Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 66–75 | Cite as

Beginning with the application in mind: Designing and planning health behavior change interventions to enhance dissemination

  • Lisa M. Klesges
  • Paul A. Estabrooks
  • David A. Dzewaltowski
  • Sheana S. Bull
  • Russell E. Glasgow


Dissemination of behavior change interventions can be enhanced by considering key elements related to public health impact in the study design and planning phases of research projects. In this article we describe a framework of reach, efficacy/effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance known as RE-AIM and how it can be used to plan and design studies with features that can strengthen the potential translation of interventions. In describing how RE-AIM concepts were introduced to and adopted by 15 behavior change intervention studies as part of the Behavioral Change Consortium (BCC), we provide an example of practical application of the framework. Recommendations for applying the framework to study planning are based on literature reviews conducted by the RE-AIM workgroup and on discussions with investigators who participated in BCC. Utilizing RE-AIM as a planning framework may have increased attention to issues of external validity among BCC studies and enhanced the potential translation and dissemination of intervention findings into practice.


Behavior Change Behavioral Medicine Health Behavior Change Public Health Impact Behavior Change Intervention 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    McGinnis JM, Foege WH: Actual causes of death in the United States.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1993,270:2207–2212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    Solomon S, Kington R: National efforts to promote behavior-change research: views from the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research.Health Education Research. 2002,17:495–499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Ory MG, Jordan PJ, Bazzarre T: The Behavior Change Consortium: Setting the stage for a new century of health behavior-change research.Health Education Research. 2002,17:500–511.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski D, Bull SS, Estabrooks P: The future of health behavior change research: What is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice?Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2004,27:3–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al.: The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.New England Journal of Medicine. 2003,348:2635–2645.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    Committee on Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine:Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Klesges LM, Bull S, Glasgow RE: Behavior change intervention research in community settings: How generalizable are the results?Health Promotion International. 2004,119:235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Bull SS, Gillette C, Glasgow RE, Estabrooks P: Work site health promotion research: To what extent can we generalize the results and what is needed to translate research to practice?Health Education & Behavior. 2003, 30:537–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Estabrooks P, Dzewaltowski DA, Glasgow RE, Klesges LM: Reporting of validity from school health promotion studies published in 12 leading journals, 1996–2000.The Journal of School Health. 2003, 73:21–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Glasgow RE, Bull SS, Gillette C, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA: Behavior change intervention research in health care settings: A review of recent reports, with emphasis on external validity.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2002,23:62–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM: Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy.Journal of the American Medical Association. 2003,290:1624–1632.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E, Marcus A: Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy to effectiveness transition.American Journal of Public Health. 2003,93:1261–1267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM: Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework.AmericanJournal of Public Health. 1999,89:1323–1327.Google Scholar
  14. (14).
    Leviton L: External validity.International Encyclopedia of the Behavioral and Social Sciences (Vol. 8). Oxford, England: Elsevier, 2001, 5195–5200.Google Scholar
  15. (15).
    RE-AIM: [Home page]. Retrieved March 2, 2005, from Scholar
  16. (16).
    Behavioral Change Consortium: Behavior Change Consortium [Home page]. Retrieved DATE from http://www1.od. Scholar
  17. (17).
    Jo Harris K, Ahluwalia JS, Catley D, et al.: Successful recruitment of minorities into clinical trials: The Kick It at Swope project.Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2003,5:575–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    Green LW, Mercer SL: Can public health researchers and agencies reconcile the push from funding bodies and the pull from communities?American Journal of Public Health. 2001,91:1926–1929.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    Gittelsohn J, Evans M, Story M, et al.: Multisite formative assessment for the Pathways study to prevent obesity in American Indian schoolchildren.American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1999,69(Suppl. 4):767S-772S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. (20).
    Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Israel BA, et al.: Conducting a participatory community-based survey for a community health intervention on Detroit’s east side.Journal of Public Health Management Practice. 1998,4:10–24.Google Scholar
  21. (21).
    Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Johnston JA: Healthy youth places promoting nutrition and physical activity.Health Education Research. 2002,17:541–551.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. (22).
    Coday M, Klesges LM, Garrison RJ, et al.: Health Opportunities with Physical Exercise (HOPE): Social contextual interventions to reduce sedentary behavior in urban settings.Health Education Research. 2002,17:637–647.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    Saunders SD, Greaney ML, Lees FD, Clark PG: Achieving recruitment goals through community partnerships: The SENIOR Project.Family & Community Health. 2003,26:194–202.Google Scholar
  24. (24).
    Toobert DJ, Strycker LA, Glasgow RE, Barrera M, Bagdade JD: Enhancing support for health behavior change among women at risk for heart disease: The Mediterranean Lifestyle Trial.Health Education Research. 2002,17:574–585.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. (25).
    Coday M, Boutin-Foster C, Goldman Sher T, et al.: Strategies for retaining study participants in behavioral intervention trials: Retention experiences of the NIH Behavior Change Consortium.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2005, 29(Suppl. 2):55–65. [this issue]PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. (26).
    Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM (eds):Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice (3rd Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002.Google Scholar
  27. (27).
    Bartholemew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb N:Intervention Mapping: Designing Theory and Evidence-Based Health Promotion Programs. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield, 2001.Google Scholar
  28. (28).
    Perry CL:Creating Health Behavior Change: How to Develop Community-Wide Programs for Youth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1999.Google Scholar
  29. (29).
    Jeffery RW: Risk behaviors and health: contrasting individual and population perspectives.American Psychologist. 1989,44:1194–1202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. (30).
    Abrams DB, Mills S, Bulger D: Challenges and future directions for tailored communication research.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1999,21:299–306.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. (31).
    Skinner CS, Campbell MK, Rimer BK, Curry S, Prochaska JO: How effective is tailored print communication?Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1999,21:290–298.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. (32).
    Stokols D: Social ecology and behavioral medicine: Implications for training, practice, and policy.Behavioral Medicine. 2000,26:129–138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. (33).
    DiClemente CC, Marinilli AS, Singh M, Bellino LE: The role of feedback in the process of health behavior change.American Journal of Health Behavior. 2001,25:217–227.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. (34).
    McClure JB: Are biomarkers useful treatment aids for promoting health behavior change? An empirical review.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2002,22:200–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. (35).
    Locke EA, Latham GP: Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation.A35-year odyssey.The American Psychologist. 2002,57:705–717.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. (36).
    Strecher VJ, Seijts GH, Kok GJ, et al.: Goal setting as a strategy for health behavior change.Health Education Quarterly. 1995,22:190–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. (37).
    Hecht J, Borrelli B, Breger R, et al.: Motivational interviewing in community-based research: Experiences from the field.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2005, 29(Suppl. 2):29–34. [this issue]PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. (38).
    Clark PG, Nigg CR, Greene G, Riebe D, Saunders SD: The study of exercise and nutrition in olders Rhode Islanders (SENIOR): Translating theory into research.Health Education Research. 2002,17:552–561.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. (39).
    Strecher V, Wang C, Derry H, Widenhaus K, Johnson C: Tailored interventions for multiple risk behaviors.Health Education Research. 2002,17:619–626.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. (40).
    Borrelli B, McQuaid EL, Becker B, et al.: Motivating parents of kids with asthma to quit smoking: The PAQS project.Health Education Research. 2002,17:659–669.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. (41).
    Resnicow K, Jackson A, Braithwaite R, et al.: Healthy Body/Healthy Spirit: A church-based nutrition and physical activity intervention.Health Education Research. 2002,17:562–573.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. (42).
    Moe EL, Elliott DL, Goldberg L, et al.: Promoting Healthy Lifestyles: Alternative Models’ Effects (PHLAME).Health Education Research. 2002, 17:586–596.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. (43).
    Glasgow RE: Translating research to practice: Lessons learned, areas for improvement, and future directions.Diabetes Care. 2003,26:2451–2456.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. (44).
    Flay BR: Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs.Preventive Medicine. 1986,15:451–474.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. (45).
    Kaplan RM: The Ziggy Theorem: Toward an outcomes-focused health psychology.Health Psychology. 1994,13:451–460.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. (46).
    Abrams DB, Orleans CT, Niaura RS, et al.: Integrating individual and public health perspectives for treatment of tobacco dependency in managed care: A combined stepped-care and matching model.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1996,18:290–304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. (47).
    Teutsch SM: A framework for assessing the effectiveness of disease and injury prevention.Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, recomm Rep. 1992,41(RR-3):1–12.Google Scholar
  48. (48).
    King AC, Friedman R, Marcus B, et al.: Harnessing motivational forces in the promotion of physical activity: The Community Health Advice by Telephone (CHAT) project.Health Education Research. 2002,17:627–636.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. (49).
    Beyer JM, Trice HM: The utilization process: A conceptual framework and synthesis of empirical findings.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1982, 27:591–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. (50).
    Goodman R, Steckler A, Kegler M: Mobilizing organizations for health enhancement: Theories of organizational change. In Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK (eds),Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1997, 287–312.Google Scholar
  51. (51).
    Rogers EM:Diffusion of Innovations (5th Ed.). New York: The Free Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  52. (52).
    Oldenburg B, Hardcastle DM, Kok G: Diffusion of innovations. In Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM (eds),Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002, 312–360.Google Scholar
  53. (53).
    Berwick DM: Disseminating innovations in health care.Journal of the American Medical Association. 2003, 289:1969–1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. (54).
    Szilagyi P, Vann J, Bordley C, et al.: Interventions aimed at improving immunization rates.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2002, (4):CD003941.Google Scholar
  55. (55).
    Goodwin MA, Zyzanski SJ, Zronek S, et al.: A clinical trial of tailored office systems for preventive service delivery. The Study to Enhance Prevention by Understanding Practice (STEP-UP).American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2001,21:20–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. (56).
    National Cancer Institute, Center for Advancement of Health, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation:Designing For Dissemination Conference Summary Report. Washington, DC: National Cancer Institute, 2002. Available at d4d/d4d_conf_sum_report.pdfGoogle Scholar
  57. (57).
    Estabrooks PA, Bradshaw M, Fox EH, Berg J, Dzewaltowski DA: The relationship between delivery agents’ physical activity level and the likelihood of implementing a physical activity program.American Journal of Health Promotion (in press).Google Scholar
  58. (58).
    Green LW: From research to “best practices” in other settings and populations.American Journal of Health Behavior. 2001,25:165–178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. (59).
    Green L, Daniel M, Novick L: Partnerships and coalitions for community-based research.Public Health Reports. 2001,116(Suppl. 1):20–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. (60).
    Corbie-Smith G, Ammerman AS, Katz ML, et al.: Trust, benefit, satisfaction, and burden: A randomized controlled trial to reduce cancer risk through African-American churches.Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2003,18:531–541.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. (61).
    Schulz AJ, Israel BA, Parker EA, et al.: The East Side Village Health Worker Partnership: Integrating research with action to reduce health disparities.Public Health Reports. 2001,116:548–557.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. (62).
    Stillman FA, Bone LR, Rand C, Levine DM, Becker DM: Heart, body, and soul: A church-based smoking-cessation program for Urban African Americans.Preventive Medicine. 1993,22:335–349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. (63).
    Kumanyika SK, Story M, Beech BM, et al.: Collaborative planning for formative assessment and cultural appropriateness in the Girls Health Enrichment Multi-site Studies (GEMS): A retrospection.Ethnicity & Disease. 2003, 13(Suppl. 1):S1–1529.Google Scholar
  64. (64).
    Wagner EH, Glasgow RE, Davis C, et al.: Quality improvement in chronic illness care: A collaborative approach.Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement. 2001,27:63–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. (65).
    Glasgow RE, Orleans CT, Wagner EH: Does the chronic care model serve also as a template for improving prevention?Milbank Quarterly. 2001,79:579–612, iv-v.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. (66).
    Baranowski T, Stables G: Process evaluation of the 5-a-Day projects.Health Education & Behavior. 2000,27:157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. (67).
    Steckler A, Linnan L (eds):Process Evaluation for Public Health Interventions and Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002.Google Scholar
  68. (68).
    Bellg A J, Borrelli B, Resnick B, et al.: Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: Best practices and recommendations from the Behavior Change Consortium.Health Psychology (in press).Google Scholar
  69. (69).
    Orleans CT: Promoting the maintenance of health behavior change: Recommendations for the next generation of research and practice.Health Psychology. 2000,19(Suppl. 1):76–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. (70).
    Wing RR: Cross-cutting themes in maintenance of behavior change.Health Psychology. 2000,19(Suppl. 1):84–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. (71).
    Goodman RM, McLeroy KR, Steckler AB: Development of level of institutionalization scales for health promotion programs.Health Education Quarterly. 1993,20:161–178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. (72).
    Barab SA, Redman BK, Froman RD: Measurement characteristics of the levels of institutionalization scales: examining reliability and validity.Journal of Nursing Measurement. 1998,6:19–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. (73).
    Goodson P, Murphy Smith M, Evans A, Meyer B, Gottlieb NH: Maintaining prevention in practice: Survival of PPIP in primary care settings. Put prevention into practice.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2001,20:184–189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. (74).
    Dzewaltowski DA, Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Estabrooks PA, Brock E: RE-AIM: Evidence-based based standards and a web resource to improve translation of research into practice.Annals of Behavioral Medicine (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Behavioral Medicine 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa M. Klesges
    • 1
  • Paul A. Estabrooks
    • 2
  • David A. Dzewaltowski
    • 3
  • Sheana S. Bull
    • 4
  • Russell E. Glasgow
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Preventive MedicineUniversity of Tennessee Health Science CenterMemphis
  2. 2.Kaiser Permanente ColoradoUSA
  3. 3.Community Health InstituteKansas State UniversityUSA
  4. 4.University of Colorado Health Sciences CenterUSA
  5. 5.Kaiser Permanente ColoradoUSA

Personalised recommendations