Advertisement

BMC Medical Genomics

, 11:15 | Cite as

Novel candidate genes important for asthma and hypertension comorbidity revealed from associative gene networks

  • Olga V. Saik
  • Pavel S. Demenkov
  • Timofey V. Ivanisenko
  • Elena Yu Bragina
  • Maxim B. Freidin
  • Irina A. Goncharova
  • Victor E. Dosenko
  • Olga I. Zolotareva
  • Ralf Hofestaedt
  • Inna N. Lavrik
  • Evgeny I. Rogaev
  • Vladimir A. Ivanisenko
Open Access
Research

Abstract

Background

Hypertension and bronchial asthma are a major issue for people’s health. As of 2014, approximately one billion adults, or ~ 22% of the world population, have had hypertension. As of 2011, 235–330 million people globally have been affected by asthma and approximately 250,000–345,000 people have died each year from the disease. The development of the effective treatment therapies against these diseases is complicated by their comorbidity features. This is often a major problem in diagnosis and their treatment. Hence, in this study the bioinformatical methodology for the analysis of the comorbidity of these two diseases have been developed. As such, the search for candidate genes related to the comorbid conditions of asthma and hypertension can help in elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying the comorbid condition of these two diseases, and can also be useful for genotyping and identifying new drug targets.

Results

Using ANDSystem, the reconstruction and analysis of gene networks associated with asthma and hypertension was carried out. The gene network of asthma included 755 genes/proteins and 62,603 interactions, while the gene network of hypertension - 713 genes/proteins and 45,479 interactions. Two hundred and five genes/proteins and 9638 interactions were shared between asthma and hypertension. An approach for ranking genes implicated in the comorbid condition of two diseases was proposed. The approach is based on nine criteria for ranking genes by their importance, including standard methods of gene prioritization (Endeavor, ToppGene) as well as original criteria that take into account the characteristics of an associative gene network and the presence of known polymorphisms in the analysed genes. According to the proposed approach, the genes IL10, TLR4, and CAT had the highest priority in the development of comorbidity of these two diseases. Additionally, it was revealed that the list of top genes is enriched with apoptotic genes and genes involved in biological processes related to the functioning of central nervous system.

Conclusions

The application of methods of reconstruction and analysis of gene networks is a productive tool for studying the molecular mechanisms of comorbid conditions. The method put forth to rank genes by their importance to the comorbid condition of asthma and hypertension was employed that resulted in prediction of 10 genes, playing the key role in the development of the comorbid condition. The results can be utilised to plan experiments for identification of novel candidate genes along with searching for novel pharmacological targets.

Keywords

Comorbidity Asthma Hypertension Apoptosis Central nervous system ANDSystem Associative gene networks Gene prioritization 

Abbreviations

BC

Betweenness centrality

CC

Closeness centrality

CNS

Central nervous system

DC

Degree centrality

eQTL

Expression quantitative trait loci

FDR

False discovery rate

GO

Gene Ontology

SNP

Single-nucleotide polymorphism

Background

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the respiratory tract, the main characteristics of which are hypersensitivity of the respiratory tract to various stimuli and reversible obstruction of airflow. The role of inflammation in the aetiology and pathogenesis of arterial hypertension is not so obvious upon first blush, but the significance of low-grade chronic inflammation in the development of metabolic syndrome, atherosclerosis, and obesity has been established in many studies [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. It is known that the processes of coagulation and anti-coagulation, the fibrinolytic system, and thrombocytes are integral to asthma pathophysiology [7]. Therefore, in a number of studies, it was shown that asthma is associated with an increase in the incidence of cardiovascular diseases [8, 9]. As a consequence, the fact that the simultaneous diagnosis of asthma and arterial hypertension, which is termed comorbidity, in a high proportion of cases, is not surprising. According to Su et al. [10], the prevalence of hypertension in asthma patients (OR 1.66 [1.47, 1.88]; P < 0.00001) is lower only compared to cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and obesity comorbidities. Apparently, this is not a coincidence as classic asthma mechanisms turned out to be a part of key processes of arterial hypertension initiation. A central example might be the discovery of the role of arachidonic acid-leukotriene B4 production in spontaneously hypertensive rats [11] or the significance of Th17 and IL17 in arterial hypertension [12]. Therapeutic treatment of allergic inflammation leads to improvement in the control of arterial pressure [13]. The importance of STAT3 transcription factors have also been uncovered - they participate in signal transduction with multiple cytokines and are active in allergic inflammation [14, 15] and vascular remodelling [16]. Based on these findings, it is possible to deduce that disturbance of the balance between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory factors within the organism creates an optimal condition for implementation of the inherent propensity to both asthma and arterial hypertension. Besides the critical role of immune reactions and inflammation control in the pathogenesis of asthma and hypertension, other mechanisms are expected to be relevant in the comorbidity of these diseases. For example, β-adrenoblockers and ACE inhibitors are widely used to treat hypertension, but for a long time, they were contraindicated for patients with asthma because of the possibility of bronchoconstriction. In a large cohort of patients, it was demonstrated that adverse respiratory reactions to beta-blockers in the case of asthma partially depends on cardioselectivity, dose, and exposure duration [17]. Polymorphisms in b-adrenergic receptor genes are associated with the risk of hypertension and bronchial asthma [18, 19, 20]. It is assumed that mutations in the SLC26A4 gene can impact the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma and hypertension and, as such, the comorbidity of these diseases [21, 22, 23, 24]. The SLC26A4 gene codes the pendrin protein with Cl-/HCO3- exchanger activity [25]. The loss of function of SLC26A4 in mice prevents development of bronchial asthma and hypertension symptoms; there is a possibility that mutations in the SLC26A4 gene among humans is a factor in the absence of these diseases [26].

Nowadays, much data has been accumulated on these diseases, allowing for the building of associative gene networks that describe the potential molecular mechanisms of interactions between the diseases. There are a number of resources in the world that allow reconstruction of such associative gene networks, for example, MetaCore [27], Ingenuity [28] and ANDSystem [29, 30]. In particular, using the developed by us ANDSystem tool, the following studies were performed: analysis of proteomic data on Helicobacter pylori infection [31]; analysis of the urine proteomic profile in control and under the influence of space flight factors [32]; analysis of tissue-specific gene knockout effect and the search for potential drug targets [33]; analysis of hepatitis C virus life cycle gene networks [34]; analysis of comorbid relations of bronchial asthma and tuberculosis [35], pre-eclampsia, diabetes and obesity [36], glaucoma [37]; search for novel candidate genes of susceptibility to tuberculosis [38].

The goal of this work was prioritization of candidate genes based on reconstruction and analysis of gene networks describing asthma and hypertension interactions. The associative network reconstructed in this work by ANDSystem [29, 30] details the interactions between genes/proteins that are linked to both asthma and hypertension, specifically including 205 genes and 9638 relations. It is worth noting that 69 genes from the network are related to apoptosis and 44 participate in central nervous system (CNS) functioning, suggestive of the important role of these processes for the formation of combined asthma and hypertension. From a ranked list of candidate genes, 10 can be highlighted as having the most priority. In particular, IL10, TLR4, and CAT had the highest priority across all examined scores, including standard methods of prioritization (Endeavor and ToppGene) as well as original methods that take into account the structure of the asthma/hypertension gene network and the associations of gene polymorphisms with the diseases. The predicted genes can be employed for planning of genotyping experiments.

Methods

The reconstruction of associative gene networks of asthma and hypertension was carried out using the ANDSystem tool [29, 30]. The ANDSystem was developed to automatically analyse scientific publications in order to extract knowledge on the molecular genetic interactions and associations of proteins, genes, metabolites, drugs, and microRNAs with diseases, biological processes, drug side effects, and the phenotypes of various organisms. The ANDSystem knowledge base was built on the basis of a large-scale analysis of over 25 million abstracts of scientific papers presented in the PubMed database. In addition, information on molecular genetic interactions from different factual databases, such as IntAct, MINT, and others was integrated into ANDSystem. In total, more than seven million facts regarding molecular genetic interactions and associations are available in the ANDSystem knowledge base. In the current study we used ANDSystem version 2016. It is based on the analysis of all PubMed abstracts up to 2016, as well as information obtained from external databases that were available in 2016.

Enriched gene ontology (GO) biological processes were identified using the service DAVID 6.8 [39]. All settings were utilised in default mode.

To evaluate the centrality of vertices in the graphs of gene networks, the following functions from the network package of the Python programming language were used: “nx.degree_centrality” to calculate the degree centrality (DC), “nx.closeness_centrality” for calculating closeness centrality (CC), and “nx.betweenness_centrality” for betweenness centrality (BC) [40].

The scheme of the gene prioritization algorithm that includes 10 criteria is shown in Fig. 1. Criterion 1 was calculated using the Endeavor system for gene prioritization, version 3.71 (https://endeavour.esat.kuleuven.be/Endeavour.aspx) [41, 42]: Rank1i = Rank(Xi), where X – sorted list of genes according to Endeavor output, i – gene number. All settings used were in default mode. As the input for the test and training sets, the list of genes from the complete asthma/hypertension network was utilised.
Fig. 1

A general scheme for calculating criteria of gene prioritization

Criterion 2 was calculated with the gene prioritization system, ToppGene (https://toppgene.cchmc.org/prioritization.jsp) [43, 44]: Rank2i = Rank(Xi), where X – sorted list of genes according to ToppGene output, i – gene number. All settings used were in default mode. The genes from the complete asthma/hypertension network were entered as the input, and the list of genes from the complete asthma/hypertension network, from which the analysed genes were excluded, was provided as a training set. Pearson’s correlation coefficient for criteria 1 and 2 ranks and its statistical significance were estimated using the Social Science Statistics resource (http://www.socscistatistics.com).

Criterion 3: involvement in the GO biological processes enriched in the complete and genetic regulatory networks of asthma/hypertension. This score was computed as Rank3i = Rank(Xi), where X – sorted list of genes according to Ni = N1i + N2i, where N1i – total number of enriched GO biological processes in complete networks of asthma/hypertension in which gene i was involved, N2 the same as N1 calculated for genetic regulatory networks of asthma/hypertension (see Additional file 1: Table S2).

Criterion 4: calculated for gene i as Rank4i = Rank(Xi), where X – sorted list of genes according to average measure of the value of DC, CC, and BC for each gene from complete network of asthma/hypertension.

Criterion 5 was calculated in the same way as Criterion 4 using genetic regulatory network of asthma/hypertension instead of complete network of asthma/hypertension.

Criterion 6: Rank6i = Rank(Xi), where X – sorted list of genes according to specificity of the connection of genes with biological processes associated with asthma and hypertension. To arrive at this score, at the first step, a list of biological processes connected with asthma and hypertension according to ANDSystem was constructed. The following types of interactions were considered: association, regulation, and treatment. For asthma, there were 357 linked biological processes and for hypertension, 338 processes. One hundred and eighteen biological processes were connected simultaneously with asthma and hypertension. Furthermore, all the biological processes presented in ANDSystem were divided into two groups. A test set that included 118 biological processes, associated simultaneously with asthma and hypertension, and a control set containing all the other 13,538 biological processes from ANDSystem. For each of the 205 genes/proteins, associated simultaneously with asthma and hypertension, interactions with biological processes were established using ANDSystem. The specificity of the connection between genes/proteins and the test set of biological processes simultaneously associated with asthma and hypertension was evaluated by applying the Student’s t-test. Student’s t-test was performed using the function stats.ttest_ind with the parameter equal_var = False, from the package, scipy.stats, in Python [45, 46]. A Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was conducted with the function, p.adjust (Y, “bonferroni”) of the “stats” package in the programming language R [47].

Criterion 7: Rank7i = 1 if SNPs from list Y was present in gene i, otherwise Rank7i was equal to maximal rank for list X (Rank7i = 205), since the presence of such polymorphisms is of great importance for genotyping. List Y included all SNPs for each gene from X that were found in the eQTL gene region with the frequency of the minor allele in at least 5% in European population. A threshold of 5% allows to detect MAF polymorphisms with a high degree of probability using available genotyping arrays, thus it is often used in genomic analysis [48, 49, 50]. To calculate this score, the GTEx resource (http://www.gtexportal.org) [51] was consulted. It provides information on the variability of global expression of genes and SNPs affecting the level of gene expression. For the analysed genes, all SNPs localized in the region of the eQTL were taken from the database. Such SNPs may be relevant to the development of diseases [52, 53, 54]. Then, only the SNPs that altered the expression of the analysed genes in whole blood were selected. As the next step, for SNPs in the eQTL region, the prevalence of the minor allele among the European population was estimated. The analysis was carried out using the Ensembl database (http://www.ensembl.org) [55] based on the averaged frequencies of minor alleles for populations of European origin CEU (inhabitants of Western and Eastern Europe), GBR (Britain and Scotland), IBS (Spain), and TSI (Italy). In terms of further analysis, only SNPs that had a minor allele frequency of at least 5% in the European population were selected (for most of the found SNPs, the minor allele frequency was 20% or higher).

Criterion 8: Rank8i = 1 if any gene i SNP associated with either asthma or hypertension was presented in list Y, otherwise Rank8i was equal to 205.

Criterion 9: Rank9i = 1 if in list Y for gene i an SNP associated with some disease comorbid to asthma or to hypertension was present, otherwise Rank9i was equal to 205. Manual analysis of PubMed publications was conducted to generate a list of diseases with comorbidity to asthma and hypertension. To this end, for asthma, we manually examined 196 PubMed publications found by the query, “asthma comorbid diseases”, and filtered via the parameter, “Free full text”. For hypertension, 622 PubMed publications, obtained with the query, “hypertension comorbid diseases”, and filtered by the parameter, “Free full text”, were analysed.

Criterion 10: Rank10i = 1 if in list Y for gene i SNP associated with any disease was present, except diseases specified for criterion 8 and criterion 9, otherwise Rank10i was equal to 205. To calculate criteria 8-10, information on the associations of SNPs with diseases was extracted from the databases, SNPedia [56], miRdSNP [57], GWAS catalog [58], and DisGeNET [59, 60]. It was considered that a polymorphism was associated with a disease if this information was found in at least in one of the databases.

For each gene, the final score was computed as the average value of ranks formulated according to criteria 1-10.

An independent evaluation of genes selected according to these criteria was carried out by analyzing the normalized frequency of their mentioning in PubMed together with the “comorbid” or “comorbidity” terms. The frequency of references (F) was calculated as the number of PubMed abstracts in which the gene name was mentioned together with “comorbid” or “comorbidity” divided by the total number of PubMed abstracts where the gene was mentioned. An analysis of the enrichment of the list of top genes by genes, which are often mentioned in the discussion of comorbid states of various diseases, was carried out by comparing the average frequencies F calculated for a set of top genes with a complete list of genes, according to the Mann-Whitney test, estimated by the function «mannwhitneyu» from the package «scipy.stats» of Python [45, 46].

The formation of lists of genes associated with apoptosis for the GO category “apoptotic process” (GO: 0006915) along with genes involved in the functioning of the CNS for GO categories “neurotransmitter secretion” (GO:0007269), “neurogenesis” (GO:0022008), “multicellular organismal response to stress” (GO:0033555), “social behaviour” (GO:0035176), “cognition” (GO:0050890), “response to antipsychotic drug” (GO:0097332), and “response to psychosocial stress” (GO:1,990,911) was performed using the AmiGO 2 database [61, 62] available at http://amigo.geneontology.org/. Only the human genes involved in the analysed GO categories were selected.

The statistical significance of the differences between the centrality of the apoptosis genes and the rest of the genes of the analysed networks was estimated by the function “stats.ttest_ind” with the parameter equal_var = False from the package “scipy.stats” of Python [45, 46]. Similarly, the statistical significance of the differences between the centrality indices of the CNS genes and the remaining genes of the analysed networks was evaluated.

Results and discussion

Associative gene networks of asthma and hypertension

In order to find the molecular genetic mechanisms underlying the development of asthma and hypertension, we compiled a list of 755 genes/proteins associated with asthma and 713 genes/proteins associated with hypertension according to ANDSystem (Additional file 2: Table S1). The gene network of asthma included 62,603 interactions between 755 genes and 751 proteins, including 2402 genetic regulations, 920 activity regulations, 79 degradation regulations, 625 transport regulations, 2594 protein-protein interactions, 751 expression links, 75 co-expression links, 159 chemical transformations, and 54,998 associative interactions. In ANDSystem associative interaction is a special type of interactions reflecting any types of relations between two objects including listed above.

The gene network of hypertension included 45,479 interactions between 713 genes and 710 proteins, including 1373 genetic regulations, 709 activity regulations, 71 degradation regulations, 423 transport regulations, 1905 protein-protein interactions, 708 expression links, 31 co-expression links, 165 chemical transformations, and 40,094 associative interactions. There are suggestions in the literature that putative candidate genes for the development of comorbid conditions between a pair of diseases are genes simultaneously associated with both diseases [63, 64, 65]. Previously, for such diseases as bronchial asthma and tuberculosis, we showed the potential role of genes concurrently linked with both of them in the pathogenesis of their comorbid relationships [35]. The network of interactions between genes and proteins, associated simultaneously with asthma and hypertension (complete asthma/hypertension network), constructed by intersection of the asthma and hypertension networks, included 85 genes, 201 proteins, and 9638 interactions of 17 types. It should be noted that the complete asthma/hypertension network included the same types of interactions as the separate networks of asthma and hypertension: 345 genetic regulations, 347 activity regulations, 25 degradation regulations, 262 transport regulations, 554 protein-protein interactions, 84 expression links, three co-expression links, 45 chemical transformations, and 7973 associative interactions. In summary, none of the types of interactions disappeared upon building up complete asthma/hypertension network.

The enriched GO biological processes (p-value < 0.01 with FDR correction) for genes/proteins associated with asthma were identified with the DAVID 6.8 system. It was observed that among the most significant GO biological processes were inflammatory response, immune response, response to hypoxia, regulation of T cell proliferation, neutrophil chemotaxis, platelet degranulation, and regulation of interleukin production (Additional file 1: Table S2). For genes/proteins associated with hypertension, among the most significant GO biological processes were regulation of blood pressure, response to drug, response to hypoxia, inflammatory response, aging, regulation of vasodilation, response to insulin, and angiogenesis (Additional file 1: Table S2). Among the most highly enriched GO biological processes for genes/proteins associated simultaneously with asthma and hypertension (complete asthma/hypertension network) were response to hypoxia, positive regulation of nitric oxide biosynthetic process, regulation of blood pressure, aging, inflammatory response, and negative regulation of apoptotic process (Additional file 1: Table S2). These processes may be the most significant for the comorbid relationship between asthma and hypertension.

Among the GO biological processes that were enriched for the asthma network and not featured in the list of enriched processes for the complete asthma/hypertension network, were microglial cell activation, regulation of interleukin production, positive regulation of tissue remodelling, and regulation of cytokine secretion. Those GO biological processes enriched only for the hypertension network were angiotensin maturation, regulation of the force of heart contraction, response to insulin, vasoconstriction, cholesterol homeostasis, and negative regulation of feeding behaviour. Such processes, apparently, are more pertinent to the mechanisms of development of individual asthma or hypertension. The GO biological processes, removal of superoxide radicals, protein kinase B signalling, positive regulation of isotype switching to IgG isotypes, and positive regulation of peptidyl-serine phosphorylation, were enriched only for the complete asthma/hypertension network and not for the individual asthma or hypertension networks.

It is known that genetic regulation is paramount for the genetic variability in diseases across patients [66, 67, 68]. The genetic regulatory network of asthma/hypertonia, including interactions between genes involved in expression regulation, expression up-regulation, and expression down-regulation, is portrayed in Fig. 2. This network contains 52 genes, 68 proteins, and 345 interactions. At the same time, from the Fig. 2 it can be seen, that general regulatory network can be divided into at least five subnetworks, including four small subnetworks containing from 2 to 3 participants (for example, PXR protein → Furin gene). These subnetworks appeared to be unconnected with the core of the regulatory network, because in ANDSystem they were connected only by associative interaction type. It was interesting to evaluate the enrichment of GO biological processes for genes/proteins from the genetic regulatory network of asthma/hypertension (Additional file 1: Table S2). It turned out that for this network seven new enriched GO biological processes were identified (response to heat, positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascade, embryo implantation, positive regulation of B cell proliferation, glucose homeostasis, positive regulation of JAK-STAT cascade, and defence response to protozoan) and these were not significant within the whole asthma/hypertension network. Among the GO processes that were simultaneously significant for the complete and genetic regulatory network of asthma/hypertension were negative regulation of apoptotic process, positive regulation of nitric oxide biosynthetic process, inflammatory response, and several others.
Fig. 2

Genetic regulatory network of asthma/hypertension. Proteins are presented by circles and genes are represented by DNA helix. Proteins involved in a large number of enriched GO biological processes (more than 20) for both the complete and genetic regulatory network of asthma/hypertension are shown with large icons. The top 10 proteins with the highest value of betweenness centrality in the complete asthma/hypertension network are highlighted in blue; in the genetic regulatory network of asthma/hypertension, in green; in both networks, in two-color green/blue. Picture was done using the ANDVisio program, which is a part of ANDSystem, and gene/protein notations are given according to ANDVisio output

One of the most central regulatory nodes for both the complete and genetic regulatory network of asthma/hypertension is TNF-α (Fig. 2). We observed that this gene is involved in a large number of enriched GO biological processes. For example, it participates in inflammatory response, immune response, the positive regulation of the nitric oxide biosynthetic process, positive regulation of NF-kappaB transcription factor activity, and is closely related to apoptosis. It is known that the level of TNF-α is elevated in both asthma and hypertension patients. The levels of TNF-α are increased in the airway tissues of asthmatic subjects and TNF-α expression has been seen to be up-regulated in alveolar macrophages, mast cells, and bronchial epithelial cells [69, 70]. TNF-α was also found to be higher in concentration in chronic inflammatory states, such as hypertension, and is implicated in both increases and decreases in blood pressure [71]. It is interesting that the TNF-α, which has a high centrality, turned out to be connected in the regulatory network with NF-kappaB, which also has a high centrality value (Fig. 2). It is known that biological networks are characterized by a low degree of assortativity, i.e. vertexes with a large number of connections are rarely connected with each other [72]. Thus, the uncovered interactions between TNF-α and NF-kappaB may indicate the special role of this connection for the comorbid state of asthma and hypertension. Further, TNF-α can activate the expression of NF-kappaB and increase its activity [73]. It was previously demonstrated that in both asthma and hypertension, the activity of NF-kappaB is enhanced [74, 75, 76, 77]. Figure 2 illustrates that, in turn, NF-kappaB is able to reduce the level of expression of the apolipoprotein A1 (apoA-1) gene [78]. There are data suggesting that in cases of hypertension, the level of apoA-1 is diminished [79, 80]. With this, in asthma patients, the level of apoA-1 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was significantly lower than in healthy controls [81, 82]. ApoA-1 has a specific role in lipid metabolism, and is the major component of HDL particles in blood [83]. It is interesting to note that the apoA-1 gene is involved in the GO category neurogenesis (GO:0022008), related to the CNS. Thus, it can be seen that, the various biological processes featured in the pathogenesis of asthma and hypertension, as well as their comorbid development, including apoptosis and CNS processes, can be mediated through regulatory interactions.

Prioritization of candidate genes

Gene prioritization is a task of many studies aimed at candidate gene identification. Among the existing tools for gene prioritization, there are Endeavour [41, 42], ToppGene [43, 44], and DIR [84]. These programs allow one to rank a test set of genes based on a training set of genes according to certain criteria characterizing the proximity of genes from the test set to the genes from the training set. The methods of these resources employ properties of the vertices of gene network graphs, genetic information (co-localization in the genome), functional properties of genes (involvement in the same GO categories), etc. To search for candidate genes that might have an important part in the molecular genetic mechanisms of asthma and hypertension comorbidity, here, we utilised the Endeavor (criterion 1) and ToppGene (criterion 2) programs. Additionally, to take into account the structure of the gene network, describing the interactions between asthma and hypertension, as well as polymorphisms in the genes associated with the studied diseases, criteria 3-10 were used. In particular, information about polymorphisms was used in criteria 7-10 in the following way: all genes with known polymorphisms had a minimal rank (equal to 1), while the rank of remaining genes had maximal value (equal to 205). It allowed to provide criteria 7-10 with a more weight compared to other criteria. We believe that the presence of polymorphisms in the studied genes is important for the development of comorbidity. The values of the listed scores for the top ten genes from the complete asthma/hypertension network are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Top 10 genes with the highest priority according to average rank

Gene name

Rank 1

Rank 2

Rank 3

Rank 4

Rank 5

Rank 6

Rank 7

Rank 8

Rank 9

Rank 10

Average rank

IL10

44

140

6

14

26

9

1

1

1

1

24.3

TLR4

11

92

17

43

92

29

1

1

1

1

28.8

CAT

59

78

11

31

71

37

1

1

1

1

29.1

NFKB1

3

26

13

5

16

8

1

205

205

1

48.3

AKT1

9

64

4

20

20

18

1

205

205

1

54.7

ADRB2

78

82

28

166

92

155

1

1

1

1

60.5

ICAM1

26

86

11

30

3

44

1

205

205

1

61.2

CST3

112

105

25

117

92

117

1

205

1

1

77.6

POMC

93

85

23

59

53

51

1

205

205

1

77.6

SPP1

25

45

26

44

30

5

1

205

205

205

79,1

According to criterion 1, among the top ten most important genes/proteins, sorted by the “P-value” indicator, were TNF, FN1, NFKB1, TGFB1, APOA1, EGFR, MMP9, RELA, AKT1, and PLAT (Additional file 3: Table S3). For criterion 2 the list of the top ten genes/proteins, ranked according to the “Average Score” indicator, included FURIN, PTGS2, TIMP1, VCAM1, NPY, CALM3, HP, RAN, AOC1, and IL4 (Additional file 4: Table S4). The correlation coefficient of the ranks, calculated according to criteria 1 and 2, was R = 0.548 with a p-value < 10− 5.

Criterion 3 suggested that for both the complete and genetic regulatory network of asthma/hypertension, IL6 was involved in the greatest number of over-represented GO biological processes - 24 and 27 processes, respectively (Additional file 5: Table S5). Ranking by criterion 3 demonstrated that for 18 genes/proteins (IL6, TGFB1, TNF, IL1B, AKT1, CCL2, IL4, IL10, EGFR, LEP, PTGS2, PTEN, EDN1, VEGFA, IFNG, ADM, CD40, INS), the total number of GO biological processes in which these genes/proteins participated with respect to the complete and genetic regulatory network of asthma/hypertension was more than 20 (Fig. 2).

According to criteria 4 and 5, it turned out that the genes/proteins with the highest centrality index for both the complete and genetic regulatory network of asthma/hypertension were IL6, TGFB1, TNF, IL1B, and IRF6. The highest centrality index for just the complete network was for genes INS, NFKB1, VEGFA, TP53, and CRP, and for the genetic regulatory network of asthma/hypertension, genes VCAM1, ICAM1, CTGF, IFNG, SERPINE1 (Additional file 6: Table S6).

According to criterion 6, 154 genes/proteins are specifically associated with the test set of biological processes with a Bonferroni corrected p-value < 0.01 (Additional file 7: Table S7). Among the genes most significantly associated with the test set were TNF, INS, IL6, LEP, SPP1, VEGFA, IGF1, NFKB1, IL10, and TGFB1.

Criterion 7 showed that of the 205 analysed genes, 30 genes had SNPs found in the eQTL. Moreover, we revealed that there were 1425 SNPs (Additional file 8: Table S8). The highest number of SNPs (more than seven per 1000 nucleotides) was observed for genes ADRB2, TLR4, CST3, IRF6, CAT, and RETN (Fig. 3). Of these, ten polymorphisms in the ADRB2, IL10 and TLR4 genes were associated with asthma, and seven polymorphisms in ADRB2, IL10 and CAT were linked to hypertension (Fig. 3). These genes had the highest priority according to criterion 8. The eight polymorphisms in genes ADRB2, IL10, CAT, TLR4, and CST3 were linked with any disease comorbid to asthma or hypertension (e.g., diabetes mellitus, arthritis, myocardial infarction, kidney diseases, diabetic nephropathy). According to criterion 9, genes ADRB2, IL10, CAT, TLR4, and CST3 had the highest priority. Analysis of the associations of the pertinent SNPs with other diseases uncovered 51 SNPs in 12 genes (Additional file 9: Table S9). Thus, according to criterion 10, the highest priority was given to genes ADRB2, IL10, CAT, TLR4, ICAM1, IRF6, AKT1, CST3, NFKB1, PNP, POMC, and SELL.
Fig. 3

Network of interactions between genes/proteins that had SNPs determined by criteria 7-10. Cyan colour - a small number of polymorphisms (0.01-0.099 SNPs per 1000 nucleotides), purple colour - a moderate number of polymorphisms (0.1-0.9 SNPs per 1000 nucleotides), pink colour - a high number of polymorphisms (1.0-4.9 SNPs per 1000 nucleotides), orange colour – a very high number of polymorphisms (5.0-31.1 SNPs per 1000 nucleotides). D — gene polymorphisms associated with various diseases; A — gene polymorphisms associated with asthma; H — gene polymorphisms associated with hypertension. Large icons indicate genes/proteins associated with apoptosis. Picture was done using the ANDVisio program

In reviewing the average rank (Additional file 10: Table S10), ten genes (IL10, TLR4, CAT, NFKB1, AKT1, ADRB2, ICAM1, POMC, CST3 and SPP1) had the highest priority (Table 1). It appeared that all genes, presented in Table 1, except CST3, were associated with asthma and/or hypertension, according to the OMIM [85] and MalaCards [86] databases. However, the associations of this gene with asthma and hypertension are discussed in the literature [87, 88, 89].

An independent analysis of co-occurrence of genes with “comorbid” or “comorbidity” terms showed that these top ten genes (F = 0.023) are more frequently (p-value < 0.05) mentioned together with these terms, compared to the total set of 205 genes (F = 0.006) from the complete regulatory network of asthma/hypertension. Thus, this may indicate a potentially important role for the comorbid state of asthma and hypertension. In particle, among these top genes TLR4 and ADRB2 (2nd and 6th place in Table 1) are directly discussed in the literature in the context of the comorbidity of asthma and hypertension [21, 22, 23, 24, 26]. TLR4 is involved in activation of the innate immune system via the NF-κB signalling pathway along with the up-regulation of inflammatory cytokine production. With this, the expression of TLR4 was observed to be up-regulated in asthma [90]. Up-regulation of TLR4 has also been observed after myocardial infarction and inhibition of TLR4 decreases blood pressure [91]. The ADRB2 gene encodes a beta-2 adrenergic receptor mediating catecholamine-induced activation of adenylate cyclase via G proteins. ADRB2 is a known drug target to treat asthma [92, 93] and a number of SNPs in this gene are associated with asthma [94, 95] and hypertension [96, 97].

Other interesting genes are IL10 and CAT, which had 1st and 3rd places in Table 1, respectively. IL-10 is an anti-inflammatory cytokine derived from CD4+ T-helper type 2 (T(H2)) cells, and in cases of asthma, a relative underproduction of IL-10 from alveolar macrophages was reported [98]. During asthma, IL-10 can inhibit eosinophilia via suppression of IL-5 and GM-CSF, regulate eosinophil apoptosis, and down-regulate IL-1. In addition, IL-10 can suppress nitric oxide production, an important component of airway inflammation [99]. Up-regulation of IL-10 was also demonstrated to normalize blood pressure and endothelial function [100, 101].

Superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide were found in higher concentrations in both asthma and hypertension patients compared with controls [102, 103]. Catalase (CAT) is an enzyme that catalyses the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide to water and oxygen, and it was observed that catalase overexpression can prevent hypertension [104] and that catalase activity was enhanced during treatment of asthma [105, 106].

Apoptosis in asthma/hypertension gene network

Apoptosis is one of the processes that features most prominently in various diseases. It is actively studied in the pathogenesis of asthma and hypertension [107, 108], and it has been suggested that deregulation of apoptosis in activated T cells and eosinophils are involved in the development of airway inflammation in asthma [109, 110]. With regard to hypertension, there is evidence of increased apoptosis in whole organs [111, 112]. Despite the fact, that apoptosis is a well-studied regulatory network, the role of apoptosis genes in the structure of gene networks of these two diseases requires further clarification. A total of 1873 genes are implicated in the apoptotic process (GO: 0006915) according to the AmiGO database [61, 62]. In the complete and genetic regulated gene network of asthma/hypertension, 69 and 48 genes of apoptosis were included, which are 34 and 53% of all the genes of the analysed networks, respectively. Analysis of the centrality of these genes in the complete network showed that the average DC value is 0.299, CC value was 0.579, and BC value was 0.0064. Additionally, it appeared that these indicators were statistically significant (p-value < 10− 4) more than those for the other genes of the complete network (DC - 0.147, CC - 0.515, BC - 0.0018). In the genetic regulatory network, the centrality of the apoptosis genes (DC - 0.038, CC - 0.296, BC - 0.023) also exceeded the CC (BC - 0.025, CC - 0.256, DC - 0.014), although no statistically significant differences were noted.

To further assess the structural role of the apoptosis genes in the graphs of the complete and genetic regulatory networks of asthma/hypertension, we evaluated the fundamental cycles using the “Find fundamental rings” function of ANDSystem [29, 30]. Fundamental cycles are those that form the basis of a cyclic space of a graph, that is, any cycle of a graph can be represented by the sum of fundamental cycles. In the complete and genetic regulatory networks of asthma/hypertension, 9354 and 230 fundamental cycles were found, respectively. It turned out that among them, 9201 and 219 cycles contained at least one gene/protein associated with apoptosis, respectively. Further, the number of cycles that featured only the genes of apoptosis was 191 for the complete network and 31 for the genetic regulatory network of asthma/hypertension. In particular, the cycle of maximum length for the complete network (Fig. 4a) among all cycles, including only the apoptotic genes, consisted of three genes (CTGF, ADM, ADIPOQ) and five proteins (CTGF, ADM, ADIPOQ, TGFB1, IFNG). In this cycle, the protein, IFNG, differentially regulates TGF-beta1 [113] and the up-regulated secretion of TGF-beta is accompanied by down-regulation of IFN-gamma [114]. IFN-gamma and IL-1beta can induce expression of the ADM gene in ARPE-19 cells [115]. As well, it is known that plasma ADM protein levels are related to SNP rs182052 in the ADIPOQ gene [116]. In turn, the ADIPOQ protein can down-regulate CTGF mRNA and proteins [117] and TGFB1 can elevate CTGF transcript levels [118]. For the genetic regulatory network, a similar cycle (Fig. 4 B) included four genes (CTGF, BCL2, HMOX1, PTGS2) and four proteins (P53, AKT1, PPARG, IL1B). In this cycle, it could be seen that the p53 protein can bind the Bcl2 protein to form a complex that influences apoptosis regulation [119], and moreover p53 was shown to induce temperature-dependent decrease in the expression of the bcl-2 gene [120]. Bcl-2 gene expression is also regulated by activation of Akt [121]. Subsequently, Akt can regulate the expression of the HMOX1 gene [122]. The expression of HMOX1 gene can be up-regulated by activation of PPARG [123]. The activation of PPARG can also suppress expression of the PTGS2 gene [124]. Further, the expression of the PTGS2 gene can be up-regulated by IL1B [125, 126]. In turn, IL1B can significantly suppress CTGF gene expression [127], of which expression can be induced by p53 protein [128].
Fig. 4

Fundamental cycles revealed in complete and genetic regulatory asthma/hypertension networks associated with apoptosis and CNS. a Cycle from the complete asthma/hypertension network, which includes just the genes/proteins associated with apoptosis (CTGF, ADM, ADIPOQ, TGFB1, and IFNG). b Cycle from the genetic regulatory network of asthma/hypertension, which includes just the genes/proteins associated with apoptosis (CTGF, BCL2, HMOX1, PTGS2, P53, AKT1, PPARG, and IL1B). c Cycle from the complete asthma/hypertension network, which includes just the genes/proteins associated with the CNS (APOE, INS, and APOA1). d Cycle from the genetic regulatory asthma/hypertension network, which includes five participants associated with the CNS (genes: VEGFA, BCL2; proteins: AKT1, OBS, EGFR). Proteins are presented by circles and genes are represented by DNA helix. Picture was done using the ANDVisio program

Along with the important role of apoptosis genes in the structure of the asthma/hypertension gene network, the apoptosis genes had high priority in Additional file 10: Table S10. Their average rank was 108.4, which is less statistically significant (p-value < 10− 10) than the average rank throughout the remainder of the Table (127.3). Thus, among the ten top genes, seven were associated with apoptosis (Table 1). Such high enrichment in Table 1 can be related to their high centrality and participation in a large number of fundamental cycles of the asthma/hypertension gene network. Among the genes of apoptosis and anti-apoptosis network with the highest priority according to the total score, one can distinguish IL10, TLR4, CAT, NFKB1, AKT1, ICAM1, and CST3. As mentioned before, IL-10 is an anti-inflammatory cytokine and can induce macrophage apoptosis [129, 130]. TLR4 stimulation also induces apoptosis [131] and can mediate neuronal apoptosis [132]. Moreover, TLR4 is necessary for the immunological mechanism of apoptosis [133]. Meanwhile, CAT was shown to inhibit apoptosis in different cells, including T cells [134, 135]. NF-kappaB controls cytokine production, cell survival, and can block apoptosis [136]. Suppression of NF-kappaB also induces apoptosis [137]. Akt can suppress apoptosis via activation of the RelA/p65 subunit of NF-κB [138] and phosphorylation-dependent cleavage of Akt can influence apoptosis in neural cells [139]. ICAM-1 is able to influence release of various inflammatory cytokines and reactive oxygen species and because of that, its involvement is notable in apoptosis regulation [140]. Induced expression of ICAM-1 leads to participation in inhibition of apoptosis [141]. Cystatin C (CST3) expression in vascular wall smooth muscle cells is diminished in certain vascular diseases, and it is known that CST3 can bring about apoptosis [142].

Genes involved in functioning of the central nervous system in the asthma/hypertension gene network

At present, there is increased interest among researchers in the problem of the effect of various pathological processes on the CNS, including inflammation, asthma, and hypertension [143, 144, 145]. It is discussed in the literature that hypertension and/or hypoxia can activate neurogenesis as a response to neuronal loss induced by these factors [146, 147]. There is an evidence that certain elements of sympathetic neurotransmission can be activated during hypertension [148]. In keeping with this, it has been demonstrated that hypertension can lead to the memory loss as well as impair learning [147, 149] and cognition [150]. Interestingly, in Guo et al. [151], it was shown that chronic asthma can affect cognitive functions and impact synaptic transduction [152] and neurogenesis [153, 154]. It has also been discussed that psycho-social stress and psychological factors can play an important role in bronchial asthma [155, 156].

In order to clarify the role of genes involved in the functioning of the CNS in the asthma/hypertension gene network, GO biological processes associated with asthma and hypertension and involved in the functioning of the CNS were selected using ANDSystem. It was found that of 357 biological processes associated with asthma, there were six terms of the CNS (neurogenesis, cognition, neurotransmitter secretion, response to psychosocial stress, social behaviour, and response to antipsychotic drug), and among the 338 of biological processes associated with hypertension, there were four such terms (neurogenesis, cognition, neurotransmitter secretion, and multicellular organismal response to stress). A small number of GO terms associated with asthma and hypertension associated with the CNS can be explained by the lack of knowledge surrounding this matter. This means a study on the relationship of CNS genes with these diseases is warranted. The following GO terms were considered: neurotransmitter secretion (GO:0007269), neurogenesis (GO:0022008), multicellular organismal response to stress (GO:0033555), social behaviour (GO:0035176), cognition (GO:0050890), response to antipsychotic drug (GO:0097332), and response to psychosocial stress (GO:1,990,911).

A total of 2017 genes were elicited with these seven GO terms according to the AmiGO database [61, 62]. In the complete and genetic regulatory gene networks of asthma/hypertension, 44 CNS genes out of 205 genes and 27 CNS genes out of 91 genes, respectively, were found.

Analysis of the complete network showed that the centrality of these genes (DC - 0.277, CC - 0.573, BC - 0.005), as well as of the apoptosis genes, statistically significantly exceeded the average centrality of the other genes from the network (DC - 0.177, CC - 0.527, BC - 0.003), with a p-value < 0.05. Similarly, as for apoptosis, the average centrality of the CNS genes (DC - 0.0336, CC - 0.3, BC - 0.0194) surpassed the average gene centrality in the genetic regulatory network (BC - 0.0315, CC - 0.267, DC - 0.0193). It is noteworthy that among the 44 genes of the CNS, there were 26 genes of apoptosis. These genes possessed increased centrality within the CNS gene grouping. Thus, apoptosis can have a significant effect on the functioning of the CNS sub-network in the asthma/hypertension gene network.

The analysis of the fundamental cycles showed that in the complete and genetic regulatory network of asthma/hypertension, there were 8999 and 199 fundamental cycles, respectively, that contained at least one gene/protein associated with the CNS. It should be acknowledged that for apoptosis, for both network fundamental cycles, only the included genes of this process were found. In the case of the CNS, the fundamental cycles consisting of CNS genes were detected only in the complete network, numbering at 59. In particular, the cycle of maximum length for a complete network, including only CNS genes, consisted of genes APOE, INS, and APOA1, and proteins APOE, INS, and APOA1 (Fig. 4 C). In this cycle, it was demonstrated that INS initiated the synthesis of apoE [157, 158] and APOA1 gene expression [159, 160]. In turn, apoA1 protein may enhance local secretion and accumulation of apoE and hence influence anti-atherogenic processes [161].

With respect to the fundamental cycles found in the genetic regulatory network of asthma/hypertension, the maximum proportion of CNS genes did not go beyond 50%. For example, in this fundamental cycle, there were five genes (VEGFA, BCL2, VCAM1, POMC, CTGF), five proteins (AKT1, OBS, EGFR, P53, ADIPOQ), two CNS genes (VEGFA, BCL2), and three CNS proteins (AKT1, OBS, EGFR) (Fig. 4 D). In this cycle, as in the cycle portrayed in Fig. 4 B, p53 protein interacted with Bcl-2 [119] and can induce the expression of the CTGF gene [128]. Bcl-2 gene expression is regulated by activation of Akt [121] and Akt influences regulation of VEGF-A expression [162]. VEGF-A expression is promoted by ADIPOQ through the ADIPOQ receptor, AdipoR [163]. ADIPOQ and OBS are able to induce VCAM-1 expression [164]. Increased OBS concentrations are linked with reduced POMC mRNA expression [165]. Of interest is that EGFR has been demonstrated to regulate expression of the POMC gene [166] and stimulate expression of CTGF [167].

Conclusion

Computer reconstruction and analysis of gene networks makes it possible to put forward hypotheses about the molecular mechanisms of diseases. It also seems to be an effective tool for studying the complex interrelationships between diseases as comorbid conditions. The reconstructed asthma/hypertension gene network, which describes the potential molecular-genetic interactions between the two diseases, included 205 genes/proteins. Analysis of the sub-networks of apoptosis and the CNS showed that the genes of the CNS, like the genes implicated in apoptosis, are represented to a large extent in the asthma/hypertension network (69 and 44 genes, respectively) and can play an important role in its structure. Therefore, they can be important for the development of the comorbid condition of these two diseases.

Based on standard methods of prioritization, as well as original criteria that utilise the structure of the asthma/hypertension gene network, 10 candidate genes for genotyping and searching for drug targets have been proposed. The highest priority was given to the genes IL10, TLR4, and CAT, which occupy an important position in the immune system and apoptosis. It appeared that apoptotic genes had a special place in this top list of candidate genes, which was highly enriched with the genes of apoptosis. CNS genes were also present in the top list. We believe that the role of CNS genes in the pathology of these diseases and their comorbid conditions are not yet fully understood and merit close attention in the future via additional experimental studies.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Cambridge Proofreading LLC for proofreading and editing the manuscript.

Funding

The gene network of apoptosis was analysed with the support of the Russian Science Foundation grant “Programmed cell death induced via death receptors: Delineating molecular mechanisms of apoptosis initiation via molecular modeling” 14-44-00011.

The analysis of the gene network of the CNS was supported by the Grant No. 14.B25.31.0033 from the government of the Russian Federation, Resolution No. 220.

Development of criteria for prioritization and gene selection was carried out with the support of the Volkswagen Stiftung Trilateral Partnerships - Cooperation Projects between Scholars and Scientists from Ukraine, Russia, and Germany “In silico screening and experimental validation of new drug targets for the treatment of co-morbid multifactorial diseases”.

Supercomputer calculations for criteria development were supported by the project No. 0324-2016-0008.

The publication cost was covered by the Russian Science Foundation grant “Programmed cell death induced via death receptors: Delineating molecular mechanisms of apoptosis initiation via molecular modeling” 14-44-00011.

Availability of data and materials

Results are shared in the additional files.

About this supplement

This article has been published as part of BMC Medical Genomics Volume 11 Supplement 1, 2018: Selected articles from Belyaev Conference 2017: medical genomics. The full contents of the supplement are available online at https://bmcmedgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/supplements/volume-11-supplement-1 .

Authors’ contributions

VAI and OVS development of criteria for prioritization and gene selection. OVS, PSD and TVI performed the reconstruction of gene networks. OVS, VAI and EYuB produced results on analysis of asthma gene network. EYuB, MBF and IAG performed SNPs analysis by GTEx resource. OVS, VAI and VED produced results on analysis of hypertension gene network. OVS, VAI and INL performed analysis of apoptosis gene network. OVS, VAI and EIR produced results on CNS gene network analysis. OVS, VAI, VED, EYuB and MBF drafted the manuscript. VAI, OVS, VED, EYuB, MBF, OIZ, INL, EIR and RH revised the manuscript. VAI supervised the whole study. All authors have read the manuscript and approved the final version.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

12920_2018_331_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (281 kb)
Additional file 1: Table S2. Results of gene ontology enrichment analysis. (XLSX 280 kb)
12920_2018_331_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (105 kb)
Additional file 2: Table S1. Lists of genes associated with asthma and hypertension. (XLSX 105 kb)
12920_2018_331_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (59 kb)
Additional file 3: Table S3. Criterion 1 results. (XLSX 59 kb)
12920_2018_331_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx (41 kb)
Additional file 4: Table S4. Criterion 2 results. (XLSX 41 kb)
12920_2018_331_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx (19 kb)
Additional file 5: Table S5. Criterion 3 results. (XLSX 18 kb)
12920_2018_331_MOESM6_ESM.xlsx (36 kb)
Additional file 6: Table S6. Criteria 4 and 5 results. (XLSX 36 kb)
12920_2018_331_MOESM7_ESM.xlsx (23 kb)
Additional file 7: Table S7. Criterion 6 results. (XLSX 23 kb)
12920_2018_331_MOESM8_ESM.xlsx (64 kb)
Additional file 8: Table S8. Criterion 7 results. (XLSX 63 kb)
12920_2018_331_MOESM9_ESM.xlsx (20 kb)
Additional file 9: Table S9. Criteria 8-10 results. (XLSX 20 kb)
12920_2018_331_MOESM10_ESM.xlsx (35 kb)
Additional file 10: Table S10. Total score results. (XLSX 34 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Cooke AA, Connaughton RM, Lyons CL, McMorrow AM, Roche HM. Fatty acids and chronic low grade inflammation associated with obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Eur J Pharmacol. 2016;785:207–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Montecucco F, Pende A, Quercioli A, Mach F. Inflammation in the pathophysiology of essential hypertension. J Nephrol. 2011;24(1):23–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pietri P, Vlachopoulos C, Tousoulis D. Inflammation and arterial hypertension: from pathophysiological links to risk prediction. Curr Med Chem. 2015;22(23):2754–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chehimi M, Vidal H, Eljaafari A. Pathogenic role of IL-17-producing immune cells in obesity, and related inflammatory diseases. J Clin Med. 2017;6(7):68.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Asghar A, Sheikh N. Role of immune cells in obesity induced low grade inflammation and insulin resistance. Cell Immunol. 2017;315:18–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xu M, Xu J, Yang X. Asthma and risk of cardiovascular disease or all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. Ann Saudi Med. 2017;37(2):99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Boer JD, Majoor CJ, van’t Veer C, Bel EH, van der Poll T. Asthma Coagul Blood. 2012;119(14):3236–44.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prosser R, Carleton B, Smith A. The comorbidity burden of the treated asthma patient population in British Columbia. Chronic Dis Inj Can. 2010;30(2):46–55.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tattersall MC, Guo M, Korcarz CE, Gepner AD, Kaufman JD, Liu KJ, Barr RG, Donohue KM, McClelland RL, Delaney JA, Stein JH. Asthma predicts cardiovascular disease events. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35(6):1520–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Su X, Ren Y, Li M, Zhao X, Kong L, Kang J. Prevalence of comorbidities in asthma and nonasthma patients: a meta-analysis. Medicine. 2016;95(22):e3459.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Waki H, Hendy EB, Hindmarch CC, Gouraud S, Toward M, Kasparov S, Murphy D, Paton JF. Excessive leukotriene B4 in nucleus tractus solitarii is prohypertensive in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 2013;61(1):194–201.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Solak Y, Afsar B, Vaziri ND, Aslan G, Yalcin CE, Covic A, Kanbay M. Hypertension as an autoimmune and inflammatory disease. Hypertens Res. 2016;39(8):567–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Magen E, Yosefy C, Viskoper RJ, Mishal J. Treatment of allergic rhinitis can improve blood pressure control. J Hum Hypertens. 2006;20(11):888.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Litonjua AA, Tantisira KG, Lake S, Lazarus R, Richter BG, Gabriel S, Silverman ES, Weiss ST. Polymorphisms in signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 and lung function in asthma. Respir Res. 2005;6(1):52.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Simeone-Penney MC, Severgnini M, Tu P, Homer RJ, Mariani TJ, Cohn L, Simon AR. Airway epithelial STAT3 is required for allergic inflammation in a murine model of asthma. J Immunol. 2007;178(10):6191–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Freeman AF, Avila EM, Shaw PA, Davis J, Hsu AP, Welch P, Matta JR, Hadigan C, Pettigrew RI, Holland SM, Gharib AM. Coronary artery abnormalities in hyper-IgE syndrome. J Clin Immunol. 2011;31(3):338–45.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morales DR, Lipworth BJ, Donnan PT, Jackson C, Guthrie B. Respiratory effect of beta-blockers in people with asthma and cardiovascular disease: population-based nested case control study. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):18.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu Z, Qi H, Liu B, Liu K, Wu J, Cao H, Zhang J, Yan Y, He Y, Zhang L. Genetic susceptibility to salt-sensitive hypertension in a Han Chinese population: a validation study of candidate genes. Hypertens Res. 2017;  https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2017.57.
  19. 19.
    Timasheva Y, Nasibullin T, Imaeva E, Mirsaeva G, Mustafina O. ISH NIA OS-03 genetic determinants of essential hypertension in the population of Tatars from Russia. J Hypertens. 2016;34:e42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xie H, Cheng Y, Huo Y, Huang G, Su J. Association between β2-adrenoceptor gene polymorphisms and asthma risk: an updated meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e101861.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nofziger C, Vezzoli V, Dossena S, Schönherr T, Studnicka J, Nofziger J, Vanoni S, Stephan S, Silva ME, Meyer G, Paulmichl M. STAT6 links IL-4/IL-13 stimulation with Pendrin expression in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;90(3):399–405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim BG, Yoo TH, Yoo JE, Seo YJ, Jung J, Choi JY. Resistance to hypertension and high Cl− excretion in humans with SLC26A4 mutations. Clin Genet. 2017;91(3):448–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dossena S, Bizhanova A, Nofziger C, Bernardinelli E, Ramsauer J, Kopp P, Paulmichl M. Identification of allelic variants of pendrin (SLC26A4) with loss and gain of function. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2011;28(3):467–76.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Madeo AC, Manichaikul A, Pryor SP, Griffith AJ. Do mutations of the Pendred syndrome gene, SLC26A4, confer resistance to asthma and hypertension? J Med Genet. 2009;46(6):405–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bonar PT, Casey JR. Plasma membrane Cl-/HCO3-exchangers: structure, mechanism and physiology. Channels. 2008;2(5):337–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Christiansen SC, Schatz M, Yang SJ, Ngor E, Chen W, Zuraw BL. Hypertension and asthma: a comorbid relationship. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016;4(1):76–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ekins S, Bugrim A, Brovold L, Kirillov E, Nikolsky Y, Rakhmatulin E, Sorokina S, Ryabov A, Serebryiskaya T, Melnikov A, Metz J, Nikolskaya T. Algorithms for network analysis in systems-ADME/Tox using the MetaCore and MetaDrug platforms. Xenobiotica. 2006;36(10-11):877–901.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mayburd AL, Martlinez A, Sackett D, Liu H, Shih J, Tauler J, Avis I, Mulshine JL. Ingenuity network-assisted transcription profiling: identification of a new pharmacologic mechanism for MK886. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(6):1820–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Demenkov PS, Ivanisenko TV, Kolchanov NA, Ivanisenko VA. ANDVisio: a new tool for graphic visualization and analysis of literature mined associative gene networks in the ANDSystem. In silico biology. 2012;11(3, 4):149–61.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ivanisenko VA, Saik OV, Ivanisenko NV, Tiys ES, Ivanisenko TV, Demenkov PS, Kolchanov NA. ANDSystem: an associative network discovery system for automated literature mining in the field of biology. BMC Syst Biol. 2015;9(2):S2.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Momynaliev KT, Kashin SV, Chelysheva VV, Selezneva OV, Demina IA, Serebryakova MV, Alexeev D, Ivanisenko VA, Aman E, Govorun VM. Functional divergence of helicobacter pylori related to early gastric cancer. J Proteome Res. 2009;9(1):254–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Larina IM, Pastushkova LK, Tiys ES, Kireev KS, Kononikhin AS, Starodubtseva NL, Popov IA, Custaud MA, Dobrokhotov IV, Nikolaev EN, Kolchanov NA, Ivanisenko VA. Permanent proteins in the urine of healthy humans during the Mars-500 experiment. J Bioinforma Comput Biol. 2015;13(01):1540001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Petrovskiy ED, Saik OV, Tiys ES, Lavrik IN, Kolchanov NA, Ivanisenko VA. Prediction of tissue-specific effects of gene knockout on apoptosis in different anatomical structures of human brain. BMC Genomics. 2015;16(13):S3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Popik OV, Petrovskiy ED, Mishchenko EL, Lavrik IN, Ivanisenko VA. Mosaic gene network modelling identified new regulatory mechanisms in HCV infection. Virus Res. 2016;218:71–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bragina EY, Tiys ES, Freidin MB, Koneva LA, Demenkov PS, Ivanisenko VA, Kolchanov NA, Puzyrev VP. Insights into pathophysiology of dystropy through the analysis of gene networks: an example of bronchial asthma and tuberculosis. Immunogenetics. 2014;66(7-8):457–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Glotov AS, Tiys ES, Vashukova ES, Pakin VS, Demenkov PS, Saik OV, Ivanisenko TV, Arzhanova ON, Mozgovaya EV, Zainulina MS, Kolchanov NA, Baranov VS, Ivanisenko VA. Molecular association of pathogenetic contributors to pre-eclampsia (pre-eclampsia associome). BMC Syst Biol. 2015;9(2):S4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Saik OV, Konovalova NA, Demenkov PS, Ivanisenko NV, Ivanisenko TV, Ivanoshchuk DE, Konovalova OS, Podkolodnaya OA, Lavrik IN, Kolchanov NA, Ivanisenko VA. Molecular mechanisms of the interaction between the processes of the cell response to mechanical stress and neuronal apoptosis in primary open-angle glaucoma. Russ J Genet Appl Res. 2017;7(5):558–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bragina EY, Tiys ES, Rudko AA, Ivanisenko VA, Freidin MB. Novel tuberculosis susceptibility candidate genes revealed by the reconstruction and analysis of associative networks. Infect Genet Evol. 2016;46:118–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4(1):44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hagberg A, Swart P, Chult D. Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. Los Alamos: Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL); 2008.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tranchevent LC, Ardeshirdavani A, ElShal S, Alcaide D, Aerts J, Auboeuf D, Moreau Y. Candidate gene prioritization with Endeavour. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(W1):W117–21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Aerts S, Lambrechts D, Maity S, Van Loo P, Coessens B, De Smet F, Tranchevent LC, De Moor B, Marynen P, Hassan B, Carmeliet P. Gene prioritization through genomic data fusion. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24(5):537.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Chen J, Xu H, Aronow BJ, Jegga AG. Improved human disease candidate gene prioritization using mouse phenotype. BMC bioinformatics. 2007;8(1):392.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Chen J, Bardes EE, Aronow BJ, Jegga AG. ToppGene suite for gene list enrichment analysis and candidate gene prioritization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(suppl_2):W305–11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Oliphant TE. Python for scientific computing. Comput Sci Eng. 2007;9(3):10–20.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Millman KJ, Aivazis M. Python for scientists and engineers. Comput Sci Eng. 2011;13(2):9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shaffer JP. Multiple hypothesis testing. Annu Rev Psychol. 1995;46(1):561–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Stranger BE, Nica AC, Forrest MS, Dimas A, Bird CP, Beazley C, Ingle CE, Dunning M, Flicek P, Koller D, Montgomery S, Tavaré S, Deloukas P, Dermitzakis ET. Population genomics of human gene expression. Nat Genet. 2007;39(10):1217.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, Goldstein DB, Hindorff LA, Hunter DJ, McCarthy MI, Ramos EM, Cardon LR, Chakravarti A, Cho JH, Guttmacher AE, Kong A, Kruglyak L, Mardis E, Rotimi CN, Slatkin M, Valle D, Whittemore AS, Boehnke M, Clark AG, Eichler EE, Gibson G, Haines JL, Mackay TF, McCarroll SA, Visscher PM. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature. 2009;461(7265):747.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    International HapMap 3 Consortium. Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations. Nature. 2010;467(7311):52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lonsdale J, Thomas J, Salvatore M, Phillips R, Lo E, Shad S, Hasz R, Walters G, Garcia F, Young N, Foster B. The genotype-tissue expression (GTEx) project. Nat Genet. 2013;45(6):580–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Franke L, Jansen RC. eQTL analysis in humans. Cardiovasc Genomics Methods Protoc. 2009;573:311–28.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Raj T, Rothamel K, Mostafavi S, Ye C, Lee MN, Replogle JM, Feng T, Lee M, Asinovski N, Frohlich I, Imboywa S. Polarization of the effects of autoimmune and neurodegenerative risk alleles in leukocytes. Science. 2014;344(6183):519–23.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Nicolae DL, Gamazon E, Zhang W, Duan S, Dolan ME, Cox NJ. Trait-associated SNPs are more likely to be eQTLs: annotation to enhance discovery from GWAS. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(4):e1000888.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hubbard T, Barker D, Birney E, Cameron G, Chen Y, Clark L, Cox T, Cuff J, Curwen V, Down T, Durbin R. The Ensembl genome database project. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(1):38–41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Cariaso M, Lennon G. SNPedia: a wiki supporting personal genome annotation, interpretation and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;40(D1):D1308–12.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Bruno AE, Li L, Kalabus JL, Pan Y, Yu A, Hu Z. miRdSNP: a database of disease-associated SNPs and microRNA target sites on 3’UTRs of human genes. BMC Genomics. 2012;13(1):44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    MacArthur J, Bowler E, Cerezo M, Gil L, Hall P, Hastings E, Junkins H, McMahon A, Milano A, Morales J, Pendlington ZM. The new NHGRI-EBI catalog of published genome-wide association studies (GWAS catalog). Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D896–901.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Piñero J, Bravo À, Queralt-Rosinach N, Gutiérrez-Sacristán A, Deu-Pons J, Centeno E, García-García J, Sanz F, Furlong LI. DisGeNET: a comprehensive platform integrating information on human disease-associated genes and variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D833–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Piñero J, Queralt-Rosinach N, Bravo À, Deu-Pons J, Bauer-Mehren A, Baron M, Sanz F, Furlong LI. DisGeNET: a discovery platform for the dynamical exploration of human diseases and their genes. Database. 2015;  https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bav028.
  61. 61.
    Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, Harris MA. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000;25(1):25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Carbon S, Ireland A, Mungall CJ, Shu S, Marshall B, Lewis S. AmiGO hub, web presence working group. AmiGO: online access to ontology and annotation data. Bioinformatics. 2008;25(2):288–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Cole J, Ball HA, Martin NC, Scourfield J, Mcguffin P. Genetic overlap between measures of hyperactivity/inattention and mood in children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009;48(11):1094–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Puzyrev VP. Genetic bases of human comorbidity. Russ J Genet. 2015;51(4):408–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Sundarrajan S, Arumugam M. Comorbidities of psoriasis-exploring the links by network approach. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0149175.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Hong X, Tsai HJ, Liu X, Arguelles L, Kumar R, Wang G, Kuptsova-Clarkson N, Pearson C, Ortiz K, Bonzagni A, Apollon S. Does genetic regulation of IgE begin in utero? Evidence from T H 1/T H 2 gene polymorphisms and cord blood total IgE. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126(5):1059–67.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Lamontagne M, Timens W, Hao K, Bossé Y, Laviolette M, Steiling K, Campbell JD, Couture C, Conti M, Sherwood K, Hogg JC. Genetic regulation of gene expression in the lung identifies CST3 and CD22 as potential causal genes for airflow obstruction. Thorax. 2014;  https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-205630.
  68. 68.
    Turpeinen H, Seppälä I, Lyytikäinen LP, Raitoharju E, Hutri-Kähönen N, Levula M, Oksala N, Waldenberger M, Klopp N, Illig T, Mononen N. A genome-wide expression quantitative trait loci analysis of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin enzymes identifies a novel regulatory gene variant for FURIN expression and blood pressure. Hum Genet. 2015;134(6):627–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Matera MG, Calzetta L, Cazzola M. TNF-α inhibitors in asthma and COPD: we must not throw the baby out with the bath water. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2010;23(2):121–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Nabe T. Tumor necrosis factor alpha-mediated asthma? Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2013;160(2):111–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ramseyer VD, Garvin JL. Tumor necrosis factor-α: regulation of renal function and blood pressure. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2013;304(10):F1231–42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5(2):101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Hohmann HP, Remy R, Scheidereit C, Van Loon AP. Maintenance of NF-kappa B activity is dependent on protein synthesis and the continuous presence of external stimuli. Mol Cell Biol. 1991;11(1):259–66.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Matsumura Y. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell NF-κB p105 mRNA decreases during asthmatic attacks. Biomed Pharmacother. 2008;62(3):147–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Schuliga M. NF-kappaB signaling in chronic inflammatory airway disease. Biomol Ther. 2015;5(3):1266–83.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Zinchuk VV, Pronko TP, Lis MA. Blood oxygen transport and endothelial dysfunction in patients with arterial hypertension. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2004;24(4):205–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Magyar K, Deres L, Eros K, Bruszt K, Seress L, Hamar J, Hideg K, Balogh A, Gallyas F, Sumegi B, Toth K. A quinazoline-derivative compound with PARP inhibitory effect suppresses hypertension-induced vascular alterations in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-molecular basis of disease. 2014;1842(7):935–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Morishima A, Ohkubo N, Maeda N, Miki T, Mitsuda N. NFκB regulates plasma apolipoprotein AI and high density lipoprotein cholesterol through inhibition of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(40):38188–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Chotkowska EW, Sznajderman M, Szcześniewska D, Niegowska J, Rywik S. Dyslipoproteinemia in primary hypertension. Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej. 1997;97(2):126–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Wang Y, Su X, Zhang W, Yang W, Wang Y, He Y. Correlation between serum cystatin C level and elderly hypertensive patients combined coronary heart disease. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(4):6287.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Yao X, Vitek MP, Remaley AT, Levine SJ. Apolipoprotein mimetic peptides: a new approach for the treatment of asthma. Front Pharmacol. 2012;3:37.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Park SW, Lee EH, Lee EJ, Kim HJ, Bae DJ, Han S, Kim D, Jang AS, Uh ST, Kim YH, Erle DJ. Apolipoprotein A1 potentiates lipoxin A4 synthesis and recovery of allergen-induced disrupted tight junctions in the airway epithelium. Clin Exp Allergy. 2013;43(8):914–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Getz GS, Reardon CA. Apoprotein E as a lipid transport and signaling protein in the blood, liver, and artery wall. J Lipid Res. 2009;50(Supplement):S156–61.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Chen Y, Wang W, Zhou Y, Shields R, Chanda SK, Elston RC, Li J. In silico gene prioritization by integrating multiple data sources. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21137.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    McKusick VA. Mendelian inheritance in man: a catalog of human genes and genetic disorders. JHU Press. 1998;1Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Rappaport N, Twik M, Plaschkes I, Nudel R, Iny Stein T, Levitt J, Lancet D. MalaCards: an amalgamated human disease compendium with diverse clinical and genetic annotation and structured search. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D877–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Kestenbaum B, Rudser KD, de Boer IH, Peralta CA, Fried LF, Shlipak MG, Palmas W, Stehman-Breen C, Siscovick DS. Differences in kidney function and incident hypertension: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(7):501–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Shigemura M, Konno S, Nasuhara Y, Shimizu C, Matsuno K, Nishimura M. Impact of asthmatic control status on serum cystatin C concentrations. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012;50(8):1367–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Tousoulis D, Androulakis E, Papageorgiou N, Miliou A, Chatzistamatiou E, Oikonomou E, Moustakas G, Kallikazaros I, Stefanadis C. Genetic predisposition to left ventricular hypertrophy and the potential involvement of cystatin-C in untreated hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2013;26(5):683–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Qiao J, Luan B, Gu H, Zhang Y. Effect of different 1, 25-(OH) 2D3 doses on high mobility group box1 and toll-like receptors 4 expression in lung tissue of asthmatic mice. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(3):4016.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Bomfim GF, Dos Santos RA, Oliveira MA, Giachini FR, Akamine EH, Tostes RC, Fortes ZB, Webb RC, Carvalho MH. Toll-like receptor 4 contributes to blood pressure regulation and vascular contraction in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Clin Sci. 2012;122(11):535–43.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Tachibana A, Kato M, Kimura H, Fujiu T, Suzuki M, Morikawa A. Inhibition by fenoterol of human eosinophil functions including β2-adrenoceptor-independent actions. Clin Exp Immunol. 2002;130(3):415–23.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Koryakina YA, Fowler TW, Jones SM, Schnackenberg BJ, Cornett LE, Kurten RC. Characterization of a panel of six β 2-adrenergic receptor antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy. Respir Res. 2008;9(1):32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Holloway JW, Dunbar PR, Riley GA, Sawyer GM, Fitzharris PF, Pearce N, Le Gros GS, Beasley R. Association of b2-adrenergic receptor polymorphisms with severe asthma. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000;30(8):1097–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Gao JM, Lin YG, Qiu CC, Liu YW, Ma Y, Liu Y. Beta2-adrenergic receptor gene polymorphism in Chinese northern asthmatics. Chin Med Sci J. 2004;19(3):164–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Bray MS, Krushkal J, Li L, Ferrell R, Kardia S, Sing CF, Turner ST, Boerwinkle E. Positional genomic analysis identifies the β 2-adrenergic receptor gene as a susceptibility locus for human hypertension. Circulation. 2000;101(25):2877–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Herrmann SM, Nicaud V, Tiret L, Evans A, Kee F, Ruidavets JB, Arveiler D, Luc G, Morrison C, Hoehe MR, Paul M, Cambien F. Polymorphisms of the β2-adrenoceptor (ADRB2) gene and essential hypertension: the ECTIM and PEGASE studies. J Hypertens. 2002;20(2):229–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Chung F. Anti-inflammatory cytokines in asthma and allergy: interleukin-10, interleukin-12, interferon-γ. Mediat Inflamm. 2001;10(2):51–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Ogawa Y, Duru EA, Ameredes BT. Role of IL-10 in the resolution of airway inflammation. Curr Mol Med. 2008;8(5):437–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Tinsley JH, South S, Chiasson VL, Mitchell BM. Interleukin-10 reduces inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and blood pressure in hypertensive pregnant rats. Am J Phys Regul Integr Comp Phys. 2010;298(3):R713–9.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Harmon A, Cornelius D, Amaral L, Paige A, Herse F, Ibrahim T, Wallukat G, Faulkner J, Moseley J, Dechend R, LaMarca B. IL-10 supplementation increases Tregs and decreases hypertension in the RUPP rat model of preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2015;34(3):291–306.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Smith LJ, Shamsuddin M, Sporn PH, Denenberg M, Anderson J. Reduced superoxide dismutase in lung cells of patients with asthma. Free Radic Biol Med. 1997;22(7):1301–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Kumar KV, Das UN. Are free radicals involved in the pathobiology of human essential hypertension? Free Radic Res Commun. 1993;19(1):59–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Godin N, Liu F, Lau GJ, Brezniceanu ML, Chénier I, Filep JG, Ingelfinger JR, Zhang SL, Chan JS. Catalase overexpression prevents hypertension and tubular apoptosis in angiotensinogen transgenic mice. Kidney Int. 2010;77(12):1086–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Pennings HJ, Borm PJ, Evelo CT, Wouters EF. Changes in levels of catalase and glutathione in erythrocytes of patients with stable asthma, treated with beclomethasone dipropionate. Eur Respir J. 1999;13(6):1260–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Mitsunobu F, Yamaoka K, Hanamoto K, Kojima S, Hosaki Y, Ashida K, Sugita K, Tanizaki Y. Elevation of antioxidant enzymes in the clinical effects of radon and thermal therapy for bronchial asthma. J Radiat Res. 2003;44(2):95–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Gobe G, Browning J, Howard T, Hogg N, Winterford C, Cross R. Apoptosis occurs in endothelial cells during hypertension-induced microvascular rarefaction. J Struct Biol. 1997;118(1):63–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    de Benedictis FM, de Benedictis D, Spinozzi F. Apoptosis in asthma. Apoptosis: Modern Insights into Disease from Molecules to Man. 2010;405Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Druilhe A, Letuve S, Pretolani M. Eosinophil apoptosis in asthma. Pathologie-biologie. 2000;48(6):566–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Jayaraman S, Castro M. O’Sullivan M, Bragdon MJ, Holtzman MJ. Resistance to Fas-mediated T cell apoptosis in asthma. J Immunol. 1999;162(3):1717–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Hamet P, Richard L, Dam TV, Teiger E, Orlov SN, Gaboury L, Gossard F, Tremblay J. Apoptosis in target organs of hypertension. Hypertension. 1995;26(4):642–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Morillas P, de Andrade H, Castillo J, Quiles J, Bertomeu-González V, Cordero A, Tarazón E, Roselló E, Portolés M, Rivera M, Bertomeu-Martínez V. Inflammation and apoptosis in hypertension. Relevance of the extent of target organ damage. Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition). 2012;65(9):819–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Nagineni CN, Cherukuri KS, Kutty V, Detrick B, Hooks JJ. Interferon-γ differentially regulates TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 expression in human retinal pigment epithelial cells through JAK-STAT pathway. J Cell Physiol. 2007;210(1):192–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Paas-Rozner M, Sela M, Mozes E. The nature of the active suppression of responses associated with experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis by a dual altered peptide ligand administered by different routes. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001;98(22):12642–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Udono T, Takahashi K, Nakayama M, Murakami O, Durlu YK, Tamai M, Shibahara S. Adrenomedullin in cultured human retinal pigment epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41(7):1962–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Wong HK, Ong KL, Leung RY, Cheung TT, Xu A, Lam TH, Lam KS, Cheung BM. Plasma level of adrenomedullin is influenced by a single nucleotide polymorphism in the adiponectin gene. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e70335.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Walter R, Wanninger J, Bauer S, Eisinger K, Neumeier M, Weiss TS, Amann T, Hellerbrand C, Schäffler A, Schölmerich J, Buechler C. Adiponectin reduces connective tissue growth factor in human hepatocytes which is already induced in non-fibrotic non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Exp Mol Pathol. 2011;91(3):740–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Wenger C, Ellenrieder V, Alber B, Lacher U, Menke A, Hameister H, Wilda M, Iwamura T, Beger HG, Adler G, Gress TM. Expression and differential regulation of connective tissue growth factor in pancreatic cancer cells. Oncogene. 1999;18(4):1073–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Tomita Y, Marchenko N, Erster S, Nemajerova A, Dehner A, Klein C, Pan H, Kessler H, Pancoska P, Moll UM. WT p53, but not tumor-derived mutants, bind to Bcl2 via the DNA binding domain and induce mitochondrial permeabilization. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(13):8600–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Miyashita T, Krajewski S, Krajewska M, Wang HG, Lin HK, Liebermann DA, Hoffman B, Reed JC. Tumor suppressor p53 is a regulator of bcl-2 and bax gene expression in vitro and in vivo. Oncogene. 1994;9(6):1799–805.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Tonic I, Yu WN, Park Y, Chen CC, Hay N. Akt activation emulates Chk1 inhibition and Bcl2 overexpression and abrogates G2 cell cycle checkpoint by inhibiting BRCA1 foci. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(31):23790–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Lien GS, Wu MS, Bien MY, Chen CH, Lin CH, Chen BC. Epidermal growth factor stimulates nuclear factor-κB activation and heme oxygenase-1 expression via c-Src, NADPH oxidase, PI3K, and Akt in human colon cancer cells. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e104891.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Li M, Li Z, Sun X, Yang L, Fang P, Liu Y, Li W, Xu J, Lu J, Xie M, Zhang D. Heme oxygenase-1/p21WAF1 mediates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ signaling inhibition of proliferation of rat pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. FEBS J. 2010;277(6):1543–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Ackerman WE IV, Zhang XL, Rovin BH, Kniss DA. Modulation of cytokine-induced cyclooxygenase 2 expression by PPARG ligands through NFκB signal disruption in human WISH and amnion cells. Biol Reprod. 2005;73(3):527–35.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Sampey AV, Hutchinson P, Morand EF. Annexin I and dexamethasone effects on phospholipase and cyclooxygenase activity in human synoviocytes. Mediat Inflamm. 2000;9(3-4):125–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Xue S, Slater DM, Bennett PR, Myatt L. Induction of both cytosolic phospholipase A2 and prostaglandin H synthase-2 by interleukin-1 β in WISH cells is inhibited by dexamethasone. Prostaglandins. 1996;51(2):107–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Masuko K, Murata M, Yudoh K, Shimizu H, Beppu M, Nakamura H, Kato T. Prostaglandin E 2 regulates the expression of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN2) in human osteoarthritic chondrocytes via the EP4 receptor. BMC research notes. 2010;3(1):5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Kodama T, Takehara T, Hikita H, Shimizu S, Shigekawa M, Tsunematsu H, Li W, Miyagi T, Hosui A, Tatsumi T, Ishida H. Increases in p53 expression induce CTGF synthesis by mouse and human hepatocytes and result in liver fibrosis in mice. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(8):3343.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Wang ZQ, Bapat AS, Rayanade RJ, Dagtas AS, Hoffmann MK. Interleukin-10 induces macrophage apoptosis and expression of CD16 (FcγRIII) whose engagement blocks the cell death programme and facilitates differentiation. Immunology. 2001;102(3):331–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Matsuda T, Saito H, Fukatsu K, Han I, Inoue T, Furukawa S, Ikeda S, Hidemura A. Cytokine-modulated inhibition of neutrophil apoptosis at local site augments exudative neutrophil functions and reflects inflammatory response after surgery. Surgery. 2001;129(1):76–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Equils O, Lu D, Gatter M, Witkin SS, Bertolotto C, Arditi M, McGregor JA, Simmons CF, Hobel CJ. Chlamydia heat shock protein 60 induces trophoblast apoptosis through TLR4. J Immunol. 2006;177(2):1257–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Tang SC, Lathia JD, Selvaraj PK, Jo DG, Mughal MR, Cheng A, Siler DA, Markesbery WR, Arumugam TV, Mattson MP. Toll-like receptor-4 mediates neuronal apoptosis induced by amyloid β-peptide and the membrane lipid peroxidation product 4-hydroxynonenal. Exp Neurol. 2008;213(1):114–21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Deng F, Han F, Wu C. Expression and immune effect of toll-like receptor 4 in human trophoblast cells. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2009;29(3):359–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Woo SH, Park IC, Park MJ, Lee HC, Lee SJ, Chun YJ, Lee SH, Hong SI, Rhee CH. Arsenic trioxide induces apoptosis through a reactive oxygen species-dependent pathway and loss of mitochondrial membrane potential in HeLa cells. Int J Oncol. 2002;21(1):57–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Takahashi A, Kono K, Ichihara F, Sugai H, Amemiya H, Iizuka H, Fujii H, Matsumoto Y. Macrophages in tumor-draining lymph node with different characteristics induce T-cell apoptosis in patients with advanced stage-gastric cancer. Int J Cancer. 2003;104(4):393–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Kajino S, Suganuma M, Teranishi F, Takahashi N, Tetsuka T, Ohara H, Itoh M, Okamoto T. Evidence that de novo protein synthesis is dispensable for anti-apoptotic effects of NF-[kappa] B. Oncogene. 2000;19(18):2233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Kolenko V, Bloom T, Rayman P, Bukowski R, Hsi E, Finke J. Inhibition of NF-κB activity in human T lymphocytes induces caspase-dependent apoptosis without detectable activation of caspase-1 and-3. J Immunol. 1999;163(2):590–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Madrid LV, Wang CY, Guttridge DC, Schottelius AJ, Baldwin AS, Mayo MW. Akt suppresses apoptosis by stimulating the transactivation potential of the RelA/p65 subunit of NF-κB. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(5):1626–38.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    François F, Grimes ML. Phosphorylation-dependent Akt cleavage in neural cell in vitro reconstitution of apoptosis. J Neurochem. 1999;73(4):1773–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Jo SK, Yun SY, Chang KH, Cha DR, Cho WY, Kim HK, Won NH. α-MSH decreases apoptosis in ischaemic acute renal failure in rats: possible mechanism of this beneficial effect. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001;16(8):1583–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Shimamoto T, Ohyashiki K, Takeshita K. Overexpression of the homeobox gene DLX-7 inhibits apoptosis by induced expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1. Exp Hematol. 2000;28(4):433–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Liang X, Nagai A, Terashima M, Sheikh AM, Shiota Y, Mitaki S, Kim SU, Yamaguchi S. Cystatin C induces apoptosis and tyrosine hydroxylase gene expression through JNK-dependent pathway in neuronal cells. Neurosci Lett. 2011;496(2):100–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Kline JN, Rose RM. Central nervous system influences in asthma. In: Heterogeneity in asthma. Boston: Humana Press; 2014. p. 309–19.Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    Wyss JM, Carlson SH. The role of the central nervous system in hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep. 1999;1(3):246–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Marvar PJ, Lob H, Vinh A, Zarreen F, Harrison DG. The central nervous system and inflammation in hypertension. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2011;11(2):156–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Pedroso D, Nunes AR, Diogo LN, Oudot C, Monteiro EC, Brenner C, Vieira HL. Hippocampal neurogenesis response: what can we expect from two different models of hypertension? Brain Res. 2016;1646:199–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Shih YH, Tsai SF, Huang SH, Chiang YT, Hughes MW, Wu SY, Lee CW, Yang TT, Kuo YM. Hypertension impairs hippocampus-related adult neurogenesis, CA1 neuron dendritic arborization and long-term memory. Neuroscience. 2016;322:346–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Ralevic V. P2X receptors in the cardiovascular system and their potential as therapeutic targets in disease. Curr Med Chem. 2015;22(7):851–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Ghavipanjeh GR, Alaei H, Khazaei M, Pourshanazari AA, Hoveida R. Effect of acute and chronic hypertension on short-and long-term spatial and avoidance memory in male rats. Pathophysiology. 2010;17(1):39–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Bink DI, Ritz K, Aronica E, Van Der Weerd L, Daemen MJ. Mouse models to study the effect of cardiovascular risk factors on brain structure and cognition. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33(11):1666–84.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Guo RB, Sun PL, Zhao AP, Gu J, Ding X, Qi J, Sun XL, Hu G. Chronic asthma results in cognitive dysfunction in immature mice. Exp Neurol. 2013;247:209–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Barnes PJ. Editor. Neural mechanisms in asthma. Br Med Bull. 1992;48(1):149–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Albéri L. Asthma: a clinical condition for brain health. Exp Neurol. 2013;248:338–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Klein B, Mrowetz H, Thalhamer J, Scheiblhofer S, Weiss R, Aigner L. Allergy enhances neurogenesis and modulates microglial activation in the hippocampus. Front Cell Neurosci. 2016;10Google Scholar
  155. 155.
    Higgs CM, Harvey JE. The role of psycho-social stresses in bronchial asthma. In: Biological psychiatry, higher nervous activity: Springer US; 1985. p. 801–5.Google Scholar
  156. 156.
    Van Lieshout RJ, MacQueen G. Psychological factors in asthma. Allergy, Asthma Clin Immunol. 2008;4(1):12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Titiov VN. Insulin as a humoral factor of energy supply for the biological function of locomotion. Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii meditsinskikh nauk. 2005;2:3–8.Google Scholar
  158. 158.
    Haffner SM, Stern MP, Miettinen H, Robbins D, Howard BV. Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and LDL size in a biethnic population. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16(9):1184–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Zheng XL, Matsubara S, Diao C, Hollenberg MD, Wong NC. Epidermal growth factor induction of apolipoprotein AI is mediated by the Ras-MAP kinase cascade and Sp1. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(17):13822–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Basque JR, Lévy É, Beaulieu JF, Ménard D. Apolipoproteins in human fetal colon: immunolocalization, biogenesis, and hormonal regulation. J Cell Biochem. 1998;70(3):354–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    Rees D, Sloane T, Jessup W, Dean RT, Kritharides L. Apolipoprotein AI stimulates secretion of apolipoprotein E by foam cell macrophages. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(39):27925–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Banerjee A, Wu ZS, Qian PX, Kang J, Liu DX, Zhu T, Lobie PE. ARTEMIN promotes de novo angiogenesis in ER negative mammary carcinoma through activation of TWIST1-VEGF-A signalling. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50098.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. 163.
    Lee HP, Lin CY, Shih JS, Fong YC, Wang SW, Li TM, Tang CH. Adiponectin promotes VEGF-A-dependent angiogenesis in human chondrosarcoma through PI3K, Akt, mTOR, and HIF-α pathway. Oncotarget. 2015;6(34):36746.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    Conde J, Scotece M, López V, Gómez R, Lago F, Pino J, Gómez-Reino JJ, Gualillo O. Adiponectin and leptin induce VCAM-1 expression in human and murine chondrocytes. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52533.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    MacKay H, Patterson ZR, Khazall R, Patel S, Tsirlin D, Abizaid A. Organizational effects of perinatal exposure to bisphenol-a and diethylstilbestrol on arcuate nucleus circuitry controlling food intake and energy expenditure in male and female CD-1 mice. Endocrinology. 2013;154(4):1465–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. 166.
    Fukuoka H, Cooper O, Ben-Shlomo A, Mamelak A, Ren SG, Bruyette D, Melmed S. EGFR as a therapeutic target for human, canine, and mouse ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(12):4712.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. 167.
    Urtasun R, Latasa MU, Demartis MI, Balzani S, Goñi S, Garcia-Irigoyen O, Elizalde M, Azcona M, Pascale RM, Feo F, Bioulac-Sage P. Connective tissue growth factor autocriny in human hepatocellular carcinoma: Oncogenic role and regulation by epidermal growth factor receptor/yes-associated protein–mediated activation. Hepatology. 2011;54(6):2149–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olga V. Saik
    • 1
  • Pavel S. Demenkov
    • 1
  • Timofey V. Ivanisenko
    • 1
  • Elena Yu Bragina
    • 2
  • Maxim B. Freidin
    • 2
  • Irina A. Goncharova
    • 2
  • Victor E. Dosenko
    • 3
  • Olga I. Zolotareva
    • 4
  • Ralf Hofestaedt
    • 5
  • Inna N. Lavrik
    • 6
  • Evgeny I. Rogaev
    • 1
    • 7
    • 8
    • 9
  • Vladimir A. Ivanisenko
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Research Institute of Medical Genetics, Tomsk NRMCTomskRussia
  3. 3.Bogomoletz Institute of PhysiologyKievUkraine
  4. 4.Bielefeld University, International Research Training Group “Computational Methods for the Analysis of the Diversity and Dynamics of Genomes”BielefeldGermany
  5. 5.Bielefeld University, Technical Faculty, AG Bioinformatics and Medical InformaticsBielefeldGermany
  6. 6.Department of Translational Inflammation, Institute of Experimental Internal MedicineOtto von Guericke UniversityMagdeburgGermany
  7. 7.University of Massachusetts Medical SchoolWorcesterUSA
  8. 8.Department of Genomics and Human Genetics, Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  9. 9.Center for Genetics and Genetic Technologies, Faculty of Biology, Faculty of Bioengineering and BioinformaticsLomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations