Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 96–99 | Cite as

Methodological Challenges in Research on Sexual Risk Behavior: III. Response to Commentary

  • Kerstin E. E. Schroder
  • Michael P. Carey
  • Peter A. Vanable


Background: We recently provided two detailed reviews of sexual risk behavior research (1,2) in which we identified methodological challenges, reviewed new developments, and made recommendations to guide future research. In this issue, Catania et al. provide a commentary on our two reviews.Purpose: Clarifications.Method: We carefully reviewed the commentary provided by Catania et al. and respond to their critique.Results: Catania et al. emphasized three major points in their commentary: (a) When assessing sexual risk behavior, categorical assessments of unprotected intercourse may be preferable to count data; (b) quantification of sexual risk via counts of unprotected intercourse does not reflect the complexity of the sexual transmission of HIV; and (c) analysis of variance and analysis of covariance options in analyzing the effects of randomized HIV risk-reduction trials were overemphasized in our review. We address each of these points in turn and clarify the three points that were misunderstood.Conclusions: We remain convinced that count data of sexual risk behavior are the more useful, versatile, and valid indicators of sexual risk reduction in the evaluation of sexual risk behavior interventions. We urge interested readers to review our original articles, which provide a more detailed account of the challenges and opportunities of sexual behavior research.


Sexual Risk Sexual Risk Behavior Unprotected Intercourse Infected Partner Categorical Report 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    Schroder KEE, Carey MP, Vanable PA: Methodological challenges in research on sexual risk behavior: I. Item content, scaling, and data analytical options.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2003,26:76–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    Schroder KEE, Carey MP, Vanable PA: Methodological challenges in research on sexual risk behavior: II. Accuracy of self-reports.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2003,26:104–123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Durant LE, Carey MP, Schroder KEE: Effects of anonymity, gender, and erotophilia on the quality of data obtained from self-reports of socially sensitive behaviors.Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2002,25:439–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Weinhardt LS, Forsyth AD, Carey MP, Jaworski BC, Durant LE: Reliability and validity of self-report measures of HIV-related sexual behavior: Progress since 1990 and recommendations for research and practice.Archives of Sexual Behavior. 1998,27:155–180.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Carey MP, Maisto SA, Kalichman SC, et al.: Enhancing motivation to reduce the risk of HIV infection for economically disadvantaged urban women.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1997,65:531–541.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    Carey MP, Braaten LS, Maisto SA, et al.: Using information, motivational enhancement, and skills training to reduce the risk of HIV infection for low-income urban women: A second randomized clinical trial.Health Psychology. 2000,19:3–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Carey MP, Carey KB, Maisto SA, et al.: Reducing HIV-risk behavior among adults receiving outpatient psychiatric treatments: Results from a randomized controlled trial.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2004,72:252–268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Stevens J:Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences (4th Ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kerstin E. E. Schroder
    • 1
  • Michael P. Carey
    • 2
  • Peter A. Vanable
    • 2
  1. 1.Utah State UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Syracuse UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations