Boning up: amino-bisphophonates as immunostimulants and endosomal disruptors of dendritic cell in SARS-CoV-2 infection

Abstract

Amino-bisphosphonates such as zoledronic acid (ZA) can possibly ameliorate or prevent severe COVID-19 disease by at least three distinct mechanisms: (1) as immunostimulants which could boost γδ T cell expansion, important in the acute response in the lung; (2) as DC modulators, limiting their ability to only partially activate T cells; and (3) as prenylation inhibitors of small GTPases in the endosomal pathway of the DC to prevent expulsion of lysosomes containing SARS-CoV-2 virions. Use of ZA or other amino-bisphosphonates as modulators of COVID-19 disease should be considered.

Zoledronic acid as an immunostimulant of γδ T cells

Zoledronic acid (ZA) is a nitrogen containing aminobisphosphonate with wide use in breast cancer in patients taking aromatase inhibitors to prevent osteoporosis [1]. ZA was first noted in 2009 to reduce the incidence of bone metastases in post-menopausal women [2]. Large clinical trials [3] and a meta-analysis [4] confirmed the benefit of ZA in early stage post-menopausal breast cancer, with highly significant reductions in distant recurrence, bone recurrence, and breast cancer mortality.

ZA inhibits the mevalonate pathway (Fig. 1) through inhibition of farnesyl diphosphate synthetase, leading to upstream accumulation of phosphoantigen isopentyl diphosphate (IPP), stimulating γ9δ2 T cell expansion [5]. Some γδ T cells have direct cytotoxicity against breast cancer cells in vitro [6]. In early stage breast cancer, treatment with a single dose of ZA results in long lasting activation of effector subsets of γ9δ2 T lymphocytes [7]. ZA can also increase natural killer (NK) cells through a DC mediated mechanism modulated by γ9δ2 T cells [8]. Approximately 50% of patients taking ZA and other aminobisphosphonates experience an acute phase reaction [9], which is correlated with γδ T cell subset expansion [10].

Fig. 1
figure1

Zoledronic acid (ZA) acts as immunostimulant and endosomal disruptor of dendritic cell in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Inhaled SARS-CoV-2 particles are internalized by the DC (top). In COVID-19 disease, there is depletion of γδ T cells (bottom-left). In addition, virion release depends on prenylation signaling derived from the mevalonate pathway. On the other hand, ZA (bottom-right) inhibits the conversion of geranyl pyrophosphate (GPP) to farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP), increasing the concentrations of isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP). Release of IPP induces γ9δ2 T-cell expansion by phosphoantigen recognition, mediated by butyrophilin-presentation. Downstream inhibition of prenylation reduces the activity of GTPases, decreasing the release of SARS-CoV-2. ZA also affects differentiation of the DC with downregulation of the expression of CD1a, CD11c, CD83, CD86, DC-SIGN, and HLA-DR and enhancement of the expression of CD80. Figure was created using BioRender https://biorender.com/

T cells that express gamma/delta (γδ) T cell receptors are important in the immune response to viruses [11] as well as cancer [12]. In the setting of HIV infection, the circulating γ9δ2 T cells, most responsive to butyrophilin presented mevalonate pathway molecules, are eradicated for years even with successful control of viral infection [13]. Three months after recovery from SARS, patients exhibited selective expansion of γδ T cell populations, but not alpha/beta (αβ) T cell populations [14]. γδ T cell expansion is associated with higher anti-SARS-CoV IgG titers [14]. When non-MHC restricted γδ T cell are stimulated with SARS-CoV in vitro, they kill SARS-Co-V infected THP-1 myeloid cells in culture with high efficiency. This suggests a protective effect of γδ T cells in SARS-CoV infection. Agents which expand γδ T cell populations within the lung [14] could protect individuals from COVID-19 and/or ameliorate symptoms.

Pamidronate reduces disease severity and mortality from human H1N1 influenza virus and avian H5N1 influenza virus in an immunodeficient mouse–human immune chimera [15] through expansion of γδ T cell subsets. Inhaled intranasal liposomal clodronate can reduce inhibitory alveolar macrophages and increase respiratory DC migration and activation in a mouse model of SARS-CoV [16]. This can reduce viral titers and protect the animals from lethal infection.

Concerns regarding the clinical consequences and safety of γδ T cell expansion are valid. In preclinical models, Oberg et al. [17] demonstrate the successful recruitment of γδ T cells to sites of tumor in a model of pancreatic adenocarcinoma by which tumor growth is retarded in immunocompromised mice. These mice may not be able to manifest the full consequences of immune activation. In human studies, no major toxicities were appreciated in a phase I trial of metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients in which ZA was utilized to activate Vγ9 Vδ2 T cells with or without IL-2 [18]. ZA expanded γδ T cells were additionally noted to be safe in patients with NSCLC [19] following adoptive transfer.

The anti-viral effects of γδ T cells, mediated by release of infected-cell specific IFN-γ [20] promotes an anti-SARS-CoV (2003 outbreak) effect with expansion of γδ-cells [14]. T cells, including γδ subpopulations, are depleted in patients with severe COVID-19 illness [21]. Indeed stimulation of γ9δ2 T cells early in the disease would be safe but would require careful analysis of the cytokine profiles after γδ T cell-expansion. Recent findings in malaria models suggest that M-CSF production from γδ T cells is important for long-lasting control of the disease [22]. Such an M-CSF producing cell may be important in regulating and controlling the SARS-CoV2 virus.

The respiratory DC as central to SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis

In the SARS-CoV-2 infection, there is initial lymphopenia. The lymphocyte count is predictive of disease severity and mortality [23]. Lymphocyte counts recover with viral clearance and disease resolution, with adaptive immune cells (CD3+ T cells) being especially important [24]. Such immune deficiency can in part be explained by viral infection and T cell interaction with the respiratory DC.

Early and central infection of tissue resident dendritic cells (DC) by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus explain some of the immunopathology of the COVID-19 pandemic. DC are richly abundant in the lung and responsive to viral infection [25]. In COVID-19, T cell receptor (TCR) repertoires are dramatically reduced during the early onset of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection but recover during the convalescent stage [26]. Such reduction of T cells suggest acute wholesale apoptotic death with engagement of the TCR in the absence of costimulatory molecules, normally provided by DC [27].

Zoledronic acid as a dendritic cell modulator

ZA treatment can affect DC differentiation and maturation, decreasing expression of CD1a, CD11c, CD83, CD86, DC-SIGN, HLA-DR and enhancing expression of CD80 [28]. ZA can augment the allostimulatory activity of DCs [28]. ZA can also activate human NK cells in a DC dependent but γδ T cell independent manner [8]. ZA could therefore act on the DC to further stimulate the initial immune response to pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2.

The interplay between γδ T cells and dendritic cells is indeed complex [29]. Depending on the clinical setting and the pathogen involved, such interaction can generate and inhibitory or stimulatory immune response.

In regard to the connection between DC and γ9δ2 cells, it is important to point out that Calmette-Guerin recognition by dendritic cells promotes the expansion of γ9δ2 cells, which occurs via isopentyl diphosphate (IPP) release [30]. In this regard, ZA also prompts IPP release from dendritic cells. This potent inhibitor of farnesyl diphosphate synthase is known to induce the release of IPP from dendritic cells when these are treated with ZA [31]. In fact, 1-Hydroxy-2-methyl-2-buten-4-yl 4-diphosphate (HDMAPP) is the most potent phosphoantigen that stimulates γ9δ2 cells. This appears to a critical mechanism of chemical synapse between DCs and γδ cells.

Zoledronic acid as a disruptor of the endosome in SARS-CoV-2 infection

While virus replication of SARS-Co-V within infected human monocytes is limited, the virions are observed by electron microscopy to accumulate in phagolysosomes of the endosomal system [32]. Some of the potential immune dysfunction of DCs in SARS-CoV-2 infection can therefore be traced to the endosome. The endosomal pathway is critically important in DC antigen function, processing, and cross presentation of antigens [33]. Proper ion and pH homeostasis in the endosomal compartment appears to be required for glycosylation of proteins, membrane trafficking, and protein sorting [34].

It is worth noting that preclinical screening of anti-SARS-CoV-2 drugs identified three agents, cepharanthine (CEP), selamectin, and mefloquine hydrochloride [35] that could disrupt endosomal pH through alterations in ion balance. Endosomal homeostasis is likely important in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. The active endosomal environment central to DC biology could be exploited by SARS-CoV-2. Agents that alter endosomal pH such as hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) could be protective in SARS-CoV-2 infected DCs in maintaining the immune response as well as the lymphocyte count, as was observed in a recently reported randomized, parallel, open label, multicenter clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and usual care versus usual care alone for the treatment of COVID infection [36].

The likely involvement of the endosome in SARS-CoV-2 infection is suggested by a possible attenuation mutation in the ORF 3a protein. Viral evolutionary theory suggests that one option for a viral strain introduced to a novel host is to maintain fitness through reduction in virulence [37]. The ORF 3a protein of SARS-CoV is comprised of 247 amino acids with three transmembrane domains [38]. It is a putative ion channel that is present both in the endosomal compartment and within the cell membrane [38], modulating release of virus [38]. Deletion mutants of ORF 3a demonstrate its importance in SARS-CoV virulence in mice [39]. Emodin, an ion channel inhibitor, blocks SARS-CoV pathogenesis in culture and inhibits viral release from the cell [40]. A stable Q57H non-synonymous substitution in the ORF 3a protein appears to have arisen in a subclade of D614G mutant SARS-CoV-2 [41]. This substitution is near the N-terminus of transmembrane region I of ORF 3a [39] and is predicted to be deleterious [42]. A mutation in one of the ion channels of the SARS-CoV-2 ORF 3a protein could possibly inhibit release of the virus by phagolysosomes” and, by this mechanism, reduce virulence.

The importance of the endosome in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis is also underscored by a recent report [43], where 26 of the 29 SARS-CoV-2 proteins in human cells were tagged and identified as being physically associated using affinity-purification mass spectrometry (AP-MS). This assay identified 332 high-confidence SARS-CoV-2-human protein–protein interactions (PPIs), and approximately 40% of the SARS-CoV-2 interaction proteins were associated with the endomembrane compartments or vesicle trafficking pathways.

ZA could plausibly attack the endosomal trafficking central to SARS-CoV-2 infection. ZA inhibits the prenylation of small guanine-nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins (G-proteins) such as Rab family members through inhibition of geranylgeranyl transferases [44, 45]. Rab GTPase family members are involved in endosomal trafficking, including compartmentalization into early, recycling, late, and lysosomal routes [46]. Osteoclasts require endosomal trafficking, lysosomal sorting, and exocytosis of lysosomes for the secretion of the hyaluronidase HYAL1, which degrades bone collagen and can cause osteoporosis [47]. ZA administration can disrupt such trafficking in osteoclasts through inhibition of G-protein geranylation [48]. Since osteoclasts and DCs share a common precursor as well as many functions [49, 50] it is plausible that ZA would inhibit endosomal pathway and exocytosis in the DC as well, and possibly prevent trafficking and exocytosis of lysosomes in the SARS-CoV-2 virion-infected DC.

We propose consideration of ZA as therapy for COVID-19 if given early in the disease course, preferably following exposure and before symptoms occur. While ZA is currently given by intravenous infusion, oral preparations are in development [51]. Oral aminobisphosphates such as ibandronate also expand γδ T cell subsets [52].

Conclusion

Infection of the DC by SARS-CoV-2 could explain the exuberant distal immunopathology observed in COVID-19 [25]. The immune-depleted environment as a result of early infection is a possible setting for therapeutic intervention. Amino-bisphosphonates may be capable of making DCs or DC precursors less susceptible to further SARS-CoV-2 infection. Immunostimulating γ9δ2 T cell expansion, DC membrane receptor modulation with NK activation, and prenylation inhibition of small GTPases with consequent inhibition of endolysosomal pathways used in the viral lifecycle are all plausible mechanisms of actions of ZA in this context. In the absence of clinical data, it is unclear if ZA alone would sufficiently achieve these intended goals. Hence, these data form the foundation for clinical trials.

In conclusion, possible amelioration of the immune host status through amino-bisphosphonate use should be considered for COVID-19 disease.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. 1.

    Brufsky A, Harker WG, Beck JT, et al. Zoledronic acid inhibits adjuvant letrozole-induced bone loss in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(7):829–36. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.05.3744.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Brufsky AM, Bosserman LD, Caradonna RR, et al. Zoledronic acid effectively prevents aromatase inhibitor–associated bone loss in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer receiving adjuvant letrozole: Z-FAST Study 36-month follow-up results. Clin Breast Cancer. 2009;9(2):77–85. https://doi.org/10.3816/CBC.2009.n.015.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Coleman R, Cameron D, Dodwell D, et al. Adjuvant zoledronic acid in patients with early breast cancer: final efficacy analysis of the AZURE (BIG 01/04) randomised open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(9):997–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70302-X.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Adjuvant bisphosphonate treatment in early breast cancer meta-analyses of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2015;386(10001):1353–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60908-4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sugie T, Murata-Hirai K, Iwasaki M, et al. Zoledronic acid-induced expansion of γδ T cells from early-stage breast cancer patients: effect of IL-18 on helper NK cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2013;62(4):677–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-012-1368-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Morrow ES, Roseweir A, Edwards J. The role of gamma delta T lymphocytes in breast cancer: a review. Transl Res. 2019;203:88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2018.08.005.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Santini D, Martini F, Fratto ME, et al. In vivo effects of zoledronic acid on peripheral γδ T lymphocytes in early breast cancer patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2009;58(1):31–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-008-0521-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Nussbaumer O, Gruenbacher G, Gander H, Thurnher M. DC-like cell-dependent activation of human natural killer cells by the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid is regulated by γδ T lymphocytes. Blood. 2011;118(10):2743–51. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-01-328526.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Drake MT, Clarke BL, Khosla S. Bisphosphonates: mechanism of action and role in clinical practice. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83(9):1032–45. https://doi.org/10.4065/83.9.1032.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hewitt RE, Lissina A, Green AE, Slay ES, Price DA, Sewell AK. The bisphosphonate acute phase response: rapid and copious production of proinflammatory cytokines by peripheral blood gd T cells in response to aminobisphosphonates is inhibited by statins. Clin Exp Immunol. 2005;139(1):101–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2249.2005.02665.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Dandekar AA, O’Malley K, Perlman S. Important roles for gamma interferon and NKG2D in gammadelta T-cell-induced demyelination in T-cell receptor beta-deficient mice infected with a coronavirus. J Virol. 2005;79(15):9388–96. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.79.15.9388-9396.2005.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Maeurer MJ, Martin D, Walter W, et al. Human intestinal Vdelta1 + lymphocytes recognize tumor cells of epithelial origin. J Exp Med. 1996;183(4):1681–96. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.183.4.1681.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Chen ZW. Protective immune responses of major Vγ2 Vδ2 T-cell subset in M. tuberculosis infection. Curr Opin Immunol. 2016;42:105–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2016.06.005.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Poccia F, Agrati C, Castilletti C, et al. Anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus immune responses: the role played by Vγ9 Vδ2 T Cells. J Infect Dis. 2006;193(9):1244–9. https://doi.org/10.1086/502975.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Tu W, Zheng J, Liu Y, et al. The aminobisphosphonate pamidronate controls influenza pathogenesis by expanding a γδ T cell population in humanized mice. J Exp Med. 2011;208(7):1511–22. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20110226.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zhao J, Zhao J, Van Rooijen N, Perlman S. Evasion by stealth: inefficient immune activation underlies poor T Cell response and severe disease in SARS-CoV-Infected Mice. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(10):e1000636. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000636.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Oberg H-H, Peipp M, Kellner C, et al. Novel bispecific antibodies increase γδ T-cell cytotoxicity against pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2014;74(5):1349–60. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-13-0675.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Dieli F, Vermijlen D, Fulfaro F, et al. Targeting human γδ T Cells with zoledronate and interleukin-2 for immunotherapy of hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2007;67(15):7450–7. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-0199.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kakimi K, Matsushita H, Murakawa T, Nakajima J. γδ T cell therapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res Vol 3, No 1 (February 2014) Transl Lung Cancer Res (Immunotherapy lung cancer-Guest Ed Yasuhiko Nishioka); 2013.

  20. 20.

    Sant S, Jenkins MR, Dash P, et al. Human γδ T-cell receptor repertoire is shaped by influenza viruses, age and tissue compartmentalisation. Clin Transl Immunol. 2019;8(9):e1079–e1079. https://doi.org/10.1002/cti2.1079.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wilk AJ, Rustagi A, Zhao NQ, et al. A single-cell atlas of the peripheral immune response in patients with severe COVID-19. Nat Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0944-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mamedov MR, Scholzen A, Nair RV, et al. A macrophage colony-stimulating-factor-producing T Cell subset prevents malarial parasitemic recurrence. Immunity. 2018;48(2):350–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2018.01.009.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tan L, Wang Q, Zhang D, et al. Lymphopenia predicts disease severity of COVID-19: a descriptive and predictive study. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5(1):33. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-020-0148-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Chen X, Ling J, Mo P, et al. Restoration of leukomonocyte counts is associated with viral clearance in COVID-19 hospitalized patients. medRxiv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.03.20030437.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Li G, Fan Y, Lai Y, et al. Coronavirus infections and immune responses. J Med Virol. 2020;92(4):424–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25685.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Niu X, Li S, Li P, et al. Analysis of peripheral blood T Cell receptor and B Cell receptor repertoires reveals dynamic adaptive immune responses in COVID-19 patients. SSRN Electron J. 2020. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3575132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Tai Y, Wang Q, Korner H, Zhang L, Wei W. Molecular mechanisms of T cells activation by dendritic cells in autoimmune diseases. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:642. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00642.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Chen Y-J, Chao KSC, Yang Y-C, Hsu M-L, Lin C-P, Chen Y-Y. Zoledronic acid, an aminobisphosphonate, modulates differentiation and maturation of human dendritic cells. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2009;31(3):499–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923970902814103.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Van Acker HH, Anguille S, Van Tendeloo VF, Lion E. Empowering gamma delta T cells with antitumor immunity by dendritic cell-based immunotherapy [Internet]. Oncoimmunology. 2015;4(8):e1021538. https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402x.2015.1021538.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lafont V, Liautard J, Sable-Teychene M, Sainte-Marie Y, Favero J. Isopentenyl pyrophosphate, a mycobacterial non-peptidic antigen, triggers delayed and highly sustained signaling in human gamma delta T lymphocytes without inducing eown-modulation of T cell antigen receptor. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(19):15961–7. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m008684200.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Riganti C, Castella B, Massaia M. ABCA1, apoA-I, and BTN3A1: a Legitimate Ménage à Trois in Dendritic Cells. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Yilla M, Harcourt BH, Hickman CJ, et al. SARS-coronavirus replication in human peripheral monocytes/macrophages. Virus Res. 2005;107(1):93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2004.09.004.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Compeer EB, Flinsenberg TWH, van Grein SG, Boes M. Antigen processing and remodeling of the endosomal pathway: requirements for antigen cross-presentation. Front Immunol. 2012;3(MAR):37. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2012.00037.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kellokumpu S. Golgi pH, ion and redox homeostasis: how much do they really matter? Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019;7(JUN):93. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2019.00093.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Fan H-H, Wang L-Q, Liu W-L, et al. Repurposing of clinically approved drugs for treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 in a 2019-novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) related coronavirus model. Chin Med J (Engl). 2019;2020:1. https://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000000797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Tang W, Cao Z, Han M, et al. Hydroxychloroquine in patients with COVID-19: an open-label, randomized, controlled trial. MedRxiv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.10.20060558.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Geoghegan JL, Holmes EC. The phylogenomics of evolving virus virulence. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19(12):756–69. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-018-0055-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Lu W, Zheng B-J, Xu K, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus 3a protein forms an ion channel and modulates virus release. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103(33):12540–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605402103.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Castaño-Rodriguez C, Honrubia JM, Gutiérrez-Álvarez J, et al. Role of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus viroporins E, 3a, and 8a in replication and pathogenesis. MBio. 2018;9(3):e02325. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02325-17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Schwarz S, Wang K, Yu W, Sun B, Schwarz W. Emodin inhibits current through SARS-associated coronavirus 3a protein. Antiviral Res. 2011;90(1):64–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2011.02.008.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Genomic epidemiology of novel coronavirus - Global subsampling [Internet]. Nextstrain. [cited 2020 Apr 19]; https://nextstrain.org/ncov/global?branchLabel=aa&c=gt-S_614.

  42. 42.

    Issa E, Merhi G, Panossian B, Salloum T, Tokajian S. SARS-CoV-2 and ORF3a: non-synonymous mutations and polyproline regions. bioRxiv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.27.012013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Gordon DE, Jang GM, Bouhaddou M, et al. A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing. Nature. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2286-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Okamoto S, Jiang Y, Kawamura K, et al. Zoledronic acid induces apoptosis and S-phase arrest in mesothelioma through inhibiting Rab family proteins and topoisomerase II actions. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5(11):e1517–e1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2014.475.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Coxon FP, Helfrich MH, Van Hof R, et al. Protein geranylgeranylation is required for osteoclast formation, function, and survival: inhibition by bisphosphonates and GGTI-298. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15(8):1467–76. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.8.1467.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Wandinger-Ness A, Zerial M. Rab proteins and the compartmentalization of the endosomal system. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6(11):a022616. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a022616.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Puissant E, Boonen M. Monocytes/macrophages upregulate the hyaluronidase HYAL1 and adapt its subcellular trafficking to promote extracellular residency upon differentiation into osteoclasts. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0165004–e0165004. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165004.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Itzstein C, Coxon FP, Rogers MJ. The regulation of osteoclast function and bone resorption by small GTPases. Small GTPases. 2011;2(3):117–30. https://doi.org/10.4161/sgtp.2.3.16453.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Xiao Y, Zijl S, Wang L, et al. Identification of the common origins of osteoclasts, macrophages, and dendritic cells in human hematopoiesis. Stem cell reports. 2015;4(6):984–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.04.012.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Wakkach A, Mansour A, Dacquin R, et al. Bone marrow microenvironment controls the in vivo differentiation of murine dendritic cells into osteoclasts. Blood. 2008;112(13):5074–83. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-01-132787.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Jeon O-C, Seo D-H, Kim H-S, Byun Y, Park JW. Oral delivery of zoledronic acid by non-covalent conjugation with lysine-deoxycholic acid: In vitro characterization and in vivo anti-osteoporotic efficacy in ovariectomized rats. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2016;82:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2015.11.004.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kunzmann V, Bauer E, Feurle J, Tony Hans-Peter FW, Wilhelm M. Stimulation of γδ T cells by aminobisphosphonates and induction of antiplasma cell activity in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2000;96(2):384–92. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V96.2.384.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Richard Steinman, MD, Ph.D. for helpful suggestions, and Eliza Brufsky for assistance with manuscript preparation.

Funding

No funding associated with this work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both AB, MTL, JG, and AR contributed to the drafting, development. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Brufsky.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors agree to publication.

Competing interests

AB is a paid consultant for Novartis, Amgen, and Sandoz. MTL, JG, and AR have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brufsky, A., Marti, J.L.G., Nasrazadani, A. et al. Boning up: amino-bisphophonates as immunostimulants and endosomal disruptors of dendritic cell in SARS-CoV-2 infection. J Transl Med 18, 261 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02433-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • SARS Coronavirus
  • Immune response
  • Glycoproteins
  • Bisphosphonates