Clonal evolution in liver cancer at single-cell and single-variant resolution

Abstract

Genetic heterogeneity of tumor is closely related to its clonal evolution, phenotypic diversity and treatment resistance, and such heterogeneity has only been characterized at single-cell sub-chromosomal scale in liver cancer. Here we reconstructed the single-variant resolution clonal evolution in human liver cancer based on single-cell mutational profiles. The results indicated that key genetic events occurred early during tumorigenesis, and an early metastasis followed by independent evolution was observed in primary liver tumor and intrahepatic metastatic portal vein tumor thrombus. By parallel single-cell RNA-Seq, the transcriptomic phenotype of HCC was found to be related with genetic heterogeneity. For the first time we reconstructed the single-cell and single-variant clonal evolution in human liver cancer, and dissection of both genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity will facilitate better understanding of their relationship.

To the Editor,

The genetic heterogeneity in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been extensively studied by bulk or multi-region sequencing [1, 2], and more recently at single-cell sub-chromosomal scale [3, 4]. Analysis at single-variant resolution, however, is still lacking. To address this issue, here we employed a single-cell strategy to dissect the single-variant clonal structure of HCC, and investigate the relationship between genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity (Fig. 1a). A total of 5 HCC patients (HCC1, HCC2, HCC5, HCC8 and HCC9) were analyzed, including one (HCC8) with both primary tumor and the intrahepatic portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) (Additional file 1: Supplementary Methods, and Additional file 2: Fig. S1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Single-cell analysis revealed a common origin but independent evolution of primary and metastatic liver tumors. a Overview of the single-cell analysis strategy of human liver cancer. b Mutational status of SNV/INDEL sites in single cells from paratumor, primary tumor and PVTT tissues in HCC8. c Clonal evolution in HCC8 with genes mutated at each step shown. Dashed circle: virtual ancestor clone in PVTT. *COSMIC Cancer Gene Census catalogued driver genes. d Statistics of nucleotide substitution types for clone-specific point mutations newly acquired from the most recent ancestor in HCC8 as shown in (c). e Maximum parsimony tree of single cells from HCC8 based on nucleotide sequences at the target sites. Scale bar: nucleotide substitution rate

Great inter-tumor genetic heterogeneity of HCC was revealed by pseudo-bulk whole exome sequencing (WES), with different somatic mutations and mutational signatures observed among patients (Additional file 2: Fig. S2 and Additional file 3: Table S1). To further explore the intra-tumor heterogeneity, ~ 60 mutation sites (Additional file 4: Table S2) were then selected from each patient for target sequencing on single cells. High quality single-cell mutation data were obtained with good correlations between mutated cell fractions and WES-derived variant allele frequency values, as well as with low allele drop-out rates in most samples (Additional file 2: Fig. S3).

The clonal structures of liver tumor tissues were then uncovered by single-cell mutational profiles. Both HCC1 and HCC2 exhibited a single-clone structure with limited heterogeneity, while a multi-clone structure was observed in HCC9 (Additional file 2: Fig. S4). The evolutionary history of tumor cells in HCC9 was reconstructed by employing mutation combination analysis in single cells. The initiated cell was malignantly transformed to the founder Clone-1 as 9 genes were mutated, where 4 of them are COSMIC Census drivers [5]. Other clones were then derived from Clone-1 by acquisition of extra subclonal mutations.

A common origin but independent evolution pattern was observed in primary tumor and metastatic PVTT. Single cells from both tumor tissues in HCC8 shared mutations on 10 genes, where 7 of them are Census drivers: CCR4, KMT2A, ZEB1, AKT3, MUC16, BRD4 and ETV6 (Fig. 1b, c). Clone-1 with the 10 shared mutations represented a common origin, and other cells in both tumor tissues had divergent extra mutations (Fig. 1c). This implied an early stage metastasis followed by independent evolution, consistent with recent observation of early metastatic seeding in other types of solid tumor [6]. Two clones within PVTT shared PVTT-private clonal mutations on 3 genes, where KIAA1549 and NCOR1 are Census drivers related to tumorigenesis [7, 8]. Mutations on these two genes thus might be metastasis-related early genetic events. Interestingly, nine out of ten mutations in Clone-1 were T > A substitutions (Fig. 1d) related to carcinogen aristolochic acids [9], consistent with previous suggestion of early rather than late exposure for HCC development [10]. This suggested that early genetic event during liver tumorigenesis may be related to specific etiology. The phylogenetic tree of single cells also supported the multi-clone structure in HCC8 (Fig. 1e), which represented genuine tumor phylogeny different from that derived from bulk or multi-region sequencing [11].

The inter- and intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity in HCC were found consistent with phenotypic heterogeneity by parallel single-cell RNA-Seq (Additional file 2: Fig. S5). Tumor cells from 4 patients formed separate clusters, illustrating patient-specific transcriptomic profiles (Fig. 2a–c and Additional file 2: Fig. S6a, b). For intra-tumor heterogeneity, the sub-chromosomal scale copy number inference from global transcriptomic profiles in HCC1 or HCC2 were quite similar within each patient, consistent with their single-clone structures (Additional file 2: Fig. S6c, d). For HCC9, both copy number inference and differentially expressed gene analysis identified tumor sub-populations, echoing its relatively higher genetic heterogeneity (Fig. 2d, e). Interestingly, the genes mutated specifically in each tumor showed similar expression patterns among single cells from different patients, and clustering of those genes exhibited a mixture of patient origin (Fig. 2f). This suggested that the tumor-specific mutations in HCC might cause phenotypic heterogeneity by altering the expressions of other genes rather than their own. The direct link between genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity in HCC, however, still await further clarification with new single-cell multi-omics tool that could co-detect point mutation and gene expression [12].

Fig. 2
figure2

Genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity are showing consistence in liver cancer. a Cell clusters in scRNA-Seq analysis. b Heatmap showing patient-specific tumor marker genes. c The expression patterns of representative markers. d Copy number changes inferred from global transcriptomic profile of single cells in HCC9, with boxes highlighting sub-populations. e Heatmap (left) and t-SNE plot (right) showing the sub-populations in HCC9 based on differentially expressed genes. f The expression patterns of genes mutated in each HCC sample in scRNA-Seq data. Genes were grouped by tissue origin in the upper panel, and clustered by expression patterns in the lower panel

In summary, here we reconstructed single-cell clonal evolution in human liver cancer at single-variant resolution. The common origin but independent evolutionary fate for primary and metastatic liver tumors observed here may help understanding liver cancer progression, and single-cell dissection of both genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity will provide information for their functional linkage.

Availability of data and materials

The sequencing data have been deposited in NCBI GEO and SRA database under accession numbers GSE146115 and PRJNA606993.

Abbreviations

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

PVTT:

Portal vein tumor thrombus

WES:

Whole exome sequencing

References

  1. 1.

    Craig AJ, von Felden J, Garcia-Lezana T, Sarcognato S, Villanueva A. Tumour evolution in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17:139–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ally A, Balasundaram M, Carlsen R, Chuah E, Clarke A, Dhalla N, Holt RA, Jones SJM, Lee D, Ma Y, et al. Comprehensive and integrative genomic characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell. 2017;169(1327–1341):e1323.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Duan M, Hao J, Cui S, Worthley DL, Zhang S, Wang Z, Shi J, Liu L, Wang X, Ke A, et al. Diverse modes of clonal evolution in HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma revealed by single-cell genome sequencing. Cell Res. 2018;28:359–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hou Y, Guo H, Cao C, Li X, Hu B, Zhu P, Wu X, Wen L, Tang F, Huang Y, Peng J. Single-cell triple omics sequencing reveals genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptomic heterogeneity in hepatocellular carcinomas. Cell Res. 2016;26:304–19.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sondka Z, Bamford S, Cole CG, Ward SA, Dunham I, Forbes SA. The COSMIC Cancer Gene Census: describing genetic dysfunction across all human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18:696–705.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hu Z, Li Z, Ma Z, Curtis C. Multi-cancer analysis of clonality and the timing of systemic spread in paired primary tumors and metastases. Nat Genet. 2020;52:701–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mottis A, Mouchiroud L, Auwerx J. Emerging roles of the corepressors NCoR1 and SMRT in homeostasis. Genes Dev. 2013;27:819–35.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jones DT, Kocialkowski S, Liu L, Pearson DM, Backlund LM, Ichimura K, Collins VP. Tandem duplication producing a novel oncogenic BRAF fusion gene defines the majority of pilocytic astrocytomas. Cancer Res. 2008;68:8673–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ng AWT, Poon SL, Huang MN, Lim JQ, Boot A, Yu W, Suzuki Y, Thangaraju S, Ng CCY, Tan P, et al. Aristolochic acids and their derivatives are widely implicated in liver cancers in Taiwan and throughout Asia. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9:eaan6446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lin DC, Mayakonda A, Dinh HQ, Huang P, Lin L, Liu X, Ding LW, Wang J, Berman BP, Song EW, et al. Genomic and epigenomic heterogeneity of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2017;77:2255–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Alves JM, Prieto T, Posada D. Multiregional tumor trees are not phylogenies. Trends Cancer. 2017;3:546–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zhu C, Preissl S, Ren B. Single-cell multimodal omics: the power of many. Nat Methods. 2020;17:11–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Prof. Gangcai Xie and Dr. Yanfeng Liu for proofreading the manuscript.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81802806, 82073116, 81902561, 81761138045), China National Science and Technology Major Project for Prevention and Treatment of Infectious Diseases (2017ZX10203207), SJTU Interdisciplinary Program (YG2021QN80, ZH2018ZDA33), SJTU Scientific and Technological Innovation Funds (2019TPA09), Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (19140902500, 20511101900, 20ZR1427200), and Key Laboratory of Systems Biomedicine (Ministry of Education) Grant (KLSB2020QN-04).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XS, JC and ZH designed the study. XS, LZ, RZ, KT, GY, LW, KH, XC, JH, JW, BH, BY, BD, NW and XL performed experiments. XS, YS, QL1, SB, QL2, YL, XZ, SG, PY, SH, JS and JY analyzed data. XS and ZH wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xianbin Su or Jinhong Chen or Ze-Guang Han.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethnical Review Board of Shanghai Center for Systems Biomedicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

. Supplementary Methods.

Additional file 2

: Figure S1. Overview of the single-cell analysis strategy of human HCC. Figure S2. Single-cell mixture WES revealed inter-tumor genetic heterogeneity of HCC. Figure S3. High quality single-cell mutation data were obtained by target sequencing. Figure S4. Single-cell clonal structures of HCC1, HCC2 and HCC9 based on point mutations. Figure S5. scRNA-Seq revealed the constituent cell types of HCC. Figure S6. scRNA-Seq revealed the inter-tumor and intra-tumor heterogeneity of HCC. Figure S7. Schematic representation of major findings in this study.

Additional file 3

: Table S1. Exonic mutations in single-cell WGA mixtures from HCC. This table shows all the exonic mutations derived from WES of single-cell WGA mixtures from HCC1-T, HCC2-T, HCC5-T, HCC9-T, HCC8-T and HCC8-PVTT. Mutations were called with GATK, and annotated with ANNOVAR and Oncotator. SNPs were filtered using dbSNP141 and 1,000 Genomes Project (v3) database. The synonymous mutations were further filtered. This table is related to Fig S2.

Additional file 4

: Table S2. Mutation sites and amplification primers for single-cell target sequencing. This table shows the full list of target sites and PCR primers used in single-cell target amplification for HCC1, HCC2, HCC9 and HCC8. The primer sequences include the adaptor sequences that can be used for downstream library preparation with illumina Nextera XT Index Kit and multi-plexed sequencing.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, X., Zhao, L., Shi, Y. et al. Clonal evolution in liver cancer at single-cell and single-variant resolution. J Hematol Oncol 14, 22 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-021-01036-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Genetic heterogeneity
  • Somatic mutation
  • Clonal structure
  • Tumor evolution