Skip to main content
Log in

Model-Based clustering for cross-sectional time series data

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A model-based clustering method for cross-sectional time series data is proposed and applied to crop insurance programs. To design an effective grouprisk plan, an important step is to group together the farms that resemble each other and decide the number of clusters, both of which can be achieved via the model-based clustering. The mixture maximum likelihood is employed for inferences. However, with the presence of correlation and missing values, the exact maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) are difficult to obtain. An approach for obtaining approximate MLEs is proposed and evaluated through simulation studies. A bootstrapping method is used to choose the number of components in the mixture model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banfield, J. D., and Raftery, A. E. (1993), “Model-Based Gaussian and Non-Gaussian Clustering,” Biometrics, 49, 803–821.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bozdogan, H. (1993), “Choosing the Number of Component Clusters in the Mixture-Model Using a New Information Complexity Criterion of the Inverse-Fisher Information Matrix,” in Studies in Classification. Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization, eds. O. Opitz, B. Lausen, and R. Klar, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 40–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozdogan, H., and Scolve, S. L. (1984), “Multi-Sample Cluster Analysis Using Akaike’s Information Criterion,” Ann. Inst. Statist. Math., 36, 163–180.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P., and Williamson, J. A. (1978), “Asymptotic Behavior of Classification Maximum Likelihood Estimates,” Biometrika, 65, 272–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., and Cheng, P. (1997), “On Testing the Number of Components in Finite Mixture Models With Known Relevant Component Distributions,” Canadian Journal of Statistics, 25, 389–400.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dacunha-Castelle, D., and Gassiat, E. (1997), “The Estimation of the Order of a Mixture Model,” Bernoulli, 3, 279–299.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, B. S., and Hand, D. J. (1981), Finite Mixture Distributions, London: Chapman and Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Z. Z., and McCulloch, C. E. (1996), “Using Bootstrap Likelihood Ratios in Finite Mixture Models,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 58, 609–617.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, H. P., and Rubin, J. (1967), “On Some Invariant Criterion for Grouping,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 1159–1178.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, A. D. (1981), Classification: Methods for the Exploratory Analysis of Multivariate Data, New York: Chapman and Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan, J. A. (1985), “A Failure of Likelihood Asymptotic for Normal Mixtures,” in Proceedings of the Berkeley Conference in Honor of Jerzy Neyman and Jack Kiefer (Vol. II), ed. L. LeCam and R. A. Olshen, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth and Brooks, pp. 807–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy, D. A., Babcock, B. A., and Hayes, D. J. (1997), “Budgetary and Producer Welfare Effects of Revenue Insurance,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79, 1024–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, G. J. (1982), “The Classification and Mixture Maximum Likelihood Approaches to Cluster Analysis,” in Handbook of Statistics (Vol. 2), eds. P. R. Krishnaiah and L. N. Kanal, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1982), “On Bootstrapping the Likelihood Ratio Test Statistic for the Number of Components in Normal Mixture,” Applied Statistics, 36, 318–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, G. L., and Basford, K. E. (1988), “Maximum Models: Inferences and Applications to Clustering. New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marriott, F. H. C. (1975), “Separating Mixtures of Normal Distributions,” Biometrics, 31, 767–769.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, C. H. (1991), “The Influence of Distributional Assumption on the Calculation of Crop Insurance Premia,” North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics, 12, 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redner, R. A., and Walker, H. F. (1984), “Mixture Densities, Maximum Likelihood and the EM Algorithm,” SIAM Reviews, 26, 195–239.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Roeder, K. (1994), “A Graphical Technique for Determining the Number of Components in a Mixture of Normals,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 487–495.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Scolve, S. L. (1983), “Application of the Conditional Population-Mixture Model to Image Segmentation,” IEEE Transactions an Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 5, 428–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symons, M. (1981), “Clustering Criteria and Multivariate Normal Mixtures,” Biometrics, 37, 35–43.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Titterington, D. M. (1990), “Some Recent Research on the Analysis of Mixture Distributions,” Statistics, 21, 619–641.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Titterington, D. M., Smith, A. F. M., and Makov, U. E. (1985), Statistical Analysis of Finite Mixture Distributions. London: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. H., Hanson, S. D., Myers, R. J., and Black, J. R. (1998), “The Effects of Yield Insurance Designs on Farmer Participation and Welfare,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80, 806–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture. (1978), “Palouse Cooperative River Basin Study”, in Cooperative Study by Soil Conservation Service, Forest Service, and Economics, Statistics, and Cooperatives Service of Whitman Couty, WA, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office. (1995), “Crop Insurance Additional Actions Could Further Improve Programs’s Financial Condition,” im Report to the Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, U.S. Senate GAO/RCED-95-269, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, H.H., Zhang, H. Model-Based clustering for cross-sectional time series data. JABES 7, 107–127 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1198/108571102317475099

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/108571102317475099

Key Words

Navigation