AAPS PharmSciTech

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 1243–1253 | Cite as

A Scale-up Approach for Film Coating Process Based on Surface Roughness as the Critical Quality Attribute

  • Hiroyuki Yoshino
  • Yuko Hara
  • Masafumi Dohi
  • Kazunari Yamashita
  • Tadashi Hakomori
  • Shin-ichiro Kimura
  • Yasunori Iwao
  • Shigeru Itai
Research Article
  • 131 Downloads

Abstract

Scale-up approaches for film coating process have been established for each type of film coating equipment from thermodynamic and mechanical analyses for several decades. The objective of the present study was to establish a versatile scale-up approach for film coating process applicable to commercial production that is based on critical quality attribute (CQA) using the Quality by Design (QbD) approach and is independent of the equipment used. Experiments on a pilot scale using the Design of Experiment (DoE) approach were performed to find a suitable CQA from surface roughness, contact angle, color difference, and coating film properties by terahertz spectroscopy. Surface roughness was determined to be a suitable CQA from a quantitative appearance evaluation. When surface roughness was fixed as the CQA, the water content of the film-coated tablets was determined to be the critical material attribute (CMA), a parameter that does not depend on scale or equipment. Finally, to verify the scale-up approach determined from the pilot scale, experiments on a commercial scale were performed. The good correlation between the surface roughness (CQA) and the water content (CMA) identified at the pilot scale was also retained at the commercial scale, indicating that our proposed method should be useful as a scale-up approach for film coating process.

KEY WORDS

film coating scale-up appearance critical quality attribute critical material attribute 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Maurer L, Leuenberger H. Terahertz pulsed imaging and near infrared imaging to monitor the coating process of pharmaceutical tablets. Int J Pharm. 2009;370:8–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Knop K, Kleinebudde P. PAT-tools for process control in pharmaceutical film coating applications. Int J Pharm. 2013;457:527–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Agrawal AM, Pandey P. Scale up of pan coating process using quality by design principles. J Pharm Sci. 2015;104(11):3589–611.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tanabe S, Nakagawa H, Watanabe T, Minami H, Kano M, Urbanetz NA. Setting the process parameters for the coating process in order to assure tablet appearance based on multivariate analysis of prior data. Int J Pharm. 2016;511:341–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pandey P, Turton R, Joshi N, Hammerman E, Ergun J. Scale-up of a pan-coating process. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2006;7(4):E125–32.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prpich A, Am Ende M, Katzschner T, Lubczyk V, Weyhers H, Bernhard G. Drug product modeling predictions for scale-up of tablet film coating—a quality by design approach. Comp Chem Eng. 2010;34:1092–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Pharmaceutical Development Q8 (R2). 2009. http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q8_R1/Step4/Q8_R2_Guideline.pdf
  8. 8.
    Yu LX. Pharmaceutical quality by design: product and process development, understanding, and control. Pharm Res. 2008;25(4):781–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mazumder S, Pavurala N, Manda P, Xu X, Cruz CN, Krishnaiah YSR. Quality by design approach for studying the impact of formulation and process variables on product quality of oral disintegrating films. Int J Pharm. 2017;527:151–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Teckoe J, Mascaro T, Farrell TP, Rajabi-Siahboomi AR. Process optimization of a novel immediate release film coating system using QbD principles. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2013;14(2):531–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dubey A, Boukouvala F, Keyvan G, Hsia R, Saranteas K, Brone D, et al. Improvement of tablet coating uniformity using a quality by design approach. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2012;13(1):231–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nayak BK, Elchidana P, Sahu PK. A quality by design approach for coating process parameter optimization. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2017;79(3):345–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alleso M, Holm R, Holm P. Roller compaction scale-up using roll width as scale factor and laser-based determined ribbon porosity as critical material attribute. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2016;87:69–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nakagawa H, Kikkawa Y, Matsuura K, Tanabe S, Watanabe T. Implementation of enhanced QbD to drug product development. Jpn Soc Pharm Mach Eng. 2015;24:469–75.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zaid AN, Abualhasan M, Qaddumi A, Jodeh S. Development of film coated atrovastatin calcium tablet using Opadry-OY. Int J Drug Deliv. 2012;4:229–35.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zaid AN, Natour S, Qaddomi A, Ghoush AA. Formulation and in vitro and in vivo evaluation of film-coated montelukast sodium tablets using Opadry® yellow 20A82938 on an industrial scale. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2013;7:83–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yoshino H, Yamashita K, Iwao Y, Noguchi S, Itai S. Quantitative appearance inspection for film coated tablets. Chem Pharm Bull. 2016;64(8):1226–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sheth N, Shan S, Potdar A, Shah A. Studies in optimization of aqueous film coating parameters. Int J Pharm Sci Nano. 2009;2(3):621–6.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Imamura M, Nishina S, Irisawa A, Yamashita T, Kato E. 3D imaging and analysis system using terahertz waves. In: IEEE Int. Conf. IR. MMW. THz. Waves. 2010.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMW.2010.5612459.
  20. 20.
    Wataru M, Hiroyuki Y, Yoshifumi K, Kazunari Y, Keiji I, Kazuhiro S, et al. Applying terahertz technology for nondestructive detection of crack initiation in a film-coated layer on a swelling tablet. Results Pharm Sci. 2012;2:29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dohi M, Momose W, Yoshino H, Hara Y, Yamashita K, Hakomori T, et al. Application of terahertz pulse imaging as PAT tool for non-destructive evaluation of film-coated tablets under different manufacturing conditions. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2016;119:104–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Seitavuopio P, Heinämäki J, Rantanen J, Yliruusi J. Monitoring tablet surface roughness during the film coating process. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2006;7(2):E1–6.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ruotsalainen M, Heinämäki J, Taipale K, Yliruusi J. Influence of the aqueous film coating process on the properties and stability of tablets containing a moisture-labile drug. Pharm Dev Technol. 2003;8(4):443–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    May RK, Evans MJ, Zhong S, Warr I, Gladden LF, Shen Y, et al. Terahertz in-line sensor for direct coating thickness measurement of individual tablets during film coating in real-time. J Pharm Sci. 2011;100(4):1535–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lin H, Dong Y, Markl D, Zhang Z, Shen Y, Zeitler JA. Pharmaceutical film coating catalog for spectral domain optical coherence tomography. J Pharm Sci. 2017;106:3171–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Patel JK, Shah AM, Sheth NR. Aqueous-based film coating of tablets: study the effect of critical process parameters. Int J PharmTech Res. 2009;1(2):235–40.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Page S, Baumann KH, Kleinebudde P. Mathematical modeling of an aqueous film coating process in a Bohle lab-coater, part 1: development of the model. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2006;7(2):42.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Page S, Baumann KH, Kleinebudde P. Mathematical modeling of an aqueous film coating process in a Bohle lab-coater, part 2: application of the model. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2006;7(2):43.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Suzuki Y, Suzuki T, Minami H, Terada K. A novel scale up model for prediction of pharmaceutical film coating process parameters. Chem Pharm Bull. 2016;64:215–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pandey P, Katakdaunde M, Turton R. Modeling weight variability in a pan coating process using Monte Carlo simulations. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2006;7(4):83.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroyuki Yoshino
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yuko Hara
    • 1
  • Masafumi Dohi
    • 1
  • Kazunari Yamashita
    • 1
  • Tadashi Hakomori
    • 1
  • Shin-ichiro Kimura
    • 2
  • Yasunori Iwao
    • 2
  • Shigeru Itai
    • 2
  1. 1.Pharmaceutical Research & Technology Laboratories, Astellas Pharma Inc.YaizuJapan
  2. 2.Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical SciencesUniversity of ShizuokaShizuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations