Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 257–268 | Cite as

Correlates of adherence and contamination in a randomized controlled trial of exercise in cancer survivors: An application of the theory of planned behavior and the five factor model of personality

  • Kerry S. Courneya
  • Christine M. Friedenreich
  • Rami A. Sela
  • H. Arthur Quinney
  • Ryan E. Rhodes


In this study, we examined correlates of adherence and contamination in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of exercise in cancer survivors using the theory of planned behavior and the Five Factor Model of personality (FFM). We randomly assigned cancer survivors in group psychotherapy classes to either a waiting-list control group (n = 45) or a home-based, moderate intensity exercise program (n = 51). At baseline, participants completed measures of the theory of planned behavior, the FFM, past exercise, physical fitness, medical variables, and demographics. We then monitored exercise over a 10-week period by weekly self-reports. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses indicated that the independent predictors of overall RCT exercise across both conditions were past exercise (β = .36, p > .001), assignment to experimental condition (β = .34, p > .001), sex (β = .30, p > .001), and intention (β = .14, p > .10). For exercise adherence in the exercise condition, the independent predictors were sex (β = .38, p > .01), extraversion (β = .30, p > .05), normative beliefs (β = -.27, p > .05), and perceived behavioral control (β = .23, p > .10). Finally, the independent predictors of exercise contamination in the control condition were past exercise (β = .70, p > .001), sex (β = .20, p > .05), and intention (β = .17, p > .10). We conclude that the correlates of exercise adherence and contamination differ in kind as well as in degree. Explanations for these findings and practical implications for conducting exercise RCTs in this population are offered.


Cancer Survivor Breast Cancer Survivor Behavioral Medicine Plan Behavior Normative Belief 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    Courneya KS, Mackey JR, McKenzie DC: Exercise after breast cancer: Research evidence and clinical guidelines.The Physician and Sportsmedicine (in press).Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Courneya KS, Mackey JR, Rhodes RE: Exercise and cancers other than breast. In LeMura LM, von Duvillard SP (eds),Clinical Exercise Physiology: Application and Physiological Principles. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (in press).Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    MacVicar MG, Winningham ML: Response of cancer patients on chemotherapy to a supervised exercise program.Cancer Bulletin. 1986,13:265–274.Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    Winningham ML, MacVicar MG: The effect of aerobic exercise on patient reports of nausea.Oncology Nursing Forum. 1988,15:447–450.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Young-McCaughan S, Sexton DL: A retrospective investigation of the relationship between aerobic exercise and quality of life in women with breast cancer.Oncology Nursing Forum. 1991,18:751–757.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    Courneya KS, Friedenreich CM, Sela RA, et al.: The group psychotherapy and home-based physical exercise (GROUP-HOPE) trial in cancer survivors: Physical fitness and quality of life outcomes.Psycho-Oncology (in press).Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    Mock V, Pickett M, Ropka ME, et al.: Fatigue and quality of life outcomes of exercise during cancer treatment.Cancer Practice. 2001,9:119–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Segal R, Evans W, Johnson D, et al.: Structured exercise improves physical functioning in women with stages I and II breast cancer: Results of a randomized controlled trial.Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2001,19:657–665.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Martin KA, Sinden AR: Who will stay and who will go? A review of older adults’ adherence to randomized controlled trials of exercise.Journal of Aging and Physical Activity. 2001,9:91–114.Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    Shumaker SA, Rejeski WJ: Adherence to behavioral and pharmacological interventions in clinical research on older adults.Controlled Clinical Trials. 2000,21:155S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Schwartz AL: Exercise and weight gain in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.Cancer Practice. 2000,8:231–237.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    Courneya KS, Blanchard CM, Laing DM: Exercise adherence in breast cancer survivors training for a dragon boat race competition: A preliminary investigation.Psycho-Oncology. 2001,10:444–452.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Rejeski WJ, Brawley LR, McAuley E, Rapp S: An examination of theory and behavior change in randomized clinical trials.Controlled Clinical Trials. 2000,21:164S-S170S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    Shumaker SA, Dugan E, Bowen DJ: Enhancing adherence in randomized controlled clinicaltrials.ControlledClinical Trials. 2000,21:226S-232S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    Ajzen I: The theory of planned behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991,50:179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    Costa PT, McCrae RR:Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1992.Google Scholar
  17. (17).
    Courneya KS, Friedenreich CM: Determinants of exercise behavior during colorectal cancer treatment: An application of the theory of planned behavior.Oncology Nursing Forum. 1997,24:1715–1723.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    Courneya KS, Friedenreich CM:Utility of the theory of planned behavior for understanding exercise during breast cancer treatment.Psycho-Oncology. 1999,8:112–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    Courneya KS, Friedenreich CM, Arthur K, Bobick TM: Understanding exercise motivation in colorectal cancer patients: A prospective study using the theory of planned behavior.Rehabilitation Psychology. 1999,44:68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. (20).
    Courneya KS, Keats MR, Turner AR: Social cognitive determinants of hospital-based exercise in cancer patients following high dose chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation.International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2000,7:189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    Digman JM: Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model.Annual Review of Psychology. 1990,41:417–440.Google Scholar
  22. (22).
    McCrae RR, John OP: An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications.Journal of Personality. 1992,60:175–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    Marshall GN, Wortman CB, Vickers RR, Kusulas JW, Hervig LK: The five-factor model of personality as a framework for personality-health research.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994,67:278–286.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. (24).
    Courneya KS, Bobick TM, Schinke RJ: Does the theory of planned behavior mediate the relation between personality and exercise behavior?Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 1999,21:317–324.Google Scholar
  25. (25).
    Courneya KS, Hellsten LM: Personality correlates of exercise behavior, motives, barriers, and preferences: An application of the Five-Factor Model.Personality and Individual Differences. 1998,24:625–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. (26).
    Rhodes RE, Courneya KS, Bobick TM: Personality and exercise participation across the breast cancer experience.Psycho-Oncology. 2001,10:380–388.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. (27).
    Dishman RK, Sallis JF: Determinants and interventions for physical activity and exercise. In Bouchard C, Shephard RJ, Stephens T (eds),Physical Activity, Fitness and Health: Consensus Statement. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1994, 214–238.Google Scholar
  28. (28).
    Thomas S, Reading J, Shephard RJ: Revision of the physical activity readiness questionnaire (PAR-Q).Canadian Journal of Sport Sciences. 1992,17:338–345.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. (29).
    American College of Sports Medicine: Position stand on exercise and physical activity for older adults.Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 1998,30:992–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. (30).
    Godin G, Jobin J, Bouillon J: Assessment of leisure time exercise behavior by self-report: A concurrent validity study.Canadian Journal of Public Health. 1986,77:359–361.Google Scholar
  31. (31).
    Godin G, Shepard RJ: A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community.Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences. 1985,10:141–146.Google Scholar
  32. (32).
    Jacobs DR, Ainsworth BE, Hartman TJ, Leon AS: A simultaneous evaluation often commonly used physical activity questionnaires.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1985,25:81–91.Google Scholar
  33. (33).
    Courneya KS: Predicting repeated behavior from intention: The issue of scale correspondence.Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1994,24:580–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. (34).
    Ajzen I:Construction of a Standard Questionnaire for the Theory of Planned Behavior. Retrieved August 10, 2001 from http:// www-unix. Scholar
  35. (35).
    American College of Sports Medicine:Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1991.Google Scholar
  36. (36).
    McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL:Exercise Physiology, Energy, Nutrition, and Human Performance. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1991.Google Scholar
  37. (37).
    Baumgartner TA, Jackson AS:Measurement for Evaluation in Physical Education and Exercise Science. Dubuque, IA: Brown, 1995.Google Scholar
  38. (38).
    Cohen J:A power primer.Psychological Bulletin. 1992,112:155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. (39).
    Rejeski WJ, Brawley LR, Ettinger W, Morgan T, Thompson C: Compliance to exercise therapy in older participants with knee osteoarthritis: Implications for treating disability.Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1997,29:977–985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. (40).
    Godin G, Kok G: The theory of planned behavior: A review of its applications to health-related behaviors.American Journal of Health Promotion. 1996,11:87–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. (41).
    Taylor SE, Falke RL, Shoptaw SJ, Lichtman RR: Social support, support groups, and the cancer patient.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1986,54:608–615.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kerry S. Courneya
    • 1
  • Christine M. Friedenreich
    • 2
  • Rami A. Sela
    • 1
  • H. Arthur Quinney
    • 1
  • Ryan E. Rhodes
    • 3
  1. 1.University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Alberta Cancer BoardCanada
  3. 3.University of VictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations