Dental pulp stem cells can improve muscle dysfunction in animal models of Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Abstract

Background

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an inherited progressive disorder that causes skeletal and cardiac muscle deterioration with chronic inflammation. Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) are attractive candidates for cell-based strategies for DMD because of their immunosuppressive properties. Therefore, we hypothesized that systemic treatment with DPSCs might show therapeutic benefits as an anti-inflammatory therapy.

Methods

To investigate the potential benefits of DPSC transplantation for DMD, we examined disease progression in a DMD animal model, mdx mice, by comparing them with different systemic treatment conditions. The DPSC-treated model, a canine X-linked muscular dystrophy model in Japan (CXMDJ), which has a severe phenotype similar to that of DMD patients, also underwent comprehensive analysis, including histopathological findings, muscle function, and locomotor activity.

Results

We demonstrated a therapeutic strategy for long-term functional recovery in DMD using repeated DPSC administration. DPSC-treated mdx mice and CXMDJ showed no serious adverse events. MRI findings and muscle histology suggested that DPSC treatment downregulated severe inflammation in DMD muscles and demonstrated a milder phenotype after DPSC treatment. DPSC-treated models showed increased recovery in grip-hand strength and improved tetanic force and home cage activity. Interestingly, maintenance of long-term running capability and stabilized cardiac function was also observed in 1-year-old DPSC-treated CXMDJ.

Conclusions

We developed a novel strategy for the safe and effective transplantation of DPSCs for DMD recovery, which included repeated systemic injection to regulate inflammation at a young age. This is the first report on the efficacy of a systemic DPSC treatment, from which we can propose that DPSCs may play an important role in delaying the DMD disease phenotype.

Background

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a progressive and fatal X-linked recessive inherited skeletal and cardiac muscle disorder. It is the most common muscular dystrophy, affecting 1 in 3500 male births [1]. The dystrophin-glycoprotein complex deficiency of the sarcolemma results from mutations in the dystrophin gene and causes progressive degeneration/regeneration cycles in the striated muscle, manifesting as muscle weakness and eventual skeletal muscle atrophy [2, 3]. DMD is a primary degenerative myopathy with a necrotizing phase with secondary inflammation. Consequently, steroids are widely used to improve muscle strength in DMD patients [4,5,6]. However, the beneficial effects of steroid therapy, including glucocorticoid administration, vary from patient to patient, and administration of these compounds may have side effects. In principle, severe inflammation regulation in muscle tissues can prolong the duration of therapeutic effects.

Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) express several common cell-surface antigenic markers, such as CD44, CD73, CD90, and CD105, and low levels of major histocompatibility complex class I molecules, without expressing hematopoietic markers CD34 or CD45 [7]. Although originally identified in the bone marrow [7], MSCs can be extracted from numerous tissues including adipose [8], peripheral blood [9], cord blood [10], and amnion [11]. Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) obtained from the decidual tooth tissue are a less invasive cell source that shows multipotency [12], as well as high proliferative and immunosuppressive activities [13]. DPSCs can also inhibit the proliferation of phytohemagglutinin-stimulated T cells more strongly than BM-MSCs [14].

The main purpose of DMD treatment is to recover motor function by restoring the expression of dystrophin and to delay pathological progression by suppressing inflammation. Cell-based therapy for DMD has the potential to restore dystrophin expression and restore the muscle parenchyma using hematopoietic stem cells, myoblasts, muscle-derived stem cells, and mesoangioblasts in DMD model mice or Golden retriever muscular dystrophy (GRMD) [15,16,17,18]. We have also reported that BM-MSCs could be implanted into the injured muscles of canine X-linked muscular dystrophy in Japan (CXMDJ), a beagle-based dog colony [19], and successfully used for long-term engraftment in the myogenic lineage [20]. However, improvement of whole-body muscle function and long-term therapeutic effects have not been sufficiently demonstrated by cell therapy.

Our clinical interest in DPSCs for therapeutic cellular applications is based on their anti-inflammatory properties. Therefore, systemic DPSC administration is expected to benefit the immune-modulatory effect in dystrophic muscles and has the capacity to ameliorate progressive DMD. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of systemic DPSC treatment for DMD using animal models. CXMDJ shows affected temporalis and limb muscles at a young age, which are comparable to those observed in patients [21,22,23]. Through experiments using mdx mouse and CXMDJ models, we demonstrate a therapeutic strategy for long-term functional recovery in DMD using repeated DPSC administration.

Materials and methods

Animals

C57BL/6-background mdx mice, which show phenotypes similar to C57BL/10 mdx mice [24, 25], were a generous gift from Dr. T. Sasaoka (National Institute for Basic Biology). C57BL/6 (WT) mice were purchased from Nihon CLEA (Tokyo, Japan). All experiments using mice were performed in accordance with the guidelines approved by the Nippon Medical School and National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (NCNP) Animal Ethics Committees. Beagle-based CXMDJ colony dogs were bred and housed at NCNP [21]. CXMDJ used for cell transplantation and healthy Beagle dogs as controls were cared for and treated in accordance with the guidelines approved by the Ethics Committee for the Treatment of Laboratory Animals at NCNP.

Cell preparation

Pluripotent stem cell-enriched human dental pulp-derived cells (hDPSCs) were provided by JCR Pharmaceuticals (Hyogo, Japan). The cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan) at 37 °C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2.

Systemic delivery procedure

Systemic delivery of hDPSCs into mdx mice was conducted using four injections with an interval of 1 week between injection doses of 1.0 × 106 cells (high dose) or 5.0 × 105 cells (low dose) starting at 4–5 weeks of age (body weight (BW) > 10 g). Age-matched mice were used as controls for the experiments. The experiments using CXMDJ were performed using hDPSC administration in the acute phase at 2–3 months of age (Table 1). Polaramine (chlorpheniramine maleate, 0.15 mg/kg, MSD) pretreated CXMDJ (three subjects) were intravenously injected with hDPSCs (4.0 × 106 cells/kg/week) at a rate of 1 mL/min. Four injections at weekly intervals were performed as the first course, followed by four injections carried out as the second course after 8–13 weeks. Littermate CXMDJ were untreated controls that were injected with saline at identical time intervals.

Table 1 Summary of transplantation experiments

Biodistribution of hDPSCs

DNA extractions were performed on tissue suspensions using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and quantified using a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop; Thermos Fisher Scientific). Real-time quantitative PCR was performed using the DNA Master SYBR Green I kit (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) and primers for the human Alu site. The primer sequences used were as follows: 5′-GTCAGGAGATCGAGACCATCCC-3′ (forward) and 5′-TCCTGCCTCAGCCTCCCAAG-3′ (reverse). PCR conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s, 68 °C for 30 s, and then 72 °C for 30 s. Standards were generated by adding 10-fold serial dilutions of hDPSCs to determine the concentration of hDPSCs in genomic DNA.

Blood tests

Hematological and serum biochemical testing were performed using a semiautomatic hematology analyzer (Sysmex Hematology Analyzer F-820; Sysmex, Hyogo, Japan). Serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate transferase (AST), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels were measured using an automated analyzer (DRI-CHEM3506; Fuji Film Medical, Tokyo, Japan). C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured using a colorimetric assay with an FDC3500 clinical biochemistry analyzer.

ELISA

The serum IL-6 levels were determined using a Quantikine ELISA mouse kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). A canine IL-6 immunoassay (R&D Systems) was carried out according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.

Grip strength

Forelimb grip strength was measured using a grip strength meter (MK-380 M; Muromachi Kikai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) as previously described [26]. Five trials were performed with a resting period of 5 s between trials. The average tension force (g) was calculated from 3 highest measurements for each group of mice.

Analysis of locomotor activity

Physiological mouse activity was analyzed in each cage with a computerized wheel system (dual activity monitor system, SHINFACTORY Co., Ltd., Fukuoka, Japan) by counting the number of wheel revolutions during each 5 min interval using ACTIMO-DATA II software [27]. The activity of dogs was monitored and counted using an infrared sensor system (Supermex, Muromachi Kikai) as previously described [28]. The average daily locomotor activity shown by the dogs over 5 days and nights (12 h light/dark cycles) was calculated. We also compared the 15-m running time of CXMDJ during the experimental period. The running speed was averaged from four measurements. To determine the acceleration parameter, we used portable wireless hybrid sensors (TSND121; ATR-Promotions Inc., Kyoto, Japan) on the thoracic and lumbar regions of the dogs, as described previously [29]. The acceleration magnitude (AM) was calculated from the three acceleration vectors (Ax, Ay, Az) as the square root of the sum of the three-axial values (AM = √Ax2 + Ay2 + Az2) [30] and was averaged for each trial. The relative components of the AM along the three axes (%) were calculated by dividing the absolute values of each axis by the AM [31], and these components that were averaged in each trial were calculated as acceleration ratios (Ax ratio, Ay ratio, Az ratio).

Magnetic resonance imaging

Images of the T2-weighted and fat-saturated T2-weighted series were obtained in CXMDJ anesthetized animals with an inhalational mixture of 2–3% isofluorane and oxygen according to a method described previously [32] with constant monitoring of heart rate and oxygen saturation. We examined the crus muscles of the lower limbs using a superconducting 3.0-Tesla MRI device (MAGNETOM Trio; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlanger, Germany) with an 18-cm-diameter/18-cm-length human extremity coil. Quantitative analysis of the images was performed using the Syngo MR2004A software (Siemens Medical Solutions), as previously reported [29, 32]. Briefly, regions of interest (ROIs) were selected to avoid flow artifacts and large vessels. Signal intensities were measured for these ROIs. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of each ROI were calculated using the following equation: SNR = signal intensity/SDair, where SDair is the standard deviation (SD) of the background noise. The average SNR (Ave SNR) was calculated using the equation described in our previous report [29].

Hindlimb extensor strength test

The two hindlimbs in CXMDJ were evaluated by measuring the wrist flexion and extension strength using a custom-made torque measurement device. Stimulation frequencies of 60 Hz activate muscles that extend or push the hind paw against the ground. A transducer captures the torque generated when the paw pushes against the force plate. The maximal torque was expressed as a percentage of the predicted values computed using a model based on control values [33].

Histopathology and immunohistochemistry

Transverse cryosections (10-μm thick) prepared from frozen muscle tissues were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) using standard procedures. Cryosections fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde were treated with anti-canine developmental myosin heavy chain (dMyHC) antibody (NCL-MHCd; Leica) followed by Alexa 568-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibodies (Thermo Fisher) or canine IgG antibody conjugated with Alexa 488 (Thermo Fisher) as the secondary antibody and mounted in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, CA) with 4, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. Immunofluorescence and H&E staining were visualized using an IX71 and IX81 fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Quantitative analysis of the myofiber area was performed using cellSence software (Olympus) using H&E images (2500–3500 fibers in each group).

Echocardiography

Echocardiographic images of unanesthetized dogs were obtained using a Vivid S6 Dimensions (GE Healthcare Japan, Tokyo, Japan) probe equipped with a linear array ultrasound transducer (i13L) transmitting at 10 MHz as described previously [34]. The ejection fraction (EF) (%) was calculated using M-mode parameters based on multiple measurements.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± S.D. Differences between two groups were assessed using unpaired two-tailed t tests. Multiple comparisons between three or more groups were performed using one-way or two-way ANOVA. Statistical significance is defined as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001. Statistical significance was calculated using Excel (Microsoft) and GraphPad Prism 8.

Results

Systemic injection of human DPSCs (hDPSCs) into dystrophic mice

Mdx mice received a single dose of hDPSCs (high dose, 1.0 × 106 cells, or low dose, 5.0 × 105 cells) or repeated administration of high- and low-dose hDPSCs via the tail vein (Fig. 1a). None of the hDPSC-treated mdx mice showed any significant effect on body weight (BW) during the experiments (Fig. 1b). Grip strength in mdx mice showed significant restoration after repeated administration of high-dose hDPSC (Fig. 1c, Table S1, mdx vs. repeated high dose of hDPSC-mdx, P = 0.0002; WT vs. repeated high dose of hDPSC-mdx, P = 0.995). However, grip strength did not improve in mice administered a single high-dose or repeat low-dose injections. The grip strength of high-dose hDPSC-treated mdx mice was not significantly different from that of 1-year-old mdx mice or WT mice (Figure S1A).

Fig. 1
figure1

Safety and functional recovery on hDPSC-treated mdx mice. a Schematic representation of the repeat or single hDPSC-treatment schedule in mdx mice. b Growth curve of 9 to 30-week-old wild type (WT), mdx, and hDPSC-treated mdx mice (n = 4 each). c Normalized grip strength (g/g body weight, BW) measured in 9-week-old WT (n = 6), untreated mdx (n = 9), repeat (n = 17, 7), and single (n = 3, 7) hDPSC (high- or low-dose)-treated mdx mice. d Quantification of maximum running speed (m/min) in the wheel cage, and e daily distance covered during wheel running in 12-week-old WT (n = 6–8), untreated mdx (n = 10–12), repeat (n = 8–9, 5–6), and single (n = 3, 6) hDPSC (high- or low-dose)-treated mdx mice. f Quantification of maximum running speed (m/min) in the wheel cage in 50-week-old mdx (n = 16–19), repeat hDPSC (high- or low-dose)-treated mdx mice (n = 13–14, 5). All data are represented as mean ± SD and statistical differences compared to WT (*P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001) and untreated mdx (#P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, and ###P < 0.0005), one-way ANOVA

We examined the progressive resistance during wheel running in mdx mice. The hDPSCs-treated mdx mice had improved running speed compared to mdx mice (Fig. 1d, Table S2, mdx vs. repeated high dose of hDPSC-mdx, P = 0.007; WT vs. repeated high dose of hDPSC-mdx, P = 0.642; mdx vs. single high dose of hDPSC-mdx, P = 0.664; mdx vs. low dose of hDPSC-mdx, P = 0.019) and had a daily running distance similar to WT mice (Fig. 1e, Table S2, mdx vs. repeated high dose of hDPSC-mdx, P = 0.0069; WT vs. high dose of hDPSC-mdx, P = 0.214; mdx vs. single high dose of hDPSC-mdx, P = 0.07; mdx vs. low dose of hDPSC-mdx, P = 0.015). Surprisingly, there was a difference in running speed between the repeated treatment and untreated groups at 1 year of age (Fig. 1f, mdx vs. repeated high dose of hDPSC-mdx, P = 0.022), although their daily running distance was not significantly different (Figure S1B and Table S2, P = 0.24).

The cross-section of the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle of mdx mice showed smaller (regenerating fibers) and larger (hypertrophic fibers) fiber diameter in the dystrophic muscles, centrally nucleated fibers (CNFs), spread muscle interstitium, and cell infiltration interspersed in the muscle interstitium (Fig. 2a–d). The histopathological findings observed in the repeatedly hDPSC-treated mdx mice included limited muscle interstitium, nuclear infiltration (Fig. 2a, b, d), and reduced frequency of larger fiber areas (Fig. 2c), but not in a dose-dependent manner. We also observed that the CNFs in dystrophic muscle, which are indicative of regenerated myofibers following degeneration, were reduced in the hDPSC-treated mdx mice with a repeated high dose (Fig. 2e), suggesting that degeneration was regulated in the hDPSC-treated muscle. When we examined the distribution of hPDSCs by human-specific Alu-PCR, 1 week after the transplantation, many cells accumulated in the lung, and some survived in the skeletal muscle (Fig. 2f), but these were detected for only a short period of time.

Fig. 2
figure2

Histopathological appearance of hDPSC-treated mdx mice. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of overall cross-sections of the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle from 12-week-old untreated mdx and high-dose hDPSC-treated mdx mice (a) and high magnification images containing low-dose hDPSC-treated mdx mice (b). Scale bars, 100 μm. c The average percentage of the frequency distribution of the myofiber area (μm2). Area values showed both frequency (% of total fibers) and distribution comparisons, paired t test. d Quantification of nuclear expansion as cross-section area (n = 3) and (e) quantification of the percentage of centrally nucleated fibers (CNFs) in the TA muscle (n = 4). Statistical differences compared to mdx mice (*P < 0.05, and **P < 0.01), paired t test. f Biodistribution of hDPSCs measured by Alu-PCR in the TA muscle, lung, and liver tissue from untreated mdx and repeated high-dose hDPSC-mdx mice 1 week after transplantation. Statistical differences compared to mdx mice (**P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.0005); ns, not significant, two-way ANOVA

Altogether, our data supported the conclusion that short-term amelioration of the DMD phenotype was observed in all groups of hDPSC-treated mdx mice. Among them, the mice repeatedly treated with high-dose hDPSCs showed long-term and remarkable beneficial effects on the DMD phenotype.

Safe systemic transplantation of hDPSCs into CXMDJ

We next investigated the possibility of long-term benefits in hDPSC-treated animals using dog models. We started with the administration of hDPSCs in CXMDJ with the DMD phenotype in the acute phase, when the disease signs were already observable (n = 3 per group, Fig. 3a, Table 1). Eight systemic injections of 4 × 106 cells/kg were performed on three CXMDJ dogs (12205MA, 13201MA, 13304MA) with two courses of weekly injections for 4 weeks (Table 1). After each injection, we carefully monitored the activity, heart rate, respiratory rate, and appearance of any abnormal signs. During development, hDPSC-treated CXMDJ showed good growth and no severe weight loss due to continuous administration (Fig. 3b). No obvious abnormalities related to hepato-renal damage or anemia due to systemic administration in all hDPSC-treated CXMDJ were noted in blood tests, which included the determination of ALP, AST, BUN levels, and CRP levels (Fig. 3c, Figure S2A).

Fig. 3
figure3

Evaluation of safety and efficacy after repeated systemic administration of hDPSCs into CXMDJ. a Schematic representation of the hDPSC-treatment schedule in CXMDJ. b Early life growth and c serum chemistry data, such as alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) of normal dogs, untreated CXMDJ (control DMD; 12202MA, 13303MA, 14102MA), and hDPSC-treated CXMDJ (hDPSCs-DMD; 12205MA, 13201MA, 13304MA) after each administration throughout the experimental period. d Behavioral activity (day and night) in the home cage of normal dogs (13301MN, 14103MN) and CXMDJ (control DMD; 13303MA, 14102MA, and hDPSCs-DMD; 13201MA, 13304MA) at the age of 48–50 weeks, represented as mean activity counts (mean ± SD) observed every day and night. Statistical differences show normal vs. hDPSCs-DMD (*P < 0.05), and control DMD vs. hDPSCs-DMD (##P < 0.01), t test

Spontaneous locomotor activity measured using an infrared sensor system showed a largely reduced mobility of CXMDJ with aging [28]. In contrast, hDPSC-treated CXMDJ maintained activity for longer periods compared with untreated dogs until they turned 1-year-old (Fig. 3d), suggesting that no serious adverse effects in hDPSC-treated CXMDJ.

Regulatory effects of hDPSC treatment on inflammation in CXMDJ

During the experiments, serum IL-6 and TNF-α levels in CXMDJ did not increase over the normal range after hDPSC-treatment, whereas an increase was transiently detected in the untreated CXMDJ (Fig. 4a, Figure S2B). To address the regulation of progressive inflammation, the intensity of T2-signals on MRI was measured, which is characteristic of necrosis/edema and inflammatory lesions in CXMDJ. When comparing the quantitative changes of higher T2-signals (4–6 sites) in hindlimb muscles between 2 and 7 months of age, these signals were significantly reduced in the hDPSC-treated CXMDJ (Fig. 4b, c, [13201MA, 13303MA], Figure S3 [12205MA], and Table S3). These findings indicate that hDPSC treatment can enhance the regulation of inflammatory lesions in dystrophic muscles.

Fig. 4
figure4

Regulation of inflammation associated with the DMD phenotype. a Serum levels of IL-6 from dogs quantified using ELISA during the experimental period. b Cross-sectional magnetic resonance images (MRI) in the lower leg muscles of untreated (control DMD) and hDPSC-treated CXMDJ (hDPSC-DMD). T2-weighted imaging was comparable in the lower legs (R, right side; L, left side, left/right asymmetry) of CXMDJ (untreated 13303MA and hDPSC-treated 13201MA and 13304MA). c Quantitative changes of higher T2-signals (signal-to-noise ratio, SNR) in the hindlimb muscles on CXMDJ shown in MRI data (b). Relative SNR was calculated from the highest signals in each hindlimb of 2-month-old compared to 7-month-old dogs. Data are represented as mean ± SD and statistical differences compared to control DMD (*P < 0.05), t test

Structural stability of the skeletal muscle of hDPSC-treated CXMDJ

To investigate the pathological changes in hDPSC-treated muscle, we examined cross-sections of DMD muscles. Dystrophic phenotypes, including nuclear infiltration and spread of muscle fiber interstitium, were downregulated in the skeletal muscle of hDPSC-treated CXMDJ (Fig. 5a, Figure S4). Although dystrophic muscles also displayed a high myofiber size variability due to a higher number of smaller fibers and the occurrence of hypertrophic fibers, the fiber size distribution in the TA muscles shifted toward a lower number of both smaller and hypertrophic fibers in the case of hDPSC-DMD (Fig. 5b, P = 0.0425, Figure S5). Immunostaining analysis showed significantly decreased accumulation of IgG, a marker for damaged myofiber [32], in the skeletal muscle of hDPSC-treated CXMDJ (Fig. 5c). Although the muscle tissue from CXMDJ also showed a number of developmental myosin heavy chain (dMyHC)-positive fibers, which are not usually observed in the muscles of normal dogs [35], there were dMyHC-positive fibers only in limited areas within the tissue of hDPSC-treated CXMDJ, suggesting that systemic hDPSC treatment can improve the dystrophic phenotype. By Alu-PCR analysis, we also confirmed that circulating transplanted hDPSCs were not detectable in blood within 48 h after injection (Figure S2C). Seven weeks after treatment, the retention of hDPSCs was confirmed in parts of the skeletal muscle, such as the TA and extensor digitorum longus muscle and cardiac muscle (left ventricular, LV), but not detectable in the lung and diaphragm of recipient dogs (Fig. 5d).

Fig. 5
figure5

Histopathological examination of hDPSC-treated CXMDJ. a Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of the tibialis anterior (TA) and the gastrocnemius lateral (GL) muscle, and heart (left ventricular) from 1-year-old control DMD (12202MA, 13303MA, and 14102MA) and hDPSCs-DMD dogs (12205MA and 13304MA). Scale bar, 100 μm. b Muscle fiber areas (μm2) measured from the TA muscle of control and hDPSC-DMD dogs by H&E staining (n = 4). The average number of myofibers is described as the distribution. c Immunofluorescence analysis of the TA and gastrocnemius medialis (GM) muscles from the control DMD (12202MA, 14102MA, and 3903MA) and hDPSCs-DMD (12205MA and 13304MA) with anti-IgG antibodies (green) and anti-developmental myosin heavy chain antibodies (red) and DAPI (blue) staining. d Biodistribution of hDPSCs measured by Alu-PCR in the TA, extensor digitorum longus (EDL), extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) muscle, diaphragm, heart (left ventricular, LV; right ventricular, RV), and lung tissue from repeated hDPSC-CXMDJ, 7 weeks after transplantation. N.D., not detected

Improved locomotor activity in hDPSC-treated CXMDJ

The CXMDJ model displays progressive clinical impairment with a rapid decline in the walking ability of dogs with progressive weakness, abnormal stiff limbs, and short strides [21, 29]. hDPSC-treated CXMDJ showed continued stabilization of clinical status characterized by a higher clinical score maintained up to the age of 12 months (Figure S6), reflecting reduced fatigability, decreased limb stiffness intensity, and less severe ankyloses [36], as described in our previous reports [21, 28, 29, 37]. Indeed, the home cage physiological activity of hDPSC-CXMDJ during the daytime (9213 ± 2871 counts) was higher than that of control DMD (4645 ± 183.9 counts, P = 0.0075) in 12-month-old dogs (Fig. 3d), even though it was still significantly different from that of normal dogs (41,746 ± 6241 counts, P < 0.0001). Video data showed an increased mobility of hDPSC-CXMDJ compared to untreated CXMDJ in the cage based on jumping and playfulness (Supporting Information, movie S1). These observations encouraged us to investigate whether hDPSC could increase the locomotor activity of CXMDJ. We monitored the 15 m running speed of CXMDJ to determine motor function and confirmed that CXMDJ had a slower speed according to their progressive phenotype (Fig. 6a, Supporting Information, movie S2, 3). Meanwhile, hDPSC-treated CXMDJ maintained their running speed and were active for more than 12 months (vs. control DMD, P < 0.00001; vs. normal, P < 0.0005). We also measured multiple acceleration parameters, which severely decrease with age in dystrophic dogs compared to normal dogs, as we have previously reported [29]. When using the acceleration parameter to evaluate motor function, acceleration magnitudes (AM) were not significantly different between untreated and hDPSC-treated CXMDJ in either the thoracic or lumbar region (Figure S7 and Table S4). Interestingly, the higher AM (> 10,000 mG) maintenance ratio was rarely reached in CXMDJ, but was observed more frequently in hDPSC-treated CXMDJ (Fig. 6b).

Fig. 6
figure6

Improvement of muscle function in hDPSC-treated CXMDJ. a Monitoring of 15 m running speed (s) during the experimental period. b As an acceleration parameter, the acceleration magnitude (AM) was calculated from the three acceleration vectors measured by 15 m running. Hardly detectable ratio of higher AM value (> 10,000 mG) was obtained, which was calculated by dividing the total number of AM from the number of higher AM value (> 10,000 mG) in all groups. c Tetanic force estimated on hindlimbs of dogs. The graph shows the summary statistics of force change relative to baseline values 5 weeks after the final injection. d Ejection fraction (EF) values were calculated using echocardiographic parameters post-transplantation (normal dogs, 14103MN and 12201MN; control DMD, 13303MA, 13802MA, and 14102MA; and hDPSCs-DMD, 12205MA, 13201MA, and 13304MA). All data are represented as mean ± SD and statistical differences between normal and control DMD dogs (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001), control DMD and hDPSCs-DMD (#P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, and ####P < 0.0001), multiple t test and one-way ANOVA

Improvement in skeletal muscle and cardiac dysfunction

Finally, we investigated whether repeated systemic administration of hDPSCs would lead to long-term improvement of dystrophic muscle function. An instantaneous force by torque evaluation was used to assess skeletal muscle function. The tetanic force on the CXMDJ hindlimbs was 51.0 ± 12.3% (3.12 ± 1.0 N m/s; P < 0.0001) compared to normal dogs (6.12 ± 0.49 N m/s), while all hDPSC-treated CXMDJ (4.96 ± 1.24 N m/s) showed significantly stronger torque values (81.0 ± 12.8% of normal dogs, P = 0.042) compared to untreated CXMDJ (P = 0.0039) as described in Fig. 6b. With regard to cardiac function, CXMDJ shows progressive cardiac dysfunction, which is similar to DMD patients presenting with dilated cardiomyopathy [22, 38]. Echocardiography showed that LV function was maintained, with higher levels of EF in hDPSC-treated CXMDJ (mean ± SD, 67.3 ± 0.53%) than that in control DMD (60.5 ± 3.2%, P = 0.001), and comparable to that in normal dogs (69.6 ± 4.7%, Fig. 6c).

Altogether, these observations consistently indicate that repeated systemic hDPSC treatment in DMD animals can improve the dystrophic phenotype by maintaining muscle function.

Discussion

Here, we investigated and proposed a protocol for safe and effective stem cell transplantation aimed at the functional recovery of skeletal muscles. A comprehensive analysis was performed during experiments performed by administering hDPSCs in animal models of DMD. Results from both mdx mice and CXMDJ models showed that disease progression slowed down after repeated rounds of hDPSC treatment to induce long-term effects.

Short-term amelioration of locomotor function was also observed in all groups of hDPSC-treated mdx mice. However, the dose-dependent effects of hDPSC on physiological activity, grip strength, running speed, and longer running distances suggest that sufficient amelioration would require repeated high-dose administration of cells (Fig. 1). The maintained running ability up to 1 year of age in mice repeatedly treated with high-dose hDPSCs in the acute DMD phase also supports the conclusion that the effects are long-term. Since transplanted cells are temporary, but accumulate in muscle tissues, it is generally considered that hDPSCs play a protective role against inflammation in the dystrophic muscle. In our study, this was supported by the histopathological appearance of the hDPSC-treated muscle, with findings such as reduced areas of nucleic infiltration (Fig. 2).

In our experiments using dog models, repeated systemic hDPSC injections into the CXMDJ were safe and caused no severe side effects without the need for immunosuppression (Fig. 3). Since hDPSCs share characteristics with clinically used BM-MSCs that lack HLA-DR expression, these cells are not likely to be subjected to immunological attack in the recipient body.

The repeated use of hDPSCs in the CXMDJ prevented severe inflammation with an IL-6 and TNF-α surge, as validated by cell infiltration that was much more localized, and attenuation of T2 signals in muscles on MRI (Fig. 4, Figure S2B). Higher concentrations of circulating IL-6, IL-1, and TNF-α have also been reported in DMD compared to that in healthy subjects [39]. These facts indicate that hDPSCs have an immune-modulatory effect in DMD and may attenuate the histopathological changes that lead to dysfunction in dystrophic muscles. Histopathological appearance improvements after hDPSC administration indicate the functional recovery of dystrophic muscle (Fig. 5). Importantly, the home cage activity and running function of hDPSC-treated CXMDJ were maintained until they reached 1 year of age (Figs. 3d and 6a). The therapeutic effects of hDPSCs are considered to be more effective in the long-term maintenance of running function, a capacity that diminishes with age in the disease, rather than contributing to recovery. It appears that hDPSC treatment at a young age could alleviate the DMD phenotype by preserving the whole-body muscle function.

Our results included an acceleration parameter to determine the instantaneous running ability of CXMDJ (Fig. 6b). Since there is a large difference in the evaluation of running speeds among individuals, and there are issues for some DMD patients in walking for even for 6 min, introducing the acceleration parameter into the evaluation of running ability could be applied to assess outcomes in clinical trials for hereditary neuromuscular disorders, including DMD.

Significantly stronger isometric torque values in hDPSC-treated CXMDJ clearly demonstrate that the progressive loss in limb muscle strength is ameliorated by repeated hDPSC treatment (Fig. 6c). Echocardiography showed that decreased EF in CXMDJ due to progressive cardiac dysfunction [22, 38] was rescued in the hDPSC-treated CXMDJ (Fig. 6d), suggesting that hDPSC treatment improved not only limb muscle strength but also cardiac muscle function. Since DMD patients sometimes exhibit dilated cardiomyopathy, the DPSC therapies presented in this study may be promising for maintaining cardiac function.

It has also been reported that transplantation of hDPSCs in the GRMD model improved muscle pathology, resulting in limited dystrophin expression [40]. Since hDPSCs can differentiate into the myogenic lineage only with very low efficiency without the use of agents, including the demethylating agent 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine [41], our study indicates that the benefits obtained from hDPSCs depend on their function as anti-inflammatory agents, and not by direct contribution to tissue repair. We examined the possibility of dystrophin expression derived from hDPSCs in the skeletal muscle but did not confirm the presence of dystrophin mRNA by reverse transcription PCR (Figure S8). In fact, the restoration of dystrophin protein levels is the major target for the treatment of DMD patients. In contrast, the benefit of DPSCs in this study is likely dependent on their role as a systemic anti-inflammatory agent and not their differentiation directly promoting muscle fiber regeneration. The present innovation is a therapeutic approach utilizing the inflammation-regulating ability of MSCs. Since stem cells other than MSCs do not exhibit such ability, this function can be expected to be novel.

We previously provided evidence that severe phenotypes in IL-10 knockout mdx mice, such as increased M1-macrophage infiltration, high inflammatory factor levels, and progressive cardiorespiratory dysfunction, show a predisposition toward inflammation [42]. Glucocorticoids are widely used in patients to interrupt and improve muscle strength during early stages, which may also act directly on muscle fibers by stabilizing the sarcolemma [43, 44]. However, this is frequently associated with severe side effects. Several anti-inflammatory therapies reportedly have beneficial effects on DMD phenotypes [45, 46]. TNF-α blockers, such as infliximab, have been investigated using mdx mice as an anti-inflammatory agent for DMD [45, 47]. Proteasome inhibitors, such as bortezomib, have been shown to block NF-κB activation, improve the appearance of muscle fibers, and reduce both connective tissue deposition and inflammatory cell infiltration in GRMD. Moreover, treatment with an adeno-associated virus vector encoding a short hairpin RNA (shRNA) that specifically targets NF-κB ameliorated muscle pathologies in mdx mice [48]. Therefore, our hDPSC transplantation strategy has the potential to be used in the form of combined therapy with steroid or other immune-modulating treatments.

Comparison of human MSCs derived from different tissues revealed no differences in cell morphology or expression of surface markers typical of mesenchymal stem cells [49]. Many therapeutic approaches have been developed using MSCs derived from bone marrow (BM) [50, 51], adipocytes [52], and placenta [53]. In this study, we first demonstrated the long-term therapeutic effects of systemic administration of DPSCs. hDPSCs showed immunoregulatory properties similar to those of BM-MSCs in terms of the cellular proliferation inhibition of both CD4+- and CD8+-activated T cells, and increased IL-10 and prostaglandin E2 production compared to BM-MSCs [54]. In addition, hDPSCs proliferate much faster than those from human BM-MSCs, e.g., when the yields of hDPSCs were 1.2 × 106 cells, BM-MSCs were 6.0 × 105 cells at passage 3 [55]. Under serum/xeno-free, good manufacturing practice-compliant (GMP) conditions, DPSCs showed shorter doubling times compared to BM-MSCs and maintained long-term “stemness” [56]. Comparing hDPSCs-cultivation in xeno-free serum and FBS medium, population doublings showed an initial linear trend, but a statistically significantly lower number of cumulative doublings in xeno-free serum versus FBS medium was detected by passage 6 [57]. Based on the safety evaluation of MSC expansion, a consistent decrease in telomere length was found in both DPSC and BM-MSC cultures under GMP conditions [56]. These findings indicate that DPSCs are a promising cell source for transplantation, at least for expansion under the GMP level; however, there is still a need for the development of qualified protocols for clinical-grade expansion of oral MSCs.

While the gene expression profiles of BM-MSCs, adipocyte-MSCs, and umbilical cord tissue-derived MSCs were similar, DPSCs differed in relative pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1 (PDX1) and Sox2 gene expression and had higher expression of E-cadherin and lower expression of Snail associated with tissue reparative functions in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition [49]. Furthermore, we confirmed that expression of the chemokine, stromal-derived factor-1(SDF-1/CXCL12), from hDPSCs was upregulated in response to TNF-α stimulation (Figure S9). SDF-1 and growth factors might enhance DPSC retention by altering the microenvironment. The binding of SDF-1 to both CXCR4 and CXCR7 is responsible for the production of paracrine mediators, including VEGF, β-FGF-1, and HGF, which exert mitogenic, anti-apoptotic, pro-angiogenic, and anti-inflammatory effects [58]. Comparing to other MSCs, DPSCs have an extensive trophic secretomes, which include NGF, BDNF, NT-3, GDNF, VEGF, and PDGF, and express greater amounts of NGF, BDNF, and NT-3, which promote axon/neurite regeneration [59, 60]. The neuroprotective/pro-regenerative effects are significantly greater in DPSC transplanted animals compared to BM-MSC-treated ones and are correlated with a more favorable neurotrophic secretome by DPSC [60]. Based on this, we surmise that tissue repair mechanisms by DPSC may be associated with DMD treatment. Furthermore, MSCs derived from different sources are transcriptomically different from each other, although they share basic characteristics. This transcriptomic difference is also important in terms of the diversity of the secretions such as mi-RNA. For example, miR-199a-5p is known to be increased in exosomes of DMD patients, or miR-24, which is involved in myogenic differentiation [61]. Future therapeutic studies using various tissue-derived MSCs will allow for the selection of optimal cell sources.

As a possible source for cell therapy, hDPSCs have been investigated for their potential in treating various degenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, myocardial infarction, bone defects, and corneal reconstruction [62]. In the case of experimental spinal cord injury, stroke, and Parkinson’s disease models, hDPSC transplantation has been demonstrated as a promising treatment for improving functional outcome [63]. Here, we show for the first time the long-lasting restorative effect in DMD animal models produced by systemic DPSC injection that did not result in discernible side effects. Hopefully, this approach can be considered a safe and effective therapeutic measure against DMD. Although further studies are still needed to ascertain the clinical usage and to elucidate molecular mechanisms, since repeated treatments are required to prevent the DMD phenotype, hDPSC treatment can be considered a promising DMD therapy.

Conclusion

DPSCs have potential as therapeutics, since similar types of bone marrow-derived MSCs have been reported to show immunosuppressive properties. This report investigated the therapeutic effects of DPSCs using animal models of DMD. Our study demonstrates that DMD phenotypes, such as pathological inflammation and motor dysfunction, were significantly improved by repeated systemic injections of DPSCs. This study provides valuable insights into MSC cell therapy in DMD for potential clinical applications.

Additional file 2: Movie S2. Movies showing 15 m running analysis in CXMDJ. Movies of 15 m running in untreated CXMDJ littermates (control DMD, 12202MA).

Additional file 3: Movie S3. Movies showing 15 m running analysis in CXMDJ. Movies of 15 m running in hDPSC-treated CXMDJ (hDPSCs-DMD, 12205MA).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ALP:

Alkaline phosphatase

AM:

Acceleration magnitude

AST:

Aspartate transferase

BDNF:

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor

BUN:

Blood urea nitrogen

BM-MSCs:

Bone marrow-derived multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells

BW:

Body weight

β-FGF-1:

β-Fibroblast growth factor-1

CD:

Cluster of differentiation

CNFs:

Centrally nucleated fibers

CRP:

C-reactive protein

CXCR:

C-X-C Chemokine receptor

CXMDJ :

Canine X-linked muscular dystrophy model in Japan

dMyHC:

Developmental myosin heavy chain

DAPI:

4, 6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole

DMD:

Duchenne muscular dystrophy

DPSCs:

Dental pulp stem cells

EDL:

Extensor digitorum longus

EF:

Ejection fraction

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

FHL:

Flexor hallucis longus

GDNF:

Glial Cell Line-derived Neurotrophic Factor

GL:

Gastrocnemius lateral

GM:

Gastrocnemius medialis

GRMD:

Golden retriever muscular dystrophy

H&E:

Hematoxylin and eosin

HGF:

Hepatocyte growth factor

HLA-DR:

Human leukocyte antigen-D-related

IL-6:

Interleukin-6

IL-10:

Interleukin-10

LV:

Left ventricular

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

MSCs:

Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells

N.D.:

Not detected

NF-κB:

Nuclear factor-kappa B

NGF:

Nerve growth factor

NT-3:

Neurotrophin-3

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

PDGF:

Platelet-Derived Growth Factor

PDX1:

Pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1

ROI:

Regions of interest

RV:

Right ventricular

shRNA:

Short hairpin RNA

SD:

Standard deviation

SDF-1/CXCL12:

stromal-derived factor-1

SNRs:

Signal-to-noise ratios

Sox2:

Sry related high mobility group box 2

TA:

Tibialis anterior

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

WT:

Wild type

References

  1. 1.

    Haslett JN, Sanoudou D, Kho AT, Bennett RR, Greenberg SA, Kohane IS, Beggs AH, Kunkel LM. Gene expression comparison of biopsies from Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and normal skeletal muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:15000–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Campbell KP. Three muscular dystrophies: loss of cytoskeleton-extracellular matrix linkage. Cell. 1995;80:675–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ervasti JM, Ohlendieck K, Kahl SD, Gaver MG, Campbell KP. Deficiency of a glycoprotein component of the dystrophin complex in dystrophic muscle. Nature. 1990;345:315–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Matthews E, Brassington R, Kuntzer T, Jichi F, Manzur AY. Corticosteroids for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;13:CD003725.

  5. 5.

    Mantovani A, Sica A, Sozzani S, Allavena P, Vecchi A, Locati M. The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization. Trends Immunol. 2004;25:677–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Moxley RT 3rd, Ashwal S, Pandya S, Connolly A, Florence J, Mathews K, Baumbach L, McDonald C, Sussman M, Wade C. Practice parameter: corticosteroid treatment of Duchenne dystrophy: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology. 2005;64:13–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Friedenstein AJ, Petrakova KV, Kurolesova AI, Frolova GP. Heterotopic of bone marrow. Analysis of precursor cells for osteogenic and hematopoietic tissues. Transplantation. 1968;6:230–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Zannettino AC, Paton S, Arthur A, Khor F, Itescu S, Gimble JM, Gronthos S. Multipotential human adipose-derived stromal stem cells exhibit a perivascular phenotype in vitro and in vivo. J Cell Physiol. 2008;214:413–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    He Q, Wan C, Li G. Concise review: multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells in blood. Stem Cells. 2007;25:69–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Oh W, Kim DS, Yang YS, Lee JK. Immunological properties of umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. Cell Immunol. 2008;251:116–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Tsai MS, Lee JL, Chang YJ, Hwang SM. Isolation of human multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from second-trimester amniotic fluid using a novel two-stage culture protocol. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1450–6.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zhang W, Walboomers XF, Van Kuppevelt TH, Daamen WF, Van Damme PA, Bian Z, Jansen JA. In vivo evaluation of human dental pulp stem cells differentiated towards multiple lineages. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2008;2:117–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Jo YY, Lee HJ, Kook SY, Choung HW, Park JY, Chung JH, Choung YH, Kim ES, Yang HC, Choung PH. Isolation and characterization of postnatal stem cells from human dental tissues. Tissue Eng. 2007;13:767–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ozdemir AT, Ozgul Ozdemir RB, Kirmaz C, Sariboyaci AE, Unal Halbutogllari ZS, Ozel C, Karaoz E. The paracrine immunomodulatory interactions between the human dental pulp derived mesenchymal stem cells and CD4 T cell subsets. Cell Immunol. 2016;310:108–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Camargo FD, Green R, Capetanaki Y, Jackson KA, Goodell MA. Single hematopoietic stem cells generate skeletal muscle through myeloid intermediates. Nat Med. 2003;9:1520–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lee-Pullen TF, Bennett AL, Beilharz MW, Grounds MD, Sammels LM. Superior survival and proliferation after transplantation of myoblasts obtained from adult mice compared with neonatal mice. Transplantation. 2004;78:1172–6.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Quenneville SP, Chapdelaine P, Rousseau J, Tremblay JP. Dystrophin expression in host muscle following transplantation of muscle precursor cells modified with the phiC31 integrase. Gene Ther. 2007;14:514–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sampaolesi M, Blot S, D'Antona G, Granger N, Tonlorenzi R, Innocenzi A, Mognol P, Thibaud JL, Galvez BG, Barthelemy I, Perani L, Mantero S, Guttinger M, Pansarasa O, Rinaldi C, Cusella De Angelis MG, Torrente Y, Bordignon C, Bottinelli R, Cossu G. Mesoangioblast stem cells ameliorate muscle function in dystrophic dogs. Nature. 2006;444:574–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Valentine BA, Winand NJ, Pradhan D, Moise NS, de Lahunta A, Kornegay JN, Cooper BJ. Canine X-linked muscular dystrophy as an animal model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a review. Am J Med Genet. 1992;42:352–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Nitahara-Kasahara Y, Hayashita-Kinoh H, Ohshima-Hosoyama S, Okada H, Wada-Maeda M, Nakamura A, Okada T, Takeda S. Long-term engraftment of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells that differentiate to form myogenic cells in dogs with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Mol Ther. 2012;20:168–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Shimatsu Y, Yoshimura M, Yuasa K, Urasawa N, Tomohiro M, Nakura M, Tanigawa M, Nakamura A, Takeda S. Major clinical and histopathological characteristics of canine X-linked muscular dystrophy in Japan. CXMDJ Acta Myol. 2005;24:145–54.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Yugeta N, Urasawa N, Fujii Y, Yoshimura M, Yuasa K, Wada MR, Nakura M, Shimatsu Y, Tomohiro M, Takahashi A, Machida N, Wakao Y, Nakamura A, Takeda S. Cardiac involvement in Beagle-based canine X-linked muscular dystrophy in Japan (CXMDJ): electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and morphologic studies. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2006;6:47.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Urasawa N, Wada MR, Machida N, Yuasa K, Shimatsu Y, Wakao Y, Yuasa S, Sano T, Nonaka I, Nakamura A, Takeda S. Selective vacuolar degeneration in dystrophin-deficient canine Purkinje fibers despite preservation of dystrophin-associated proteins with overexpression of Dp71. Circulation. 2008;117:2437–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Aartsma-Rus A, van Putten M. Assessing functional performance in the mdx mouse model. J Vis Exp. 2014;85:e51303.

  25. 25.

    Hyzewicz J, Tanihata J, Kuraoka M, Nitahara-Kasahara Y, Beylier T, Ruegg UT, Vater A, Takeda S. Low-intensity training and the C5a complement antagonist NOX-D21 rescue the mdx phenotype through modulation of inflammation. Am J Pathol. 2017;187:1147–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Hyzewicz J, Tanihata J, Kuraoka M, Ito N, Miyagoe-Suzuki Y, Takeda S. Low intensity training of mdx mice reduces carbonylation and increases expression levels of proteins involved in energy metabolism and muscle contraction. Free Radic Biol Med. 2015;82:122–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Buyse GM, Van der Mieren G, Erb M, D'Hooge J, Herijgers P, Verbeken E, Jara A, Van Den Bergh A, Mertens L, Courdier-Fruh I, Barzaghi P, Meier T. Long-term blinded placebo-controlled study of SNT-MC17/idebenone in the dystrophin deficient mdx mouse: cardiac protection and improved exercise performance. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:116–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hayashita-Kinoh H, Yugeta N, Okada H, Nitahara-Kasahara Y, Chiyo T, Okada T, Takeda S. Intra-amniotic rAAV-mediated microdystrophin gene transfer improves canine X-linked muscular dystrophy and may induce immune tolerance. Mol Ther. 2015;23:627–37.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kuraoka M, Nitahara-Kasahara Y, Tachimori H, Kato N, Shibasaki H, Shin A, Aoki Y, Kimura E, Takeda S. Accelerometric outcomes of motor function related to clinical evaluations and muscle involvement in dystrophic dogs. Plos One. 2018;13:e0208415.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Galan-Mercant A, Baron-Lopez FJ, Labajos-Manzanares MT, Cuesta-Vargas AI. Reliability and criterion-related validity with a smartphone used in timed-up-and-go test. Biomed Eng Online. 2014;13:156.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Barthelemy I, Barrey E, Aguilar P, Uriarte A, Le Chevoir M, Thibaud JL, Voit T, Blot S, Hogrel JY. Longitudinal ambulatory measurements of gait abnormality in dystrophin-deficient dogs. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:75.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kobayashi M, Nakamura A, Hasegawa D, Fujita M, Orima H, Takeda S. Evaluation of dystrophic dog pathology by fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging. Muscle Nerve. 2009;40:815–26.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Childers MK, Okamura CS, Bogan DJ, Bogan JR, Petroski GF, McDonald K, Kornegay JN. Eccentric contraction injury in dystrophic canine muscle. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1572–8.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Nitahara-Kasahara Y, Hayashita-Kinoh H, Chiyo T, Nishiyama A, Okada H, Takeda S, Okada T. Dystrophic mdx mice develop severe cardiac and respiratory dysfunction following genetic ablation of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23:3990–4000.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Stupka N, Schertzer JD, Bassel-Duby R, Olson EN, Lynch GS. Stimulation of calcineurin Aalpha activity attenuates muscle pathophysiology in mdx dystrophic mice. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2008;294:R983–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Rouger K, Larcher T, Dubreil L, Deschamps JY, Le Guiner C, Jouvion G, Delorme B, Lieubeau B, Carlus M, Fornasari B, Theret M, Orlando P, Ledevin M, Zuber C, Leroux I, Deleau S, Guigand L, Testault I, Le Rumeur E, Fiszman M, Cherel Y. Systemic delivery of allogenic muscle stem cells induces long-term muscle repair and clinical efficacy in duchenne muscular dystrophy dogs. Am J Pathol. 2011;179:2501–18.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Shimatsu Y, Katagiri K, Furuta T, Nakura M, Tanioka Y, Yuasa K, Tomohiro M, Kornegay JN, Nonaka I, Takeda S. Canine X-linked muscular dystrophy in Japan (CXMDJ). Exp Anim. 2003;52:93–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Takano H, Fujii Y, Yugeta N, Takeda S, Wakao Y. Assessment of left ventricular regional function in affected and carrier dogs with Duchenne muscular dystrophy using speckle tracking echocardiography. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2011;11:23–30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Cruz-Guzman Odel R, Rodriguez-Cruz M, Escobar Cedillo RE. Systemic inflammation in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: association with muscle function and nutritional status. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:891972.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Kerkis I, Ambrosio CE, Kerkis A, Martins DS, Zucconi E, Fonseca SA, Cabral RM, Maranduba CM, Gaiad TP, Morini AC, Vieira NM, Brolio MP, Sant'Anna OA, Miglino MA, Zatz M. Early transplantation of human immature dental pulp stem cells from baby teeth to golden retriever muscular dystrophy (GRMD) dogs: local or systemic? J Transl Med. 2008;6:35.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Pisciotta A, Riccio M, Carnevale G, Lu A, De Biasi S, Gibellini L, La Sala GB, Bruzzesi G, Ferrari A, Huard J, De Pol A. Stem cells isolated from human dental pulp and amniotic fluid improve skeletal muscle histopathology in mdx/SCID mice. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:156.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Nitahara-Kasahara Y, Takeda S, Okada T. Inflammatory predisposition predicts disease phenotypes in muscular dystrophy. Inflamm Regen. 2016;36:14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Jacobs SC, Bootsma AL, Willems PW, Bar PR, Wokke JH. Prednisone can protect against exercise-induced muscle damage. J Neurol. 1996;243:410–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Serra F, Quarta M, Canato M, Toniolo L, De Arcangelis V, Trotta A, Spath L, Monaco L, Reggiani C, Naro F. Inflammation in muscular dystrophy and the beneficial effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Muscle Nerve. 2012;46:773–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Hodgetts S, Radley H, Davies M, Grounds MD. Reduced necrosis of dystrophic muscle by depletion of host neutrophils, or blocking TNFalpha function with Etanercept in mdx mice. Neuromuscul Disord. 2006;16:591–602.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Cai B, Spencer MJ, Nakamura G, Tseng-Ong L, Tidball JG. Eosinophilia of dystrophin-deficient muscle is promoted by perforin-mediated cytotoxicity by T cell effectors. Am J Pathol. 2000;156:1789–96.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Grounds MD, Torrisi J. Anti-TNFalpha (Remicade) therapy protects dystrophic skeletal muscle from necrosis. FASEB J. 2004;18:676–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Yang Q, Tang Y, Imbrogno K, Lu A, Proto JD, Chen A, Guo F, Fu FH, Huard J, Wang B. AAV-based shRNA silencing of NF-kappaB ameliorates muscle pathologies in mdx mice. Gene Ther. 2012;19:1196–204.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Stanko P, Kaiserova K, Altanerova V, Altaner C. Comparison of human mesenchymal stem cells derived from dental pulp, bone marrow, adipose tissue, and umbilical cord tissue by gene expression. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2014;158:373–7.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Shang YC, Wang SH, Xiong F, Peng FN, Liu ZS, Geng J, Zhang C. Activation of Wnt3a signaling promotes myogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in mdx mice. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2016;37:873–81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Maeda Y, Yonemochi Y, Nakajyo Y, Hidaka H, Ikeda T, Ando Y. CXCL12 and osteopontin from bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells improve muscle regeneration. Sci Rep. 2017;7:3305.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Liu YN, Yan X, Sun Z, Han Q, Zhao RC. Mice adipose derived Flk-1+ mesenchymal stem cells can ameliorate Duchenne's muscular dystrophy in mdx mice for their multilineage potential. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2007;15:306–12.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Bier A, Berenstein P, Kronfeld N, Morgoulis D, Ziv-Av A, Goldstein H, Kazimirsky G, Cazacu S, Meir R, Popovtzer R, Dori A, Brodie C. Placenta-derived mesenchymal stromal cells and their exosomes exert therapeutic effects in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Biomaterials. 2018;174:67–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    De la Rosa-Ruiz MDP, Alvarez-Perez MA, Cortes-Morales VA, Monroy-Garcia A, Mayani H, Fragoso-Gonzalez G, Caballero-Chacon S, Diaz D, Candanedo-Gonzalez F, Montesinos JJ. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells derived from dental tissues: a comparative in vitro evaluation of their immunoregulatory properties against T cells. Cells. 2019;8:1491–512.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Ponnaiyan D, Jegadeesan V. Comparison of phenotype and differentiation marker gene expression profiles in human dental pulp and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Eur J Dent. 2014;8:307–13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Bakopoulou A, Apatzidou D, Aggelidou E, Gousopoulou E, Leyhausen G, Volk J, Kritis A, Koidis P, Geurtsen W. Isolation and prolonged expansion of oral mesenchymal stem cells under clinical-grade, GMP-compliant conditions differentially affects “stemness” properties. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8:247.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Ledesma-Martinez E, Mendoza-Nunez VM, Santiago-Osorio E. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from dental pulp: a review. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:4709572.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Liu H, Liu S, Li Y, Wang X, Xue W, Ge G, Luo X. The role of SDF-1-CXCR4/CXCR7 axis in the therapeutic effects of hypoxia-preconditioned mesenchymal stem cells for renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. Plos One. 2012;7:e34608.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Sakai K, Yamamoto A, Matsubara K, Nakamura S, Naruse M, Yamagata M, Sakamoto K, Tauchi R, Wakao N, Imagama S, Hibi H, Kadomatsu K, Ishiguro N, Ueda M. Human dental pulp-derived stem cells promote locomotor recovery after complete transection of the rat spinal cord by multiple neuro-regenerative mechanisms. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:80–90.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Mead B, Berry M, Logan A, Scott RA, Leadbeater W, Scheven BA. Stem cell treatment of degenerative eye disease. Stem Cell Res. 2015;14:243–57.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Sun E, Karaoz E. Can Wharton jelly derived or adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cell can be a treatment option for duchenne muscular dystrophy? Answers as transcriptomic aspect. Am J Stem Cells. 2020;9:57–67.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Huang GT, Gronthos S, Shi S. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from dental tissues vs. those from other sources: their biology and role in regenerative medicine. J Dent Res. 2009;88:792–806.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Yamada Y, Nakamura-Yamada S, Kusano K, Baba S. Clinical potential and current progress of dental pulp stem cells for various systemic diseases in regenerative medicine: a concise review. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:1132–48.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the research support team from JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. The authors acknowledge Akihiko Umezawa (National Center for Child Health and Development), Naoko Yugeta, Yoko Fujii (University of Azabu), Yoshitaka Miyagawa (Nippon Medical School), Hironori Okada, Jun Tanihata, and Michihiro Imamura (NCNP) for technical advice; Chiaki Masuda, Yuki Oda, Sonoko Shimazu, Tomoka Fukatsu, Maya Kawamura, and Yuko Kakiuchi (Nippon Medical School) for technical assistance; and the care staff for assistance with CXMDJ (General Animal Research Facility, NCNP).

Funding

This work was supported by a research grant from JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Health Sciences Research Grants for Research on Human Genome and Gene Therapy from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan (grant number: 21A-3), and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (grant number 22390284, 22-40134) and a grant from Nippon Medical School.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y. N-K. and T. O. conceived and planned the experiments. Y. N-K., M. K., K. M., and K. K. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. H. H-K., P. H. G., Y. M., and A. N-T. contributed to sample preparation and assisted with experiments involving animal models. Y. N-K. wrote the manuscript receiving advice on English proofreading by P.H.G. T.O. and S.T. supervised the project. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuko Nitahara-Kasahara or Takashi Okada.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Animal experiments using MSCs were conducted in accordance with the protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Nippon Medical School (27-199) and National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (NCNP) Animal Ethics Committees (2012011, 2015004, and 19–30-06).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Y. N-K., H. H-K., and T. O. were members of the Division of Cell and Gene Therapy, Nippon Medical School, which is an endowment department, supported with an unrestricted grant from JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., and Kaneka Corporation. hDPSCs were provided by JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Movie S1.

Activity of control and hDPSC-treated CXMDJ.

Additional file 4: Figure S1.

Grip strength and daily running distance in aged mice. Figure S2. Blood levels of hDPSCs after injection. Figure S3. MRI of the lower leg muscle of CXMDJ. Figure S4. H&E staining of hDPSC-treated skeletal muscle. Figure S5. Muscle fiber distribution from skeletal muscle of CXMDJ. Figure S6. Clinical follow-up of CXMDJ after hDPSC transplantation. Figure S7. Multiple parameters of acceleration measured by 15 m of running. Figure S8. Reverse transcription PCR of human specific dystrophin expression. Figure S9. Cytokine and chemokine expression in hDPSCs. Table S1. Normalized grip strength in mice. Table S2. Locomotor activity in mice. Table S3. Quantitative changes of higher T2-signals in hindlimb muscles.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nitahara-Kasahara, Y., Kuraoka, M., Guillermo, P.H. et al. Dental pulp stem cells can improve muscle dysfunction in animal models of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Stem Cell Res Ther 12, 78 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-020-02099-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Dental pulp stem cells
  • Duchenne muscular dystrophy
  • Anti-inflammatory therapy