Unveiling the hidden function of long non-coding RNA by identifying its major partner-protein
- 5.7k Downloads
Tens of thousands of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been discovered in eukarya, but their functions are largely unknown. Fortunately, lncRNA–protein interactions may offer details of how lncRNAs play important roles in various biological processes, thus identifying proteins associated with lncRNA is critical. Here we review progress of molecular archetypes that lncRNAs execute as guides, scaffolds, or decoys for protein, focusing on advantages, shortcomings and applications of various conventional and emerging technologies to probe lncRNAs and protein interactions, including protein-centric biochemistry approaches such as nRIP and CLIP, and RNA-centric biochemistry approaches such as ChIRP, CHART and RAP. Overall, this review provides strategies for probing interactions between lncRNAs and protein.
KeywordsLong non-coding RNA Function Interaction Protein Biochemistry approaches
long non-coding RNA
RNA binding protein
ploycomb repressive complex 2
HOXA transcript at the distal tip
HOX antisense intergenic RNA
brain cytoplasmic RNA 1
fetal-lethal non-coding developmental regulatory RNA
cold assisted intronic non-coding RNA
taurine upregulated gene 1
nuclear-enriched autosomal transcript 2
polycomb 2 protein
p21 associated ncRNA DNA damage activated
growth arrest-specific 5
metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1
cross-linking and immunoprecipitation
chromatin isolation by RNA purification
capture hybridization analysis of RNA targets
RNA antisense purification
individual-nucleotide resolution CLIP
high-throughput sequencing of CLIP
Recently, an explosion of microarray tiling and high-throughput deep sequencing analysis has led to the discovery of thousands of previously presumed non-coding transcripts [1, 2]. Global transcriptional analyses of the human genome have revealed that non-coding RNA far exceed the protein-coding mRNAs which account for only about two percent of the human genome . Non-coding RNA include many small regulatory RNAs and tens of thousands of polyadenylated and nonpolyadenylated lncRNAs which have been shown to be essential for many rapidly growing research areas . Although only a few lncRNA have been documented to have important biological functions, increasing evidences suggest that the regulation of lncRNAs on target genes is complicated .
lncRNAs, through interactions with protein, DNA and RNA, regulate gene expression at multiple levels, including chromatin remodeling and nuclear transcription, pre-mRNA splicing and cytoplasmic mRNA translation . Moreover, virtually all functional RNA molecules interact with protein complexes and protein is confirmed to be the first and principal partner of lncRNA . Thus, understanding lncRNA functions can be accomplished by identification of lncRNA-bound proteomes. Substantial effort is being devoted to depicting RNA–protein interactions for gaining insight into molecular mechanisms, but lncRNA–protein interplay is poorly understood [8, 9, 10]. In this review, we highlight molecular modes and functions of lncRNA–protein interactions and summarize conventional and emerging techniques to probe these interactions, with hopes of illuminating hidden lncRNA regulatory mechanisms.
Characteristics and function of lncRNA
LncRNA are a group of non-coding RNAs defined as being larger than 200 nucleotides in length, which distinguish them from small RNAs such as microRNAs, small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) . According to the relative position of the coding gene, lncRNA exist in four groups: intergenic, introngenic, overlap and antisense . Compared with protein coding RNA, lncRNAs are typically shorter with fewer exons, less abundance, less coding potential and more restrictions to particular tissues or cells . Moreover, lncRNAs sequences are less conserved than mRNA among related species. Recently, secondary structures of lncRNAs have been shown to be conserved, having ‘repeat A’ region in lncRNA Xist (X inactive-specific transcript) and a ‘roX-boxes’ sequence motif comprised of two lncRNAs roX1 and roX2 [14, 15]. Research that lncRNAs have various important regulatory effect on target gene expression contributing to epigenetic modification, transcription and post-transcriptional processing via specific interactions with proteins and other cellular factors [16, 17, 18].
LncRNAs mediate epigenetic changes by recruiting chromatin remodeling complexes to specific genomic loci . For example, the lncRNA HOX antisense intergenic RNA (HOTAIR)which is initiated from the HOXC cluster interacts with ploycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) to silence transcription across 40 kb of the HOXC locus in trans by inducing a repressive chromatin state . lncRNAs, Xist, RepA and Kcnqot1 all recruit the polycomb complex to the target genome and they trimethylate lysine 27 residues (me3K27) of histone H3 to induce heterochromatin formation and repress gene expression [20, 21]. In addition, lncRNA also regulate target gene at transcriptional . Proximal promoters can be transcribed into long ncRNAs that recruit and integrate RNA binding proteins function into the transcriptional process . For example, an lncRNA induced by DNA damage and transcribed from the cyclin D1 gene promoter, recruits and integrates RNA binding protein TLS to silence cyclin D1 gene expression . LncRNAs could act as co-factors to modulate transcription factor activity. LncRNA Evf-2 is transcribed from an enhancer and recruits transcription factor DlX2 to this same enhancer to induce expression of adjacent protein-coding genes . Moreover, post-transcriptional regulation of lncRNAs is being revealed. Normally, lncRNAs are involved in splicing regulation and translational control . The lncRNA MALAT1 (metastasis-associated long adenocarcinoma transcript 1) interacts with serine–arginine splicing factor to regulate its distribution in nuclear speckle domains and to modulate pre-mRNA alternative splicing . A neuron-specific antisense lncRNA, AS Uchl1, could specifically induce the translation of ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal esterase L1(Uchl1) under certain stress conditions through its complementarity with target mRNA . LncRNA brain cytoplasmic RNA 1 (BC1) blocks protein complex assembly to repress translation initiation in neurons and germ cells .
Molecular archetypes of the lncRNA–protein interaction
Recently, how lncRNAs control gene expression and molecular function archetypes of lncRNAs have been concerned. Wang’s group discussed four emerging archetypes of molecular functions that lncRNAs execute as signals, decoys, guides, and scaffolds via proteins, DNA and RNA interaction . Here, we distill the myriad functions of lncRNA into three archetypes of molecular mechanisms to illustrate how lncRNAs directly interacting with proteins and serve as ‘guide’ to recruit protein complexes to target genes, serve as ‘scaffold’ to assemble proteins into RNPs, and serve as ‘decoy’ to sequester regulatory proteins away from target gene . We then offer examples of each archetype’s lncRNA–protein interactions.
LncRNAs act as protein guides
LncRNAs scaffolds bring proteins together
lncRNA can be scaffolds to create discrete protein complexes: lncRNA–RNPs (Fig. 1b). HOTAIR could both bind to PRC2 and LSD1 to repress gene transcription and the catalytic methyl-transferase subunit EZH2 of PRC2 is confirmed to be recruited via a structural domain at the 5′-end of HOTAIR to impart repressive histone modifications. Meanwhile the 3′-end of HOTAIR associates with LSD1, inducing H3K4 demethylated modification . Another nascent antisense lncRNA, ANRIL, which is transcribed by RNA polymerase II at the TSS of the p16 INK4a gene, recruits PRC2 and PRC1 to mediate protein-coding gene repression in cis . LncRNA roX is transcribed from the Drosophila X genome, which is thought to be critical scaffold for assembly of a functional MSL dosage compensation complex to activate transcription through acetylation of H4K16 [15, 39]. Moreover, lncRNAs act as protein scaffolds to control gene expression by modulation of nuclear architecture. The sub-nuclear structure-specific lncRNAs taurine upregulated gene 1 (TUG1) and nuclear-enriched autosomal transcript 2 (NEAT2)bind to methylated and unmethylated polycomb 2 protein (Pc2) respectively to mediate assembly of multiple corepressor or coactivator protein complexes , which switch non-histone protein methylated mark recognition to relocation of transcription units in the nuclear three-dimensional space, achieving coordinated gene expression regulation.
LncRNAs act as decoys to titrate away proteins
lncRNAs act as decoys to remove proteins away from target loci (Fig. 1c). The lncRNA p21 associated ncRNA DNA damage activated (PANDA) is a well-studied lncRNA that acts as a decoy for transcription factors. PANDA is located 5 kb upstream of the CDKN1A with a 5′-cap and a 3′-polyadenylated but non-spliced tail. PANDA binds to and sequestrates NF-YA transcription factor from target gene promoters to repress gene expression . Also, lncRNA could also be decoy of other proteins. LncRNA growth arrest-specific 5 (Gas5) has been identified to interact with glucocorticoid receptor (GR) to prevent binding to DNA response elements, thereby blocking glucocorticoid signal pathway . The lncRNA metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1) binds to and sequesters several serine/arginine splicing factors to modulate their nuclear distribution and phosphorylation states to ensure splicing factor regulation of alternative splicing of cellular pre-mRNAs at a precise time, place, and concentration .
Technologies to probe the lncRNA–protein interactions
AS the significance of lncRNA–protein interactions is better understood, their biochemistry attributes are being discovered and novel bioinformatics approaches are being developed to identify and predict proteins that interact with target lncRNA. Previously, most methods to study RNA–protein interactions are protein-centric, including native RNA immunoprecipitation (nRIP), cross-linking and immunoprecipitation (CLIP) [43, 44]. Recently, the discovery of numerous non-coding RNA has led to concern about RNA-centric approaches, such as the RNA pull-down assay, chromatin isolation by RNA purification (ChIRP), capture hybridization analysis of RNA targets (CHART), and RNA antisense purification (RAP) [45, 46, 47, 48]. So other methods are being sought [49, 50], and here we depict detailed strategies for identifying lncRNA–protein interactions.
Protein-centric approach to probing lncRNA–protein interactions
nRIP and nRIP-seq
Summary of lncRNA analyzed by several biochemistry approaches
Influences p16 INK4a gene expression and cell senescence
Targets G9a in cis for imprinting
Regulates gene in cis and in trans
Modulation of nuclear architecture across chromosomes
Silences transcription in trans via its modular architecture
Activates gene expression via chromosomal looping
Mediates p53-dependent gene repression
RNA pull down-MS
PSPC1, PSF, PURA
Sequesters splicing factor to regulate alternative splicing
PSPC1, SRSF1, ESRP2
Plays roles in RNA processing and transcriptional regulation
Mediates X chromosome upregulated to rescue male lethality
Functions as the template and scaffold for the telomerase complex
81 proteins (Hnrnpk, Spen)
Mediates chromatin modifications and Polycomb targeting
10 proteins (SHARP, HDAC3)
Interacts directly with SHARP to silence transcription through HDAC3
CLIP and CLIP-seq
CLIP is a powerful protein-centric tool used to isolate cross-linked RNA and protein complexes in tissues or cultured cells and subsequently purify the RNA targets. CLIP overcomes the drawbacks of nRIP by cross-linking RNA–protein complexes with ultraviolet light. Based on strong cross-links, followed by RNase treatment of the cell lysate to shorten RNA fragments, immunoprecipitation is performed to purify the covalently cross-linked lncRNA–protein. Importantly, covalent cross-linking permits stringent washing of immunoprecipitates, and this reduces background noise . CLIP has been used to reveal that many intronic lncRNA directly bind to the PRC2 complex (see Table 1) . For instance, Takashi’s group reported that lncRNA Air interacted with the H3K9 histone methyl-transferase G9a by CLIP , but their data suggest that the post-assay RNA quantity is small and the assay is tedious steps. Consequently, CLIP combined with high-throughput sequencing (HITS-CLIP or CLIP-seq) is used to identify many RBPs, such as Nova, Ago2, and TDP-43 [65, 66, 67]. The CLIP assay occasionally produces false–positive interactions and it determining the exact binding sites is not always straightforward . Therefore, modified protocols have been developed to define cross-linking events, such as photoactivatable-ribonucleoside-enhanced CLIP (PAR-CLIP) and individual-nucleotide resolution CLIP (iCLIP) [69, 70]. With PAR-CLIP, cells are cultured in the presence of 4-SU (4-thiouridine) or 6-SG (6-thioguanosine), which are incorporated into RNA and induce strong cross-linking between RNAs and RBPs. Thus, this method can eliminate nonspecific targets and identify exact binding sites at a single nucleotide resolution . Disadvantage of PAR-CLIP is difficulties in the use of 4-SU and 6-SG in living animals due to the toxicity. Thus, the PAR-CLIP method has been successfully applied to RBPs, such as HuR, FMRP, and Ataxin-2 [72, 73, 74]. To identify RNA binding motifs and novel functions, iCLIP introduces an adapter at the 5′ end through the primer used for reverse transcription by cDNA circularization and subsequent linearization. Thus, both truncated and read-through cDNAs are captured. Importantly, iCLIP also provides information about the cross-link site that permits precise mapping of RNA–protein contacts at a nucleotide resolution . Rossbach’s group performed iCLIP combined with deep-sequencing (iCLIP-Seq) to reveal global regulatory roles of hnRPN L protein .
RNA-centric approach to dissecting lncRNA–protein interactions
RNA pull-down assay
RNA pull-down assay is a preliminary RNA-centric in vitro method that enabling identification and characterization of various proteins which interact with a given lncRNA of interest. First, lncRNA probes were synthesized and labeled with high affinity tags, such as biotin, then cell lysate was prepared from a in vitro sample. Next, the lncRNA probe was incubated with lysate or recombinant protein to form a specific lncRNA–protein complex. Subsequently, the protein complex was pulled down with streptavidin agarose or magnetic beads. Finally, the retrieved protein was identified with Western blot or mass spectrometry (MS) . Rinn’s group used RNA pull-down to discover that HOTAIR was directly associated with the PCR2 complex, which repressed transcription of the HOXD loci in trans .
ChIRP and ChIRP-MS
MS based proteomics is a common tool for studying cellular interactions. Baltz and colleagues and Castello’s group used MS to identify hundreds of novel RBPs in human cells [78, 79]. Recently, to enable quantitation and accurate discovery of novel RNA–protein interactions from complexes assembled in vivo, Klass and colleagues used quantitative MS combined with RNase treatment of affinity-purified RNA–protein complexes to identify proteins that bind to RNA concurrently with an RBP of interest . Kramer’s group developed an experimental and computational workflow method combining photo-induced cross-linking, high-resolution MS and automated analysis of the resulting spectra for identification of RNA interactions with proteins . This MS-based workflow based on MS can be applied to map any RNA–protein complex of interest. Recently, ChIRP-MS, an optimized ChIRP method for systematically discovering lncRNA-bound proteome in vivo proteomes by MS was developed to identify 81 endogenous proteins that associated with Xist in two waves to coordinate X chromatin spreading and silencing. Interestingly, HrnpK protein participates in Xist-mediated gene silencing and chromatin modifications, but not Xist biogenesis or localization. Thus, the results suggested ChIRP-MS assay achieved high output and specificity regarding lncRNA–protein interactions in vivo .
CHART and CHART-MS
Another hybridization-based purification strategy is CHART which is used to confirmed the genome-wide localization of lncRNA in chromatin and isolate the protein associated with the lncRNA of interest. CHART is more similar than different with ChIRP (Fig. 2), but one significant difference is the design criteria of the oligonucleotide probe. With ChIRP, short antisense DNA oligonucleotides tile across the entire target lncRNA without a priori knowledge of target RNA function domain cover all potential hybridization spots . In contrast, probes of CHART are empirically determined after RNase H assay which determines the candidate hybridization region . CHART is a useful method for biochemically defining DNA and proteins associated with lncRNAs. CHART-seq, which combines CHART and RNA-seq, was applied to discover hundreds of trans-genomic binding sites for NEAT1 and MALAT1 . Moreover, West’s group initially adapted the CHART assay to identify the full complement of proteins associated with RNAs in vivo with MS. CHART-MS was performed for two human lncRNAs, NEAT1 and MALAT1, to identify many nuclear speckle and para-speckle components and several new proteins not previously associated with them (see Table 1) .
RAP and RAP-MS
Similar to ChIRP and CHART, the RAP method is also used to capture a target lncRNA of interest through hybridization with antisense biotinylated oligos (Fig. 2) . With RAP, various cross-linking conditions can be performed to identify different molecules that interact with the target RNA via different mechanisms. For direct RNA–RNA interactions, psoralens are used for cross-linking, but for protein–RNA interactions, formaldehyde or ultraviolet (UV) light is applied to crosslink. Compared to ChIRP and CHART, the most distinctive feature of RAP is its use of long capture probes (>60 nucleotides), which form very stable RNA-DNA hybrids . Such a probe design strategy robustly captures any RNA and enables the use of stringent hybridization and washing conditions that dramatically reduce nonspecific interactions of off-target nucleic acids or proteins. Long DNA probes are considerably more costly but the background signals may be reduced due to the fewer probes used compared with short probes . Hacisuleyman’s group applied RAP to discover the genomics sites and proteins that associated with lincRNA FIREE. And confirmed that it interacts with hnPNPU protein in an RRD-dependent manner and localizes across several trans-chromosomal binding sites (see Table 1) . To developed a high-throughput method to identify proteins associated with a specific lncRNA in vivo, McHugh and colleagues combined RAP with MS to obtain high yields of RNA complex and identified ten proteins associated with lncRNA Xist, including SHARP, RBM15, MYEF2, CELF1, HNRNPC, LBR, SAF-A, RALY, HNRNPM, and PTBP1 (see Table 1). Also, they reported that the Xist interacts directly with SHARP to silence transcription through HDAC3 and that the recruitment of PCR2 by Xist depended on SHARP and HDAC3. These data is contrasted with previous work indicating that Xist directly interacted with PCR2 across the X chromosome . Thus, the RAP-MS can be useful for investigating lncRNA regulation mechanism.
Bioinformatics approach to predicting lncRNA–protein interactions
Biochemical approaches to identify the lncRNA–protein complexes are constantly expanding along with computational technologies. Compared with biochemical assays, the bioinformatics is more convenient and rapid for large-scale predictions of protein–lncRNA associations. Tartaglia’s group developed the algorithm, ‘fast predictions of RNA and protein interactions and domains at the Center for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Catalonia’ (catRAPID), which evaluates interaction propensities of polypeptide and nucleotide chains using their physicochemical properties . catRAPID was used to predict RNA–protein interactions in neurodegenerative disorders, in which RNA-binding proteins apparently have a major role . Recently, this method was used to predict protein interactions in the Xist regulatory network , and data show that catRAPID is powerful for predicting RNA–protein interactions from sequences. However, prediction of lncRNAs function is generally hampered by poor sequence homology and lack of interaction data. Consequently, Lu and colleagues developed a new computational method, lncPro, to predict lncRNA–protein interactions. Compared to CatRAPID, lncPro is computational-friendly and does not lead to nonsensical cross terms. Applying lncPro to all human proteins, this laboratory reported that long non-coding RNAs tend to interact with nuclear and RNA-binding proteins . However, this technique is limited for finding the direct lncRNA–protein interaction s due to the volume of proteins. Recently, to gain insights into global relationships between lncRNAs and their binding proteins, Shang and colleagues constructed an lncRNA–protein network (LPN) including 177 lncRNAs, 92 proteins and confirmed 683 relationships between them, based on experimentally determined functional interactions . Therefore, bioinformatics approaches to predicting lncRNA–protein interactions may guide future experimental approaches and facilitate a deeper understanding of the role of lncRNAs.
Conclusions and perspectives
Given the multitude of non-coding transcripts discovered by second-generation deep sequencing, lncRNAs arouse interest to biological and bio-medical researchers. Recently, evidence has accumulated to support the idea that lncRNAs are critical to numerous biological processes, whereas the mechanisms by which lncRNA are poorly understood. Protein, an important partner for RNA in vivo, has been associated with molecular archetypes of lncRNA and we observed scaffolds, guides and decoys in these associations. However, some lncRNA interact with protein through more than one kind molecular mechanism. For example, HOTAIR is a scaffold for PCR2 and LSD1 as well as a guide to recruit PCR2 to target loci. Therefore molecular mechanisms behind lncRNA–protein interactions are complicated and rarely described. Study of lncRNAs interaction partners and the use of technologies to isolate and identify molecules associated with lncRNA are assisting researchers with the study of proteins and genomic DNA that directly and indirectly interplay with target lncRNAs. However, these interactions have not been studied across diverse species. As technologies improve, we may 1 day better understand evolution and functional mechanisms of lncRNAs.
HZ and YY planned the manuscript outline and wrote the draft. YY generated figures and tables. LW and HZ revised and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
We thank Chen-Guang Zhou and Jing Shi for stimulating discussions and critical review of the manuscript.
The authors declared that they have no competing interests.
- 2.Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, Van Baren MJ, Salzberg SL, Wold BJ, Pachter L. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:511–5.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Novikova IV, Hennelly SP, Sanbonmats KY. Sizing up long non-coding RNAs: do lncRNAs have secondary and tertiary structure? Bioarchitecture. 2012;2:189–99.Google Scholar
- 6.Yoon J, Abdelmohsen K, Gorospe M. Functional interactions among microRNAs and long noncoding RNAs. Seminars in cell and developmental biology. Elsevier; 2014. p. 9–14.Google Scholar
- 11.Wang S, Tran E. Unexpected functions of lncRNAs in gene regulation. Commun Integr Biol. 2013; 6.Google Scholar
- 12.Zhu B, Yang Y, Li R, Fu D, Wen L, Luo Y, Zhu H. RNA sequencing and functional analysis implicate the regulatory role of long non-coding RNAs in tomato fruit ripening. J Exp Bot. 2015;66:4483–95.Google Scholar
- 28.Rinn JL, Chang HY. Genome regulation by long noncoding RNAs. Annu Rev Biochem. 2012;81:145–66.Google Scholar
- 33.Zappulla DC, Cech TR. RNA as a flexible scaffold for proteins: yeast telomerase and beyond. Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2006. p. 217–24.Google Scholar
- 42.Kino T, Hurt DE, Ichijo T, Nader N, Chrousos GP. Noncoding RNA Gas5 is a growth arrest and starvation-associated repressor of the glucocorticoid receptor. Sci Signal. 2010;3:a8.Google Scholar
- 45.Feng Y, Hu X, Zhang Y, Zhang D, Li C, Zhang L. Methods for the Study of Long Noncoding RNA in Cancer Cell Signaling. Cancer Cell Signaling. Springer; 2014. p. 115–43.Google Scholar
- 46.Chu C, Quinn J.Chang HY. Chromatin isolation by RNA purification (ChIRP). J Vis Exp. 2012;61. doi: 10.3791/3912.
- 48.Engreitz J, Lander ES, Guttman M. RNA antisense purification (RAP) for mapping rna interactions with chromatin. Nuclear bodies and noncoding RNAs. Springer; 2015. p. 183–97.Google Scholar
- 51.Selth LA, Close P, Svejstrup JQ. Studying RNA–protein interactions in vivo by RNA immunoprecipitation. Epigenetics protocols. Springer; 2011. p. 253–64.Google Scholar
- 53.Khalil AM, Guttman M, Huarte M, Garber M, Raj A, Morales DR, Thomas K, Presser A, Bernstein BE, van Oudenaarden A. Many human large intergenic noncoding RNAs associate with chromatin-modifying complexes and affect gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106:11667–72.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 58.Hacisuleyman E, Goff LA, Trapnell C, Williams A, Henao-Mejia J, Sun L, McClanahan P, Hendrickson DG, Sauvageau M, Kelley DR. Topological organization of multichromosomal regions by the long intergenic noncoding RNA Firre. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2014;21:198–206.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 61.Quinn JJ, Chang HY. In situ dissection of RNA functional subunits by domain-specific chromatin isolation by RNA purification (dChIRP). Nuclear bodies and noncoding RNAs. Springer; 2015. p. 199–213.Google Scholar
- 63.McHugh CA, Chen C, Chow A, Surka CF, Tran C. The Xist lncRNA interacts directly with SHARP to silence transcription through HDAC3. Nature. 2015;521:232–6.Google Scholar
- 68.Li Q, Uemura Y, Kawahara Y. Cross-linking and immunoprecipitation of nuclear RNA-binding proteins. nuclear bodies and noncoding RNAs. Springer; 2015. p. 247–63.Google Scholar
- 71.Hafner M, Landthaler M, Burger L, Khorshid M, Hausser J, Berninger P, Rothballer A, Ascano M, Jungkamp A, Munschauer M. PAR-CliP-a method to identify transcriptome-wide the binding sites of RNA binding proteins. J Vis Exp. 2010;41. doi: 10.3791/2034.
- 84.Agostini F, Cirillo D, Bolognesi B, Tartaglia GG. X-inactivation: quantitative predictions of protein interactions in the Xist network. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:e31.Google Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.