Plasma microbial cell-free DNA load is associated with mortality in patients with COVID-19

Introduction

Severe COVID-19 pneumonia requiring intensive care unit (ICU) support can be complicated by secondary bacterial or fungal infections. The incidence and impact of secondary pneumonias in COVID-19 are not well-defined because clinical distinction from isolated SARS-CoV-2 infection is challenging and diagnostic practices have been highly variable [1]. Early administration of empiric antibiotics limits the sensitivity of subsequent microbiologic studies, whereas standard invasive workup with bronchoscopy is often avoided due to the risks of healthcare personnel exposure to aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 [2]. To overcome such limitations and comprehensively identify secondary pneumonias in COVID-19, we performed microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) metagenomic sequencing (mcfDNA-Seq) in plasma samples in addition to conventional microbiologic workup.

Methods

We enrolled 15 critically-ill patients with COVID-19 (confirmed by nasopharyngeal qPCR for SARS-CoV-2) in a prospective ICU cohort study [3]. Following informed consent, we obtained plasma samples for conducting mcfDNA-Seq with the Karius Test (Karius, Inc. Redwood City, CA)[4]. We evaluated detection of mcfDNA in the context of clinical diagnoses and prescribed antimicrobial therapies by the treating physicians, and examined for associations with clinical outcomes.

Results

Of 15 patients analyzed (median age 63, 53% females, 73% mechanically-ventilated), six (40%) died within 30 days from enrollment. Samples were obtained at a median (interquartile range-IQR) of 10 (4–12) days from COVID-19 symptoms onset, and each sample contained a median of 837 (111–4638) total mcfDNA molecules per microliter (MPMs) and 2 (1–4) identified organisms. Of the total 92,791 MPMs reported across 15 samples, 90% belonged to typical pathogenic bacteria (e.g. E.coli and K. Pneumoniae), with the remainder MPMs aligned to commensal bacteria (5%, e.g. oral Streptococcus species), fungi (4%, Candida species) and DNA viruses (1%). Compared to survivors, non-survivors had higher total mcfDNA (p = 0.04), higher pathogenic bacteria MPMs (p = 0.02) and a trend for a higher number of identified organisms per sample (p = 0.06). (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Non-survivors of severe COVID-19 infection had higher microbial cell-free DNA molecules per microliter of plasma by metagenomic sequencing compared to survivors (median [interquartile range]: 11,125 [650–26,436] vs. 661 [1], Wilcoxon test p-value = 0.04) and a trend for higher number of identified microbes per sample (3.5 [1.8–4.3] vs. 1.0 [0–2.5], Wilcoxon test p-value = 0.06)

Secondary pneumonia was clinically suspected or diagnosed by the treating physicians in 11/15 (73%) patients (Group A, Fig. 2), with microbiologic confirmation by positive respiratory cultures in 3/11 subjects (27%); these three patients had high plasma mcfDNA MPMs for common bacterial pathogens, such as E.coli and Ps. aeruginosa. Among the remaining eight patients with clinically-suspected infections and empiric antibiotic treatments, high mcfDNA MPMs of probable bacterial pathogens were detected in 2/8 patients (co-infecting Ps. aeruginosa and K. PneumoniaeRaoultella ornithinolytica, respectively). In the additional six patients, no evidence of co-infecting bacterial pathogens was present, whereas in one patient (subject 7, Fig. 2) there was high signal for Candida tropicalis (2,490 MPMs) concerning for undiagnosed invasive Candidiasis.

Fig. 2
figure2

Case-based analysis of 15 critically ill patients with COVID-19 with depicted clinical diagnoses, plasma microbial cell-free DNA metagenomics and survival outcomes. The Y-axis margin indicates two groups of clinical diagnoses: Group A includes 11 patients who received antibiotics for either microbiologically-confirmed (n = 3) or clinically-suspected infections despite negative microbiologic workup (n = 8), whereas Group B includes four patients with low clinical suspicion for secondary infection and no antibiotic therapies at time of sampling. The Y-axis ticks denote each patient sample and the x-height of each stacked bar represents the number of microbial cell-free DNA molecules per plasma microliter (MPMs) by metagenomic sequencing, with different colors for the top 10 microbes by ranked abundance. The “other” category (shown in grey) represents the sum of lower abundance taxa of commensal origin. Five out of 11 subjects of Group A (45%, Subjects 1–5) had high MPM signal for probable respiratory pathogens, whereas in the remaining 6/11 subjects there was no evidence of co-infecting bacterial pathogens. Subject 7 was clinically-diagnosed with culture-negative sepsis and treated with prolonged course of empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics while on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for refractory hypoxemic respiratory failure from COVID-19; the high mcfDNA signal for C.tropicalis (2,490 MPMs) is concerning for undiagnosed invasive Candidiasis, corroborated by persistent growth of yeast organisms (not further speciated) from clinical bronchoalveolar lavage samples obtained on days 5, 9 and 14 after the research sample acquisition. Two out of four patients of Group B (subjects 12 and 13) who did not survive and had not received empiric antimicrobials were found to have high mcfDNA signal (> 4000 total MPMs) of probable respiratory pathogens, indicative of undiagnosed (and untreated) secondary infections

We detected respiratory pathogen MPMs (S. aureus, Ps. aeruginosa and K. Pneumoniae) in 3/4 subjects with low suspicion for secondary infection (Group B, Fig. 2). In these patients, no respiratory specimen cultures were obtained, and antibiotics had not been initiated or had been discontinued based on negative blood cultures by the time of research sampling. Notably, two of these individuals experienced sustained vasodilatory shock and died from multiorgan dysfunction attributed to isolated SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Discussion

McfDNA-Seq in patients with COVID-19 indicates a higher incidence of probable secondary infections than previously recognized. Despite our small sample size, the significant association between mcfDNA and 30-day mortality suggests that COVID-19 severity may be influenced by circulating bacterial fragments, either from secondary pneumonias or from possible translocation of colonizing microbiota along the disrupted alveolar/epithelial surface of lungs injured by COVID-19 [5]. Integration of mcfDNA detection with clinical data demonstrates opportunity for antibiotic stewardship in patients with suspected infection. On the other hand, the signal for undiagnosed and untreated secondary infections should serve as a call for vigilance and thorough diagnostic workup in patients with severe COVID-19 [6].

Availability of data and materials

All de-identified data are available from the authors upon request.

References

  1. 1.

    Garcia-Vidal C, Sanjuan G, Moreno-García E, Puerta-Alcalde P, Garcia-Pouton N, Chumbita M, et al. Incidence of co-infections and superinfections in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.07.041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wahidi MM, Shojaee S, Lamb CR, Ost D, Maldonado F, Eapen G, et al. The use of bronchoscopy during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: CHEST/AABIP guideline and expert panel report. Chest. 2020;158:1268–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.04.036.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kitsios GD, Yang H, Yang L, Qin S, Fitch A, Wang X-H, et al. Respiratory tract dysbiosis is associated with worse outcomes in mechanically-ventilated patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201912-2441OC.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Blauwkamp TA, Thair S, Rosen MJ, Blair L, Lindner MS, Vilfan ID, et al. Analytical and clinical validation of a microbial cell-free DNA sequencing test for infectious disease. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:663–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-018-0349-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Arunachalam PS, Wimmers F, Mok CKP, Perera RAPM, Scott M, Hagan T, et al. Systems biological assessment of immunity to mild versus severe COVID-19 infection in humans. Science. 2020;369:1210–20. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc6261.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cox MJ, Loman N, Bogaert D, O’Grady J. Co-infections: potentially lethal and unexplored in COVID-19. Lancet Microbe. 2020;1:e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30009-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the multiple investigators that contributed to our clinical research efforts for COVID-19, including investigators from the Acute Lung Injury Center of Excellence and the Center for Medicine and the Microbiome at the University of Pittsburgh, and the collaborators from Karius, Inc.

Funding

This work was supported by Career Development Award Number IK2 BX004886 from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs Biomedical Laboratory R&D (BLRD) Service (W.B.); the National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers K23 HL129987 (G.D.K); P01HL114453 (B.J.M.); University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science Institute COVID-19 Pilot Grant Program (G.D.K).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: GDK, AM; Acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data: GDK, WB, NAY, RD, AAA, BJM, AM; Drafting of work and/or revising for important intellectual content: GDK, WB, NAY, RD, AAA, BJM, AM; Final approval of version to be published; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved: GDK, WB, NAY, RD, AAA, BJM, AM. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgios D. Kitsios.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board (Protocol STUDY19050099). Written informed consent was provided by all participants or their surrogates in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Competing interests

Dr. Bryan J. McVerry has been a consultant for Vapotherm, Inc. and receives research funding from Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr. Georgios Kitsios has received research funding from Karius, Inc. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kitsios, G.D., Bain, W., Al-Yousif, N. et al. Plasma microbial cell-free DNA load is associated with mortality in patients with COVID-19. Respir Res 22, 24 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01623-0

Download citation