Advertisement

Gender differences in cardiovascular reactivity to competitive stress: The impact of gender of competitor and competition outcome

  • Julianne Holt-Lunstad
  • Claudia J. Clayton
  • Bert N. Uchino
Empirical contributions

Abstract

There is a broad literature indicating gender differences in cardiovascular heart disease (CHD), with higher risks among men. One possible explanation offered has been gender differences in cardiovascular reactivity. However, this gender gap in morbidity and mortality has been decreasing and attributed by some to the increasing competitive pressure placed on women in the workplace. As a result, it is important to understand situational factors that may influence cardiovascular reactivity during competitive stress. We examined this issue in 46 healthy men and women who competed against a same—or opposite—sex competitor while heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were measured. Competition outcome (winning or losing) and gender composition of the dyads were balanced and controlled. Consistent with the gender-role conflict perspective, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) reactivity was higher when competing against a man than a woman. In addition, men also showed higher DBP reactivity when losing than when winning, and women demonstrated the opposite pattern. These data suggest that these gender processes may play an important role in understanding response to stressful interpersonal situations.

Key words

cardiovascular reactivity gender health psychosocial stress competition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, J. L., Saadati, S. E., Clements, C. L., & Moriarty, D. D. (1988). Effects of feedback, competitor’s gender, and locus of control on reaction time of females.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 242–243.Google Scholar
  2. Davis, S. (1990). Menas success objects and womenas sex objects: A studyof personal advertisements.Sex Roles, 23, 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eisler, R. M., Skidmore, J. R., & Ward, C. H. (1988). Masculine gender-role stress: Predictor of anger, anxiety, and health-risk behaviors.Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 133–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Frankenhaeuser, M. (1991). Mini-series: Behavioral medicine: An international perspective: The psychophysiology of workload, stress, and health: Comparison between the sexes.Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 13, 197–204.Google Scholar
  6. Girdler, S. S., Turner, J. R., Sherwood, A., & Light, K. C. (1990). Gender differences in blood pressure control during a variety of behavioral stressors.Psychosomatic Medicine, 52, 571–591.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Helgeson, V. S., & Sharpsteen, D. J. (1987). Perceptions of danger in achievement and affiliation situations: Anextensionofthe Pollak and Gilligan versus Bentonetal. debate.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 727–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Horner, M. S. (1972). Toward an understanding of achievement-related conflicts in women.Journal of Social Issues, 28(2), 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kamarck, T. W., Jennings, J. R., Pogue-Geile, M., Manuck, S. B. (1994). A multidimensional measurement model for cardiovascular reactivity: Stability and cross-validation in two adult samples.Health Psychology, 13, 471–487.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kimmel, M. S. (1994). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, and silence in the construction ofgender identity. In H. Brod & M. Kaufman (Eds.),Theorizing masculinities (pp. 274–288). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Knapp, P. H., Levy, E. M., Giorgi, T. G., & Black, P. H. (1992). Short-term immunological effectsof induced emotion.Psychosomatic Medicine, 54, 133–148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Krantz, D. S., & Manuck, S. B. (1984). Acute psychophysiologic reactivity and risk of cardiovascular disease: A review and methodologic critique.Psychological Bulletin, 96, 435–464.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lakey, B., & Heller, K. (1988). Social support fromafriend, perceived support, and social problem solving.American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 811–824.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lash, S.J., Gillespie, B.L., Eisler, R.M., & Southard, D.R.(1991). Sex differencesincardiovascular reactivity: Effects of the gender relevance of the stressor.Health Psychology, 10, 392–398.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Manuck, S. B. (1994). Cardiovascular reactivity in cardiovascular disease: “Once more unto the breach.”International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1, 4–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Manuck, S. B., Cohen, S., Rabin, B. S., Muldoon, M. F., & Bachen, E. A. (1991). Individual differences in cellular immune response to stress.Psychological Science, 2, 111–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Martin, C. L. (1990). Attitudes and expectations about children with nontraditional and traditional gender roles.Sex Roles, 22, 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Matthews, K.A.(1989). Interactive effects ofbehavior and reproductive hormonesonsex differences in risk for coronary heart disease.Health Psychology, 8, 373–387.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Matthews, K. A., Weiss, M. S., Detre, T., Dembroski, T.M., Falkner, B., Manuck, S. B., & Williams, R. B. (Eds.). (1986).Handbook of stress, reactivity, and cardiovascular disease. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. O’Neil, J. M., Helms, B. J., Gable, R. K., David, L., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1986). Gender-role conflict scale: College men’s fear of femininity.Sex Roles, 14, 335–350.Google Scholar
  22. Sgoutas-Emch, S. A., Cacioppo, J. T., Uchino, B. N., Malarkey, W., Pearl, D., Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Glaser, R. (1994). The effects of an acute psychological stressor on cardiovascular, endocrine, and cellular immune response: A prospective study of individuals high and low in heart rate reactivity.Psychophysiology, 31, 264–271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sharpley, C. F., & Scuderi, C. S. (1994). Gender and age correlates of adults’ heart rate reactivity to a brief psychological stressor: Implications for Australian research and practice.Australian Psychologist, 29(1), 41–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stone, S. V., Dembroski, T.M., Costa, P.T., & MacDougall, J. M.(1990). Gender differencesin cardiovascular reactivity.Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 13, 137–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stoney, C. M., Davis, M. C., & Matthews, K. A. (1987). Sex differences in physiological responses to stress and in coronary heart disease: A causal link?Psychophysiology, 24, 127–131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tomaka, J., & Blascovich, J. (1994). Effects of justice beliefs on cognitive appraisal of and subjective, physiological, and behavioral responses to potential stress.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 732–740.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tomaka, J., Blascovich, J., Kelsey, R.M., & Leitten, C. L.(1993). Subjective, physiological, and behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 248–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tomaka, J., Blascovich, J., Kibler, J., & Ernst, J. M. (1997). Cognitive and physiological antecedents of threat and challenge appraisal.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 63–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Uchino, B. N., Cacioppo, J. T., Malarkey, W., & Glaser, R. (1995). Individual differences in cardiac sympathetic control predict endocrine and immune responses to acute psychological stress.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 736–743.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julianne Holt-Lunstad
    • 1
  • Claudia J. Clayton
    • 2
  • Bert N. Uchino
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyBrigham Young UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations