Understanding the Potential for Dissolution Simulation to Explore the Effects of Medium Viscosity on Particulate Dissolution
- 103 Downloads
Viscosity, influenced by medium composition, will affect the hydrodynamics of a dissolution system. Dissolution simulation methods are valuable tools to explore mechanistic dissolution effects, with an understanding of limitations of any simulation method essential to its appropriate use. The aims of this paper were a) to explore, using dissolution simulation, the effects of slightly viscous media on particulate dissolution and b) to illustrate approaches to, and limitations of, the dissolution simulations. A lumped parameter fluid dynamics dissolution simulation model (SIMDISSO™) was used to simulate particulate (20 and 200 μm diameter) dissolution in media with viscosity at 37 °C of water (0.7 mPa.s), milk (1.4 mPa.s) and a nutrient drink (12.3 mPa.s). Effects of flow rate, modality (constant vs pulsing), viscosity and gravitational and particle motion/sedimentation effects on simulated dissolution were explored, in the flow through and paddle apparatuses as appropriate. Shadowgraph imaging (SGI) was used to visualise particle suspension behaviour. Flow rate, hydrodynamic viscous effects and disabling particle motion and gravitational effects affected simulated dissolution of larger particles. SGI imaging revealed retention of particles in suspension in 1.4 mPa.s medium, which sedimented in water. The effect of diffusion adjusted for viscosity was significant for both particle sizes. The limitations of this 1D simulation approach would be greater for larger particles in low velocity regions of the paddle apparatus. Even slightly viscous media can affect dissolution of larger particles with dissolution simulation affording insight into the mechanisms involved, provided the assumptions and limitations of the simulation approach are clarified and understood.
KEY WORDSdissolution simulation fluid dynamics viscosity particle dissolution modelling and simulation
- 7.Reppas C, Karatza E, Goumas C, Markopoulos C, Vertzoni M. Characterization of contents of distal ileum and cecum to which drugs/drug products are exposed during bioavailability/bioequivalence studies in healthy adults. Pharm Res. 2015;32(10):3338–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-015-1710-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Koziolek M, Schneider F, Grimm M, Modebeta C, Seekamp A, Roustom T, et al. Intragastric pH and pressure profiles after intake of the high-caloric, high-fat meal as used for food effect studies. J Control Release. 2015;220(Pt A):71–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.10.022.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.United States Pharmacopoeia 41/National Formulary 36. Rockwell, MD, USA: The United States Pharmacopeial Convention; 2018.Google Scholar
- 28.Serrano DR, Persoons T, D'Arcy DM, Galiana C, Dea-Ayuela MA, Healy AM. Modelling and shadowgraph imaging of cocrystal dissolution and assessment of in vitro antimicrobial activity for sulfadimidine/4-aminosalicylic acid cocrystals. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2016;89:125–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2016.04.030.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Bird R, Stewart W, Lightfoot E. Transport phenomena. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2002.Google Scholar
- 30.Kovacevic I, Parojcic J, Homsek I, Tubic-Grozdanis M, Langguth P. Justification of biowaiver for carbamazepine, a low soluble high permeable compound, in solid dosage forms based on IVIVC and gastrointestinal simulation. Mol Pharm. 2009;6(1):40–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/mp800128y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Diebold SM, Dressman JB. Hydrodynamik kompendialer Lösungsgeschwindigkeits-Testapparaturen Paddle und Basket. Pharm Ind. 2001;63(1):94–104.Google Scholar
- 33.Diebold SM. Hydrodynamik und Losungsgeschwindigkeit-Untersuchungen zum Einfluss der Hydrodynamik auf die Losungsgeschindigkeit schwer wasserloslicher Arzneistoffe. Frankfurt am Main. Germany: Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universitat; 2000.Google Scholar
- 35.D’Arcy DM. Use of computational fluid dynamics to investigate the relationship between hydrodynamics and rates of dissolution. Trinity College Dublin: Dublin; 2007.Google Scholar
- 44.Zarmpi P, Flanagan T, Meehan E, Mann J, Fotaki N. Biopharmaceutical understanding of excipient variability: effect of HPMC level and viscosity type on drug solubility. AAPS Annual Meeting; San Diego, USA: http://abstracts.aaps.org/published/; 2017.