Advertisement

The AAPS Journal

, 21:5 | Cite as

Effect of the Plasticizer DEHP in Blood Collection Bags on Human Plasma Fraction Unbound Determination for Alpha-1-Acid Glycoprotein (AAG) Binding Drugs

  • Nicholas Ingram
  • Christopher Dishinger
  • Jennifer Wood
  • J. Matthew Hutzler
  • Sherri Smith
  • Michael HuskinEmail author
Research Article
  • 203 Downloads

Abstract

Fraction unbound (fu) is a critical drug distribution parameter commonly utilized for modeling efficacious dosage and safety margin predictions. An over-estimation of fu for 13 chemically diverse small molecule drugs primarily bound to alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) in human plasma was discovered when in vitro results from our screening lab were compared to literature values. Di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), a plasticizer known to be used in the manufacture of blood collection bags, was extracted from plasma obtained through three common techniques that allowed contact with DEHP, and drug fu values in plasma from each collection method were estimated using the HTDialysis protein binding methodology. Additionally, fu of test compounds in plasma spiked with varying concentrations of DEHP (0–800 μM) was determined, and DEHP extractions were performed from plasma stored in Terumo bags over 7 days. Blood stored in Terumo bags, blood collected in Terumo bags, but immediately transferred to conical vials, and vacutainer-collected blood yielded DEHP concentrations of 300–1000 μM, 1–10 μM, and 0.1–2 μM, respectively. This finding corresponded with the fu of tested drugs in DEHP-spiked plasma increasing between 2- and 5-fold. Additionally, DEHP was discovered to leach from the Terumo bag, with concentrations increasing 10-fold over a 7-day test period. In summary, the presence of DEHP in commercially available blood collection bags confounds in vitro fu estimation for drugs that bind primarily to AAG. It is recommended that vacutainer-collected human plasma, which contains negligible DEHP, be used for the most accurate estimation of fu in human plasma.

KEY WORDS

alpha-1-acid glycoprotein equilibrium dialysis plasma protein binding plasticizer di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Will Plentl and team at ZenBio, Inc. for collecting and storing donated plasma under our specified experimental conditions, and Sabrina Giordano at BioreclamationIVT for information regarding plasma storage conditions.

References

  1. 1.
    Brown K, Hingorani G, Franklin R. An effective screening approach to assess the impact of α-1 acid glycoprotein binding on the fraction unbound of a drug. Poster session presented at: 17th Annual ISSX Meeting; 2011. Oct 16–20; Atlanta GA.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Routledge PA. The plasma protein binding of basic drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;22(5):499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Al-Dewik N, Jewell A, Yassin M, Morsi H. Studying the impact of presence of alpha acid glycoprotein and protein glycoprotein in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with Imatinib Mesylate in the State of Qatar. Biomark Cancer. 2015;7:63–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pollack GM, Buchanan JF, Slaughter RL, Kohli RK, Shen DD. Circulating concentrations of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and its de-esterified phthalic acid products following plasticizer exposure in patients receiving hemodialysis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1985;79(2):257–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bicalho B, Serrano K, dos Santos Pereira A, Devine DV, Acker JP. Blood bag plasticizers influence red blood cell vesiculation rate without altering the lipid composition of the vesicles. Transfus Med Hemother. 2016;43:19–26.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000441639.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yue Y, Lui K, Liu R, Sun Y, Li X, Fan J. The binding affinity of phthalate plasticizers-protein revealed by spectroscopic techniques and molecular modeling. Food Chem Toxicol. 2014;71:244–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2014.06.022.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sager G, Little C. The effect of the plasticizers TBEP (tris-(2-butoxyethyl)-phosphate) and DEHP (di-(2-ethylhexyl)-phthalate) on beta-adrenergic ligand binding to alpha 1-acid glycoprotein and mononuclear leukocytes. Biochem Pharmacol. 1989;28(15):2551–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leetz A. Frace first EU country to ban the use of DEHP in paediatrics, neonatology maternity wards in Hospitals Health Care Without Harm Europe. 2012; Dec 13.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Griffiths WC, Camara PD, Sarietlli A, Gentile J. The in vitro serum protein-binding characteristics of bis-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and its principal metabolite, mono-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate. Environ Health Perspect. 1988;77:151–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Banker M, Clark T, Williams J. Development and validation of 96-well equilibrium dialysis apparatus for measuring plasma protein binding. J Pharm Sci. 2003;92(5):967–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zamek-Gliszczynski M, Ruterbories J, Ajamie R, Wikremsinhe E, Pothuri L, Rao MVS, et al. Validation of 96-well equilibrium dialysis with non-radiolabeled drug for definitive measurement of protein binding and application to clinical development of highly-bound drugs. J Pharm Sci. 2011;100(6):2498–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Feigal. PVC devices containing the Plasticzier DEHP. In: FDA Public Health Notification. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2002. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/PublicHealthNotifications/ucm062182.htm. Accessed 25 Aug 2016.
  13. 13.
    Shah D, Burgess J. A simple, fast, and reliable LC-MS/MS method for determination and quantification of phthalates in distilled beverages. In: Application Notes. Waters Corporation. 2015. http://www.waters.com/webassets/cms/library/docs/720005403en.pdf. Accessed 29 Apr 2016.
  14. 14.
    Dine T, Luyckx M, Cazin M, Brunet C, Cazin JC, Goudaliez F. Rapid determination by high performance liquid chromatography of di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate in plasma stored in plastic bags. Biomed Chromatogr. 1991;5:94–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bista SR, Haywood A, Hardy J, Lobb M, Tapuni A, Norris R. Protein binding of fentanyl and its metabolite nor-fentanyl in human plasma, albumin and α-1 acid glycoprotein. Xenobiotica. 2015;45(3):207–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Di L, Kerns EH. Application of pharmaceutical profiling assays for optimization of drug-like properites. Curr Opin Drug Discov Dev. 2005;8(4):495–504.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Di L, Kerns EH, Carter GT. Drug-like property concepts in pharmaceutical design. Curr Pharm Des. 2009;15(19):2184–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McGinnity DF, Collington J, Austin RP, Riley RJ. Evaluation of human pharmacokinetics, therapeutic dose and exposure predictions using marketed oral drugs. Curr Drug Metab. 2007;8(5):463–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Obach RS, Walsky R, Venkatakrishnan K, Gaman E, Houstan JB, Termain L. The utility of in vitro cytochrome P450 inhibiation data in the prediction of drug-drug interactions. JPET. 2006;316(1):336–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harmer AR, Valentin J-P, Pollard CE. On the relationship between block of the cardiac Na+ channel and drug-induced prolongation of the QRS complex. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;164:260–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jones H, Gardner I, Collard W, Stanley P, Oxley P, Hosea N, et al. Simulation of human intravenous and oral pharmacokinetics of 21 diverse compounds using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2001;50(5):331–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sinha VK, Snoeys J, Osselaer NV, Peer AV, Mackie C, Heald D. From preclinical to human—prediction of oral absorption and drug-drug interaction potential using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach in an industrial setting: a workflow by using case example. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2012;33(2):111–21.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bdd.1782.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Drugs@FDA: FDA Approved Drug Products [Internet]. Silver Spring: U.S. Food and Drug Administration; c1996. Xanax; (revised 2011 Mar; cited 2018 Apr 16; 44 p.). Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/018276s044,021434s006lbl.pdf.

Copyright information

© American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas Ingram
    • 1
  • Christopher Dishinger
    • 1
  • Jennifer Wood
    • 1
  • J. Matthew Hutzler
    • 1
  • Sherri Smith
    • 2
  • Michael Huskin
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Q2 Solutions, Bioanalytical and ADME LabsIndianapolisUSA
  2. 2.H3 Biomedicine, Inc.CambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations