, Bousquet J, Chabagno JM, Denizart O. Blending of polymers in high speed, vertical mixers: development of a thermal tracer measurement procedure. Powder Technol. 2002;123:25–32.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Dipali SR, Chandler C, Adusumilli P, Lech S, Daskalakis S, Mathis N, editors. A novel technique for determination of real time blend uniformity using thermal effusivity. Proceedings of AAPS Convention; 2001 October 20–25; Denver, US. Parsippany: GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, New Brunswick: Mathis Instruments Ltd; 2001.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Closs S, editor. Thermal effusivity as a means to determine the uniformity of a dry blend in a high shear granulator. Proceedings of AAPS Convention; 2004 November 7–11; Baltimore, US. Durham: Patheon Inc; 2004.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Closs S, Mathis N, Meyer W, Roy W, editors. Thermal effusivity as a process analytical technology (PAT) to optimize blend uniformity: a case study in on-line monitoring of a pharmaceutical blend in a bin blender. Proceedings of AAPS Convention; 2004 November 7–11; Baltimore, US. New Brunswick: Mathis Instruments Ltd; 2004.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Fariss G, Keintz R, Okoye P. Thermal effusivity and power consumption as PAT tools for monitoring granulation end point. Pharm Technol. 2006;6:60–72.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Nakagawa M, Altobelli SA, Caprihan A, Fukushima E, Jeong EK. Non-invasive measurements of granular flows by magnetic resonance imaging. Exp Fluids. 1993;16:54–60.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Hill KM, Caprihan A, Kakalios J. Bulk segregation in rotated granular material measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Phys Rev Lett. 1997;78:50–3.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Sommier N, Porion P, Evesque P, Leclerc B, Tchoreloff P, Couarraze G. Magnetic resonance imaging investigation of the mixing-segregation process in a pharmaceutical blender. Int J Pharm. 2001;222:243–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Porion P, Sommier N, Faugere AM, Evesque P. Dynamics of size segregation and mixing of granular materials in a 3D-blender by NMR imaging investigation. Powder Technol. 2004;141:55–68.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Kawaguchi T, Tsutsumi K, Tsuji Y. MRI measurement of granular motion in rotating drum. Part Part Syst Charact. 2006;23:266–71.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Yang CY, Fu XY. Development and validation of a material labeling method for powder process characterization using x-ray computed tomography. Powder Technol. 2004;146:10–9.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Chester AW, Kowalski JA, Coles ME, Muegge EL, Muzzio FJ, Brone D. Mixing dynamics in catalyst impregnation in double-cone blenders. Powder Technol. 1999;102:85–94.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Dickin FJ, Williams RA, Beck MS. Determination of composition and motion of multicomponent mixtures in process vessels using electrical impedance tomography—I. Principles and process engineering applications. Chem Eng Sci. 1993;48:1883–97.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Rimpilainen V, Poutiainen S, Heikkinen LM, Savolainen T, Vauhkonen M, Ketolainen J. Electrical capacitance tomography as a monitoring tool for high-shear mixing and granulation. Chem Eng Sci. 2011;66:4090–100.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Marashdeh Q, Fan LS, Du B, Warsito W. Electrical capacitance tomography—a perspective. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2008;47:3708–19.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Pugsley T, Tanfara H, Malcus H, Chaouki J, Winters C. Verification of fluidized bed electrical capacitance tomography measurements with a fibre optic probe. Chem Eng Sci. 2003;58:3923–34.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Yang WQ, Peng L. Image reconstruction algorithms for electrical capacitance tomography. Meas Sci Technol. 2003;14:R1–R13.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Tily PJ, Porada S, Scruby CB, Lidingon S. Monitoring of mixing processes using acoustic emission. In: Harnby N, Benkreira H, Carpenter KJ, Mann R, editors. Fluid mixing III. Rugby: Institute of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series No. 108; 1988. p. 75–94.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Kinsler LE, Frey AR, Coppens AB, Sanders JV. Fundamentals of acoustics. New York City, United States of America: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 2000.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Boyd J, Varley J. The uses of passive measurement of acoustic emissions from chemical engineering processes. Chem Eng Sci. 2001;56:1749–67.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Barron RF. Industrial noise control and acoustics. United States of America. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 2003.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Vervloet D, Nijenhuis J, van Ommen J. Monitoring a lab-scale fluidized bed dryer: a comparison between pressure transducers, passive acoustic emissions and vibration measurements. Powder Technol. 2010;197:36–48.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Briens L, Smith R, Briens C. Monitoring of a rotary dryer using acoustic emissions. Powder Technol. 2008;181:115–20.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Albion K, Briens L, Briens C, Berruti F. Flow regime determination in horizontal pneumatic transport of fine powders using non-intrusive acoustic probes. Powder Technol. 2007;172:157–66.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Hansuld E, Briens L, Sayani A, McCann J. Monitoring quality attributes for high-shear wet granulation with audible acoustic emission. Powder Technol. 2011;215-216:117–23.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Bellamy LJ, Nordon A, Littlejohn D. Non-invasive monitoring of powder mixing with near infrared spectrometry and acoustics. Spectrosc Eur. 2004;16:30–2.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Crouter A, Briens L. Passive acoustic emissions from particulates in a V-blender. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2015;41:1809–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringWestern UniversityLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations