# Modeling the Fresh and Hardened Stage Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete using Random Kitchen Sink Algorithm

- 271 Downloads

## Abstract

High performance concrete especially self compacting concrete (SCC) has got wide popularity in construction industry because of its ability to flow through congested reinforcement without segregation and bleeding. Even though European Federation of National Associations Representing for Concrete (EFNARC) guidelines are available for the mix design of SCC, large number of trials are required for obtaining an SCC mix with the desired engineering properties. The material and time requirement is more to conduct such large number of trials. The main objective of the study presented in this paper is to demonstrate use of regularized least square algorithm (RLS) along with random kitchen sink algorithm (RKS) to effectively predict the fresh and hardened stage properties of SCC. The database for testing and training the algorithm was prepared by conducting tests on 40 SCC mixes. Parametric variation in the SCC mixes were the quantities of fine and coarse aggregates, superplasticizer dosage, its family and water content. Out of 40 test results, 32 results were used for training and 8 set results were used for testing the algorithm. Modelling of both fresh state properties viz., flowing ability (Slump Flow), passing ability (J Ring), segregation resistance (V funnel at 5 min) as well as hardened stage property (compressive strength) of the SCC mix was carried out using RLS and RKS algorithm. Accuracy of the model was checked by comparing the predicted and measured values. The model could accurately predict the properties of the SCC within the experimental domain.

## Keywords

self compacting concrete rheological properties of SCC hardened properties of SCC regularized least squares random kitchen sink## 1 Introduction

In the construction of heavily reinforced structural members one of the biggest problems encountered is the compaction of concrete. Improper compaction can lead to low quality and poor performance. In such structures it is difficult to use mechanical vibrators or manual compaction methods and the solution is to develop a mix which does not need compaction. This led to the introduction of self compacting concrete in the late 1980s by Nagamoto and Ozava (1999). The fresh stage characteristics of SCC include high passing ability to flow through congested reinforcements under its own weight, flowing ability to flow and fill the formwork under self weight and segregation resistance. The above requirements of SCC can be measured using J ring test, slump flow test and V funnel test at 5 min respectively. The hardened stage properties of SCC include its compressive strength, split tensile strength etc. The mix proportioning of SCC is done in such a way that it satisfies the rheological and hardened properties.

As it is very difficult to establish a general relation between the SCC properties and its ingredients a large number of trials (involving time, material and labour) are generally needed to get an SCC mix with required rheological and hardened properties. This brings out the importance of modeling the fresh and hardened stage properties of SCC. The common trend in most of the studies that have been reported is to adopt analytical equation relating the required properties of SCC with its ingredients and then optimizing this equation using regression analysis. These methods are less efficient in the case of nonlinearly separable data (Chien et al. 2010). Tools like artificial neural networks (ANN), fuzzy logic etc., have been used to model non linearly separable data, but if the data size is big they need large space for storing the data and require lot of computational time. Hence a modeling approach which is good for nonlinearly separable data with the advantage of limited data storage space and computation time requirement for analysis has greater utility. RKS has been proved as one of such modeling method (Nair et al. 2015).

## 2 Background Literature

EFNARC guidelines are available for the mix proportioning of SCC. Compared to conventional concrete, the proportioning is complex and no theoretical relationships have been developed between the mixture proportioning and the measured fresh or hardened stage properties of SCC. Large numbers of trials needed to develop SCC mix with the desired properties will lead to wastage of materials and time. This paper demonstrates a nonparametric approach of effectively using regularized least square algorithm along with random kitchen sink algorithm to predict the fresh stage and hardened properties of SCC. Using the experimental data generated in the laboratory, the relationship between the engineering properties and mix proportions are generated. This generated model will be useful to obtain the properties of SCC mixes avoiding the physical performance of the test in laboratory and also reduce the wastage of material and time.

Literature review brings out earlier studies related to the prediction of concrete properties using ANN, fuzzy logic, support vector machines (SVM), design of experiments (DOE) etc. Highlights of some of the recent works related to the prediction are included in this section.

Using fuzzy logic and ANN, the strength of high strength concrete was predicted by Gokmen Tayfur et al. (2014) and a comparative study between the two models was also done. To compare between the models their root mean square error (RMSE), mean relative error (MRE) and mean absolute error (MAE) was found out. Results showed lesser errors for fuzzy logic compared to ANN for the training data set. Testing data error is less for ANN which shows the better prediction capabilities of ANN over fuzzy logic. The insignificant values of error showed that both the models have good extrapolation capabilities. The strength of concrete was analyzed by Yeh (2006) using neural networks and design of experiments (DOE). The effect on the late and early compressive strength when fly ash is used as cement replacement in the range of 0–50% was studied. Water to cementitious material ratio was also varied in the range of 0.3–0.7. The effect of each parameter on the compressive strength was studied. The data collected from DOE were used to develop a high correlation between the compressive strength and component properties. Metaheuristic optimized least squares support vector regression (LSSVR) was used by Pham et al. (2015) to predict the compressive strength of high performance concrete. Least squares support vector regression is an advanced artificial intelligence method that can be effectively used for nonlinear modeling. Using ANN and SVM as bench marks the performance of the model was verified. The model performance was measured using RMSE and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). LSSVR achieved the lowest MAPE and RMSE followed by SVM and ANN. The fracture characteristics of high strength and ultra high strength concrete were modeled using support vector regression (SVR) by Yuvaraj et al. (2013). Using coefficient of determination (r^{2}) the accuracy of the model was determined. The value of r^{2} for all the outputs were found to be closer to 1 indicating that the model has good prediction capability. Yan and Shi (2010) predicted the elastic modulus of normal and high strength concrete by SVM. A comparison was done between SVM and other methods including ANN, fuzzy logic, regression, equations of ACI 363 code etc. The MAPE of the model were 3.13 and 8.42% for high and normal strength concrete in training while it was 3.75 and 9.69% for test data which is better compared to the other models. Other works in the area of modeling of hardened properties of mortar and concrete like compressive strength, flexural strength and torsional strength using different soft computing methods are also reported (Yeh 1998; Lee 2003; Tang 2006; Hossain et al. 2006; Tang et al. 2007; Pala et al. 2007; Topcu and Saridemir 2008; Altun et al. 2008; Prasad et al. 2009; Khatibinia et al. 2016).

Mohebbi et al. (2011) proposed an ANN model on the effect chemical and mineral admixtures on the flow properties of self consolidating cement paste based on 200 training data. The 14 input parameters were the water binder ratio, 4 type mineral admixture quantity, 5 different superplasticizer quantity and 4 viscosity modifying admixture quantity. Mini slump spread diameter and flow cone time were the output parameters. The developed model could predict the optimum quantity of admixtures which have strong influence on the rheological properties of the cement paste. Modeling of the fresh stage properties of concrete using ANN and other soft computing methods are also reported in other studies (Yeh 2007, 2008a, 2008b; Ghafari et al. 2015).

Few of the important works related to modeling of fresh as well as hardened stage properties of SCC using ANN and SVM methods are reviewed in this section. Fresh stage properties of SCC mixtures with different dosages of water, superplasticizer and coarse aggregate were measured and modeled by Sonebi et al. (2016) using support vector machine approach. Properties of SCC viz., slump flow, flow time (T_{50} and T_{60}), V funnel, orimet time and blocking ratio (L box) were predicted using the radial basis function and polynomial kernel. The study showed that RBF kernel was more accurate than polynomial kernel based support vector machines. Sensitivity analysis was also done to check the effects of mixture constituents (including water content, weight of cement and limestone powder, volumes of aggregate, amount of superplasticizer) as well as testing time on the predicted values. The result showed that SVM RBF Model can predict the fresh stage properties of SCC with high accuracy. Sonebi et al. (2016) modeled the fresh stage properties of SCC using ANN also. In this SCC mix composition are given as the input parameter and 6 parameters like blocking ratio (L-box), slump flow, T_{50}, T_{60}, orimet flow time, V-funnel flow time were the output parameters. Check on the accuracy of the model to predict the fresh stage properties of the SCC indicated that ANN model could accurately predict the flow properties. The rheological and mechanical performances of SCC mixtures were predicted by Nehdi et al. (2001) using ANN, which is a non parametric approach. The network was trained based on relationships between the proportions of SCC and its performance using existing data available in published literature. The rheological properties of SCC like slump flow, filling capacity and segregation along with compressive strength were modeled using ANN. The feed forward back propagation algorithm was adopted in the study. The model developed had good predictive capability. Few more studies are reported related to modeling of fresh and hardened stage properties of SCC (Pathak et al. 2012; Raheman and Modani 2013; Douma et al. 2014; Malagavelli and Manalel 2014).

Nair et al. (2015) did a spread sheet implementation for classification of data using random kitchen sink algorithm (RKS). Experiments were performed on linear and non-linear data sets using RKS and regularized least square estimation techniques. Classification has been done in an efficient manner by inheriting concepts from linear algebra and optimization theory. Data was mapped into a higher dimension using RKS and weight matrix for optimizing the data generated using regularized least square (RLS). The accuracy levels attained were 100% in case of linear data and 98% for nonlinear data. Preliminary studies have been made to predict the passing ability of the SCC mix using RKS by Prakash et al. (2016).

## 3 Approach to Modeling and Prediction

### 3.1 Random Kitchen Sink Algorithm (RKS)

### 3.2 Regularised Least Square Algorithm (RLS)

*core*, implemented through the GURLS routine that is responsible for processing the task pipe line.

## 4 Experimental Details

The data sets used for training and testing was obtained experimentally. SCC was tested for its rheological and hardened stage properties. The rheological properties of SCC like flowability, passing ability and segregation resistance were tested. For hardened properties SCC was tested for its compressive strength. As the mixing process affect the properties of the concrete, the mixing sequence and time of mixing were kept the same throughout the preparation of the training and testing data. The materials were mixed using a tilting drum mixer. Initially dry mixing of the materials (cement, fine aggregate and coarse aggregate) was done for 3 min and then 70% of the mixing water is added to the mixer and mixing is done for 2 min. Superplasticizer along with remaining (30%) water is added after that and mixed for 2 min.

The materials which were used for the preparation of the SCC mix were flyash based portland pozzolana cement (PPC), coarse aggregate (CA), fine aggregate (FA), superplasticizer (SP) and water. The cement used was tested for its consistency, specific gravity, fineness and compressive strength according to IS 4031 (Part 1-2005a, Part 11-2005b, Part 4-2005c, Part 6-2005d). The obtained values are 37%, 2.9, 2.95 and 35 N/mm^{2} respectively which were compared with the specifications given in IS 1489 (2005) and it satisfied the requirements.

Aggregate properties.

Type | Specific gravity | Water absorption (%) | Bulk density (kg/m | Fineness modulus |
---|---|---|---|---|

CA | 2.74 | 1.8 | 1535 | 7.46 |

FA | 2.80 | 5 | 1320 | 3.64 |

_{1}), Lignosulphates-LS (SP

_{2}), Polycarboxylic Ether-PCE (SP

_{3}) and Sulphonated Melamine Formaldehyde-SMF (SP

_{4}). Superplasticizers were tested for their densities and solid content according to IS 9103 (2004). The test results are given in Table 2. Based on the solid content and density of the superplasticizer the necessary water correction was done on the mix for specific superplasticizer dosage. As the incompatibility between cement and superplasticizer can lead to excessive bleeding, segregation and other undesirable properties (excessive setting time, air entrainment), it is essential to check the compatibility between the two before using it in SCC mixes. In this work the compatible combination approach based on saturation dosage of superplasticizer (Sathyan et al. 2016) were used. Mini slump and Marsh cone tests were performed on the superplasticized cement paste mix to find the saturation dosages. Bleeding and segregation were observed in some SCC mixes (especially with PCE superplasticizer) when the superplasticizer dosage is considerably on the higher side of saturation dosage (but within the manufacturers recommendation). Such mixes were eliminated and superplasticizer quantity was kept in a range close to saturation dosage.

Superplasticizer properties.

No | Superplasticizer designation | Density (g/cc) | Solid content (%) | Saturation dosage (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|

1 | SP | 1.23 | 37.4 | 0.6 |

2 | SP | 1.17 | 31.6 | 0.6 |

3 | SP | 1.09 | 36.7 | 0.5 |

4 | SP | 1.23 | 33.1 | 1 |

The trials were performed by varying the quantity of fine aggregate, coarse aggregate, type of superplasticizer and its dosage. Fresh stage properties (flowability, filling ability and segregation resistance) of the mixes were checked and only those mixes which satisfied all requirements were taken for modeling.

Ranges of ingredients of the SCC mixes.

Ingredients | Range | Average | Standard deviation |
---|---|---|---|

Water (ml) | 3930–4149 | 4041.9 | 58.94 |

Superplasticizer—SP | 102.39–163.80 | 139.24 | 21.14 |

Superplasticizer—SP | 152.07–228.12 | 182.49 | 26.18 |

Superplasticizer—SP | 145.22–232.37 | 180.13 | 29.99 |

Superplasticizer—SP | 184.56–253 | 212.17 | 23.68 |

Coarse aggregate (kg) | 12.55–15.33 | 13.96 | 1.09 |

Fine aggregate (kg) | 12.55–15.33 | 13.96 | 1.09 |

SCC was tested for both its fresh and hardened properties. The flowability of the SCC mix was found out by doing slump flow test according to UNI 11041 (2003) and the spread diameter of the concrete was measured. The passing ability of the SCC mix was found out by doing J ring test according to UNI 11045 (2003) specification. The height of concrete just inside and outside J ring bars was measured and their difference was taken. To find the segregation resistance of the SCC mix V funnel test was carried out according to UNI 11042 (2003). The time required for emptying the funnel after 5 min (T_{5}) was noted. The results obtained from all the three tests were compared with the specifications given in UNI 11040 (2003). A mix which satisfies all the three rheological characteristics was accepted as a SCC mix. For finding out the hardened properties, SCC was tested for its compressive strength. For finding the compressive strength of concrete, cubes were cast of dimension 10 × 10 × 10 cm and tested in accordance with IS 516 (2004). The experimental results obtained for slump flow, V funnel, J-ring and compressive strength was used for both training and testing of the model.

## 5 Database Preparation and Modeling

Normalised input variables of SCC mixtures used to train the algorithm.

Training data mix number | Cement | FA | CA | SP | SP | SP | SP | Water |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

9 | 0.1581 | 0.1580 | 0.1580 | 0.2762 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1595 |

10 | 0.1581 | 0.1417 | 0.1731 | 0.2762 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1586 |

11 | 0.1581 | 0.1580 | 0.1580 | 0.3222 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1588 |

12 | 0.1581 | 0.1417 | 0.1731 | 0.3222 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1561 |

13 | 0.1581 | 0.1731 | 0.1417 | 0.3682 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1613 |

14 | 0.1581 | 0.1580 | 0.1580 | 0.3682 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1585 |

15 | 0.1581 | 0.1417 | 0.1731 | 0.3682 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1558 |

16 | 0.1581 | 0.1580 | 0.1580 | 0.2302 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1601 |

17 | 0.1581 | 0.1580 | 0.1580 | 0 | 0.2611 | 0 | 0 | 0.1584 |

18 | 0.1581 | 0.1417 | 0.1731 | 0 | 0.2611 | 0 | 0 | 0.1558 |

19 | 0.1581 | 0.1580 | 0.1580 | 0 | 0.3046 | 0 | 0 | 0.1578 |

20 | 0.1581 | 0.1417 | 0.1731 | 0 | 0.3046 | 0 | 0 | 0.1604 |

21 | 0.1581 | 0.1731 | 0.1417 | 0 | 0.3482 | 0 | 0 | 0.1599 |

22 | 0.1581 | 0.1580 | 0.1580 | 0 | 0.3482 | 0 | 0 | 0.1571 |

23 | 0.1581 | 0.1417 | 0.1731 | 0 | 0.3482 | 0 | 0 | 0.1544 |

24 | 0.1581 | 0.1580 | 0.1580 | 0 | 0.3917 | 0 | 0 | 0.1565 |

25 | 0.1581 | 0.1580 | 0.1580 | 0 | 0 | 0.2518 | 0 | 0.1584 |

26 | 0.1581 | 0.1417 | 0.1731 | 0 | 0 | 0.2518 | 0 | 0.1558 |

27 | 0.1581 | 0.1580 | 0.1580 | 0 | 0 | 0.3022 | 0 | 0.1578 |

28 | 0.1581 | 0.1417 | 0.1731 | 0 | 0 | 0.3030 | 0 | 0.1549 |

29 | 0.1581 | 0.1731 | 0.1417 | 0 | 0 | 0.3526 | 0 | 0.1597 |

30 | 0.1581 | 0.1580 | 0.1580 | 0 | 0 | 0.3526 | 0 | 0.1570 |

31 | 0.1581 | 0.1417 | 0.1731 | 0 | 0 | 0.3526 | 0 | 0.1543 |

32 | 0.1581 | 0.1580 | 0.1580 | 0 | 0 | 0.4029 | 0 | 0.1562 |

33 | 0.1581 | 0.1580 | 0.1580 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2735 | 0.1577 |

34 | 0.1581 | 0.1417 | 0.1731 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2735 | 0.1577 |

35 | 0.1581 | 0.1580 | 0.1580 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3078 | 0.1571 |

36 | 0.1581 | 0.1417 | 0.1731 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3078 | 0.1544 |

37 | 0.1581 | 0.1731 | 0.1417 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3419 | 0.1592 |

38 | 0.1581 | 0.1580 | 0.1580 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3419 | 0.1572 |

39 | 0.1581 | 0.1417 | 0.1731 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3419 | 0.1537 |

40 | 0.1581 | 0.1580 | 0.1580 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3750 | 0.1559 |

## 6 Analysis and Discussion of Result

Comparison of measured and predicted normalized values of familiar mixes.

Mix number | Fresh stage properties | Hardened stage property | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Slump flow | J ring | V funnel | Compressive strength | |||||

Measured | Predicted | Measured | Predicted | Measured | Predicted | Measured | Predicted | |

10 | 0.1556 | 0.1522 | 0.2097 | 0.2077 | 0.1569 | 0.1753 | 0.1550 | 0.1574 |

18 | 0.1334 | 0.1347 | 0.2097 | 0.1983 | 0.1403 | 0.1437 | 0.1395 | 0.1293 |

26 | 0.1728 | 0.1678 | 0.1747 | 0.1527 | 0.1414 | 0.1502 | 0.1927 | 0.1582 |

27 | 0.1911 | 0.1771 | 0.1399 | 0.1370 | 0.0909 | 0.1109 | 0.1764 | 0.1674 |

33 | 0.1662 | 0.1534 | 0.1049 | 0.1482 | 0.1319 | 0.1812 | 0.1654 | 0.1328 |

37 | 0.1802 | 0.1601 | 0.1678 | 0.1338 | 0.1499 | 0.1514 | 0.1742 | 0.1369 |

RMSE | 0.012 | 0.025 | 0.023 | 0.025 | ||||

MAE | 0.009 | 0.019 | 0.017 | 0.021 |

Comparison of measured and predicted normalized values of unfamiliar mixes

Mix number | Fresh stage properties | Hardened stage property | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Slump flow | J ring | V funnel | Compressive strength | |||||

Measured | Predicted | Measured | Predicted | Measured | Predicted | Measured | Predicted | |

1 | 0.1763 | 0.1526 | 0.1258 | 0.1732 | 0.1913 | 0.1194 | 0.1683 | 0.2063 |

2 | 0.1451 | 0.1522 | 0.2097 | 0.1407 | 0.1180 | 0.1096 | 0.1129 | 0.2137 |

3 | 0.1404 | 0.1402 | 0.1678 | 0.1720 | 0.1020 | 0.0643 | 0.1174 | 0.1339 |

4 | 0.1490 | 0.1385 | 0.1048 | 0.1584 | 0.0602 | 0.0744 | 0.1033 | 0.1530 |

5 | 0.1506 | 0.1711 | 0.1048 | 0.1033 | 0.1339 | 0.0234 | 0.1853 | 0.1969 |

6 | 0.1849 | 0.1749 | 0.1399 | 0.1062 | 0.0698 | 0.0584 | 0.1410 | 0.1911 |

7 | 0.1623 | 0.1552 | 0.1048 | 0.1115 | 0.1080 | 0.1056 | 0.1403 | 0.1514 |

8 | 0.1592 | 0.1560 | 0.1048 | 0.1232 | 0.1184 | 0.1185 | 0.1713 | 0.1585 |

RMSE | 0.013 | 0.038 | 0.049 | 0.046 | ||||

MAE | 0.010 | 0.029 | 0.032 | 0.036 |

The prediction accuracy of the model largely depends on number and nature of data available for training. With limited amount of training data available (only 32) in this study, the accuracy of the model could be lower as it captures the influence of all mixture components on the SCC mix in a limited way within the experimental domain (as indicated earlier in Table 3). However the preliminary study (Prakash et al. 2018) on comparison of prediction models with respect to split tensile strength showed marginally higher accuracy for RKS model over that of ANN model for the same experimental data set. Enhanced prediction accuracy of the RKS model is also established by comparing the mean absolute error in the predicted values obtained using the proposed RKS model with those of the ANN model (Nehdi et al. 2001), in which the average absolute value of the predicted filling capacity, slump value, segregation resistance and compressive strength were 0.05, 0.04, 0.07 and 0.07 respectively.

## 7 Summary and Conclusion

This study showed that the rheological and hardened properties of SCC can be predicted using regularized least square approach along with random kitchen sink algorithm. The RKS model was able to predict the rheological properties (slump flow, passing ability and segregation resistance) and compressive strength of test mixes which were familiar and unfamiliar to the model. Mean absolute error and root mean square error of all predicted properties are less than 0.05. Thus the model is able to understand the relationship amongst the ingredients, capture the effect of the considered mixture variables and satisfactorily predict the fresh and hardened stage properties of SCC. There is potential to improve the model subsequently by incorporating the effect of the change in site conditions, mixing methods, placing methods etc. in the training data. Such an improved model generated with an extensive data base will be useful for industries to limit the number of trials and thus minimize wastage of materials and labour.

## Notes

## Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

## References

- Altun, F., Kisi, O., & Aydin, K. (2008). Prediction the compressive strength of steel fiber added lightweight concrete using neural network.
*Computational Material Science,**42,*259–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Belalia Douma, O., Boukhatem, B., & Ghrici, M. (2014). Prediction compressive strength of self-compacting concrete containing fly ash using fuzzy logic inference system.
*International Journal of Civil, Architectural, Structural and Construction Engineering,**8*(12), 1265–1269.Google Scholar - Chien, W.-H., Chen, L., Wei, C.-C., Hsu, H.-H., & Wang, T.-S. (2010). Modeling slump flow of high performance concrete using a back propagation network.
*Applied Mechanics and Materials,**20–23,*838–842. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.20-23.838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ghafari, E., Bandarabadi, M., Costa, H., & Júlio, E. (2015). Prediction of fresh and hardened state properties of UHPC: comparative study of statistical mixture design and an artificial neural network model.
*Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering,**27*(11), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hossain, K. M. A., Lachemi, M., & Easa, S. M. (2006). Artificial neural network model for the strength prediction of fully restrained RC slabs subjected to membrane action.
*Computers and Concrete,**3*(6), 439–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - IS 1489. (2005).
*Indian standard specification for portland pozzolana cement, Part 1*. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian standards.Google Scholar - IS 2386. (2002a).
*Indian standard methods of test for aggregate for concrete, particle size and shape, Part I*. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.Google Scholar - IS 2386. (2002b).
*Indian standard specification for methods of test for aggregates of concrete, specific gravity, density, voids, absorption and bulking, Part III*. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.Google Scholar - IS 383. (2002).
*Indian standard specification for coarse and fine aggregates from natural sources for concrete*. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.Google Scholar - IS 4031. (2005a).
*Indian standard specification for method of physical tests for hydraulic cement, determination of fineness by dry sieving, Part 1*. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian standards.Google Scholar - IS 4031. (2005b).
*Indian standard specification for method of physical tests for hydraulic cement, determination of density, Part 11*. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian standards.Google Scholar - IS 4031. (2005c).
*Indian standard specification for method of physical tests for hydraulic cement, determination of consistency of standard cement paste, Part 4*. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian standards.Google Scholar - IS 4031. (2005d).
*Indian standard specification for method of physical tests for hydraulic cement, determination of compressive strength of hydraulic cement other than masonry cement, Part 6*. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian standards.Google Scholar - IS 516. (2004).
*Method of tests for strength of concrete*. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian standards.Google Scholar - IS 9103. (2004).
*Indian standard specifications for concrete admixtures*. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian standards.Google Scholar - Khatibinia, M., Feizbakhsh, A., Mohseni, E., & Ranjbar, M. M. (2016). Modeling mechanical strength of self–compacting mortar containing nanoparticles using wavelet–based support vector machine.
*Computers and Concrete,**18*(6), 1065–1082.Google Scholar - Lee, S. (2003). Prediction of concrete strength using artificial neural networks.
*Engineering Structures,**25*(7), 849–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Malagavelli, V., & Manalel, P. A. (2014). Modeling of compressive strength of admixture based self-compacting concrete using fuzzy logic and artificial neural networks.
*Asian Journal of Applied Science,**7*(7), 536–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mohebbi, A., Shekarchi, M., Mahoutian, M., & Mohebbi, S. (2011). Modeling the effects of additives on rheological properties of fresh self-consolidating cement paste using artificial neural network.
*Computers and Concrete,**8*(3), 279–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Nagamoto, N. and Ozawa, K. (1999). Mixture properties of self-compacting, high-performance concrete.
*Third CANMET/ACI International Conference on design and materials and recent advances in concrete technology. Proceedings*,*V. M. Malhotra, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills*SP-**172**, 623–637.Google Scholar - Nair Y. C., Binsha, P., Pradeep, V. V., Sowmya, V., Soman, K. P. (2015). Spreadsheet implementation of random kitchen sink for classification.
*IEEE Sponsored 2nd International Conference on innovations in information. Embedded and communication systems (ICIIECS).*Google Scholar - Nehdi, M., El Chabib, H., & Hesham El Naggar, M. (2001). Predicting performance of self compacting concrete mixtures using artificial neural networks.
*ACI Materials Journal,**98*(5), 394–401.Google Scholar - Pala, M., Ozbay, E., Oztas, A., & Yuce, M. (2007). Appraisal of long-term effects of fly ash and silica fume on compressive strength of concrete by neural networks.
*Construction and Building Materials,**21,*384–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Pathak, S. S., Sharma, Sanjay, Sood, Hemant, & Khitoliya, R. K. (2012). Prediction of compressive strength of self compacting concrete with fly ash and rice husk ash using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system.
*International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications,**3*(10), 119–122.Google Scholar - Pham, A.-D., Hoang, N.-D., & Nguyen, Q.-T. (2015). Predicting compressive strength of high-performance concrete using metaheuristic-optimized least squares support vector regression.
*Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering*. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cp1943-5487.0000506.Google Scholar - Prakash, A. J., Sathyan, D., Anand, K. B., Premjith, B. (2016). Prediction of passing ability of self compacting concrete—regularized least square approach.
*Proceedings of International conference on emerging and sustainable technologies for infrastructure systems*(pp. 323–328).Google Scholar - Prasad, B., Eskandari, H., & Venkatarama, B. (2008). Prediction of compressive strength of SCC and HPC with high volume fly ash using ANN.
*Construction and Building Materials,**23*(1), 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Raheman, A., & Modani, P. O. (2013). Prediction of properties of self compacting concrete using artificial neural network.
*International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications,**3*(4), 333–339.Google Scholar - Rahimi, A. & Recht, B. (2007). Random features for large scale kernel machines.
*Advances in neural network processing systems*(pp. 1177–1184).Google Scholar - Prakash A. J., Sathyan, D., Anand, K. B., Aravind, N. R. (2018). Comparison of ANN and RKS approaches to model SCC strength.
*IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 310*. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/310/1/012037 - Sathyan, D., Anand, K. B., & Mini, K. M. (2016). Experimental study on portland pozzolana cement-superplasticiser compatibility in mortar.
*International Journal of Earth Science and Engineering,**9*(2), 539–544.Google Scholar - Sonebi, M., Cevik, A., Grunewald, S., & Walraven, J. (2016a). Modelling the fresh stage properties of self-compacting concrete using support vector machine approach.
*Construction and Building Materials,**106,*55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sonebi, M., Grunewald, S., Cevik, A., & Walraven, J. (2016b). Modelling fresh properties of self-compacting concrete using neural network technique.
*Computers and Concrete,**18*(4), 903–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Tang, C. (2006). Using radial basis function neural networks to model torsional strength of reinforced concrete beams.
*Computers and Concrete,**3*(5), 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Tang, C., Lin, Y., & Kuo, S. F. (2007). Investigation on correlation between pulse velocity and compressive strength of concrete using ANNs.
*Computers and Concrete,**4*(6), 477–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Tayfur, G., Erdem, T. K., & Kırca, O. (2014). Strength prediction of high-strength concrete by fuzzy logic and artificial neural networks.
*Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering,**26*(11), 04014079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Topcu, I., & Saridemir, M. (2008). Prediction of compressive strength of concrete containing fly ash using artificial neural networks and fuzzy logic.
*Computational Material Science,**41,*305–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - UNI 11040 (2003). Self compacting concrete, specification, characteristics and checking.
*Italian Standards.*Google Scholar - UNI 11041 (2003). Testing fresh self compacting concrete, determination of free flow and time flow.
*Italian Standards.*Google Scholar - UNI 11042 (2003). Testing fresh self compacting concrete, determination of flow time in V-funnel.
*Italian Standards.*Google Scholar - UNI 11045 (2003). Testing fresh self compacting concrete, determination of confined flowability in J-ring.
*Italian Standards.*Google Scholar - Yan, K., & Shi, C. (2010). Prediction of elastic modulus of normal and high strength concrete by support vector machine.
*Construction and Building Materials,**24,*1479–1485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Yeh, I. C. (1998). Modeling of strength of high-performance concrete using artificial neural networks.
*Cement and Concrete Research,**28*(12), 1797–1808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Yeh, I. C. (2006). Analysis of strength of concrete using design of experiments and neural networks.
*Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering,**18,*597–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Yeh, I. C. (2007). Modeling slump flow of concrete using second-order regressions and artificial neural networks.
*Cement Concrete Composites,**29,*474–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Yeh, I. C. (2008a). Modeling slump of concrete with fly ash and superplasticizer.
*Computers and Concrete,**5*(6), 559–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Yeh, I. C. (2008b). Prediction of workability of concrete using design of experiments for mixtures.
*Computers and Concrete,**5*(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Yuvaraj, P., Ramachandra Murthy, A., Iyer, Nagesh R., Sekar, S. K., & Samuid, Pijush. (2013). Support vector regression based models to predict fracture characteristics of high strength and ultra high strength concrete beams.
*Engineering Fracture Mechanics,**98,*29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

## Copyright information

**Open Access**This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.