Fig. 4 | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Fig. 4

From: Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment

Fig. 4

Bland–Altman plots of intra-observer variability of conventional (a) and CS (b) cine CMR. Bland–Altman plots of inter-observer variability of conventional (c) and CS (d) cine CMR. The solid line indicates the difference between the two sequences. The long-dashed lines represent the 95% agreement interval (i.e., the mean ± 1.96 SD). The short-dashed lines indicate the 95% confidence interval of the mean difference

Back to article page