Synthetic signal sequences that enable efficient secretory protein production in the yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus
- 3k Downloads
Targeting of cellular proteins to the extracellular environment is directed by a secretory signal sequence located at the N-terminus of a secretory protein. These signal sequences usually contain an N-terminal basic amino acid followed by a stretch containing hydrophobic residues, although no consensus signal sequence has been identified. In this study, simple modeling of signal sequences was attempted using Gaussia princeps secretory luciferase (GLuc) in the yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus, which allowed comprehensive recombinant gene construction to substitute synthetic signal sequences.
Mutational analysis of the GLuc signal sequence revealed that the GLuc hydrophobic peptide length was lower limit for effective secretion and that the N-terminal basic residue was indispensable. Deletion of the 16th Glu caused enhanced levels of secreted protein, suggesting that this hydrophilic residue defined the boundary of a hydrophobic peptide stretch. Consequently, we redesigned this domain as a repeat of a single hydrophobic amino acid between the N-terminal Lys and C-terminal Glu. Stretches consisting of Phe, Leu, Ile, or Met were effective for secretion but the number of residues affected secretory activity. A stretch containing sixteen consecutive methionine residues (M16) showed the highest activity; the M16 sequence was therefore utilized for the secretory production of human leukemia inhibitory factor protein in yeast, resulting in enhanced secreted protein yield.
We present a new concept for the provision of secretory signal sequence ability in the yeast K. marxianus, determined by the number of residues of a single hydrophobic residue located between N-terminal basic and C-terminal acidic amino acid boundaries.
KeywordsSynthetic signal sequence Hydrophobic core Secretion Thermotolerant yeast Heterologous protein production
Aspergillus oryzae amylase
Bacillus licheniformis amylase
Gaussia princeps secretory luciferase
Human interleukin 6
Human leukemia inhibitory factor
Human alpha-2-glycoprotein 1
Kluyveromyces marxianus autonomously replicating sequence 7
K. marxianus centromere sequence D
K. marxianus polygalacturonase
Non-homologous end joining
Polymerase chain reaction
Reverse transcription PCR
Saccharomyces cerevisiae TDH3 promoter-driven yGLuc cassette
Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyaclylamide gel electrophoresis
Saccharomycopsis fibuligera glucoamylase
The signal sequence for a secretory protein is the first designated peptide sequence that exhibits similarity with the common amino-acid domain located at the N-terminus of all secretory proteins [1-3]. The signal peptide usually consists of an N-terminal basic residue and a subsequent stretch of amino acids containing a hydrophobic core, known to be recognized by the signal recognition particle in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. In eukaryotes, the signal recognition particle translocates the proteins to the inner side of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) [1,4-8]. After insertion into the ER, the proteins are trafficked to the Golgi body and secretory vesicles; finally, membrane fusion of the secretory vesicles to the plasma membrane excretes the proteins into the extracellular environment. Whereas the N-terminal signal sequence is indispensable for protein secretion, strict consensus sequence has not been found. Generally hydrophobic amino acids in the region number from ten to fifteen, but not fewer than six.
The hydrophobic amino acids are Leu, Ile, Val, Phe, Ala, Trp, Met, and Gly, and these exhibit similar chemical characteristics. Consequently, by calculating the hydrophobicity values for each amino acid, probable signal sequences can be predicted by software programs [9-12]. However, it is also known that different signal sequences exhibit different levels of secretory activity [13-16]. Studies have found that replacement of the original signal sequences of foreign proteins with that of the host organisms has resulted in an enhancement of heterologous protein production [13,15,17-19]. For example, the addition of the N-terminal region of the α mating factor to heterologous proteins enhanced secretory protein production in yeast [17,18,20,21]. These results indicate that there may be a preference for signal sequences among different organisms. In order to develop a strategy for efficient secretory protein production for industrial purposes, and also to reveal a potential mechanism underlying the role of signal sequences in protein secretion, we attempted to model secretory signal using simplified, synthetic peptide sequences.
For the purpose of creating numerous synthetic peptide sequences by recombinant DNA technology, a recently developed non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) cloning system was applied in this study. The yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus exhibits efficient NHEJ activity that joins DNA ends in a sequence-independent manner through transformation . When DNA fragments are prepared by using primers with synthetic sequences to attach to the N-terminus of a protein, these fragments can be autonomously circularized by NHEJ following introduction into the yeast. Therefore, DNA constructs containing synthetic signal peptide sequences can be created and expressed for examination of their secretory activities only through transformation of the PCR products into K. marxianus.
By comprehensive mutational analysis of the N-terminal sequence of the GLuc luciferase gene, we found that the presence of the acidic Glu residue downstream of the hydrophobic peptide had a role in defining the boundary of the signal sequence. Through placement of N-terminal basic and C-terminal acidic amino acids on either side of a hydrophobic core, we were able to examine various synthetic amino acid stretches for their secretory protein production in yeast. The results indicated that the number of amino acids adequate for efficient secretion could be defined when a single hydrophobic amino acid repeat was utilized instead. Unexpectedly, we found that the sixteen of the same amino acid (Met) provided the most efficient secretory production of GLuc in the yeast K. marxianus.
Deletion analysis of the N-terminal sequence of yGLuc
Luciferase activities generated using the deleted signal sequences are shown in Figure 1b. Deletion of the 2nd Gly (G) and 3rd Val (V) did not cause significant changes but the additional deletion of the 4th Lys (K) diminished the activity level, indicating that this K residue is important for secretion activity. In addition, deletions of the following amino acids individually or in multiples in the sequence VLFALICIAVA (Leu: L; Phe: F; Ala: A; Ile: I; Cys: C) also diminished the activity, indicating the importance of the hydrophobic core sequence. Contrary to these results, the deletion of the 16th Glu (E) enhanced the activity considerably. Deletion of the 17th A showed an activity level comparable with that of the wild type, and deletion of the 18th K also showed increased activity. These results suggested that the 16th E and 18th K inhibited secretory activity in K. marxianus. Deletion of the amino acids downstream from the 18th K decreased the activity slightly in a gradual manner except for 20th T, which increased the activity.
Substitution of the 16th E and the 4th K of the yGLuc signal sequence
Similarly, the 4th K was substituted to each of the other amino acids (Figure 2b). In this case, the 2nd G and the 3rd V were deleted as well. Substitution of K to Arg (R) increased the measured luciferase activity, and Asn (N) and W substitutions yielded levels similar to the original K. However, all other amino acids showed decreased activities upon substitution, suggesting that the presence of specific amino acids at the N-terminus of hydrophobic core is necessary for secretion. From these results, we assumed that the hydrophobic core was defined by the region between the N-terminal basic and C-terminal non-hydrophobic amino acids.
Substitution of the hydrophobic core with a single amino acid stretch
Hydrophobic core designation using various lengths of a single amino acid
To determine effective amino acids as the boundary for the hydrophobic core, Glu following to poly-L was substituted with the other amino acids. We used L13 instead of L11 for the border-E substitution experiment because loss of the boundary will show lower GLuc activity by hydrophobic sequence extension (Figure 4b). Substitution for E with any other amino acid decreased secretory activity, indicating that E is the most effective amino acid at the boundary of hydrophobic core. The placement of E at the C terminus of the hydrophobic core may have a strong role in determining the extent of the hydrophobic region. Overall, we speculate that an effective secretion signal peptide requires an adequate hydrophobic core, which is experimentally determined by the flanking N-terminal basic and C-terminal E residues. Stronger or weaker hydrophobicity in this region may be inadequate for efficient secretion.
Optimal amino acid number for a hydrophobic core
Similarly, we varied the amino acid length with poly-F and poly-M. For these constructs, the trend was similar to that seen with poly-L, but the activity was increased substantially. The F13 and F15 substitutions showed a eleven-fold increase over the wild type, and M16 showed a twenty-four-fold increase. Interestingly, poly-M showed these extremely elevated activity levels over a wide range; from twelve to seventeen Ms, all showed more than twelve-fold enhancement over the original sequence, though native poly-M sequences are rarely found in the protein database (see the Discussion section).
All of the constructs expressed the modified yGLuc under the control of the ScTDH3 promoter. However, it is possible that the differences in the activity levels were caused by differences in the levels of transcription. To examine the levels of transcripts produced by the constructs (Figures 4a and 5a), total RNA was isolated from these strains and RT-PCR was performed with 30, 35, and 40 cycles using the primers for yGLuc and ACT1 as a control (Figure 5b). All showed similar band intensities, indicating that mRNA levels were roughly similar in these strains.
The culture supernatants of the wild type and M16 strains were examined by western blotting using anti-GLuc antibody (Figure 5c). Only M16 supernatant showed an intensive band at a smaller size than 20 kD. The predicted molecular weights of M16:GLuc were 20.7 kD with M16 signal sequence and 18.4 kD without the signal sequence. The detected protein size of the western blotting analysis suggests that the M16 signal sequence may be cleaved. The activities in culture supernatant and culture fluid containing yeast cells were comparable (data not shown), indicating that the GLuc consisting of M16 signal sequence were actually released from cells.
Heterologous signal sequences
Figure 6 shows that a P can be observed in the putative hydrophobic core in hIL6 (11th P), hEPO (7th P), hLIF (10th and 24th P), and hAZGP1 (6th P); all of these constructs showed relatively lower activities, except for hAZGP1. The signal sequence of hAZGP1 has hydrophobic core consisting of VLLSLLLLLG after the 6th P, which seemed not to be deleterious to the overall core hydrophobicity in this case. BlAmyL appeared to have an ideal hydrophobic core, but showed low activity. This sequence contains two Ks and two Rs at the N-terminus, a feature not observed in other eukaryotic signal sequences. AoTAA, KmPGU1, and SfGLU1 contained an N-terminal W, N, and K, respectively, which have a specific role as the N-terminal amino acid before the hydrophobic core (Figure 2b); followed by relatively long stretches of hydrophobic amino acids. These results suggest that there exists an ideal structure for efficient protein secretion in K. marxianus.
Secretory production of the hLIF protein in K. marxianus
Mutational analysis of the yGLuc signal sequence using K. marxianus NHEJ cloning
Yeast strains used in this study
Genotype ( K. marxianus except for RAK5125)
S. cerevisiae: MAT a ade2Δ0A his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0::ScTDH3p-yGLuc15C LEU2
ura3-1 ade2-1 pKM030 [KmCenD-ScADE2-KmARS7-ScURA3]
ura-13 ade2-1 pKM152 [ScTDH3p-yGLuc-ScURA3-KmCenD-ScADE2-KmARS7]
ura3-1 ade2-1 pKM198 [ScTDH3p-M16:yGLuc]a
ura3-1 ade2-1 pKM207 [ScTDH3p-F13:yGLuc]a
ura3-1 ade2-1 pKM288 [ScADE2-ScTDH3p-PhEG-ScURA3-KmCenD-KmARS7]
ura3-1 ade2-1 pKM414 [ScTDH3p-L13:yGLuc]a
ura3-1 ade2-1 pKM417 [ScTDH3p-I13:yGLuc]a
ura3-1 ade2-1 pKM398 [ScTDH3p-hLIF:FLAG]a
ura3-1 ade2-1 pKM623 [ScTDH3p-M16:hLIF:FLAG]a
To determine the frequency of aberrant mutant clones in the transformant colonies, three clones each from M16, F13, and L13 transformants, and four clones of I13 constructs were sequenced. Of the 13 clones, only one, from the I13 clones, showed a mutation; this was a deletion of three nucleotides coding for one Ile residue, resulting in an incorrect (I12) clone. From this result, we estimated that 12 of 13 clones (92%) would have correct sequence. It may be argued that incorrect clones should not be allowed in the analysis; however, over 90% were accurate clones when sequenced. Also, transformants that showed null value were 17% in the constructs over 0.1-fold (Figure 1b, n/N), suggesting that NHEJ accuracy after PCR amplification is approximately 83-90%. Therefore, we performed direct analysis of transformant colonies without sequence verification.
The role of specific amino acids in a signal sequence
The comprehensive deletion analysis of signal sequences in this study demonstrated that deletion of the 4th K, or of one or several amino acids in the hydrophobic core, severely decreased the secretory activities of the signal sequences (Figure 1b). These results confirmed the importance of the N-terminal basic amino acid and the hydrophobic core, as previously reported [25-27]. This result also indicated that the hydrophobic core of the yGLuc signal sequence is the minimum required for functioning in K. marxianus, because only a single amino acid deletion in the hydrophobic core caused defects of secretory production. Additionally, when the 16th E was deleted (E16Δ), the activity of secreted luciferase increased 4.5-fold, suggesting that the increased hydrophobicity of the core caused by the deletion of a strong hydrophilic amino acid led to enhanced secretory production, because the 17th amino acid is A (see Figure 1). This result is reminiscent of the simple concept that a hydrophobic core is defined as being between hydrophilic amino acids; an N-terminal K and a C-terminal E in this case. This interpretation can be supported by the substitution experiment wherein the 16th E in the GLuc signal sequence was substituted to each of the other amino acids (Figure 2a). Substitution of E16 to L, M, C, F, A, W, V, S, G, Y, H (His), I, Q, or T increased the activity more than two-fold. These amino acids are more hydrophobic than E. In contrast, substitution of the 16th E to D and P decreased the activity, supporting the conclusion of the interference of hydrophilic amino acid in the hydrophobic core and also suggesting a damaging effect of P on a hydrophobic core structure.
The substitution experiment of the N-terminal K to each of the other amino acids indicated that R, N, W, and F can be used instead of K for efficient protein secretion. For these amino acids, however, the N acted as an interfering amino acid when located at the C terminus of a hydrophobic core, similar to the effect of K and R (Figure 2a). N can therefore act as an important amino acid for the constitution of a signal sequence. That W had a positive effect was unexpected; however, the large size of its side chain might provide functionality instead of its basic amino acid structure.
Modeling the hydrophobic core
To generate a simplified signal sequence, we substituted a part of the yGLuc hydrophobic core with repeats of a single amino acid. The VLFALICI sequence was initially substituted to contain an eight residue repeat of a single amino acid (Figure 3). L8, M8, W8, and F8 increased secreted protein activity but repeats containing other residues (I, T, S, Q, Y, A, V, and C) did not. This result indicated that a complex amino acid sequence such as VLFALICI can be substituted with a repeat of select, single amino acids. Furthermore, although eight residue repeats of the residues I, T, S, Q, Y, A, V, and C, appeared not to be suitable, or too weak for a hydrophobic core; in fact, a hydrophobic core consisting of I12 and I13 was able to function as a signal sequence (Figure 5a). Therefore, the hydrophobic core in a signal sequence can be determined by the number of hydrophobic amino acids without including charged amino acids such as E, D, R, and K. Moreover, the efficiency of secretory production can be determined by the specific repeat number of single hydrophobic amino acid (Figures 4a and 5a). The amino acid L required eleven or twelve repeats for the best production but more than this led to decreased activities. Substitution experiment of human lysozyme signal sequence to poly-L was previously reported and optimum length was presented as L10 when located between N-terminal R and C-terminal P in S. cerevisiae . It may be possible that each yeast species has proper length of hydrophobic core. Other amino acids, such as I, F, and M, showed peak activities at the different numbers of repeats. The exclusion of charged amino acids from optimal hydrophobic-core functioning is also supported by the amino acid substitution experiment at the E following the L13 hydrophobic core sequence (Figure 4b). The substitution of the C-terminal E of the L13 hydrophobic core sequence to any other amino acid decreased the overall activity, indicating that E is the most effective at that site for the determination of hydrophobicity. In other words, it acts as a boundary amino acid for the hydrophobic core. P also functions in this way. All other hydrophobic amino acids, such as G, W, I, L, A, V, C, M, F, and Y, showed much lower activities when placed at this site. Therefore, increased hydrophobicity over an optimal hydrophobic core (as occurred following the latter substitutions) was harmful for signal sequence function.
Secretory production was unexpectedly much higher in hydrophobic cores containing optimized numbers of poly-F and poly-M sequences (Figure 5a). In particular, the activity produced by M16 was twenty-four-fold higher than that from the wild type GLuc signal sequence. RT-PCR analysis indicated that the transcriptional levels, in contrast, were all similar to those of the wild type (Figure 5b). Therefore, we found in this study that an artificial poly-M hydrophobic core constituted a supreme signal sequence in the yeast K. marxianus. Western blotting of the GLuc revealed that the artificial M16 signal sequence enhanced secretion of GLuc protein (Figure 5c). The artificial signal sequence M16 can be used as an efficient signal sequence for heterologous protein secretion, as shown with the human LIF protein (Figure 7). We also compared the effect of artificial signal sequences (F13, L13, and M16) with the signal sequences of GLuc and α mating factor (ScMFα1) in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Additional file 1: Data S1). The signal sequence consisting of F13, L13, or M16 showed higher activity than the wild type, and the M16 signal was the best among the synthetic signals examined in S. cerevisiae. However, the α-factor signal sequence of S. cerevisiae showed higher activity than the M16. For optimal secretion, the number of M may need to be adjusted in different yeast species.
At present, we cannot explain why the signal sequence consisting of poly-M is higher than other amino acids. One hypothesis is that poly-M is resistant to degradation pathways. Hydrophobicity of methionine is lower than other hydrophobic amino acids such as Leu, Ile and Phe. The signal consisting of poly-M is in totally enough hydrophobicity to work as a secretion signal but it might not be recognized as a degradation target. Further study is required to understand the effect of poly-M signal sequence on secretion.
Interpretation of heterologous signal sequences
The optimal signal sequence in K. marxianus can be interpreted as follows: the presence of an N-terminal K, R, W, or N; a subsequent hydrophobic core containing an adequate number of non-charged amino acids; and the presence of a C-terminal E or P residue. The validity of this type of signal sequence was examined using heterologous signal sequences (Figure 6). Heterologous signal sequences from proteins across multiple species were attached to the 16th E position using an authentic E or P residue from their original signal sequences. Signal sequences from hIL6, BlAmyL, hEPO, and hLIF showed lower activities but those from AoTAA, KmPGU1, hAZGP1, and SfGLU1 were higher. hIL6 contained an 11th P in its hydrophobic core, which may be the reason for lower secretion in K. marxianus. BlAmyL seems to contain an adequate signal sequence if the region from the 10th R to the 23th P was used as the core sequence, but it also contained an additional K and R at the N-terminus, which may play a negative role in K. marxianus. hEPO and hLIF contained additional W and K residues, which may play N-terminus roles in front of a hydrophobic core region; however, the hydrophobic sequences following the P residue are too short for optimal function in K. marxianus. The AoTAA, KmPGU1, and SfGLU1 sequences have adequate numbers of hydrophobic amino acids following W, N, or K. Among them, SfGLU1 contained the highest number of hydrophobic amino acids without any charged amino acids. We supposed that this was the reason for the efficient secretion driven by the SfGLU1 signal sequence in K. marxianus. Together, these results indicated that the length of the non-charged amino acids between the N-terminal W, N, R, or K and the C-terminal P or E determined the efficiency of secretion in K. marxianus. The inverse of this finding is that different organisms may have their own N-terminal and C-terminal boundary amino acids to define their hydrophobic core and provide their core sequences with suitable hydrophobicity for optimum secretion.
N-terminal poly-M proteins
We found that an artificial poly-M sequence can be used as a functional signal sequence in yeast. Therefore, we searched for poly-M sequences in the protein database. Interestingly, N-terminal poly-M containing protein sequences were identified in pathogenic parasites, although all were hypothetical proteins (Additional file 2: Figure S2). These include the CCD59747 protein from Schistosoma mansoni, which is a trematode parasite that causes schistosomiasis; EJD73276 from Loa loa, which is the filarial nematode that causes Loa loa filariasis; and CDI74732 from Eimeria praecox, which is an apicomplexan parasite capable of causing the disease coccidiosis in animals. Based on their relatively unique shared peptide sequence, these N-terminal poly-M proteins may have similar roles in secretion or function in their respective parasitic life cycles.
The deletion and substitution analyses of the GLuc signal sequence indicated the importance of 4th K and 16th E for determining the length of hydrophobic stretch required for efficient secretory activity. This was a key finding to achieve the following synthetic analysis. We found that the synthetic signal sequences consisting of the N-terminal K, a repeat of a single hydrophobic amino acid such as poly-M, L, I, or F, and the C-terminal E functioned as secretion signals in K. marxianus in length-dependent manner. The most efficient synthetic secretion signal was MKM16E and it secreted hLIF protein successfully in K. marxianus though the native signal sequence of hLIF did not. Based on all the mutational and synthetic analyses, we propose a simple concept of secretory signal sequence in K. marxianus, which consists of an N-terminal K, R, W, or N, a subsequent hydrophobic core containing an adequate number of non-charged amino acids, and a C-terminal E or P residue. The model signal sequence structure could explain the secretion activities of GLuc constructs with various secretion signals from human, fungal and bacterial origins.
Materials and methods
Yeast strains and growth conditions
Yeast strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. Cells were grown in YPD medium (1% yeast extract, 2% polypeptone, and 2% glucose) or synthetic drop-out media (0.17% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids and ammonium sulfate, 0.5% ammonium sulfate, and 2% glucose and required nutrients) at 28-30°C. Agar (2%) was added to the media if necessary. 5-Fluoroorotic acid (FOA) medium was prepared as described previously .
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
Oligonucleotide primers used in this study are listed in Additional file 3: Table S3. The reaction mixture consisted of 5 μl of 2 × KOD FX neo buffer (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan), 2 μl of 2 mM dNTPs, 0.2 μl of KOD FX neo polymerase (Toyobo), and 0.3 μl each of the primer pair (10 μΜ) in a total volume of 10 μl with sterile water. Cycling conditions were as follows: 94°C for 2 min, followed by 30 cycles each of 98°C for 10 s, 65°C for 30 s, and 68°C for 3–4 min. For construction of pKM152, KOD plus polymerase (Toyobo) was used. This reaction mixture consisted of 1 μl of 10 × KOD plus buffer, 1 μl of 2 mM dNTPs, 0.4 μl of 25 mM MgSO4, 0.2 μl of KOD plus polymerase, and 0.3 μl each of the primer pair (10 μΜ) in a total volume of 10 μl with sterile water. Cycling conditions were as follows: 94°C for 1 min, followed by 30 cycles each of 94°C for 20 s, 60 or 65°C for 30 s, and 68°C for 1–4 min. The amplified DNA fragments were directly used for yeast transformation.
Transformation of K. marxianus
Transformation of K. marxianus was performed as previously described . Briefly, yeast cells (RAK3908) were cultured in 30 ml of YPD medium in a 250 ml baffled flask and shaken at 150 rpm for 24 h at 30°C. The cells were collected by centrifugation and suspended in 900 μl of transformation buffer (TFB), prepared by mixing 20 ml of 60% polyethylene glycol 3350 (Sigma-Aldrich, Tokyo, Japan), 3 ml of 1 M dithiothreitol (Wako, Osaka, Japan), 1.5 ml of 4 M lithium acetate (Kishida Chemical, Osaka, Japan), and 5.5 ml of sterilized water. Next, the cells were centrifuged and resuspended in fresh 600 μl of TFB. Then, 50 μl of the cell suspension was mixed with the amplified DNA fragment (~70 ng) and incubated at 42°C for 30 min. The cell suspension was spread on a synthetic drop-out medium plate and incubated at 28-30°C for 2–3 d.
Construction of signal sequence mutants of yGLuc
The gene for the Gaussia princeps luciferase GLuc (New England BioLabs, Inc., Ipswich, MA, USA) was codon-optimized for yeast expression which was referred to as yGLuc . yGLuc was used in construction of the pKM152 plasmid, and it was maintained in the K. marxianus strain RAK6205. The pKM152 contained ScTDH3p-yGLuc (S. cerevisiae TDH3 promoter-driven yGLuc cassette), ScADE2 and ScURA3 selectable markers, an autonomously replicating sequence (KmARS7), and a centromere sequence (KmCenD) (Figure 1a).
pKM152 was generated as follows: the ScTDH3p-yGLuc cassette was amplified from the chromosomal DNA of RAK5125 (S. cerevisiae: MAT a ade2Δ0A his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0::ScTDH3p-yGLuc15C LEU2)  using TDH3-698 and 15G-yGLuc primers. The ScURA3 marker gene was amplified from the chromosomal DNA of the S. cerevisiae strain BY4704  using 15C-URA3-223 and URA3-300c primers. These two DNA fragments were fused at the 15C:15G annealing sequence using TDH3-698 and URA3+771c primers by fusion PCR . To prepare the vector fragment, a DNA fragment was amplified from the total DNA of RAK6140, which contains the pKM030 plasmid , using URA3+771c and URA3+772 primers. Using this amplified DNA fragment as a template, a second DNA fragment was amplified using URA3+772 and KmARS7(201-260)-ADE2-797 primers. For final plasmid construction, the DNA fragment obtained through fusion PCR and the pKM030-derived DNA fragment were mixed and used to transform RAK3908; transformants were selected on uracil drop-out medium. A clone that showed the Ade+ Ura+ FOA+ and Gluc+ phenotype was chosen and stocked as RAK6205, containing the pKM152 plasmid.
The construction of mutated yGLuc signal sequences was performed by PCR using KOD FX neo polymerase with total DNA from RAK6205, or using a PCR-amplified pKM152 fragment as a template. Primer pairs utilized are listed in Additional file 4: Table S4. K. marxianus has an efficient NHEJ ability , which allows the generation of a circular plasmid by joining of the DNA fragment ends . Transformants were selected on adenine drop-out plates. Transformant colonies were picked using toothpicks, inoculated into 96-well plates (TPP Techno Plastic Products AG, Trasadingen, Switzerland) containing 160 μl of uracil drop-out medium, and incubated at 28-30°C for 2 d. Subsequently, 10 μl of the cell culture was inoculated into 290 μl of YPD medium in 96-well plates and incubated at 28-30°C for 1 d. The final culture fluid was used directly for the GLuc luciferase assay.
GLuc luciferase assay
To measure the luminescence of secreted GLuc proteins, we utilized the BioLux Gaussia Luciferase Assay Kit (New England Biolabs, Inc.). A small aliquot of culture fluid (10 μl) was transferred to a black 96-well microplate (Greiner Bio-One, Frichenhausen, Germany) and mixed with 20 μl of substrate solution. The mixture was incubated for 5 sec, and then subjected to a 1 sec measurement using a Centro LB960 microplate reader (Berthold, Wildbad, Germany). The yeast cell concentration was determined by optical density (OD600) using a Power Wave XS microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). GLuc luciferase activity was expressed in relative luminescence units (RLU = value/(μl · sec · OD600)). The fold change was calculated as the ratio of mutagenized GLuc activity per wild type activity. Over twelve colonies were picked for each construct and used for the GLuc assay. Usually, several colonies in each group showed no luciferase activity, probably due to improper plasmid construction. From the blank (negative control: no GLuc insertion) strain measurements, the level of background activity was 0.44 ± 0.20 (average RLU ± standard deviation). Therefore, when the GLuc RLU values of a transformant were not over 0.64, the data were considered to be of null value and were not included in the RLU calculations. In several cases, almost all of the colonies of particular mutant constructs showed null values. It is possible that these designed signal sequence mutations were not functional, but these experiments were not used for calculation because the mutant sequences in these transformants were not confirmed by DNA sequencing. All values except for these null values were subjected to average and standard error calculations.
Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR)
For transcription analysis, total RNA was extracted from the cells of the RAK6205, RAK8772, RAK9383, and RAK10336 strains. The yeast cells were inoculated to 1 ml of uracil drop-out (−U) medium in a 24-well microplate and incubated for 2 d with shaking at 150 rpm at 28°C. An aliquot of the culture (10 μl) was inoculated into 1 ml of YPD medium in a 24-well plate and incubated for 24 h with shaking at 28°C. The yeast cells were collected by centrifugation at 1,000 g for 5 min, suspended in 2 ml of buffer Y (0.1 M EDTA, 1 M sorbitol, 0.7% 2-mercaptoethanol, and 2 mg/ml Zymolyase, pH 7.4), and incubated at 30°C for 30 min. For RNA extraction, the Maxwell 16 LEV simplyRNA Tissue kit (Promega, Tokyo, Japan) was used following the manufacturer’s protocol, and the cell suspension processed in an automated Maxwell 16 Research System (Promega).
DNA (genomic and construct) was removed from the extracted RNA using the Turbo DNA-free kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Life Technologies, CA, USA). For reverse transcription, the SuperScript First-Stand Synthesis System for RT-PCR kit (Life Technologies) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA-free RNA (100 ng) was used for RT-PCR, and A small fraction (1/50th; 0.5 μl) of the reverse transcribed DNA was used as a template for KOD FX neo PCR in a total of 10 μl using yGLuc+82 and 3CG9-yGLuc+558c primers. Primers KmACT1+16 and KmACT+1111c were used as a control.
DNA manipulations of the human LIF gene
A human LIF (hLIF) cDNA fragment was amplified from pCAGGS-LIF [32,33] by PCR using the hLIF+1 and hLIF+694c primers. Addition of a FLAG tag (DYKDDDDK) to the C terminus of hLIF was performed by PCR amplification of the hLIF cDNA fragment using the hLIF+1 and 3CG9-FLAGc-hLIF+609c primers. This DNA fragment in turn was used as a template for PCR amplification using the hLIF+1 and URA3+772term3CG9 primers to construct an insert fragment. The vector backbone fragment was prepared by PCR amplification of K. marxianus RAK9817 total DNA, which contains the pKM288 plasmid , using the URA3+771c and ScTDH3-1c40 primers. These two DNA fragments were mixed and used for transformation of the K. marxianus RAK3908 strain. The transformants were selected on –U plates. The sequence of an Ade+ Ura+ clone was verified and the clone was stored as RAK10252, containing the vector pKM398 (ScTDH3p-hLIF:FLAG).
To attach an artificial signal sequence to the N terminus of the hLIF:Flag construct, template DNA was prepared by PCR amplification of total DNA from the RAK10252 strain using the TDH3p-1c40 and hLIF+4 primers. This DNA fragment was diluted and used as a template for a second PCR using the primer pair MKM(16)Ec-TDH3-1c and hLIF+4. The DNA fragment was used for transformation of the RAK3908 strain; Ade+ and Ura+ transformants were picked and the sequence of the construct was verified. The RAK11616 strain was stocked as the M16-hLIF:FLAG expression strain.
Yeast cells of strain RAK3908 were cultured in 2 ml of YPD, and cells of RAK10252 and RAK11616 were cultured in 2 ml of −U medium for 2 d at 28°C with shaking at 150 rpm. A 20-μl aliquot of the culture was inoculated into 2 ml of YPD and incubated at 28°C with shaking at 150 rpm overnight. The cell culture was transferred to a microtube and centrifuged by 12,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was used for ELISA and western blotting analyses. For assessment of protein levels by ELISA, the MAXISORP plate (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., MA USA) and a mouse monoclonal antibody that detects human antigens (anti-hLIF mAbs: 8 μg/ml, clone 9824, R&D Systems Inc., MN, USA) was used. A 50 μl aliquot of the yeast culture supernatant was added to each well and 50 μl of 0.4 μg/ml biotinylated human LIF goat polyclonal antibodies (BAF250, R&D Systems Inc.) in PBS was added to the wells. For detection, Vectastain ABC standard stain solution (Vector laboratories, CA, USA) was used following to manufacture’s protocol. The OD 450 nm and 540 nm values of the samples were measured by a Synergy MX microplate reader (BioTek). The measured quantity of hLIF protein was expressed as the value of OD450 - OD540.
Western blotting analyses
For western blotting analysis of GLuc, yeast cells of RAK6205 and RAK8772 strains were incubated in 2 ml of YPD for 1 d, and 500 μl and 450 μl of the culture supernatants, which corresponded to an equivalent number of cells, respectively, were used. To the supernatants, 1 ml of cold acetone was added and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 min. The precipitate was dissolved in 20 μl of Laemmli Sample Buffer (Bio-Rad, CA, USA) and incubated at 95°C for 5 min. Five μl was loaded to SDS-PAGE equipped with a Cassette Electrophoresis Unit DPE-1020 (Cosmo-bio, Tokyo, Japan) and a SuperSep Ace gel, (5-20%, Wako). After SDS-PAGE, proteins were transferred onto the PVDF membrane by iBlot western blotting system (Life technologies, CA, USA). For protein detection, 1/5000-diluted anti-GLuc antibody (E8023S, New England Biolabs, Inc.), 1/1000-diluted anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (Jackson ImmunoResearch Inc., PA, USA) and Immunostar Zeta (Wako) were used.
In western blotting analysis of hLIF, a 400 μl of yeast culture supernatant containing hLIF proteins was treated using the Endo Hf kit (New England Biolabs, Inc.) for protein deglycosylation according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The deglycosylated sample was mixed with 500 μl of cold acetone and the precipitate was collected by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 10 min. The precipitate was dissolved in 40 μl of Laemmli Sample Buffer (Bio-Rad) and boiled for 10 min. After SDS-PAGE, proteins were transferred onto the Immobilon PVDF membrane. For protein detection, 1/1000-diluted anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody (1E6, Wako), 1/1000-diluted anti-mouse IgG-HRP (Jackson ImmunoResearch), and Immunostar Zeta (Wako) were used.
We would like to thank Yukie Misumi for technical assistance. We also thank Dr. Hitoshi Niwa for his gift of the pCAGGS-LIF plasmid. This study was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Nos. 26450505, 24658096); the Adaptable and Seamless Technology Transfer Program through Target-driven R&D; and the Advanced Low Carbon Technology R&D Program (JST, Japan).
- 1.Blobel G, Walter P, Chang CN, Goldman BM, Erickson AH, Lingappa VR. Translocation of proteins across membranes: the signal hypothesis and beyond. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1979;33:9–36.Google Scholar
- 9.Popowicz AM, Dash PF. SIGSEQ: a computer program for predicting signal sequence cleavage sites. Comput Appl Biosci. 1988;4:405–6.Google Scholar
- 12.Studnicka GM. Quantitative computer analysis of signal sequence homologies in DNA. Comput Appl Biosci. 1986;2:269–75.Google Scholar
- 16.Kang DO, Hwang IK, Kim BY, Ahn SC, Mheen TI, Ahn JS, et al. Secretion of Bacillus alpha-amylase from yeast directed by glucoamylase I signal sequence of Saccharomyces diastaticus. Biochem Mol Biol Int. 1996;39:181–90.Google Scholar
- 18.Brake AJ. Secretion of heterologous proteins directed by the yeast alpha-factor leader. Biotechnology. 1989;13:269–80.Google Scholar
- 23.Yarimizu T, Nonklang S, Nakamura J, Tokuda S, Nakagawa T, Lorreungsil S, et al. Identification of auxotrophic mutants of the yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus by non-homologous end joining-mediated integrative transformation with genes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 2013;30:485–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Yang YG, Xu JN, Hu TS, Qian YC, Yang SL, Gong Y. Increase in hydrophobicity of signal peptide enhances secretion of penicillin G acylase. Sheng Wu Hua Xue Yu Sheng Wu Wu Li Xue Bao (Shanghai). 2000;32:163–8.Google Scholar
- 30.Abdel-Banat BM, Nonklang S, Hoshida H, Akada R. Random and targeted gene integrations through the control of non-homologous end joining in the yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus. Yeast. 2010;27:29–39.Google Scholar
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.