Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 225–235 | Cite as

Diabetes self-management among low-income spanish-speaking patients: A pilot study

  • Milagros C. Rosal
  • Barbara Olendzki
  • George W. Reed
  • Ira Ockene
  • Olga Gumieniak
  • Jeffrey Scavron


Background: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes and diabetesrelated morbidity and mortality is higher among low-income Hispanics when compared to that of Whites. However, little is known about how to effectively promote self-management in this population.Purpose: The objectives were first to determine the feasibility of conducting a randomized clinical trial of an innovative self-management intervention to improve metabolic control in low-income Spanish-speaking individuals with type 2 diabetes and second to obtain preliminary data of possible intervention effects.Methods: Participants for this pilot study were recruited from a community health center, an elder program, and a community-wide database developed by the community health center, in collaboration with other agencies serving the community, by surveying households in the entire community. Participants were randomly assigned to an intervention (n = 15) or a control (n = 10) condition. Assessments were conducted at baseline and at 3 months and 6 months postrandomization. The intervention consisted of 10 group sessions that targeted diabetes knowledge, attitudes, and self-management skills through culturally specific and literacysensitive strategies. The intervention used a cognitivebehavioral theoretical framework.Results: Recruitment rates at the community health center, elder program, and community registry were 48%, 69%, and 8%, respectively. Completion rates for baseline, 3-month, and 6-month assessments were 100%, 92%, and 92%, respectively. Each intervention participant attended an average of 7.8 out of 10 sessions, and as a group the participants showed high adherence to intervention activities (93% turned in daily logs, and 80% self-monitored glucose levels at least daily). There was an overall Group × Time interaction (p = .02) indicating group differences in glycosylated hemoglobin over time. The estimated glycosylated hemoglobin decrease at 3 months for the intervention group was −0.8% (95% confidence intervals = −1.1%, −0.5%) compared with the change in the control group (p = .02). At 6 months, the decrease in the intervention group remained significant, −0.85% (95% confidence intervals = −1.2, −0.5), and the decrease was still significantly different from that of the controls (p = .005). There was a trend toward increased physical activity in the intervention group as compared to that of the control group (p = .11) and some evidence (nonsignificant) of an increase in blood glucose self-monitoring in the intervention participants but not the control participants. Adjusting for baseline depressive scores, we oberved a significant difference in depressive symptoms between intervention participants and control participants at the 3-month assessment (p = .02).Conclusions: Low-income Spanish-speaking Hispanics are receptive to participate in diabetes-related research. This study shows that the pilot-tested diabetes self-management program is promising and warrants the conduct of a randomized clinical trial.


Intervention Participant American Dietetic Association Massachusetts Medical School Hispanic Individual Starr County 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, et al.: Diabetes trends in the U.S.: 1990–1998.Diabetes Care. 2000,23:1278–1283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Socioeconomic status of women with diabetes—United States, 2000.Journal of the American Medical Association. 2000,287:2496–2497.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    Flegal KM, Ezzati TM, Harris MI, et al.: Prevalence of diabetes in Mexican Americans, Cubans, and Puerto Ricans from the Hispanic health and nutrition examination survey, 1982–1984.Diabetes Care. 1991,14:528–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, Schmid CH, Engelgau MM: Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control.Diabetes Care 2002,25:1159–1171.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Norris SL, Engelgau MM, Narayan KM: Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Diabetes Care. 2001,24:561–587.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    Norris SL, Nichols PJ, Caspersen CJ, et al.: Increasing diabetes self-management education in community settings. A systematic review.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2002,22:39–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Brown SA: Studies of educational interventions and outcomes in diabetic adults: A meta-analysis revisited.Patient Education and Counseling. 1990,16:189–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Brown SA: Effects of educational interventions in diabetes care: A meta-analysis of findings.Nursing Research. 1988,37:223–230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Padgett D, Mumford E, Hynes M, Carter R: Meta-analysis of the effects of educational and psychosocial interventions on management of diabetes mellitus.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1988,41:1007–1030.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention:National Diabetes Fact Sheet: General Information and National Estimates on Diabetes in the United States, 2000. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2002.Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    Grieco E, Cassidy R:Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: Census 2000 Brief. Retrieved February 20, 2003, from Scholar
  12. (12).
    Carter JS, Wiggins CL, Becker TM, Key CR, Samet JM: Diabetes mortality among New Mexico's American, Indian, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic White populations, 1958–1987.Diabetes Care. 1993,16:306–309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Wetterhall SF, Olson DR, DeStefano F, et al.: Trends in diabetes and diabetic complications, 1980–1987.Diabetes Care. 1992,15:960–967.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    Vazquez IM, Millen B, Bissett L, Levenson SM, Chipkin SR: Buena Alimentacion, Buena Salud: A preventive nutrition intervention in Caribbean Latinos with type 2 diabetes.American Journal of Health Promotion. 1998,13:116–119.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    Brown SA, Garcia AA, Kouzekanani K, Hanis CL: Culturally competent diabetes self-management education for Mexican Americans: The Starr County border health initiative.Diabetes Care. 2002,25:259–268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    Therrien M, Ramirez RR:The Hispanic Population in the United States: March 2000, Current Population Reports.Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000.Google Scholar
  17. (17).
    Tucker KL, Bermudez OI, Castaneda C: Type 2 diabetes is prevalent and poorly controlled among Hispanic elders of Caribbean origin.American Journal of Public Health. 2000,90:1288–1293.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    Frayne SM, Burns RB, Hardt EJ, Rosen AK, Moskowitz MA: The exclusion of non-English-speaking persons from research.Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1996,11:39–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services:Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health (2nd Ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000.Google Scholar
  20. (20).
    Department of Health and Human Services:The Initiative to Eliminate Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health. Retrieved December 9, 2002, from http://raceandhealth.hhs.govGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    Demographic Report for 2003: Door to Door Outreach Utilizing Community HealthWorkers. Springfield, MA: North End Outreach Network, 2003.Google Scholar
  22. (22).
    U.S. Census Bureau:Demographic Surveys Division, American Fact Finder. Retrieved March 6, 2002, from http://factfinder. census.govGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    Rosal MC, GoinsKV, Carbone E, De Cortes D, Olendzki B: Perceptions and preferences of low-literate Hispanics for diabetes education.HealthEducationandBehavior. 2004,31:388–405.Google Scholar
  24. (24).
    Bandura A:Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman, 1997.Google Scholar
  25. (25).
    American Diabetes Association: Evidence-based nutrition principles and recommendations for the treatment and prevention of diabetes and related complications [Position statement].Diabetes Care. 2002,25: S50-S60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. (26).
    Position of the American Dietetic Association: Integration of medical nutrition therapy and pharmacotherapy.Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2003,103:1363–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. (27).
    Rosal MC, Ebbeling CB, Lofgren I, et al.: Facilitating dietary change: The patient-centered counseling model.Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2001,101:332–341.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. (28).
    Drevenhorn E, Hakansson A, Petersson K: Blood pressure measurement- An observational study of 21 public health nurses.Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2001,10:189–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. (29).
    Johnson RK: Dietary intake—How do we measure what people are really eating?Obesity Research. 2002,10:63S-68S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. (30).
    Stewart AL, Napoles-Springer A: Health-related quality-of-life assessments in diverse population groups in the United States.Medical Care. 2000,38: II102-II124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. (31).
    Tucker KL, Bianchi LA, Maras J, Bermudez OI: Adaptation of a food frequency questionnaire to assess diets of Puerto Rican and non-Hispanic adults.American Journal of Epidemiology 1998,148:507–518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. (32).
    Speight J, Bradley C: The ADKnowl: Identifying knowledge deficits in diabetes care.Diabetic Medicine. 2001,18:626–633.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. (33).
    Bradley C, Todd C, Gorton T, et al.: The development of an individualized questionnaire measure of perceived impact of diabetes on quality of life: The ADDQoL.Quality of Life Research 1999,8:79–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. (34).
    Bernal H,Woolley S, Schensul JJ, Dickinson JK: Correlates of self-efficacy in diabetes self-care among Hispanic adults with diabetes.Diabetes Educator. 2000,26:673–680.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. (35).
    Sawyer-Radloff L: The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population.Applied Psychological Measurement. 1977,1:385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. (36).
    Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER:Measurement in Nursing Research. Philadelphia: Davis, 1991.Google Scholar
  37. (37).
    Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD:SAS System for Mixed Models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc., 1996.Google Scholar
  38. (38).
    Eakin EG, Bull SS, Glasgow RE, Mason M: Reaching those most in need: A review of diabetes self-management interventions in disadvantaged populations.Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews. 2002,18:26–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. (39).
    Brown SA, Garcia AA, Winchell M: Reaching underserved populations and cultural competence in diabetes education.Current Diabetes Reports. 2002,2:166–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. (40).
    Camacho TC, Roberts RE, Lazarus NB, Kaplan GA, Cohen RD: Physical activity and depression: Evidence from the Alameda County Study.American Journal of Epidemiology 1991,134:220–231.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. (41).
    Cohen S, Wills TA: Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.Psychological Bulletin. 1985,98:310–357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. (42).
    Reis A, Petersson KM, Castro-Caldas A, Ingvar M: Formal schooling influences two-but not three-dimensional naming skills.Brain and Cognition. 2001,47:397–411.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. (43).
    Petersson KM, Reis A, Askelof S, Castro-Caldas A, Ingvar M: Language processing modulated by literacy: A network analysis of verbal repetition in literate and illiterate subjects.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2000,12:364–382.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. (44).
    Wilson SE: The health capital of families: An investigation of the inter-spousal correlation in health status.Social Science and Medicine. 2002,55:1157–1172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. (45).
    Perusse L, Leblanc C, Tremblay A, et al.: Familial aggregation in physical fitness, coronary heart disease risk factors, and pulmonary function measurements.Preventive Medicine. 1987,16:607–615.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. (46).
    Hanis CL, Ferrell RE, Barton SA, et al.: Diabetes among Mexican Americans in Starr County, Texas.American Journal of Epidemiology 1983,118:659–672.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. (47).
    Brown SA, Harrist RB, Villagomez ET, et al.: Gender and treatment differences in knowledge, health beliefs, and metabolic control in Mexican Americans with type 2 diabetes.Diabetes Educator. 2000,26:425–438.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. (48).
    Glasgow RE, McCaul KD, Schafer LC: Self-care behaviors and glycemic control in type I diabetes.Journal of Chronic Diseases 1987,40:399–412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. (49).
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services:Healthy People 2010, With Understanding and Improving Health and Objectives for Improving Health (2nd Ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000.Google Scholar
  50. (50).
    von Goeler DS, Rosal MC, Ockene JK, Scavron J, de Torrijos F: Self-management of type 2 diabetes: A survey of low income, urban Puerto Ricans.Diabetes Educator. 2003,29:663–672.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Milagros C. Rosal
    • 1
  • Barbara Olendzki
    • 1
  • George W. Reed
    • 1
  • Ira Ockene
    • 1
  • Olga Gumieniak
    • 2
  • Jeffrey Scavron
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Massachusetts Medical SchoolUSA
  2. 2.Brigham and Women's HospitalBoston
  3. 3.Brightwood Health CenterSpringfield

Personalised recommendations