Skip to main content
Log in

The effect on model identifiability of allowing different relocation rates for live and dead animals in the combined analysis of telemetry and recapture data

  • Editor’s Invited Article
  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Models are described for the joint analysis of live-trapping and radio telemetry data from a study on black bears (Ursus americanus) in which all animals received ear tags and a subset also received radio tags. Concerns about bias in survival estimates led to investigation of identifiability and estimator precision for a series of models that allowed differenttelemetry relocation rates for living and dead animals, in addition to emigration and seasonal variation in survival. Identifiability was determined by showing that the expected information matrix was nonsingular. Models with fidelity constant across time, and with the same degree of time specificity for survival rates and relocation rates for dead animals, were determined to be nonidentifiable. More general models, with a greater degree of time specificity for survival rates, were near-singular, and estimators under these near-singular models had poor precision. Analysis of data from the study on black bears illustrated that estimates of survival have poor precision when relocation rates are estimated separately for live and dead animals. It is recommended that the effort expended to relocate both living and dead animals be consistently high in each telemetry survey, so that relocation rates will be high and constant across time and mortality status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azzalini, A. (1996), Statistical Inference Based On The Likelihood, New York: Chapman & Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bennetts, R. E., Dreitz, V. J., Kitchens, W. M., Hines, J. E., and Nichols, J. D. (1999), “Annual Survival of Snail Kites in Florida: Comparisons Between Radio-Telemetry and Capture-Resighting Data,” Auk, 116, 435–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole, E. A., Freeman, S. N., and Morgan, B. J. T. (1996), “Steps to Parameter Redundancy in Age-Dependent Recovery Models,” Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 58, 763–774.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole, E. A., Kgosi, P. M., and Morgan, B. J. T. (2001), “On the Near-Singularity of Models For Animal Recovery Data,” Biometrics, 57, 720–726.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole, E. A., and Morgan, B. J. T. (1997), “Detecting Parameter Redundancy,” Biometrika, 84, 187–196.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (2001), “Deficiency of Parameter-Redundant Models,” Biometrika, 88, 593–598.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole, E. A., Morgan, B. J. T., and Freeman, S. N. (1998), “Estimation in Parameter-Redundant Models,” Biometrika, 85, 462–468.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hightower, J. E., Jackson, J. R., and Pollock, K. H. (2001), “Use of Telemetry Methods to Estimate Natural and Fishing Mortality of Striped Bass in Lake Gaston, North Carolina,” Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 130, 557–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Mathematical and Statistical Libraries, Inc. (1987), User’s Mannual STAT/Library FORTRAN Subroutines for Statistical Analysis, Houston, TX: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasution, M. D. (2000), “Estimating Survival from Joint Analysis of Resighting and Radio-Telemetry Data in Wildlife Populations” unpublished doctoral dissertation, North Carolina State University at Raleigh, Dept. of Statistics

  • Nasution, M. D., Brownie, C., and Pollock, K. H. (2001), “Estimating Survival. From Joint Analysis of Resighting and Radio-telemetry Capture-recapture Data For Wild Animals,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 6, 461–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, K. H., Bunck, C. M., Winterstein, S. R. and Chen, C. L. (1995), “A Capture-Recapture Survival Analysis Model for Radio Tagged Animals,” Journal of Applied Statistics, 22, 661–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, S. R. (1982), Matrix Algebra Useful For Statistics, New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, V. A., and Powell, R. A. (1998), “Estimating Survival Rates of Black Bears,” Canadian Journal of Zoology, 76, 1335–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, K., Pollock, K. H., and Brownie, C. (1999), “Effects of Violation of Assumptions for Survival Analysis methods in Radiotelemetry Studies,” Journal of Wildlife Management, 63, 1369–1375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viallefont, A., Lebreton, J. D., Reboulet, A. M., and Gory, G. (1998), “Parameter Identifiability and Model Selection in Capture Recapture Models: A Numerical Approach,” Biometrical Journal, 40, 313–325.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • White, G. C. (1983), “Numerical Estimation Of Survival Rates From Band-Recovery and Biotelemetry Data,” Journal of Wildlife Management, 47, 716–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marlina D. Nasution.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nasution, M.D., Brownie, C., Pollock, K.H. et al. The effect on model identifiability of allowing different relocation rates for live and dead animals in the combined analysis of telemetry and recapture data. JABES 9, 27–41 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1198/1085711043181

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/1085711043181

Key Words

Navigation