Annals of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 22–33 | Cite as

The daily spiritual experience scale: development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data



Spirituality and religiousness are gaining increasing attention as health research variables. However, the particular aspects examined vary from study to study, ranging from church attendance to religious coping to meaning in life. This frequently results in a lack of clarity regarding what is being measured, the meaning of the relationships between health variables and spirituality, and implications for action. This article describes the Daily Spiritual Experience Scale (DSES) and its development, reliability, exploratory factor analyses, and preliminary construct validity. Normative data from random samples and preliminary relationships of health-related data with the DSES also are included. Detailed data for the 16-item DSES are provided from two studies; a third study provided data on a subset of 6 items, and a fourth study was done on the interrater reliability of the item subset. A 6-item version was used in the General Social Survey because of the need to shorten the measure for the survey. A rationale for the conceptual underpinnings and item selection is provided, as are suggested pathways for linkages to health and well-being. This scale addresses reported ordinary experiences of spirituality such as awe, joy that lifts one out of the mundane, and a sense of deep inner peace. Studies using the DSES may identify ways in which this element of life may influence emotion, cognition and behavior, and health or ways in which this element may be treated as an outcome in itself, a particular component of well-being. The DSES evidenced good reliability across several studies with internal consistency estimates in the .90s. Preliminary evidence showed that daily spiritual experience is related to decreased total alcohol intake, improved quality of life, and positive psychosocial status.


Exploratory Factor Analysis Behavioral Medicine Religious Coping General Social Survey Spiritual Experience 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    James W:The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. New York: Modern Library, 1994 (1902).Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Strawbridge WJ, Cohen RD, Shema SJ, Kaplan GA: Frequent attendance at religious services and mortality over 28 years.American Journal of Public Health. 1997,8:957–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Levin JS: How religion influences morbidity and health: Reflections on natural history, salutogenesis, and host resistance.Social Science and Medicine. 1996,43:849–864.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Pargament KI, Smith BW, Koenig HG, Perez L: Patterns of positive and negative religious coping with major life stressors.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 1998,37:710–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Koenig HG:Is Religion Good for Your Health? Binghamton, NY: Haworth, 1997.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Sloan RP, Bagiella E, Powell T: Religion, spirituality, and medicine.Lancet. 1999,353:664–667.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Fetzer Institute, National Institute on Aging Working Group: Multidimensional Measurement of Religiousness, Spirituality for Use in Health Research.A Report of a National Working Group Supported by the Fetzer Institute in Collaboration With the National Institute on Aging. Kalamazoo, MI: Fetzer Institute, 1999.Google Scholar
  8. (8).
    Bradley MB, Green NM, Jones DE, Lynn M, McNeil L:Churches and Church Membership in the United States: 1990. Atlanta, GA: Glenmary Research Institute, 1992.Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    Koenig H, Futterman A: Religion and Health Outcomes: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature. Methodological Approaches to the Study of Religion, Aging, and Health. Washington, DC: 1995.Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    Hoge D: A validated intrinsic religious motivation scale.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 1972,11:369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Idler EL, Kasl SV: Religion among disabled and nondisabled elderly persons: I. Cross-sectional patterns in health practices, social activities, and well-being.Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences. 1997,52B:S294-S305.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    Benson PL, Donahue MJ, Erickson JA: The Faith Maturity Scale: Conceptualization, measurement, and empirical validation. In Lynn ML, Moberg DO (eds),Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion (Vol. 5). Greenwich, CT: JAI, 1993, 1–26.Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    Schwartz SH, Bilsky W: Toward a universal psychological structure of human values.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987,53:550–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    McGinn B: The letter and the spirit: Spirituality as an academic discipline.Christian Spirituality Bulletin. 1993,1(2):2–9.Google Scholar
  15. (15).
    Underwood L: A working model of health: Spirituality and religiousness as resources: Applications to persons with disability.Journal of Religion, Disability and Health. 1999,3(3):55–71.Google Scholar
  16. (16).
    Tononi G, Edelman G: Consciousness and complexity.Science. 1998,282:1846–1851.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Bennett WJ: Neuroscience and the human spirit.National Review. 1998,50(25):32–35.Google Scholar
  18. (18).
    Damasio A:Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Avon, 1994.Google Scholar
  19. (19).
    Hood R: The construction and preliminary validation of a measure of reported mystical experience.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 1975,22:353–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. (20).
    Underhill E:Practical Mysticism. New York: Dutton, 1914.Google Scholar
  21. (21).
    Pargament KI:The Psychology of Religion and Coping: Theory, Research, Practice. New York: Guilford, 1997.Google Scholar
  22. (22).
    Allport G, Ross J: Personal religious orientation and prejudice.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1967,5:447–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    Paloutzian RF, Ellison CW: Loneliness, spiritual well-being and quality of life. In Peplau LA, Perlman D (eds),Loneliness: A Sourcebook of Current Theory, Research, Research and Therapy. New York: Wiley Interscience, 1982, 224–237.Google Scholar
  24. (24).
    Ellison CW: Spiritual well-being: Conceptualization and measurement.Journal of Psychology and Theology. 1983,11:330–340.Google Scholar
  25. (25).
    Williams DR: Commitment. In Fetzer Institute, National Institute on Aging Working Group: Multidimensional Measurement of Religiousness/Spirituality for Use in Health Research,A Report of a National Working Group Supported by the Fetzer Institute in Collaboration with the National Institute on Aging. Kalamazoo, MI: Fetzer Institute, 1999, 72.Google Scholar
  26. (26).
    Cohen S, Kessler R, Underwood-Gordon L (eds):Measuring Stress: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  27. (27).
    Stone AA, Bovbjerg DH: Stress and humoral immunity: A review of the human studies.Advanced Neuroimmunology. 1994,4:49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. (28).
    Flood AB, Lorence DP, Ding J, et al.: The role of expectations in patients’ reports of post-operative outcomes and improvement following therapy.Medical Care. 1993,31:1043–1056.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. (29).
    Roberts AH, Kewman DG, Mercier L, et al.: The power of nonspecific effects in healing: Implications for psychosocial and biological treatments.Clinical Psychology Review. 1995,12:375–391.Google Scholar
  30. (30).
    Davidson R, Kabat-Zinn J, Schumacher J, {eaet al.}: Alterations in Brain and Immune Function Produced by Mindfulness Meditation. Manuscript submitted for publication, 2002.Google Scholar
  31. (31).
    Hummer RA, Rogers RG, Nam CB, et al.: Religious involvement and U.S. adult mortality.Demography. 1999,36:273–285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. (32).
    Idler EL, Kasl SV: Religion among disabled and nondisabled elderly persons: II. Attendance at religious services as a predictor of the course of disability.Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences. 1997,52B:S306-S316.Google Scholar
  33. (33).
    Oxman TE, FreemanJr. DH, Manheimer ED: Lack of social participation or religious strength and comfort as risk factors for death after cardiac surgery in the elderly.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1995,57:5–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. (34).
    Elkins DN, Hedstrom LJ, Hughes LL, Leaf JA, Saunders C: Toward a humanistic-phenomenological spirituality: Definition, description, and measurement.Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 1988,28(4):5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. (35).
    Buber M:I and Thou (Kaufmann W, trans.). New York: Touchstone, 1996 (1937).Google Scholar
  36. (36).
    De Wit H:Contemplative Psychology. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne, 1991.Google Scholar
  37. (37).
    Hanh TN:A Joyful Path: Community, Transformation and Peace. Berkeley, CA: Parallax, 1994.Google Scholar
  38. (38).
    Merton T:Life & Holiness. New York: Doubleday, 1969.Google Scholar
  39. (39).
    van Kaam A:Formation of the Human Heart (Formative Spirituality Series, Vol. 3). New York: Crossroads, 1991.Google Scholar
  40. (40).
    Smith H:The World’s Religions: Our Great Wisdom Tradition (Rev. Ed.). San Francisco: Harper, 1991.Google Scholar
  41. (41).
    van Kaam A:Fundamental Formation (Formative Spirituality Series, Vol. 1). New York: Crossroads, 1986.Google Scholar
  42. (42).
    Steindl-Rast D:Gratefulness, the Heart of Prayer—An Approach to Life in Fullness. New York: Paulist, 1984.Google Scholar
  43. (43).
    Vacek EC:Love, Human & Divine: The Heart of Christian Ethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  44. (44).
    Vanier J:Becoming Human. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist, 1999.Google Scholar
  45. (45).
    {au{fnLofty} {gnM}}: WHO and Spirituality, Religiousness and Personal Beliefs (SRPB): Report on WHO Consultation June 22-24, 1998. Unpublished report. World Health Organization, Division of Mental Health and Prevention of Substance Abuse. 1998.Google Scholar
  46. (46).
    David JA, Smith TW, Marsden PV:General Social Surveys, 1972-2000 Cumulative Codebook. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center, 2001.Google Scholar
  47. (47).
    Keefe FF, Affleck G, Lefebvre J, et al.: Living with rheumatoid arthritis: The role of daily spirituality and daily religious and spiritual coping.Journal of Pain. 2001,2:101–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. (48).
    Tonigan J, Walter S, Underwood L: Test-Retest Study of the Brief Measure of Religiousness and Spirituality Among Treatment Seeking Substance Users. Manuscript submitted for publication, 2002.Google Scholar
  49. (49).
    Ellison C: Religious involvement and self perception among Black Americans.Social Forces. 1993,71:1027–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. (50).
    Spielberger CD, Gorush R, Lushene R, Vagg P, Jacobs G:Manual: For the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  51. (51).
    Radloff LS: The CES-D scale: A self report depression scale for research in the general population.Applied Psychological Measurement. 1977,1:385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. (52).
    Cohen S, Karmarck T, Mermelstein R: A global measure of perceived stress.Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1983,24:385–396.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. (53).
    Scheirer MF, Carver CS, Bridges MW: Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994,67:1063–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. (54).
    Seeman TE, Berkman LF: Structural characteristics of social networks and their relationship with support in the elderly.Social Science and Medicine. 1988,7:737–749.Google Scholar
  55. (55).
    McHorney CA, Ware Jr. JE, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups.Medical Care. 1994,32:40–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. (56).
    Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1988,54: 1063–1070.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. (57).
    Underwood LG: The human experience of compassionate love: Conceptual mapping and data from selected studies. In Post SG, Underwood LG, Schloss JP, Hurlbut WB (eds),Altruism and Altruistic Love: Science, Philosophy, and Religion in Dialogue. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  58. (58).
    Cohen S, Underwood L, Gottlieb B (eds):Social Support Measurement and Intervention: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  59. (59).
    Cohen S, Doyle WJ, Skoner DP, Rabin BS, GwaltneyJr. JM: Social ties and susceptibility to the common cold.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1997,227:1940–1944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. (60).
    Brown J:The Self. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fetzer InstituteKalamazoo
  2. 2.Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale and Columbia University Stroud CenterUSA

Personalised recommendations