Comparative evaluation of fluoride varnishes, self-assembling peptide-based remineralization agent, and enamel matrix protein derivative on artificial enamel remineralization in vitro



One of the most unfavorable side effects of fixed orthodontic treatment is white spot lesions (WSLs). Although the most important approach is prevention of WSLs, it is also essential to evaluate the efficacy of the remineralization agents. However, there is no concurrence in the literature with respect to the remineralization process of these agents. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of different fluoride varnishes, enamel matrix protein, and self-assembling peptide derivatives with varying chemical compositions on remineralization of artificially created WSLs in vitro using quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF).


Artificial WSLs were created on bovine enamel samples using acidic buffer solution (pH 5, 10 days). Specimens were randomly allocated to six groups (n = 10/group): (1) Emdogain (Straumann, Basel, Switzerland), (2) Curodont Repair (Credentis AG, Switzerland), (3) Duraphat (Colgate-Palmolive, New York, NY), (4) Clinpro XT (3 M ESPE, Pymble, New South Wales, Australia), (5) Enamel Pro Varnish (Premier Dental Products, PA, USA), and (6) control (untreated). The agents were applied to the WSLs according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Fluorescence loss (ΔF), lesion area (area), and impact (ΔQ) values of enamel surfaces were quantified by QLF-D BiluminatorTM (Inspektor-Pro, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) at baseline and after 7, 14, and 21 days of application of the respective materials.


ΔF value presented a significantly decreasing trend throughout the 21 days for all groups except the Duraphat and Enamel Pro varnishes. The changes between 14th and 21st days of the Clinpro XT varnish application were significantly higher than Emdogain, Curodont, and Enamel Pro. The Curodont group showed higher lesion area changes between the first and second week in comparison to the Emdogain, Clinpro XT, and Enamel Pro groups, whereas Clinpro XT assured the highest reduction from the second to the third week of the observation period.


The fluorescence loss was significantly reduced with enamel matrix protein, self-assembling peptide, and light-curable fluoride varnishes in the analysis for 21 days. Curodont and Clinpro XT were effective in diminishing the fluorescence loss and lesion area compared to the Duraphat, Enamel Pro fluoride varnishes, and Emdogain in different time points.


White spot lesion (WSL) is the first clinical sign of enamel demineralization which may progress to dental caries or an arrested demineralized area if not treated at an early stage [1]. Fixed orthodontic appliances cause retentive areas that are difficult to ensure the oral hygiene, which leads to plaque accumulation. The risk of WSL formation increases due to orthodontic treatment with a reported incidence of 46–73% [1, 2], especially in patients with poor oral hygiene [3].

The most important aspect of WSL management is the prevention of new lesions forming. Good oral hygiene maintenance, reducing dietary carbohydrate consumption, and using fluoridated dental care materials constitute the main prerequisites for this purpose [4]. For the treatment of already present lesions, minimally invasive treatments are advocated for the maximum preservation of healthy enamel and remineralization of affected areas [4, 5]. Current approaches for remineralization of initial lesions aim to reduce the solubility of enamel by inhibiting the demineralization of hydroxyapatites. The most established element for prevention against caries is fluoride, which aims to harden the mineral surface layer and inhibit its progression. Fluoride, best known for its preventive effect on caries, aims at hardening the mineral surface layer, thus inactivating the caries by inhibiting its progression [5]. Among all the methods of fluoride application, fluoride varnish is the preferred method as they are less dependent on patient compliance [6]. However, fluoride does not diffuse in the demineralized subsurface zone [7] and conventional fluoride varnish have to be applied repeated range from once every 2 weeks to four topical applications a year to maintain their effectiveness. Currently, fluoride varnish application is being used in a conventional and light-curable form to reduce the frequent application [6].

With the advent of enamel matrix proteins, self-assembling peptides were shown to be used in the remineralization process of enamel, dentin, and cementum [6]. Self-assembling peptides form a three-dimensional matrix that helps the remineralization of subsurface lesions. The short hydrophilic peptide within their molecular design enables the assembly of the structure into the fibers. It has been reported that the self-assembling peptide P11-4 with high affinity to calcium ions in saliva also leads to the formation of enamel crystals around the enamel matrix. The self-assembling peptide described in combination with guided enamel regeneration is based on the rational design of a short hydrophilic peptide that assembles into fibers, forming a 3-dimensional matrix that has been used for remineralization of subsurface lesions [7, 8]. It has been reported that the self-assembling peptide P11-4 with high affinity to calcium ions in saliva also leads to the formation of enamel crystals around the enamel matrix [9]. As a commercially available product, Emdogain, which is mainly used for guided tissue regeneration, is composed of the hydrophobic enamel matrix proteins [10]. This revolutionary product also has attracted much attention for the remineralization process of enamel in the past years. Its protein constituents have been claimed to have the potential to advocate remineralization process of enamel and dentin [10, 11]. However, only a few studies [11,12,13,14] have been evaluated its potential.

There is a growing body of literature that recognizes the role of fluoride varnishes; however, to the best of our knowledge, despite the frequent use of fluoride products as prophylaxis, no in vivo or in vitro study has directly or indirectly compared the effect of varying fluoride varnishes, self-assembling peptides, and enamel matrix protein on enamel demineralization. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to compare the effects of topical application of conventional fluoride varnishes, light-curable fluoride varnish, self-assembling peptides, and enamel matrix proteins in the treatment of enamel demineralization in vitro by means of quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF). The null hypothesis was that the application of fluoride varnishes, self-assembling peptides, and enamel matrix proteins cannot improve the remineralization process of WSLs.


Sample preparation

Bovine incisors (n = 10/group) stored in 0.5% chloramine solution at 4 °C no longer than 6 months were initially cut from their roots under water irrigation. Enamel discs with a diameter of 5 mm were cut from the labial aspect of each crown using a custom-made diamond-coated trephine bur (80 μm, Intensiv SA, Lugano-Grancia, Switzerland). They were then flattened from the bottom to approximately 3 mm in height (Struers, Birmensdorf, Switzerland). Each piece was randomly allocated to six groups. They were embedded with their labial surfaces exposed in auto-polymerizing acrylic resin (Palapress; Heraeus Kulzer, Wehrheim, Germany) in cylindrical molds with a size of 6 mm diameter and 3 mm thickness. The specimens were ground flat and polished with water-cooled carborundum discs (1200, 2400, and 4000 grit; Struers, Erkrat, Germany) and stored in tap water until demineralization procedure. The enamel surface was covered with a perforated tape, leaving a defined area in 3 mm diameter. The remaining area was demineralized in an acidic buffer solution for 14 days.

Demineralization procedure

Demineralization was achieved by immersing the specimens in acidic buffer solution (pH 5, 37 °C, 10 days) according to Buskes et al. [15]. The solution was renewed each second day to keep the pH constant. Subsequently, specimens were removed from the solution and thoroughly washed with deionized water. Examination of samples was performed under magnification to determine the opacity change before the experiment (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

The opacity change of a demineralized bovine incisor

Remineralization procedures

Following demineralization, the specimens were treated by one-time application of the undermentioned groups as follows:

  1. (1)

    Enamel matrix proteins: Lyophilized Emdogain (Straumann, Basel, Switzerland) was dissolved in 1 mL 0.05 M acetic acid and stored for 30 min at 4 °C to a final concentration of 30 mg/mL and delivered from syringes loaded with 0.7 mL. During each treatment, one drop of Emdogain gel was placed on the surface of the carious lesion and daubed into a very thin layer that covered the lesion surface.

  2. (2)

    Self-assembling peptide (SAP): Curodont (Curodont Repair, Credentis AG, Switzerland) (P11-4 oligopeptide solution) was mixed with 0.05 mL deionized water, and one drop was applied and left for 5 min on the demineralized enamel surfaces.

  3. (3)

    Duraphat varnish (Colgate-Palmolive, New York, NY) (5% NaF and 2.26% F): The enamel surface received a single topical application of a conventional fluoride varnish with a brush applicator after mixing thoroughly.

  4. (4)

    Clinpro XT (3 M ESPE, Pymble, New South Wales, Australia): The paste and the liquid components were mixed for 15 s using an agate spatula. Consistent mix was then applied as a thin layer over the etched enamel surface with the aid of applicator brush and light-cured for 20 s.

  5. (5)

    Enamel Pro Varnish (Premier Dental Products, PA, USA): Varnish was stirred with an applicator brush and mixed thoroughly. A thin coat of varnish applied across tooth surfaces.

  6. (6)

    Control: Specimens remained untreated. The chemical compositions of the materials are summarized in Table 1. All procedures involving air/water syringe were performed using a custom-made device assuring standard distance to the specimens from the application tips and standard pressures provided by the air/water syringe. After storing the specimens in artificial saliva at room temperature for 4 h, the remineralization products were carefully removed with the swabs and 50% acetone solution. The tapes were then removed and the specimens were then submerged back into the renewed artificial saliva to imitate the intraoral conditions. Artificial saliva was prepared according to the formula given by Klimek et al. [16] and was renewed every 2 days. The pH value of the artificial saliva solution for the groups was measured ranged between 6.5 and 6.8.

Table 1 Composition of the products according to the manufacturers’ information

QLF measurements

At baseline (after the demineralization process) (T0) and after 7 (T1), 14 (T2), and 21 (T3) days, QLF images were taken by the same author (A.A.Y) using QLF-D BiluminatorTM (Inspektor Research Systems BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Between three and five views were taken of the specimens so that good quality images could be captured of each lesion. Each sample was dried for 5 s with compressed air before imaging. Images were captured using a custom-built, high-resolution, fluorescence imaging system. The camera and illuminator were mounted in a geometry stabilizing unit (State-of-the-art In Vitro Research setup). This, together with video repositioning software, enabled specimens to be accurately repositioned at each observation. The images were acquired using the QLF-D BiluminatorTM software (Inspektor Research Systems BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) with the video repositioning software and a grab level of 0.95 set for the 7-, 14-, and 21-day images. The obtained images were stocked on a hard drive and a unique subject identifier was allocated.

QLF provides mainly 3 variables: ΔF (%), area (mm2), and ΔQ (mm2 × %). ΔF is the percentage fluorescence loss comparing sound enamel to an identified lesion. Threshold for ΔF is set to 5%, indicating that any fluorescence loss below this level is considered as noise. Area of the lesion is calculated as pixels considered by the analysis software as representing demineralized enamel (i.e., those with a fluorescence loss of 5% or more). ΔQ is the product of ΔF and area and indicates the volume of the lesion [17]. After the calculation of the samples’ ΔF, ΔF max, area, and ΔQ values, the data were exported as text files and imported into Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) using a custom macro.

Statistical analysis

A sample size of 10 in each group was calculated to have 80% power to detect a difference in means of 1.69 according to our pilot study results. This assumes that the group 1 standard deviation is 6.72 and the group 2 standard deviation is 7.35 using a two-group Satterthwaite t test with a 0.05 two-sided significance level.

Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS software, version 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A Shapiro-Wilk test was performed to assess the distribution of data. As the data were normally distributed, one-way ANOVA was conducted to analyze possible differences between the groups at the same time points and the differences between the time points. The mean difference in ΔF, ΔF max, area, and ΔQ, observed in different time points within each group, was analyzed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. Statistical significance was established at p < 0.05.


The mean ΔF, ΔF max, area, and ΔQ, standard deviation, and minimum/maximum values of measurements at baseline, after 7, 14, and 21 days for each group are presented in Table 2. The baseline parameters (ΔF, ΔF max, area, and ΔQ) did not differ significantly among the 6 groups (p = 0.793, p = 0.538, p = 0.449, and p = 0.108, respectively). The changes obtained between time points and significant differences between groups at each time point are shown in Table 3.

Table 2 Intragroup comparisons of QLF scores between timeline intervals
Table 3 Intergroup comparisons of the QLF measurements’ changes between different time points

Fluorescence loss (ΔF)

The application of the Emdogain resulted in a significant decrease of the fluorescence loss during the first week (p = 0.001). Following the 14 days, ΔF decreased significantly in Emdogain, Curodont, and control groups (p = 0.021, p = 0.001, p = 0.022, respectively). ΔF value presented a significantly decreasing trend throughout the 21 days for all groups except the Duraphat and Enamel Pro varnishes. Fluorescence loss was reduced significantly for Curodont than Emdogain and Clinpro XT between 7th and 14th day (p = 0.002). The changes between T2 and T3 days of the Clinpro XT varnish application were significantly higher than Emdogain, Curodont, and Enamel Pro.

Maximum fluorescence loss (ΔF max)

Following the application of the products, ΔF max value presented a significant decrease in all groups after 21 days except for the Duraphat and Enamel Pro varnishes groups. Highest change obtained between the first and the second week was in the Curodont group. However, the Clinpro XT varnish application was shown a significantly higher reduction than Curodont from the second week to the 21st day.

Lesion area (area)

A distinct decrease in the lesion area was determined in the control, Curodont, and Clinpro XT groups at the end of the observation period (p = 0.009, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). The Curodont application induced a significant change in area component even after the 14 days (p < 0.001). The Curodont group showed higher lesion area changes between T1 and T2 in comparison to the Emdogain, Clinpro XT, and Enamel Pro® groups, whereas Clinpro XT assured the highest reduction from the second to the third week of the observation period.

Lesion volume (ΔQ)

Although changes of the ΔQ value at the end of the whole observation process did not differ significantly between treatment groups (p = 0.371), the reduction in ΔQ value was found to be significant in the control (p = 0.001), Curodont (p < 0.001), and Clinpro XT (p = 0.007) groups. The mean lesion volume in the Emdogain group was significantly decreased to the 31,330.75 after the first 7 days (p = 0.010). A significant decrease was seen after the second week, and these results were sustained throughout 21 days for the Curodont group. The higher lesion volume changes between T1 and T2 were determined in the Curodont group than Emdogain, Clinpro XT, and Enamel Pro groups (p < 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.005, respectively). For the time duration between T2 and T3, the greatest amount of the decrease was seen in the Clinpro XT group. Among the treatment groups, the least affected group for the ΔQ measurement was Duraphat varnish.


Since one of the most undesirable side effects of fixed orthodontic treatment is WSLs, it is important to know the proper treatment approaches and the efficacy of the remineralization agents. However, there is no consensus in the literature with respect to their remineralization capacity. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate the efficacy of enamel matrix protein, self-assembling peptide, and fluoride varnishes for the remineralization of WSLs by using an in vitro model. The effects of the materials were determined as the change in the area of the lesions and total lesion fluorescence. Based on the obtained results, the null hypothesis was rejected since differences in the remineralization capacities were observed among the different materials tested. Self-assembling peptide (Curodont) and light-curable fluoride varnish (Clinpro XT) performed better in diminishing the fluorescence loss and lesion area compared to the remained fluoride varnishes and enamel matrix protein (Emdogain) in different time points.

There is clear evidence to support the routine use of conventional fluoride varnishes for the first step in the treatment of WSLs [6, 18, 19]. Fluoride application intends to harden the mineral surface layer, by its high affinity to hydroxyapatite, thus inhibiting the progression of the mineral loss [5, 7]. The fluoride ion does not enter into the subsurface layers if the appropriate fluoride concentration and frequency of application is not considered [20]. It has been verified that enamel demineralization around orthodontic brackets usually occurs at 30 days without any intervention [21]. In a recent split-mouth clinical study, Shah et al. [6] stated the first measurement time point as 45 days that found several changes in the demineralized enamel lesion depth. In addition, they concluded that Clinpro XT possibly provides a burst of fluoride released during the first several days. However, the possible time point remained uncertain. Therefore, a reasonable subsequent step was to initiate the first measurement at 7 days, as our samples were already demineralized. In the Clinpro XT group, fluorescence loss, lesion area, and volume were found to be significantly decreased at 21 days from the baseline. Kumar Jena et al. [22] evaluated the efficacy of Clinpro XT using DIAGNOdent and direct visual inspection and found significant reduction during orthodontic treatment. In another study [21], no demineralized enamel lesions were encountered up to 4 months in the Clinpro XT group. Shah et al. [6] also histologically found the absence of the demineralized lesion depth at an interval of 45, 90, and 120 days. However, the results of the abovementioned studies cannot be directly corroborating the present study since the reason was examining its therapeutic effect in resolving the artificially induced demineralized areas. Clinpro XT exhibits superior properties to conventional fluoride varnishes. It can be hypothesized that the fluoride stays in fluoroaluminosilicate glass particles: reaction at the surface provides the immediate release, while the interior provides a reservoir of fluoride for sustained release [6]. On the other hand, although the fluorescence loss and lesion area were decreased linearly, Duraphat did not significantly differ in enamel remineralization at 7, 14, and 21 days from the baseline. Since this result also supports previous researches [6, 23] that showed the low remineralization potential of the Duraphat varnish for the longer duration, conventional fluoride varnish can be recommended to be applied more frequently. The results of the present study also revealed that Enamel Pro Varnish had insufficient effects among the studied materials in treating the WSLs. Enamel Pro Varnish is another 5% sodium fluoride varnish that additionally contains amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) formula [24]. These findings were attributed to the formation of ACP crystals and apatite on enamel surface.

The changes in the samples of the control group from baseline to day 21 suggest that some natural remineralization of WSLs occurred. Previous studies [23, 25] determined that the artificial saliva solution, which is frequently used as a negative control group in in vitro studies, displayed remineralizing potential for WSLs. Therefore, the decrease in fluorescence loss and lesion area can be contributed to the daily renewal of the artificial saliva at pH range between 6.5 and 6.8 throughout the whole present trial. However, it should be kept in mind that the remineralization was limited, and some specimens in the control group had no natural remineralization.

As expected, following the 14 days of the self-assembling peptide P11-4 (Curodont) application, a significant decrease was seen in ΔF, ΔF max, area, and ΔQ of the WSLs. The Curodont group showed higher QLF measurement changes between the first and second week in comparison to the Emdogain and Clinpro XT groups. Previous studies [8, 11, 23] comparing the remineralization activities of fluoride-containing agents also suggest Curodont as it represents the superior efficacy. In the two different in vitro studies [23, 26], self-assembling peptide P11-4 resulted a significant change in the fluorescence values at the 7th day, and an in vivo study carried out by Brunton et al. [27] showed similar findings of the remineralization in the lesion area from the 8th day. The mechanism of the self-assembling peptide P11-4 for the treatment of WSLs can be explained by the formation of de novo hydroxyapatite crystals. Since these structures are formed in a tangential form around the matrix fibers, a more “fan-type” structure is expected [7, 28]. However, the opacity of the natural enamel originates from the prismatic structure of the crystals; therefore, the entire fading of the WSLs cannot be expected following Curodont application.

Another notable result was that significant differences in fluorescence loss between baseline and the end of the observation period were found in samples on which Emdogain was applied. Although Emdogain, comprising enamel matrix proteins, has been used widely in dentistry [10, 11], up to date, there are a few studies [11,12,13,14] undertaken the direct application of Emdogain to evaluate the efficacy of remineralization stimulation potential of initial enamel caries. The results of the present study are quite similar to that of Schmidlin et al. [11] in which the application of enamel matrix proteins on artificial carious lesions seen to improve the re-hardening of the lesions, even in deeper layers. Together these findings suggest that Emdogain may promote remineralization of initial enamel carious lesions. This is consistent with a previous study [14] that confirmed the regeneration of the enamel prism-like tissue with the presence of Emdogain. Researchers attributed this effect to the molecular mechanisms of the product that include the prevention of the crystal fusion of premature crystals, the control of hydroxyapatite crystal morphology and elongation, and the control of the nucleation and regulation of the growth of the crystals in order to form the mineralized enamel covering the crowns of teeth [13, 14].

In this study, samples were acquired from bovine lower incisors in order to facilitate homogenous allocation of specimens from the same crown to the six test groups. Although human and bovine enamel are not identical in genetic and environmental features [29], it has been stated that bovine enamel could be in a better condition with a more uniform composition, particularly when a large crown size for preparing more samples from the same tooth was necessary [30]. Artificial caries lesions occurred rapidly in bovine enamel in comparison to the human teeth, even the mineral distributions of their lesions were almost equivalent [11, 31]. Since the results were only used for the interpretation of the comparison within the different groups of the present study and the changes within the same sample in different time points, we considered that the advantages of preferring bovine teeth will be acceptable.

The QLF-D is based on the same principle but with an enhanced light source and filter system compared with the traditional QLF method [32]. All specimens were dried and the images were captured with standardized settings. By using QLF-D, an in vitro standard was developed to capture the images in the same position and from the same angle. Unfortunately, the researcher in charge of product application knew which agent was applied. However, the examiners who conducted the imaging acquisition and the analysis of the images were blinded to the intervention allocation.

The results of this study revealed significant differences between initial and 21th days of QLF measurements in all groups except conventional fluoride varnishes. Although the present study did not mimic the exact real-life settings, the results have the potential to provide useful information on the remineralization effectiveness of different varnishes. Further in vivo studies would be beneficial to verify the treatment efficacy of different fluoride varnishes, enamel matrix protein, and self-assembling peptide on WSLs during or after orthodontic treatment.


Within the limitations of this study, the following could be concluded:

  • The null hypothesis was rejected. A significant regain in fluorescence was observed in all studied materials except the Duraphat and Enamel Pro fluoride varnishes. With respect to the reduction in lesion area, there were significant differences in the control, Curodont, and Clinpro XT groups at the end of the observation period.

  • The fluorescence gain in the self-assembling peptide (Curodont) group was significantly higher compared to Emdogain and Clinpro XT between the first and second week of application. After 14 days, Clinpro XT varnish had the highest potential to decrease fluorescence loss and lesion area. It may be advisable to use combined of self-assembling peptides and light-curable fluoride varnish with prolonged duration of treatment period to increase the effect.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



White spot lesions


Quantitative light-induced fluorescence

ΔF :

Fluorescence loss

ΔQ :

Lesion volume


  1. 1.

    Richter AE, Arruda AO, Peters MC, Sohn W. Incidence of caries lesions among patients treated with comprehensive orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139:657–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tufekci E, Dixon JS, Gunsolley JC, Lindauer SJ. Prevalence of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Angle Orthod. 2011;81:206–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Abufarwa M, Noureldin A, Campbell PM, Buschang PH. The longevity of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride varnish’s preventative effects: assessment of white spot lesion formation. Angle Orthod. 2019;89:10–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bergstrand F, Twetman S. A review on prevention and treatment of post-orthodontic white spot lesions - evidence-based methods and emerging technologies. Open Dent J. 2011;5:158–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gao SS, Zhang S, Mei ML, Lo EC, Chu CH. Caries remineralisation and arresting effect in children by professionally applied fluoride treatment - a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2016;16:12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Shah M, Paramshivam G, Mehta A, et al. Comparative assessment of conventional and light-curable fluoride varnish in the prevention of enamel demineralization during fixed appliance therapy: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2018;40:132–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bröseler F, Tietmann C, Bommer C, Drechsel T, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Jepsen S. Randomised clinical trial investigating self-assembling peptide P11-4 in the treatment of early caries. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:123–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Alkilzy M, Santamaria RM, Schmoeckel J, Splieth CH. Treatment of carious lesions using self-assembling peptides. Adv Dent Res. 2018;29:42–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Soares R, De Ataide IN, Fernandes M, Lambor R. Assessment of enamel remineralisation after treatment with four different remineralising agents: a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:ZC136–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Grandin HM, Gemperli AC, Dard M. Enamel matrix derivative: a review of cellular effects in vitro and a model of molecular arrangement and functioning. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2012;18:181–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Schmidlin P, Zobrist K, Attin T, Wegehaupt F. In vitro re-hardening of artificial enamel caries lesions using enamel matrix proteins or self-assembling peptides. J Appl Oral Sci. 2016;24:31–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bächli K, Schmidlin PR, Wegehaupt F, Paqué F, Ramenzoni L, Botter S. Remineralization of artificial dentin caries using dentin and enamel matrix proteins. Materials (Basel). 2019;12:2116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Xiang C, Ran J, Yang Q, Li W, Zhou X, Zhang L. Effects of enamel matrix derivative on remineralisation of initial enamel carious lesions in vitro. Arch Oral Biol. 2013;58:362–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Cao Y, Mei ML, Li QL, Lo EC, Chu CH. Enamel prism-like tissue regeneration using enamel matrix derivative. J Dent. 2014;42:1535–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Buskes JA, Christoffersen J, Arends J. Lesion formation and lesion remineralization in enamel under constant composition conditions. A new technique with applications. Caries Res. 1985;19:490–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Klimek J, Hellwig E, Ahrens G. Fluoride taken up by plaque, by the underlying enamel and by clean enamel from three fluoride compounds in vitro. Caries Res. 1982;16:156–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    de Josselin de Jong E, Sundström F, Westerling H, Tranaeus S, ten Bosch JJ, Angmar-Månsson B. A new method for in vivo quantification of changes in initial enamel caries with laser fluorescence. Caries Res. 1995;29:2–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Øgaard B, Larsson E, Henriksson T, Birkhed D, Bishara SE. Effects of combined application of antimicrobial and fluoride varnishes in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120:28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Benson PE, Parkin N, Dyer F, Millett DT, Furness S, Germain P. Fluorides for the prevention of early tooth decay (demineralised white lesions) during fixed brace treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;12:CD003809.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    He T, Li X, Dong Y, et al. Comparative assessment of fluoride varnish and fluoride film for remineralization of postorthodontic white spot lesions in adolescents and adults over a 6-month period: a single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;149:810–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mehta A, Paramshivam G, Chugh VK, Singh S, Halkai S, Kumar S. Effect of light-curable fluoride varnish on enamel demineralization adjacent to orthodontic brackets: an in-vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015;148:814–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kumar Jena A, Pal Singh S, Kumar Utreja A. Efficacy of resin-modified glass ionomer cement varnish in the prevention of white spot lesions during comprehensive orthodontic treatment: a split-mouth study. J Orthod. 2015;42:200–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Üstün N, Aktören O. Analysis of efficacy of the self-assembling peptide-based remineralization agent on artificial enamel lesions. Microsc Res Tech. 2019;82:1065–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Msallam FA, Grawish ME, Hafez AM, Abdelnaby YL. Decalcification prevention around orthodontic brackets bonded to bleached enamel using different topical agents. Prog Orthod. 2017;18:15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ionta FQ, Mendonça FL, de Oliveira GC, et al. In vitro assessment of artificial saliva formulations on initial enamel erosion remineralization. J Dent. 2014;42:175–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Savas S, Kucukyilmaz E, Celik EU. Effects of remineralization agents on artificial carious lesions. Pediatr Dent. 2016;38:511–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Brunton PA, Davies RP, Burke JL, et al. Treatment of early caries lesions using biomimetic self-assembling peptides--a clinical safety trial. Br Dent J. 2013;215:E6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kirkham J, Firth A, Vernals D, et al. Self-assembling peptide scaffolds promote enamel remineralization. J Dent Res. 2007;86:426–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Laurance-Young P, Bozec L, Gracia L, et al. A review of the structure of human and bovine dental hard tissues and their physicochemical behaviour in relation to erosive challenge and remineralisation. J Dent. 2011;39:266–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Yassen GH, Platt JA, Hara AT. Bovine teeth as substitute for human teeth in dental research: a review of literature. J Oral Sci. 2011;53:273–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lippert F, Lynch RJ. Comparison of Knoop and Vickers surface microhardness and transverse microradiography for the study of early caries lesion formation in human and bovine enamel. Arch Oral Biol. 2014;59:704–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Min JH, Inaba D, Kim BI. Evaluation of resin infiltration using quantitative light-induced fluorescence technology. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2016;15:6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable


The authors declared that this study has received no funding.

Author information




YLS carried out the data analysis and manuscript editing. EY and AAY participated in the laboratorial data acquisition and manuscript correction. EY, AAY, and EE participated in the manuscript correction. EE and RE participated in the design of the study and manuscript correction. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arzu Aykut Yetkiner.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethical approval of this study was waived as mentioned in the manuscript by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lena Sezici, Y., Yetkiner, E., Aykut Yetkiner, A. et al. Comparative evaluation of fluoride varnishes, self-assembling peptide-based remineralization agent, and enamel matrix protein derivative on artificial enamel remineralization in vitro. Prog Orthod. 22, 4 (2021).

Download citation


  • White spot lesions
  • Remineralization
  • Light-induced fluorescence
  • Fluoride varnish
  • Enamel matrix protein
  • Self-assembling peptide