Fig. 3 | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Fig. 3

From: Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment

Fig. 3

Scatter plots (a) and Bland–Altman plots (b) of global circumferential strain (GCS) measurements by CMR-FT. The solid line indicates the difference between the two sequences. The long-dashed lines represent the 95% agreement interval (i.e., the mean ± 1.96 SD). The short-dashed lines indicate the 95% confidence interval of the mean difference

Back to article page