Differentiating snail intermediate hosts of Schistosoma spp. using molecular approaches: fundamental to successful integrated control mechanism in Africa

  • Eniola Michael Abe
  • Wei Guan
  • Yun-Hai Guo
  • Kokouvi Kassegne
  • Zhi-Qiang Qin
  • Jing Xu
  • Jun-Hu Chen
  • Uwem Friday Ekpo
  • Shi-Zhu Li
  • Xiao-Nong Zhou
Open Access
Scoping Review

Abstract

Background

Snail intermediate hosts play active roles in the transmission of snail-borne trematode infections in Africa. A good knowledge of snail-borne diseases epidemiology particularly snail intermediate host populations would provide the necessary impetus to complementing existing control strategy.

Main body

This review highlights the importance of molecular approaches in differentiating snail hosts population structure and the need to provide adequate information on snail host populations by updating snail hosts genome database for Africa, in order to equip different stakeholders with adequate information on the ecology of snail intermediate hosts and their roles in the transmission of different diseases. Also, we identify the gaps and areas where there is need for urgent intervention to facilitate effective integrated control of schistosomiasis and other snail-borne trematode infections.

Conclusions

Prioritizing snail studies, especially snail differentiation using molecular tools will boost disease surveillance and also enhance efficient schistosomaisis control programme in Africa.

Keywords

Schistosomiasis snail host schistosoma spp. genome database Africa 

Abbreviations

DNA

Deoxyribonucleic acid

RAPD

Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA

rRNA

ribosomal ribonucleic acid

COI

Cytochrome oxidase I

PCR-RFLP

Polymerase Chain Reaction- Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism

ITS

Internal Transcribed Spacer

GIS

Geographical Information System

Multilingual abstracts

Please see Additional file 1 for translations of the abstract into the four official working languages of the United Nations.

Background

Snails are invertebrate animals, belonging to the Phylum Mollusca. This group of organisms (except slug) possess a unique feature, known as “shell” which is a major characteristic of the group [1]. The snails inhabits a wide range of habitats because they are found not only in freshwater environment but also in other ecological niches [2].

Some snails are medically important because they transmit disease-causing trematodes in humans and other animals [3]. Most of the diseases caused by snail-borne trematodes are prevalent in the tropic and sub-tropic regions of the world, and the medical and economic burden of these diseases are often neglected which is why they are called neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). The distribution of the diseases caused by snail-borne trematodes especially schistosomiasis is focal. Hence, the parasites distribution is strongly dependent on the intermediate snail hosts distribution [4, 5].

Firstly, the continued transmission of snail-borne trematode infections in most endemic areas is facilitated by the presence and distribution [6, 7] of these important snail intermediate hosts that provide suitable environment for the development of trematode parasites [8].

Secondly, poor access to basic infrastructure by most inhabitants living in endemic settings [9] and the limitation of chemotherapy (the main control strategy in Africa) to effectively control the burden of schistosomiasis led to the call for the implementation of integrated control strategies through the incorporation of snail control to achieve the goal of schistosomiasis elimination [3]. More so, the high risk population largely depend on water bodies domiciled by the snail hosts for their daily and economic activities.

Several studies have been done to unravel the identity of the “supposed enemy” whose influence is of great public health importance and with pronounced burden amongst people living in marginalized settings of the tropic and sub-tropic regions [10, 11, 12].

Therefore, it is important to develop the platform that will monitor and identify snail distribution and infected snails, to help improve control efforts of the diseases caused by snail-borne trematodes. Also, a lot of achievements have been recorded in the identification of some snail hosts of medical and veterinary importance using both morphological and molecular approaches [13, 14, 15, 16] and these have provided information that helped improve schistosomiasis control efforts.

There are continued efforts at improving the development of biomarkers that are effective in differentiating schistosome parasites and also provide insights into factors influencing host-parasites compatibilities on local scales [17, 18].

Despite all the efforts, it is obvious that more reliable genomic information is required for snail intermediate hosts populations to help improve control programmes [19, 20] particularly in the schistosomiasis endemic regions of Africa. It is imperative to develop tools that will detect and quantify genetic differences and changes in snail populations and also closely monitor the spread of these genetic variants that have the potentials to affect control strategies [21].

Great tasks lie ahead and more commitment is required to ensuring the elimination of schistosomiasis from endemic regions of Africa.

Though, snail hosts studies are crucial especially in Africa as we prioritize NTDs elimination but only few studies have established snail hosts differentiation on local scales [15, 22, 23].

Therefore, it is imperative to provide adequate information on snail host population structure and diversity both on national and continental scales using molecular approaches in order to strengthen control programmes in Africa. Such information is important for reliable decision making and efficient control implementation. This should be a pre-requisite for setting up effective control programmes that will be supported by active surveillance response system in endemic areas especially in sub-Saharan Africa where the disease burden is enormous but control efforts are limited due to poor funding and lack of political will.

As suggested by Rollinson et al. [24] that a global awareness be raised to provide adequate support for the elimination of schistosomiasis in endemic countries, it is believed that the support will be more effective by updating the genomic status of snail hosts of trematode parasites where available and also establish reliable comprehensive genome identification database where information is lacking across Africa.

This paper summarize the available information on the progress made in controlling schistosomiasis transmission through snail intermediate hosts studies using molecular approaches and also identify areas where actions are required to be taken for effective integrated control efforts to be achieved in Africa.

The predominant snail intermediate hosts implicated for transmitting schistosome parasites in Africa is shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Predominant snail intermediate hosts found in Africa and the schistosome parasites harboured by them

S/N

Snail intermediate hosts

Parasites transmitted

1

Bulinus globosus

Schistosoma haematobium

2

Bulinus truncatus

Schistosoma haematobium

3

Bulinus africanus

Schistosoma haematobium

4

Bulinus senegalensis

Schistosoma haematobium

5

Bulinus forskalii

Potential snail intermediate host

6

Bulinus camerunensis

Schistosoma haematobium

7

Biomphalaria pfeifferi

Schistosoma mansoni

8

Biomphalaria sudanica

Schistosoma mansoni

9

Biomphalaria choanomphala

Schistosoma mansoni

10

Bulinus alexandrina

Schistosoma mansoni

The male and female adult schistosome worms dwell inside the blood stream of humans. Schistosoma mansoni and S. haematobium are responsible for intestinal schistosomiasis and urinary schistosomiasis respectively [25] (Fig. 1). S. haematobium is located in the venous plexus and it drains the infected person’s urinary bladder while S. mansoni is located in the mesenteric veins and it drains both the large and small instestines.
Fig. 1

Typical life cycle of schistosome parasites [84]

Schistosome eggs equipped with spines are deposited by the female schistosome parasites into the small venules of the portal and perivesical systems. The eggs migrate towards the bladder and ureter (S. haematobium) and the lumen of the intestine (S. mansoni) and are released into the environment with urine or feces. The accumulation of eggs deposited in the venules cause its blockage and this burst the veins and allows eggs and blood to access the urinary bladder and the intestine and this leads to the characteristic symptom of blood in urine and feces. When the eggs are released into the freshwater bodies, they hatch into miracidia and penetrate a suitable snail intermediate host of the genus Bulinus (with species such as Bulinus truncatus, B. globosus, B. senegalensis, B. forskalii, B. camerunensis, B. africanus and B. tropicus) or Biomphalaria (with species such as Biomphalaria pfeifferi, Bi. Choanomphala, Bi. alexandrina, Bi. sudanica), both serve as snail hosts of S. haematobium and S. mansoni respectively. The schistosome parasites develop and multiply into the infective cercariae within the snail hosts and are released into the water bodies by the snails. Humans become infected when they have contact with waterbodies that are infested with active cercariae [25].

Figure 2 shows the distribution of schistosomiasis on the African continent [26].
Fig. 2

Distribution of schistosomiasis in Africa [26]

Tables 2 and 3 shows the identified Bulinus sp. and Biomphalaria sp. and their accession numbers selected from the GenBank. Source: [27]
Table 2

Selected Bulinus sp. isolates with their accession numbers on GenBank

S/N

Species

Locality

Country

Accession No

References

1

B. globosus

Ngwachani school, Pemba Island

Tanzania

AM 921827

Kane et al., [12]

2

B. globosus

Kandaria dam, Kisumu, West Africa (via DBL)a

Kenya

AM 286286

 

3

B. globosus

Pemba Island

Tanzania

AM 921823

Kane et al., [12]

4

B. globosus

Kimbuni, Pemba Island

Tanzania

AM 921830

Kane et al., [12]

5

B. globosus

Tiengre stream, Kisumu (via DBL)a

Kenya

AM 286285

 

6

B. globosus

Pietermaritzburg (Prof. K.N. De Kock)a

South Africa

AM 286289

 

7

B. globosus

Kinyasini, Unguja Island

Tanzania

AM 286292

 

8

B. globosus

Lugufu (Dr E. Michel)a

Tanzania

AM 286287

 

9

B. globosus

Road to Mtagani, Pemba Island

Tanzania

AM 921820

Kane et al., [12]

10

B. globosus

Ngwachani school, Pemba Island

Tanzania

AM 921826

Kane et al., [12]

11

B. globosus

Tiengre stream, Kisumu (via DBL)a

Kenya

AM 286284

 

12

B. globosus

Road to Mtagani, Pemba Island

Tanzania

AM 921825

Kane et al., [12]

13

B. globosus

Moyo

Uganda

AM 286291

 

14

B. globosus

Pietermaritzburg (Prof. K.N. De Kock)a

South Africa

AM 286290

 

15

B. globosus

Kinango

Kenya

AM 921844

 

16

B. globosus

Kinyasini, Unguja Island

Tanzania

AM 921840

 

17

B. globosus

Chan-jamjawiri, Pemba Island

Tanzania

AM 921828

Kane et al., [12]

18

B. globosus

Thiekeene Hulle

Senegal

AM 921808

 

19

B. africanus

Isipingo, Durban (Prof. C. Appleton)a

South Africa

AM 286296

 

20

B. globosus

Machengwe, Pemba Island

Tanzania

AM 921829

Kane et al., [12]

21

B. globosus

Ipogoro, Iringa

Tanzania

AM 286288

 

22

B. globosus

Mwaduli

Kenya

AM 921850

 

23

B. globosus

IRDC farm, Iringa (Dr. S. Walker)a

Tanzania

AM 921821

 

24

B. globosus

Mogtedo barrage

Burkina Faso

AM 286293

 

25

B. globosus

Kinyasini, Unguja Island

Tanzania

AM 921839

 

26

B. globosus

Moyo

Uganda

AM 921843

 

27

B. globosus

Kinango

Kenya

AM 921845

 

28

B. globosus

Tondia

Niger

AM 286294

 

29

B. globosus

Kachetu

Kenya

AM 921847

 

30

B. globosus

Moyo

Uganda

AM 921851

 

31

B. globosus

Imashayi, Ogun State

Nigeria

KJ361814

Akinwale et al., [23]

32

B. globosus

Owode, Ogun State

Nigeria

KF989347

Akinwale et al., [23]

33

B. truncatus

Mondego River, Coimbra (Prof. M. Gracio)a

Portugal

AM 286314

 

34

B. truncatus

Mogtedo barrage

Burkina Faso

AM 286315

 

35

B. truncatus

Mbane

Senegal

AM 921806

 

36

B. truncatus

Satoni

Niger

AM 286317

 

37

B. truncatus

Nyanguge

Tanzania

AM 286313

 

38

B. truncatus

Bouton Batt

Senegal

AM 921807

 

39

B. truncatus

Posada, Sardinia (Prof. Marco Curini Galletti and Dr. D.T.J Littlewood)a

Italy

AM 286312

 

40

B. truncatus

Satoni

Niger

AM 286316

 

41

B. camerunensis

Lake Barombi, Kotto

Cameroon

AM 286309

 

42

B. camerunensis

Owode, Ogun State

Nigeria

KF989354

Akinwale et al., [23]

43

B. camerunensis

Ayetoro

Nigeria

KF989356

Akinwale et al., [23]

44

B, senegalensis

Ayetoro

Nigeria

KJ361803

Akinwale et al., [23]

45

B. forskalii

Ijale Ketu, Ogun State

Nigeria

KF989358

Akinwale et al., [23]

46

B. forskalii

Owode, Ogun State

Nigeria

KF989359

Akinwale et al., [23]

47

B. forskalii

Katosho swamp, Lake Tanganyika, Tanzania

Tanzania

HQ 121587

Nalugwa, et al., [85]

48

B. forskalii

Lake Edward

Uganda

HQ 121583

Nalugwa, et al., [85]

49

B. forskalii

Mogtedo barrage

Burkina Faso

AM 286310

Kane, et al., [12]

50

B. forskalii

Sao Tome Island, Sao Tome City

Sao Tome & Principe

AM 286305

Kane, et al., [12]

51

B. forskalii

Satoni

Niger

AM 286308

Kane, et al., [12]

52

B. forskalii

Quifangondo

Angola

AM 286306

Kane, et al., [12]

53

B. forskalii

Lake George

Uganda

HQ 121586

Nalugwa, et al., [85]

54

B. cernicus

Mont Oreb

Mauritius

AM 286303

 

55

B. barthi

Kanga swamp, Mafia Island

Tanzania

AM 921817

 

56

B. tropicus

Njombe Kibena (Dr. S. Walker)a

Tanzania

AM 921842

 

57

B. nyassanus

Kasankha, Money Bay

Lake Malawi

AM 921838

 

58

B. nasutus productus

Nimbodze

Kenya

AM 921841

 

69

Bulinus sp.

ADC farm, Kisumu (via DBL)a

Kenya

AM 286297

 

aContributors Source: www.ncbi/BLAST/index/html

Table 3

Selected Biomphalaria sp. isolates with their accession numbers on genbank

S/N

Species

Locality

Country

Accession No

References

1.

Biomphalaria pfeifferi

Lake Albert

Uganda

EU 141219

Plam et al., [86]

2.

Biomphalaria pfeifferi

Ngamilajojo

Uganda

DQ 084834

Plam et al., [86]

3.

Biomphalaria sudanica

Ntoroko

Uganda

DQ 084843

Jorgensen et al., [87]

4.

Biomphalaria pfeifferi

Kibwezi

Kenya

DQ 084830

Jorgensen et al., [87]

5.

Biomphalaria glabrata

Imbaba

Egypt

DQ 084823

Jorgensen et al., [87]

6.

Biomphalaria pfeifferi

Lake De Guirs

Senegal

DQ 084831

Jorgensen et al., [87]

7.

Biomphalaria pfeifferi

Chiweshe

Zimbabwe

DQ 084829

Jorgensen et al., [87]

8.

Biomphalaria pfeifferi

Lwampanga, Lake Kyoga

Uganda

DQ 084833

Jorgensen et al., [87]

9.

Biomphalaria alexandrina

Egypt

Egypt

DQ 084825

Jorgensen et al., [87]

10.

Biomphalaria pfeifferi

Lwampanga, Lake Kyoga

Uganda

DQ 084833

Jorgensen et al., [87]

11.

Biomphalaria pfeifferi

Mansidi port, Lake Kyoga

Uganda

DQ 084841

Jorgensen et al., [87]

12.

Biomphalaria pfeifferi

Muzizi

Uganda

DQ 084842

Jorgensen et al., [87]

13.

Biomphalaria stanleyi

Lake Albert

Uganda

EU 141215

Plam et al., [86]

14.

Biomphalaria sudanica

Lake Albert

Uganda

EU 141227

Plam et al., [86]

15.

Biomphalaria stanleyi

Lake Albert

Uganda

EU 141225

Plam et al., [86]

16.

Biomphalaria sudanica

Butiaba, Lake Albert

Uganda

DQ 084838

Jorgensen et al., [87]

17.

Biomphalaria stanleyi

Butiaba, Lake Albert

Uganda

DQ 084837

Jorgensen et al., [87]

18.

Biomphalaria sudanica

Mahyoro

Uganda

DQ 084840

Jorgensen et al., [87]

19.

Biomphalaria sudanica

Rutoto

Uganda

DQ 084844

Jorgensen et al., [87]

20.

Biomphalaria sudanica

Ntoroko

Uganda

DQ 084843

Jorgensen et al., [87]

21.

Biomphalaria smithi

Kwensliama, Lake Edward

Uganda

DQ 084836

Jorgensen et al., [87]

22.

Biomphalaria camerunensis

Lake Bakassi

Cameroon

DQ 084827

Jorgensen et al., [87]

23.

Biomphalaria choanomphala

Lake Victoria

Uganda

EU 141235

Plam et al., [86]

24.

Biomphalaria angulosa

Ruaha River

Tanzania

DQ 084826

Jorgensen et al., [87]

25.

Biomphalaria smithi

Rwenshama, Lake Edward

Uganda

DQ 084836

Jorgensen et al., [87]

26.

Biomphalaria sudanica

Lake Albert

Uganda

EU 141230

Plam et al., [86]

27.

Biomphalaria choanomphala

Lake Albert

Uganda

EU 141226

Plam et al., [86]

Source: www.ncbi/BLAST/index/html

Snail molecular studies: identification of snail taxa

The use of molecular tools in species identification and exploring host-parasite compatibilities has provided answers to complex evolutionary questions over the years. Though, before the advent of molecular methods in differentiating snail hosts, intermediate snail hosts identification were largely done using morphological descriptions such as shell shape, shell size, nature of aperture, observations on the radula and reproductive system to assess taxonomic variations [28, 29]. However, its applications have enhanced the establishment of database platforms to deepen our understanding on snail hosts diversity and population structure [5, 30]. More importantly, its’ usage in differentiating the complex Bulinus group [31] which is the major snail intermediate hosts of S. haematobium, a prominent schistosome parasites causing serious morbidity across Africa especially in sub-Saharan Africa.

Advances in the production of effective genetic markers such as random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPDs) ribosomal gene (rRNA), and the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) have created robust and reliable taxonomy [31] which has improve our knowledge on the epidemiology of schistosomiasis [12].

Though the use of molecular approaches in differentiating snail hosts population structure have been applied on local scales across Africa but it is yet to be fully explored. For instance, [14] identified B. forskalii, Bi. pfeifferi and B. truncatus using molecular methods in N’Djamena, Chad [22]. Comprehensively identified five snail hosts (B. globosus, B. forskalii, Bi. pfeifferi, Lymnaea natalensis and Indoplanorbis exutus) of trematode parasites in Nasarawa State, north central, Nigeria using mitochondrial gene cytochrome oxidase I (cox1). The study assessed the phylogenetic relationship of these snails and established that B. globosus from Nasarawa State, Nigeria clusters with B. globosus sequence data from other West African countries such as Burkina Faso, Senegal and Niger when BLAST, using nucleotide blast homology on genbank forming a monophyletic lineage but forms paraphyletic relationship with B. globosus species from East Africa. B. forskalii also followed similar pattern, as it cluster to form a monophyletic relationship with species from Burkina Faso (Mogtedo barrage), Niger (Tondia) and Senegal (Thiekeene Hulle) while Bi. pfeifferi from Nigeria clustered with Bi. pfeifferi species from Senegal (Lake De Guirs), Kenya (Kibwezi), Uganda (Lake Albert) and Zimbabwe (Chiweshe) to form a monophyletic relationship. Indoplanorbis exutus formed a paraphyletic relationship with species from Asia. Information is lacking on the phylogenic status of Indoplanorbis exutus and Lymnaea natalensis from Africa, there is need to prioritize the establishment of reliable genome database for these snails across Africa considering their veterinary importance. Similarly, [32] characterized Bulinus truncatus using PCR-RFLP technique and assessed their infection status with Dra I gene repeat in Southwest Nigeria while [23] established the population structure of B. globosus, B. forskalii, B. camerunensis and B. senegalensis in schistosomiasis endemic communities of Ogun state, Southwestern Nigeria through the application of PCR-RFLP on the snails ribosomal ITS region.

Molecular tools application is not limited to elucidating relationships across snail hosts taxa. The application of PCR DraI and sm17 in the early detection of S. haematobium and S. mansoni in infected snail intermediate hosts of the Bulinus sp. and Bi. pfeifferi respectively have helped strengthen snail surveillance and boost schistosomiasis control efforts [33, 34]. Also, the simultaneous usage of PCR, DraI PCR and Sh110 SmSl PCR were effective in differentiating schistosome parasites that infected snails within the Bulinus group in Morocco [35]. Table 4 shows the summary of intermediate snail host studies carried out in different parts of Africa.
Table 4

Summary of snail intermediate hosts studies in different parts of Africa

S/N

Country

Snail species

References

1.

Nigeria

Bulinus globosus

[13, 22]

Bulinus forskalii

Biomphalaria pfeifferi

Lymnaea natalensis

[16]

Indoplanorbis exutus

Bulinus sp.

[23]

2.

Chad

Bulinus truncatus

[14]

Bulinus forskalii

Biomphalaria pfeifferi

3.

Angola

B. globosus

[77]

B. canescens

B. angolensis

B. crystallinus

Bi, salinarium

B. globosus

B. canescens

4.

Egypt

Biomphalaria alexandrina

[37]

[38]

Lymnaea natalensis

[88]

Bulinus truncatus

Bulinus truncatus

[39]

5.

Cameroon

Bulinus truncatus

[39]

B. globosus

B. senegalensis

B. tropicus

B. forskalii

B. camerunensis

B. globosus

[15]

B. forskalii

[11]

6.

Senegal

Bulinus truncatus

[39]

B. senegalensis

B. umbilicatus

7.

Lake Victoria (across Tanzania, Kenya and Uganda)

Biomphalaria choanomphala

[40]

8.

Tanzania

B. globosus

[89]

9.

Madagascar

Biomphalaria pfeifferi

[44]

10.

Malawi

B. globosus

[90]

B. nyassanus

11.

Cote D’ voire

B. forskalii

[11]

B. globosus

12.

Equitorial Guinea

B. forskalii

[11]

13.

Niger

B. umbilicatus

[11]

Snail genome studies: implication for effective control programme

The need to meet the goals of schistosomiasis elimination prompted the pursuit of an integrated control approach [3, 36] and contributions from different stakeholders [31] have provided baseline information and vigor for the pursuit of efficient implementation of control efforts in Africa [15, 37, 38, 39, 40].

It is observed that environmental factors play significant role in the population size of snail host’s natural populations. The effects of these environmental conditions greatly affect gene flow between populations and induces important variations in population size [29]. Their hermaphroditic capabilities enable self or cross fertilization and allows for different genetic consequences [41]. Also, the fitness impact of parasites on the snail mating systems affects the genetic structure of the snail hosts population [42, 43]. Good understanding of local fluctuation in geographic origin, population size and snail hosts’ reproductive potentials are fundamental to improving our knowledge on the demographic stochasticity of natural population’s genetic structure [43].

The investigation of snail genetics role in trematode parasite infections variation using molecular approaches is vital to understanding their epidemiology. The assessment of the genetic differentiation of Bulinus snails from different ecological zones across Cameroon, Egypt and Senegal revealed high genetic diversity within Bulinus populations sampled from the three countries with the highest diversity observed within populations of B. forskalii and B. senegalensis [39], but this is contrary to findings on Biomphalaria pfeifferi in Madagascar which was reported to have high level of inter-population variation [44]. Utilizing the use of molecular markers[45], showed that there was high intra-population diversity with high levels of population structure but low level gene flow among populations of Biomphalaria choanomphala along Lake Victoria covering Tanzania, Kenya and Uganda. The study identified consistent parasitism as the major influencing factor [46] indicated that Biomphalaria species of African origin were derived from the neotropical natives and that proto-Biomphalaria glabrata is the progenitor of the African species through the trans-Atlantic colonization of Africa.

Findings have shown that schistosome parasites development inside the snail host is influenced by both the host and parasite genes [17, 47]. This has increase stakeholders consciousness to unsnarl the schistosome parasites and snail genes that influence this intrinsic association [48, 49]. This led to the development of genetic markers for the identification of resistant genes within the snail hosts. Detailed elucidation of snail hosts population structure and the identification of genetic markers for parasite resistance will further boost the resolve of effective integrated control approach for schistosomiasis elimination in Africa [37]. Observed from investigation on identified refractory strains to S. mansoni in Bi. alexandrina population from Egypt that refractory character within the snail hosts population is hereditary and therefore advised that snails that are actively resistant to schistosome parasites should be cultured to encourage biological control of snail intermediate hosts in a natural population.

Furthermore, it was established that snail hosts infection with schistosome parasites is species specific and often localized [50], efforts should be made to identify and document snail hosts that have refractory characters across regions. The introduction of snail hosts with parasite resistant genes into the natural population to replace the susceptible snail species in endemic areas will discourage schistosomiasis transmission and also reduce damage to the natural ecosystem through the use of molluscicides.

More importantly, it is necessary to encourage the extensive study of snail genome differentiation on a large scale due to the current global changes that have led to changes in the modification of the geographical distribution of species prompting hybridization, such hybridization is already known to occur in schistosomes and offspring have been shown to have superior virulence and invasive capacities [51]. This is an emerging public health concern particularly because of the changing geographic distribution of humans, domestic animals and wildlife [52]. Prioritizing snail studies is essential and there is need to update the snail hosts genome library for Africa in order to boost the realization of schistosomiasis elimination through active integrated control mechanisms. This is important because of the dynamic changes in climatic and environmental conditions which play key roles in the distribution of the snail intermediate hosts and the development of schistosome parasites.

Large-scale assessment of snail intermediate hosts genome will create the platform to determine the degree of variability among and within snail populations across the continent and give an overview of schistosomiasis distribution in Africa with current realities.

Determination of snail intermediate hosts population genetics and diversity using biomarkers is shown in Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Determination of snail intermediate hosts population genetics and diversity using biomarkers

Gaps analysis: three research priorities identified

Though, molecular approaches to differentiating snail intermediate hosts are key to combating the menace of this debilitating disease in Africa [17]. However, studies on snail biology should not be limited to the application of molecular methods because there are other aspects of snail studies that are essential and should be taken seriously.

Firstly, snail identification using shell morphology and bionomics studies are essential to understanding the distribution pattern of snail hosts and transmission dynamics of schistosomiasis and other disease causing snail-borne trematodes at local scales across the continent [53, 54]. We observed that there is dearth of knowledge and lack of expertise in the area of malacology in Africa, this might be due to lack of interest from individuals as it is believed that the application of molecular methods is more acceptable and efforts are geared towards establishing collaborations that will help access such platforms. However, the knowledge and expertise of snail identification using shell morphology requires highly trained professionals to enhance capacity building due to its importance in disease surveillance and should be prioritized in order to achieve the goal of schistosomiasis elimination in Africa.

Secondly, the application of Geographical Information System (GIS) and remote sensing technologies to map and define the spatial limits of snail hosts distribution is an important area that requires utmost attention. Though it has been applied in some parts of Africa on local scales [55, 56, 57], but information on the geospatial distribution of important snail intermediate hosts is lacking in most African countries. Mapping and predicting snail hosts distribution on national and continental scales to establish comprehensive GIS database will help characterize the different eco-zones with relevance to the prevalent diseases, thus provide information that will enhance optimizing the use of available resources [58], and also strengthen the drive for effective schistosomiasis control on the continent.

Thirdly, there is urgent need to aggresively create awareness by educating the larger society especially people in the endemic areas through the mass media and other communication platforms on the importance of these planorbid snail hosts in schistosomiasis epidemiology. Experience in the field have shown that most locals who live around waterbodies in most endemic settings have little or no knowledge of the snails and are not aware of the danger their presence poses to their well-being. Hence, it is important to consistently create awareness on snail hosts control. The locals should be equipped with information that will spur them to ensuring that the snails does not thrive in their environment and also be mandated to urgently report snail hosts presence in any waterbody around their domain to the relevant health authorities promptly.

In addition to the aforementioned three gaps on snail biology, there are other areas that requires attention. This includes effort to put infrastructure in place or consistently modify the environment to discourage the continued presence and distribution of snail hosts and schistosomiasis transmission in most endemic countries. The environment in most endemic countries are characterized by factors that influence the distribution of snail hosts of schistosome parasites as a result of poor environmental management [59, 60, 61, 62]. The presence of aquatic plants such as Eichhornia crassipes within and around waterbodies enhance the occurrence, distribution and abundance of snail hosts because it serves as a good source of food, provide shelter and oviposition sites for the snails [63, 64, 65]. Environmental modification through active removal of aquatic plants and silts from waterbodies renders the habitat unfriendly to the snail hosts [66, 67]. The indiscriminate disposal of human wastes due to lack of sanitary facilities and poor access to potable water sources for domestic purposes also add to the sources of infection in the environment, this facilitates easy access of schistosome parasites in feces or urine from infected persons to waterbodies and snail intermediate hosts.

Despite the public health significance of schistosomiasis globally especially in Africa where about 95% of global schistosomiasis is concentrated [68, 69], the use of micro-array platforms to decipher the intricate interplay between the parasites and the snail hosts is scarce. There is need for drastic improvement in the application of immunomic and next-generation sequencing platforms regarding schistosomiasis and other NTDs [70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75]. Efforts should be geared towards identifying genes that are actively involved in snail’s immune responses in order to initiate defence mechanisms that will block schistosome parasites survival in the snails [76]. Molecular tools application is vital for efficient snail surveillance and has great potential, as it is important for snail hosts and trematode parasites identification and also useful in defining the level of species biodiversity [5, 22, 31, 77]; these are pre-requisite to blocking schistosomiasis transmission effectively [78]. The lack of reference laboratories to carry out early diagnosis of schistosomiasis cases on infected people is a big challenge to the pursuit of schistosomiasis elimination in Africa. This debacle also extends to poor or absence of platform for researchers to execute evidence-based research on snail hosts. Such platforms, if available would help strengthen schistosomiasis surveillance and capacity building within the continent.

The challenge of insufficient supply of praziquantel due to scarcity of funds and the resistance of schistosome parasites to the drug of choice [79] led to the increasing call for the use of molluscicide to curtail snail distribution, but molluscicide application is yet to be substantially utilized in many countries endemic for schistosomiasis in Africa. This is partly due to reliance on prioritized chemotherapy treatment of school-aged children with praziquantel, which is not very effective due to the high re-infection rate few weeks after treatment or due to insensitivity or poor knowledge about snail hosts’ role in schistosomiasis transmission.

This might also be attributed to the perceived negative impact that niclosamide, the molluscicide of choice have on fishes, an important protein source and means of generating income for people living in rural settings. Therefore, it is advised that the molluscicide formulation be improved to ensure that it has less negative impact on the environment and biodiversity [80], but retain its potency against snail hosts [81].

The exploration of the molluscicidal properties of plants such as Phytolacca dodencandra and Millettia thonningii and some other plants with similar properties [82] should be considered. The distribution of these molluscicidal plants in areas identified as schistosomiasis hotspots in endemic areas will help curtail the distribution of snail hosts. However, it is important to effectively monitor the plants when cultivated in large scale because of their toxic properties.

The use of biological techniques for snail hosts control is long overdue in Africa, measures should be taken to effectively apply natural predators or encourage biotechnological methods to induce infecundity in the snails [83]. Figure 4 shows the mechanism for efficient schistosomiasis transmission interruption.
Fig. 4

Mechanism for efficient schistosomiasis transmission interruption

Conclusions

The elimination of schistosomiasis and other trematode parasite infections will receive a great boost when snail hosts studies and effective snail control programme are prioritized. There is urgent need to set-up reference laboratories and other platforms that will encourage qualitative snail intermediate hosts and schistosomiasis researches and also facilitate early diagnosis of schistosomiasis cases. It is imperative to encourage capacity building through training and re-training of scholars, health workers and different stakeholders in Africa on snail hosts identification using both morphological and molecular approaches.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

The study is supported by Chinese National Science and Technology Major Program (grant no. 2016ZX10004222-004). The funders played no role in the study design, data collection, and data analysis or interpretation.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

Declarations

E. M. Abe is supported by postdoctoral fellowships from the National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. The study is supported by the Chinese National Science and Technology Major Program (grant no. 2016ZX10004222, no. 2012ZX10004 220) The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Authors’ contributions

EMA and XNZ conceived the study, EMA and XNZ wrote the manuscript, SZL, UFE, XJ, GYH, GW,QZ, KK and CJH revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript published.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

XNZ is the Editor-in-Chief of Infectious Diseases of Poverty. Other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

40249_2018_401_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (514 kb)
Additional file 1: Multilingual abstracts in the four official working languages of the United Nations. (PDF 514 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Boundless Biology. “Classification of Phylum Mollusca.” Boundless Biology. Boundless. https://www.boundless.com/biology/textbooks/boundless-biology-textbook/invertebrates-28/superphylum-lophotrochozoa-168/classification-of-phylum-mollusca-653-11874/20 May. 2016. Accessed 27 May 2016.
  2. 2.
    Okafor FC, Ngang I. Freshwater snails of Niger-Cem, Nkalagu, Eastern Nigeria: Observations on some demographic aspects of the schistosome-transmitting bulinids. Animal Res Inter. 2004;1(2):120–4.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    WHO. The control of schistosomiasis. WHO Tech Rep Ser. 1993; 830, 1–85Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hanington PC, Forys MA, Loker ES. A somatically diversified defense factor, FREP3, is a determinant of snail resistance to schistosome infection. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001591.
  5. 5.
    Gordy, MA, Kish, L, Tarrabain, M, Hanington, PC. A comprehensive survey of larval digenean trematodes and their snail hosts in central Alberta, Canada. Parasitol Res. 2016; doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s0043601651529
  6. 6.
    Loker ES. Research on the Molluscan Intermediate Hosts for Schistosomiasis: What are the Priorities? Presented to the Scientific Working Group on Schistosomiasis14–16 November. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2005.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Torgerson PR, Devleesschauwer B, Praet N, Speybroeck N, Willingham AL, Kasuga F, et al. World Health Organization. Estimates of the Global and Regional Disease Burden of 11 Foodborne Parasitic Diseases, 2010: A Data Synthesis. PLoS Med. 2015; 12(12):e1001920Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Centres for Disease Control and Prevention: Schistosomiasis Fact Sheet. 2010. https://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/ntd/diseases/schisto_burden.htmlWeblink. Accessed 17 August, 2016.
  9. 9.
    Lardans V, Dissous C. Snail control strategies for reduction of schistosomiasis transmission. Parasitol Today. 1998;14:10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jones CS, Noble LR, Ouma J, Kariuki HC, Mimpfoundi R, Brown DS, et al. Molecular identification of schistosome intermediate hosts: case studies of Bulinus forskalii group species (Gastropoda: Planorbidae) from Central and East Africa. Biol J Linn Soc. 1999;68:215–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Langand J, Barral V, Delay B, Jourdane J. Detection of genetic diversity with snail intermediate hosts of the genus Bulinus using random amplified polymorphic DNA markers (RAPDs). Acta Trop. 1993;55:205–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kane RA, Stothard JR, Emery AM, Rollinson D. Molecular characterization of freshwater snails in the genus Bulinus: a role for barcodes? Parasit Vectors. 2008;1:15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abe EM, Oluwole AS, Ojo DA, Idowu OA, Mafiana CF, Braide EI, et al. Predicting the geospatial distribution of Bulinus snail vector of urinary schistosomiasis in Abeokuta, South-Western. Nigeria. The Zool. 2012;10:53–60.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moser W, Greter H, Schindler C, Allan F, Ngandolo BNR, Moto DD, et al. The spatial and seasonal distribution of Bulinus truncatus, Bulinus forskaliiand Biomphalaria pfeifferi, the intermediate host snails of schistosomiasis, in N’Djamena. Chad. Geo Health. 2014;9(1):109–18.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Djuikwo-Teukenga FF, Da Silva A, Njiokou F, Kamgang B, Same Ekobo A, Dreyfuss G. Significant population genetic structure of the Cameroonian freshwater snail, Bulinus globosus, (Gastropoda: Planorbidae) revealed by nuclear microsatellite loci analysis. Acta Trop. 2014;137:111–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abe EM, Oluwole AS, Ahmed HO, Ekpo UF. Malacological survey and geospatial distribution of Indoplanorbis exutus (Deshayes, 1934) and Lymnaea natalensis (Krauss 1848) snail vectors of trematode parasites, in Abeokuta, south-western, Nigeria. Nig. J. Parasitol. 2016; 37(1) ISSN 1117 4145Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rollinson D, Stothard JR, Jones CS, Lockyer AE, de Souza CP, Noble LR. Molecular Characterisation of Intermediate Snail Hosts and the Search for Resistance Genes. Mem Inst Osw. Cruz. 1998;93(1):111–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Webster JP, Shrivastava J, Johnson PJ, Blair L. Is host-schistosome coevolution going anywhere? BMC Evol Bio. 2007;7:9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lu DB, Wang TP, Rudge JW, Donnelly CA, Fang GR, Webster JP. Evolution in a multi-host parasite: chronobiological circadian rhythm and population genetics of Schistosoma japonicum cercariae indicates contrasting definitive host reservoirs by habitat. Int J Parasitol. 2009;39:1581–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lu DB, Wang TP, Rudge JW, Donnelly CA, Fang GR, Webster JP. Contrasting reservoirs for Schistosoma japonicum between marshland and hilly regions in Anhui, China–a two-year longitudinal parasitological survey. Parasitol. 2010;137(1):99–110.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s003118200999103x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Campbell G, Jones CS, Lockyer AE, Hughes S, Brown D, Noble LR, et al. Molecular evidence supports an African affinity of the Neotropical freshwater gastropod, Biomphalaria glabrata, Say 1818, an intermediate host for Schistosoma mansoni. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol. 2000;267:2351–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Abe EM. Studies on diversity, molecular characterization and spatial distribution of vector snails in Nasarawa State, Nigeria. Ph.D. Thesis 2015. Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Akinwale O, Oso O, Salawu O, Odaibo A, Tang P, Chen TW, et al. Molecular characterisation of Bulinus snails intermediate hosts of schistosomes in Ogun State, South-western Nigeria. Fol Malacol. 2015; 23;1-12. doi.10.12657/folmal.023.009Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rollinson D, Knopp S, Levitz S, Stothard RJ, TchuemTchuente L, Garba A, et al. Time to set the agenda for schistosomiasis elimination. Acta Trop. 2014;128:423–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    World Health Organization. The control of schistosomiasis: report of a WHO expert committee. WHO Tech Rep Ser. 1985;728:1–113.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ren G, Liang Y. African schistosomiasis. People's Med: Publishing House, Beijing; 2016.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    http//:www.ncbi/BLAST/index/html. Accessed on 25 June, 2017.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brown DS, Kristensen TK. A fish guide to freshwater snails. 1993.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brown DS. Freshwater snails of Africa and their medical importance. 2nd ed. Taylor and Francis; 1994.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Raghavan N, Knight M. The snail (Biomphalaria glabrata) genome project. TRENDS in Parasitol. 2006;22(4):148–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rollinson D, Stothard JR, Southgate VR. Interactions between intermediate snail hosts of the genus Bulinus and schistosomes of the Schistosoma haematobium group. Parasitol. 2001;123:S245–60.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hassan AO, Amoo AOJ, Akinwale OP, Adeleke MA, Gyang PV. Molecular characterization and detection of infection in vector snails of urinary schistosomiasis around Erinle and Eko Ende Dams in South West. Nigeria. Brit Micro Res J. 2016;14(1):1–10.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hamburger J. He-Na, Xu YS, Reda MR, Jourdane J, Ruppei A. A polymerase chain reaction assay for detecting snails infected with Bilharzia parasites (Schistosoma mansoni) from very early prepatency. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998;59(6):872–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hamburger J, Hoffman O, Kariuki C, Muchiri E, Ouma JH, Koech DK, et al. Large scale chain reaction-based surveillance of Schistosoma haematobium DNA in snails from transmission sites in coastal Kenya: a new tool for studying the dynamics of snail infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;71:765–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Amarir F, Sebti F, Abbasi I, Sadak A, Fellah H, Nhammi H, et al. Schistosoma haematobium detection in snails by DraI PCR and Sh110/Sm-Sl PCR: further evidence of the interruption of schistosomiasis transmission in Morocco. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:288.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhang LJ, Li SZ, Wen LY, Lin DD, Abe EM, Zhu R, et al. The establishment and function of schistosomiasis surveillance system towards elimination in the People’s Republic of China. Adv Parasitol. 2016;92:117–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Abdel-Hamid ZA, Rawi SM, Arafa AF. Identification of a genetic marker associated with the resistance to Schistosoma mansoni infection using random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2006;101(8):863–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mohamed AH, Sharaf El-Din AT, Mohamed AM, Habib MR. The relationship between genetic variability and the susceptibility of Biomphalaria alexandrina snails to Schistosoma mansoni infection. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2012;107(3):326–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zein-Eddine R, Djuikwo-Teukeng FF, Al-Jawhari M, Senghor B, Huyse T, Dreyfuss G. Phylogeny of seven Bulinus species originating from endemic areas in three African countries, in relation to the human blood fluke Schistosoma haematobium. BMC Evol Biol. 2014;14:271.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-014-0271-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Standley CJ, Goodacre SL, Wade CM, Stothard JR. The population genetic structure of Biomphalaria choanomphala in Lake Victoria. East Africa: implications for schistosomiasis transmission. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:524.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jarne P, Charlesworth D. The evolution of the selfing rate in functionally hermaphrodite plants and animals. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 1993; 24, 441–466.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hamilton WD, Axelrod R, Tanesse R. Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 1990;87:3566–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jarne P, Vianey-Liaud M, Delay B. Selfing and outcrossing in hermaphrodite freshwater gastropods (Basommatophora): where, when and why. Biol J Linn Soc. 1993;49:99–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Charbonnel N, Angers B, Rasatavonjizay R, Bremond P, Debain C, Jarne P. The influence of mating system, demography, parasites and colonization on the population structure of Biomphalaria pfeifferi in Madagascar. Mol Ecol. 2002;11:2213–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Standley CJ, Goodacre S, Wade CM, Stothard JR. The population genetic structure of Biomphalaria choanomphala in Lake Victoria. East Africa: implications for schistosomiasis transmission. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:524.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    DeJong RJ, Morgan JAT, Lobato Paraense W, Pointier JP, Amarista M, Ayeh-Kumi PFK, et al. Evolutionary relationships and biogeography of Biomphalaria (Gastropoda: Planorbidae) with implications regarding its role as host of the human bloodfluke. Schistosoma mansoni. Mol Biol Evol. 2001;18:2225–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Has W, Haberl B. Host recognition by trematode miracidaia and cercariae. In: Fried B, Graczyk TK, editors. Adv. in trem. biol. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1997. p. 196–227.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Spada RG, Silva D, Abdel-Hamid AZ, Sobral-Hamaguchi S, Zuim NR, Zanotti-Magalhaes EM, et al. Genetic markers between Biomphalaria glabrata snails susceptible and resistant to Schistosoma mansoni infection. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2002;97:53–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lotfy WM, DeJong RJ, Black BS, Loker ES. Specific identification of Egyptian Biomphalaria species and possible hybrids using the polymerase chain reaction based on nuclear and mitochondrial loci. Mol Cell Prob. 2005;19:21–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sapp KK, Loker ES. Mechanisms underlying digenean-snail specificity: role of miracidial attachment and host plasma factors. J Parasitol. 2000;86:1012–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    King KC, Stelkens RB, Webster JP, Smith DF, Brockhurst MA. Hybridization in parasites: consequences for adaptive evolution, pathogenesis, and public health in a changing world. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1005098.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Nichols GL, Anderson Y, Lindgren E, Devaux I, Semenza JC. European monitoring systems and data for assessing environmental and climate impacts on human infectious diseases. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(4):3894–936.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Salawu OT, Odaibo AB. The bionomics and diversity of freshwater snails species in Yewa North, Ogun State. Southwestern Nigeria. Helminthol. 2014;51(4):337–44.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Abe EM, Ombugadu A, Oluwole AS, Njila HL, Mogaji HO, Adeniran AA, et al. Population abundance and bionomics of snail intermediate hosts of trematode parasites in Nasarawa State. Nigeria. Res J Parasitol. 2017:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.3923/jp.2017.
  55. 55.
    Opisa S, Odiere MR, Jura WGZO, Kuranja DMS, Mwinzi PNM. Malacological survey and geographical distribution of vector snails for schistosomiasis within informal settlements of Kisumu City, western Kenya. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4:226.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    de Kock KN, Wolmarans CT. Distribution and habitats of the Bulinus africanus species group, snail intermediate hosts of Schistosoma haematobium and S. mattheei in South Africa. Water SA. 2005;31:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ibikounlé M, Mouahid G, Sakiti NG, Massougbodji A, Mone H. Freshwater snail diversity in Benin (West Africa) with a focus on human schistosomiasis. Acta Trop. 2009;111:29–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Elnaiem DE, Schorscher J, Bendall A, Obsomer V, Osman ME, Mekkawi AM, et al. Risk mapping of visceral leishmaniasis: the role of local variation in rainfall and altitude on the presence and incidence of kala-azar in eastern Sudan. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003, 68(1):10-7.
  59. 59.
    Senghor B, Diaw OT, Doucoure S, Seye M, Talla I, Diallo A, et al. Study of the snail intermediate hosts of urogenital schistosomiasis in Niakhar, region of Fatick. West central Senegal. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:410.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Lei ZL, Zheng H, Zhang LJ, Zhu R, Guo JG, Li SZ, et al. Schistosomiasis status in People’s Republic of China in 2004. Chin J Schisto Control. 2010;23(6):599–604.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Su ZM, He H, Tu ZW, Fan HP, Mao GX, Cao MM, et al. Surveillance of schistosomiasis in Hubei Province in 2010. Chin J Schisto Cont. 2010;23(4):438–40.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Yang H, Xiao-Hua W, Zheng H, Wang LY, Guo JG, Xia G, et al. Schistosomiasis situation in People’s Republic of China in 2007. Chin J Schisto Cont. 2008;20(6):401–4.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Plummer M. l. Impact of invasive water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) on snail hosts of schistosomiasis in lake Victoria, East Africa. Ecol Health. 2005;2(1):81–6.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Holland BS. Chiaverano lM. Howard CK. Diminished fitness in an endemic Hawaiian snail in non-native host plants. Ethol Ecol Evol. 2016;12:1–12.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Boelee E, Laamrani H. Environmental control of schistosomiasis through community participation in a Moroccan oasis. Trop Med Int Health. 2004;9:997–1004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Thomas JD, Tait AI. Control of snails hosts of schistosomiasis by environmental manipulation: a field and laboratory appraisal in the Ibadan area. Nigeria. Philosophical Trans Royal Soc Lond. 1984;B305:201–53.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Oomen JMV, de Wolf J, Jobin WR. Health and Irrigation. Incorporation of Disease Control Measures in Irrigation, a Multi-faceted Task in Design, Construction, Operation. Intl Inst Land Reclam Improvement/ILRI Pub 45, Wageningen, 1990.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Steinmann P, Keiser J, Bos R, Tanner M, Utzinger J. Schistosomiasis and water resources development: systematic review, meta- analysis, and estimates of people at risk. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:411–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Utzinger J, Raso G, Brooker S, De Savigny D, Tanner M, Ornbjerg N, et al. Schistosomiasis and neglected tropical diseases: towards integrated and sustainable control and a word of caution. Parasitol. 2009;136:1859–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Driguez P, Doolan DL, Loukas A, Felgner PL, McManus DP. Schistosomiasis vaccine discovery using immunomics. Parasit Vectors. 2010;3:4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Knight M, Arican-Goktas HD, Ittiprasert W, Odoemelam EC, Miller AN, Bridger JM. Schistosomes and snails: a molecular encounter. Front genet. 2014;5:230.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.201400230.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    McWilliam HE, Driguez P, Piedrafita D, McManus DP, Meeusen ENT. Discovery of novel Schistosoma japonicum antigens using a targeted protein microarray approach. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:290.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Chen SB, Ai L, Hu W. New anti-schistosoma approaches in the People’s Republic of China: development of diagnostics, vaccines and other new techniques belonging to the ‘Omics’ group. Adv Parasitol. 2016;92:385–408.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Kassegne K, Abe EM, Chen JH, Zhou XN. Immunomic approaches for antigen discovery of human parasites. Exp Rev Proteo. 2016:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1478945020161252675.
  75. 75.
    de Assis RR, Ludolf F, Nakajima R, Jasinskas A, Oliveira GC, Felgner PL, et al. A next-generation proteome array for Schistosoma mansoni. Intl J Parasitol. 2016;46(7):411–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Adema CM, Loker ES. Specificity and immunobiology of larval digenean-snail associations. In: Fried B, Graczyk TK, editors. Advances in trematode biology. Boca Raton and New York: CRC Press; 1997. p. 229–63.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Allan F, Sousa-Figueiredo JC, Paulo R, Emery AM, Mirante C, Sebastiao A. Mapping freshwater snails in Angola: distribution, identity and molecular diversity of medically important taxa. Trop Med Intl Health. 2015;20:54–4.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Adema CM, Bayne CJ, Bridger JM, Knight M, Loker ES, Yoshino TP, et al. Will all Scientists working on snails and the diseases they transmit please stand up? PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(12):e1835.  https://doi.org/10.1371/%20journal.pntd.0001835.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Fallon PG, Warren J, Behnke JM. Evaluation of immune-dependence of anthelmintic treatment of Heligmosomoides polygyrus in CBA/Ca mice. Intl J Parasitol. 1996;26(5):557–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Sturrock RF. Schistosomiasis epidemiology and control: how did we get here and where should we go? Mem do Instit Oswaldo Cruz. 2001;96:17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Zheng Q, Vanderslott S, Jiang B, Xu LL, Liu CS, Huo LL, et al. Research gaps for three main tropical diseases in the People’s Republic of China. Infect Dis Poverty. 2013;2:15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Kloos H, McCullough FS. Plants with recognized molluscicidal activity. In: Mott KE, editor. Plant Molluscicides. New York: John Wiley; 1987. p. 45–108.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Ding ZJ, Peng GY. Discussion of schistosomiasis infection source control. Chin J Schisto Cont. 2012;24(1):117–8.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Centre for Diseases Control. The life cycle of schistosomiasis. http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/schistosomiasis/biology.html 2013. Accessed 10 September, 2016.
  85. 85.
    Nalugwa A, Jørgensen A, Nyakaana S, Kristensen TK. Molecular phylogeny of Bulinus (Gastropoda: Planorbidae) reveals the presence of three species complexes in the Albertine Rift freshwater bodies. Int J Genet Mol Biol. 2010;2:130–9.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Plam M, Jorgensen A, Kristensen TK, Madsen H. Sympatric Biomphalaria species (Gastropoda: Planorbidae) in Lake Albert, Uganda, show homoplasies in shell morphology. African Zoology 2008; 43(1):34-44. doi.org/10.3377/1562-7020
  87. 87.
    Jorgensen A, Kristensen TK, Stothard JR. Phylogeny and biogeography of African Biomphalaria (Gastropoda: Planorbidae), with emphasis on endemic species of the great African lakes. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2007;151(2):337–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Mohamed AH., Ahmad HO, Amal AM. Heba MF. Population dynamics of freshwater snails (Mollusca: Gastropoda) at Qena Governorate, Upper Egypt. Egypt Acad J Biol Sci. 2011; 3(1): 11 -22Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Allan F, Rollinson D, Smith JE, Dunn AM. Host choice and penetration by Schistosoma haematobium miracidia. J Helminth. 2009;83:33–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Stauffer JR Jr, Madsen H, Webster B, Black K, Rollinson D, Konings A. Schistosoma haematobium in Lake Malawi: susceptibility and molecular diversity of the snail hosts Bulinus globosus and B. nyassanus. J Helminthol. 2008;82:377–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eniola Michael Abe
    • 1
  • Wei Guan
    • 1
  • Yun-Hai Guo
    • 1
  • Kokouvi Kassegne
    • 1
  • Zhi-Qiang Qin
    • 1
  • Jing Xu
    • 1
  • Jun-Hu Chen
    • 1
  • Uwem Friday Ekpo
    • 2
  • Shi-Zhu Li
    • 1
  • Xiao-Nong Zhou
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention; Key Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, MOH ; National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases, Ministry of Science and Technology; WHO Collaborating Centre for Tropical DiseasesShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Department of Pure & Applied ZoologyFederal University of Agriculture AbeokutaAbeokutaNigeria

Personalised recommendations