Table 3 Left Ventricular volume measurements with Conventional and CS cine CMR

From: Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment

  Conventional cine (n = 65) CS cine (n = 65) Mean difference P value
EDV (ml) 112.1 [95.7, 140.0] 111.4 [95.6, 154.9] 0.3 ± 8.3 0.84
ESV (ml) 47.2 [33.5, 78.6] 51.0 [34.3, 79.1] -0.3 ± 6.4 0.36
SV (ml) 65.4 [52.8, 73.9] 62.1 [48.9, 76.4] 0.6 ± 9.8 0.70
Mass (g) 92.6 [75.8, 120.3] 92.2 [75.1, 117.3] 0.9 ± 5.9 0.29
EF (%) 58.6 [46.4, 66.3] 57.2 [46.2, 64.4] 1.1 ± 5.4 0.09
  1. Data are presented as the medians [first quartile, third quartile]
  2. Mean differences are presented as mean ± standard deviation
  3. EDV end-diastolic volume, EF ejection fraction, ESV end-systolic volume, SV stroke volume