Table 4 Results of GCS and GCS rate from conventional and CS cine CMR

From: Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment

  Conventional cine (n = 65) CS cine (n = 65) p
GCS (%) − 16.1 [− 11.9, − 19.3] − 17.1 [− 11.7, − 19.5] 0.508
GCS rate (s−1) − 0.8 [− 0.6, − 1.0] − 0.8 [− 0.7, − 1.0] 0.587
  1. Data are presented as the median [first quartile, third quartile]
  2. CS compressed sensing, GCS global circumferential strain
Back to article page