Income differences in cardiovascular disease: is the contribution from work similar in prevalence versus mortality outcomes?



The objective of this research is to study the contribution of adverse working conditions to the association between income and cardiovascular disease (CVD), and to analyze differences across prevalence and mortality outcomes. Cross-sectional data from the Swedish Surveys of Living Conditions, 1996–1999 (N = 6,405), and longitudinal registry data for the period 1990–95 (10,916 CVD deaths) were used, including employed wage earners, aged 40–64. Working conditions were assessed through self-reports and imputed from a job exposure matrix, respectively. Multiple logistic and Poisson regressions were applied. There were strong associations between income and CVD. Those in the lowest income quartile had 3.6 (prevalence) and 2.1 (mortality) times higher risk of CVD, compared to those in the highest income quartile (with a gradient for the intermediate groups). In the survey, low job control and physical demands contributed 8–10% to the association between income and CVD prevalence. This contribution was 10% for low job control in the mortality follow-up. A small proportion of the association between income and the prevalence of or mortality from CVD is attributable to working conditions.

Key words

income cardiovascular disease work environment self-reports job exposure matrix Sweden 


  1. Åberg-Yngwe, M., Diderichsen, F., Whitehead, M., Holland, P., & Burström, B. (2001). The role of income differences in explaining social inequalities in self rated health in Sweden and Britain. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 55, 556–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alfredsson, L., Karasek, R., & Theorell, T. (1982). Myocardial infarction risk and psychosocial work environment: An analysis of the male Swedish working force. Social Science & Medicine, 16, 463–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benzeval, M., & Judge, K. (2001). Income and health: The time dimension. Social Science & Medicine, 52, 1371–1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borg, V., & Kristensen, T. S. (2000). Social class and self-rated health: Can the gradient be explained by differences in life style or work environment? Social Science & Medicine, 51, 1019–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bosma, H., Schrijvers, C., & Mackenbach, J. P. (1999). Socio-economic inequalities in mortality and importance of perceived control: Cohort study. British Medical Journal, 319, 1469–1470.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bosma, H., Stansfeld, S. A., & Marmot, M. G. (1998). Job control, personal characteristics, and heart disease. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 402–409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, S., Line, S., Manuck, S. B., Rabin, B. S., Heise, E. R., & Kaplan, J. R. (1997). Chronic social stress, social status, and susceptibility to upper respiratory infections in nonhuman primates. Psychosomatic Medicine, 59, 213–221.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, S., Tyrrell, D. A., & Smith, A. P. (1991). Psychological stress and susceptibility to the common cold. New England Journal of Medicine, 325, 606–612.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fine, L. (2000). Chemical and physical factors. In P. L. Schnall, K. Belkic, P. Landsbergis, & D. Baker (Eds.), Occupational medicine (State of the art reviews), 15:1 (pp. 18–24). Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus.Google Scholar
  11. Fredlund, P., Hallqvist, J., & Diderichsen, F. (2000). Psykosocial yrkesexponeringsmatris. En uppdatering av ett klassifikations-system för yrkesrelaterade psykosociala exponeringar. [Psychosocial job exposure matrix]. Arbete och hälsa, 2000:11. Stockholm, Sweden: National Institute of Working Life.Google Scholar
  12. Hemström, Ö. (2002). Alcohol-related deaths contribute to socioeconomic differentials in mortality in Sweden. European Journal of Public Health, 12, 254–262.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hemström, Ö. (2005). Health inequalities by wage income in Sweden: The role of work environment. Social Science & Medicine, in press, 61, 637–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hopkins, P. N., & Williams, R. R. (1981). A survey of 246 suggested coronary risk factors. Atherosclerosis, 40, 1–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson, J., & Hall, E. (1988). Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: A cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. American Journal of Public Health, 78, 1336–1342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaplan, G., & Keil, J. (1993). Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: A review of the literature. Circulation, 88, 1973–1998.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Karasek, R. A., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, productivity and reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  18. Karasek, R., & Theorell, T. (2000). The Demand-Control-Support Model and CVD. In P. Schnall, K. Belkic, P. Landsbergis, & D. Baker (Eds.), Occupational medicine (State of the art reviews), 15:1 (pp. 78–83). Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus.Google Scholar
  19. Kivimäki, M., Leino-Arjas, P., Luukkonen, R., Riihimäki, H., Vahtera, J., & Kirjonen, J. (2002). Work stress and risk of cardiovascular mortality: Prospective cohort study of industrial employees. British Medical Journal, 325, 860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kristensen, T. S. (1989a). Cardiovascular disease and the work environment. A critical review of the epidemiologic literature on chemical factors. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 15, 245–264.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kristensen, T. S. (1989b). Cardiovascular diseases and the work environment. A critical review of the epidemiologic literature on nonchemical factors. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 15, 165–179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kristensen, T. S. (1989c). Work environment and cardiovascular diseases. A short review of the literature. Journal of UOEH, (Suppl. 11), 120–133.Google Scholar
  23. Kristensen, T. S., Kornitzer, M., Alfredsson, L., & Marmot, M. (1998). Social factors, work, stress and cardiovascular disease prevention in the European Union; The European Heart Network, July 1998. Brussels: European Heart Network.Google Scholar
  24. Landsbergis, P., & Theorell, T. (2000). Measurement of psycho- social workplace exposure variables. In P. Schnall, K. Belkic, P. Landsbergis, & D. Baker (Eds.), Occupational medicine (State of the art reviews), 15:1 (pp. 163–188). Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus.Google Scholar
  25. Lynch, J., & Kaplan, G. (2000). Socioeconomic position. In L. F. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 13–35). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lynch, J., Kaplan, G., Cohen, R., Tuomilehto, J., & Salonen, J. (1996). Do cardiovascular risk factors explain the relation between socioeconomic status, risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and acute myocardial infarction? American Journal of Epidemiology, 144, 934–942.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lynch, J., Krause, N., Kaplan, G. A., Salonen, R., & Salonen, J. T. (1997). Workplace demands, economic reward, and progression of carotid atherosclerosis. Circulation, 96, 302–307.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lynch, J., Krause, N., Kaplan, G. A., Tuomilehto, J., & Salonen, J. T. (1997). Workplace conditions, socioeconomic status, and the risk of mortality and acute myocardial infarction: The Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 617–622.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mäkelä, P., Valkonen, T., & Martelin, T. (1997). Contribution of deaths related to alcohol use of socioeconomic variationin mortality: Register based follow up study. British Medical Journal, 315, 211–216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Marmot, M. G., Bosma, H., Hemingway, H., Brunner, E., & Stansfeld, S. (1997). Contribution of job control and other risk factors to social variations in coronary heart disease incidence. The Lancet, 350, 235–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matthews, S., Hertzman, C., Ostry, A., & Power, C. (1998). Gender, work roles and psychosocial work characteristics as determinants of health. Social Science & Medicine, 46, 1417–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McNutt, L., Holcomb, J. P. J., & Carlson, B. E. (2002). Logistic regression analysis: When the odds ratio does not work. An example using intimate partner violence data. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 1050–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. National Board of Health and Welfare. (1986). Klassifikation av sjukdomar 1987 [Classification of Diseases 1987] (1 suppl. ed.). Stockholm: Statistics Sweden. MIS Report 1982:4.Google Scholar
  34. National Board of Health and Welfare. (1998). Dödsfallsregister 1970–1995: En presentation av samkörningar mellan Dödsorsaksregistret och Folk- och bostadsräkningarna 1970, 1980 och 1990 [A presentation of multiple linkages between Cause-of-Death Register and Censuses 1970, 1980 and 1990]. Stockholm: Epidemiologiskt centrum (EpC), Socialstyrelsen, Arbetarskyddsstyrelsen. EpC Report 1998:2.Google Scholar
  35. Nermo, M. (1999). Structured by gender. Patterns of sex segregation in the Swedish labour market. Historical and cross-national comparisons. Stockholm University: Swedish Institute for Social Research. Dissertation Series No. 41.Google Scholar
  36. Olsen, O., & Kristensen, T. S. (1991). Impact of work environment on cardiovascular diseases in Denmark. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 45, 4–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Palme, J., Bergmark, A., Backman, O., Estrada, F., Fritzell, J., Lundberg, O., et al. (2003). A welfare balance sheet for the 1990s. Final report of the Swedish Welfare Commission. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health Supplement, 60, 7–143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Paoli, P. (1997). Second European survey on working conditions. Dublin, Ireland: European Foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions.Google Scholar
  39. Rahkonen, O., Arber, S., Lahelma, E., Martikainen, P., & Silventoinen, K. (2000). Understanding income inequalities in health among men and women in Britain and Finland. International Journal of Health Services, 30, 27–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rose, G., & Marmot, M. (1981). Social class and coronary heart disease. British Heart Journal, 45, 13–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rosén, M. (2001). Hjärt-kärlsjukdomar [Cardiovascular Disease]. In Socialstyrelsen Epidemiologiskt centrum (Ed.), Folkhälsorapport [Public Health Report] (pp. 70–77). Spånga, Sweden: Socialstyrelsen.Google Scholar
  42. Salonen, J. (1982). Socioeconomic status and risk of cancer, cerebral stroke, and death due to coronary heart disease and any disease: A longitudinal study in eastern Finland. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 36, 294–297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schrijvers, C., van de Mheen, H., Stronks, K., & Mackenbach, J. (1998). Socioeconomic inequalities in health in the working population: The contribution of working conditions. International Journal of Epidemiology, 27, 1011–1018.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Siegrist, J., Peter, R., Cremer, P., & Seidel, D. (1997). Chronic work stress is associated with atherogenic lipids and elevated fibrinogen in middle-aged men. Journal of Internal Medicine, 242, 149–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Statistics Sweden. (2003). Mer om ULF [More about ULF]. Retrieved March 26, 2003, from Scholar
  46. Statistics Sweden. (2004). Supplement to Appendix 16: Further technical information about ULF 1994–99. Retrieved March 26, 2003, from dokument/Supplement16.pdfGoogle Scholar
  47. Statistics Sweden, & Swedish Work Environment Authority. (2002). The work environment 2001. Stockholm: Swedish Work Environment Authority.Google Scholar
  48. Steptoe, A., Kunz-Ebrecht, S., Owen, N., Feldman, P., Rumley, A., Lowe, G. O. D., et al. (2003). Influence of socioeconomic status and job control on plasma fibrinogen responses to acute mental stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65, 137–144.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Theorell, T. (1996). The Demand-Control-Support Model for studying health in relation to the work environment: An interactive model. In K. Orth-Gomér & N. Schneiderman (Eds.), Behavioral medicine approaches to cardiovascular disease prevention (pp. 69–85). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  50. Theorell, T. (2000). Working conditions and health. In L. F. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 95–117). New York; Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Theorell, T. (2001). Stress—En sjukdomsrisk [Stress—a health risk]. In Socialstyrelsen Epidemiologiskt centrum (Ed.), Folkhälsorapport [Public Health Report] (pp. 61–69). Spånga, Sweden: Kundtjänst Socialstyrelsen.Google Scholar
  52. Tsutsumi, A., Theorell, T., Hallqvist, J., Reuterwall, C., & de Faire, U. (1999). Association between job characteristics and plasma fibrinogen in a normal working population: A cross sectional analysis in referents of the SHEEP study. Stockholm Heart Epidemiology Program. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 53, 348–354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Virtanen, S. V., & Notkola, V. (2002). Socioeconomic inequalities in cardiovascular mortality and the role of work: A register study of Finnish men. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31, 614–621.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wamala, S. P. (1999). Socioeconomic status and cardiovascular vulnerability in women. Psychosocial, behavioural, and biological mediators. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet.Google Scholar
  55. Wenger, N. K. (1997). Coronary heart disease: an older woman’s major health risk. British Medical Journal, 315, 1085–1090.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Wilkinson, R. G. (1996). Unhealthy societies: The afflictions of inequality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Wilkinson, R. G. (1999). Putting the picture together: Prosperity, redistribution, health, and welfare. In M. Marmot & R. G. Wilkinson (Eds.), Social determinants of health (pp. 256–274). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Health Equity Studies (CHESS)Stockholm University/Karolinska InstituteStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations