AAPS PharmSciTech

, 20:40 | Cite as

Convective Drying Kinetics of Polymer Strip Films Loaded with a BCS Class II Drug

  • A. T. Naseri
  • E. Cetindag
  • J. Forte
  • E. Bilgili
  • Rajesh N. DavéEmail author
Research Article


Polymer strip film is a promising dosage form for oral delivery of poorly water-soluble drugs. Drying is an important step in the production of polymer strip films with significant effects on critical quality attributes (CQAs). In this study, a custom-made batch drying setup was used to study convective drying kinetics of wet polymer strip films loaded with dry-coated micronized griseofulvin (GF) at various drying conditions. A rate-based semi-empirical model was formulated and parameters were estimated by integral method of analysis using a coupled optimizer–ordinary differential equation solver. Despite its simplicity with three parameters, the model could fit the experimental data very well for all drying conditions, which enabled us to examine the effects of air velocity, temperature, and initial wet film thickness on drying kinetics quantitatively. The modeling results clearly delineate a drying mechanism with constant-rate and falling-rate periods. One set of kinetic parameter estimates reasonably predicted the drying kinetics for two different wet film thicknesses in the selected process conditions, which demonstrates the predictive capability of the model. After reporting the limitations of the semi-empirical model, upon future modification and refinement, its potential use in drying process development and process control was highlighted.


drying kinetics polymer strip film poorly water-soluble drug dry coating 



The authors thank Dr. Chettiannan Ravikumar and Dr. Gautam Setia for their contributions in building the drying setup.


Financial support was provided by the National Science Foundation (NSF) in part through the ERC (EEC-0540855) award and from the National Institute of Health (NIH) NIH-U01 in part through award U01FD005521.


  1. 1.
    Dixit R, Puthli S. Oral strip technology: overview and future potential. J Control Release. 2009;139(2):94–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hoffmann EM, Breitenbach A, Breitkreutz J. Advances in orodispersible films for drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2011;8(3):299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Averineni RK, Sunderajan SG, Mutalik S, Nayak U, Shavi G, Armugam K, et al. Development of mucoadhesive buccal films for the treatment of oral sub-mucous fibrosis: a preliminary study. Pharm Dev Technol. 2009;14(2):199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krull SM, Ma Z, Li M, Davé RN, Bilgili E. Preparation and characterization of fast dissolving pullulan films containing BCS class II drug nanoparticles for bioavailability enhancement. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2016;42(7):1073–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krull SM, Susarla R, Afolabi A, Li M, Ying Y, Iqbal Z, et al. Polymer strip films as a robust, surfactant-free platform for delivery of BCS class II drug nanoparticles. Int J Pharm. 2015;489(1–2):45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sievens-Figueroa L, Bhakay A, Jerez-Rozo JI, Pandya N, Romañach RJ, Michniak-Kohn B, et al. Preparation and characterization of hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose films containing stable BCS class II drug nanoparticles for pharmaceutical applications. Int J Pharm. 2012;423(2):496–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Susarla R, Sievens-Figueroa L, Bhakay A, Shen Y, Jerez-Rozo JI, Engen W, et al. Fast drying of biocompatible polymer films loaded with poorly water-soluble drug nano-particles via low temperature forced convection. Int J Pharm. 2013;455(1–2):93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krull SM, Ammirata J, Bawa S, Li M, Bilgili E, Davé RN. Critical material attributes of strip films loaded with poorly water-soluble drug nanoparticles: II. Impact of polymer molecular weight. J Pharm Sci. 2017;106(2):619–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krull SM, Moreno J, Li M, Bilgili E, Davé RN. Critical material attributes (CMAs) of strip films loaded with poorly water-soluble drug nanoparticles: III. Impact of drug nanoparticle loading. Int J Pharm. 2017;523(1):33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krull SM, Patel HV, Li M, Bilgili E, Davé RN. Critical material attributes (CMAs) of strip films loaded with poorly water-soluble drug nanoparticles: I. impact of plasticizer on film properties and dissolution. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2016;92:146–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang L, Li Y, Abed M, Davé RN. Incorporation of surface-modified dry micronized poorly water-soluble drug powders into polymer strip films. Int J Pharm. 2018;535(1–2):462–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Allanic N, Salagnac P, Glouannec P. Convective and radiant drying of a polymer aqueous solution. Heat Mass Transf. 2007;43(10):1087–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Airaksinen S, Karjalainen M, Shevchenko A, Westermarck S, Leppänen E, Rantanen J, et al. Role of water in the physical stability of solid dosage formulations. J Pharm Sci. 2005;94(10):2147–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ghazanfari A, Emami S, Tabil L, Panigrahi S. Thin-layer drying of flax fiber: II. Modeling drying process using semi-theoretical and empirical models. Dry Technol. 2006;24(12):1637–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Da Silva WP, e Silva CM, Gama FJ, Gomes JP. Mathematical models to describe thin-layer drying and to determine drying rate of whole bananas. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2014;13(1):67–74.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Alsoy S, Duda JL. Modeling of multicomponent drying of polymer films. AICHE J. 1999;45(4):896–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cairncross RA, Durning CJ. A model for drying of viscoelastic polymer coatings. AICHE J. 1996;42(9):2415–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guerrier B, Bouchard C, Allain C, Benard C. Drying kinetics of polymer films. AICHE J. 1998;44(4):791–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Okazaki M, Shioda K, Masuda K, Toei R. Drying mechanism of coated film of polymer solution. J Chem Eng Jpn. 1974;7(2):99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vrentas J, Vrentas C. Drying of solvent-coated polymer films. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys. 1994;32(1):187–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mesbah A, Ford Versypt AN, Zhu X, Braatz RD. Nonlinear model-based control of thin-film drying for continuous pharmaceutical manufacturing. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2013 Dec 31;53(18):7447–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Velaga SP, Nikjoo D, Vuddanda PR. Experimental studies and modeling of the drying kinetics of multicomponent polymer films. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2018;19(1):425–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mujumdar AS. Handbook of industrial drying. Boca Raton: CRC press; 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Han X, Ghoroi C, To D, Chen Y, Davé R. Simultaneous micronization and surface modification for improvement of flow and dissolution of drug particles. Int J Pharm. 2011;415(1–2):185–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Seader J, Henley E, Roper DK. Separation process principles. Hoboken: NJ: Wiley; 2006.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schmidt-Hansberg B, Baunach M, Krenn J, Walheim S, Lemmer U, Scharfer P, et al. Spatially resolved drying kinetics of multi-component solution cast films for organic electronics. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif. 2011 May 1;50(5–6):509–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Houska K, Valchar J, Viktorin Z. Computer-aided design of dryers. In: Mujumdar AS, editor. Advances in drying, vol. 4. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publ; 1987. p. 1–95.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    McCabe WL, Smith JC, Harriott P. Unit operations of chemical engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chilton TH, Colburn AP. Mass transfer (absorption) coefficients prediction from data on heat transfer and fluid friction. Ind Eng Chem. 1934 Nov 1;26(11):1183–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. T. Naseri
    • 1
  • E. Cetindag
    • 1
  • J. Forte
    • 1
  • E. Bilgili
    • 1
  • Rajesh N. Davé
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.New Jersey Center for Engineered Particulates and Department of Chemical and Materials EngineeringNew Jersey Institute of TechnologyNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations