Advertisement

AAPS PharmSciTech

, Volume 19, Issue 7, pp 2929–2933 | Cite as

The Effects of Fillers and Binders on the Accuracy of Tablet Subdivision

  • Gessyka Rayana S. Pereira
  • Stephania F. Taveira
  • Marcilio Cunha-Filho
  • Ricardo Neves Marreto
Rapid Communication
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

The effects of excipients on the accuracy of tablet subdivision are severely underinvestigated. In this study, placebo tablets were prepared using a combined mixture design of fillers and binders to evaluate the effect of these excipients on subdivision accuracy. The responses assessed were mass loss, mass variation, tablet fragmentation, and increased friability. Dicalcium phosphate dihydrate (DCP) gave rise to more uniform and denser tablets than microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), thus resulting in greater subdivision accuracy. The binder type, hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC) or polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), did not affect the subdivision of DCP tablets. On the contrary, the structural similarity between HPC and MCC led to improved subdivision accuracy for MCC tablets. A less accurate subdivision was observed in tablets prepared with a DCP–MCC combination; this finding could be attributed to irregular binder distribution in this matrix. An optimized response was built using desirability analysis. This study helps to illuminate the relationship between fillers and binders to guide formulation scientists in the development of tablets with better subdivision performance.

Key Words

tablet splitting binder distribution cellulose excipients matrix homogeneity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Brazilian agency CAPES.

References

  1. 1.
    Teixeira M, Sá-Barreto LCL, Gratieri T, Gelfuso GM, Silva ICR, Cunha-Filho MSS. Key technical aspects influencing the accuracy of tablet subdivision. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2017;18(4):1393–01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Quinzler R, Gasse C, Schneider A, Kaufmann-Kolle P, Szecsenyi J, Haefeli WE. The frequency of inappropriate tablet splitting in primary care. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;62(12):1065–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nidanapu RP, Rajan S, Mahadevan S, Gitanjali B. Tablet splitting of antiepileptic drugs in pediatric epilepsy: potential effect on plasma drug concentrations. Pediatr Drugs. 2016;18(6):451–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sovany T, Kása P, Pintye-Hódi K. Modeling of subdivision of scored tablets with the application of artificial neural networks. J Pharm Sci. 2010;2:905–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shah RB, Collier JS, Sayeed VA, Bryant A, Habib MJ, Khan MA. Tablet splitting of a narrow therapeutic index drug: a case with levothyroxine sodium. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2010;11(3):1359–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gupta A, Hunt RL, Khan MA. Influence of tablet characteristics on weight variability and weight loss in split tablets. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2008;65(24):2326–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ito A, Dobashi Y, Sugihara M. The relationship between dividing properties of scored tablets and dynamic characteristics of various mixed powders. Chem Pharm Bull. 1993;41(3):590–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Odsei-Yeboah F, Zhang M, Feng Y, Sun CC. A formulation strategy for solving the overgranulation problem in high shear wet granulation. J Pharm Sci. 2014;103:2434–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Morkhade DM. Comparative impact of different binder addition methods, binders and diluents on resulting granule and tablet attributes via high shear wet granulation. Powder Tech. 2017;30:114–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Joneja SK, Harcum WW, Skinner GK, Barnum PE, Guo J-H. Investigating the fundamental effects of binders on pharmaceutical tablet performance. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1999;25(10):1129–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morin G, Briens L. A comparison of granules produced by high-shear and fluidized- bed granulation methods. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2014;15:1039–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gessyka Rayana S. Pereira
    • 1
  • Stephania F. Taveira
    • 1
  • Marcilio Cunha-Filho
    • 2
  • Ricardo Neves Marreto
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Laboratory of Nanosystems and Drug Delivery Devices (NanoSYS), School of PharmacyUniversidade Federal de GoiásGoiâniaBrazil
  2. 2.Laboratory of Food, Drug and Cosmetics (LTMAC), School of Health SciencesUniversity of BrasíliaBrasíliaBrazil
  3. 3.Faculdade de Farmácia UFGGoiâniaBrazil

Personalised recommendations