Relationships between menstrual status and obesity phenotypes in women: a cross-sectional study in northern China

Abstract

Background

One of most important concerns of postmenopausal women is obesity. The relationships between menstruation status and obesity phenotypes are unclear. This study aimed to assess the associations between menstrual status and different obesity phenotypes in women.

Methods

In total, 5373 women aged ≥40 years were recruited from the Jidong and Kailuan communities. Basic information was collected via clinical examination, laboratory testing and standardized questionnaires. The women were stratified into the following three groups: menstrual period, menopausal transition period and postmenopausal period. General obesity was defined as a body mass index (BMI) of ≥28 kg/m2. Central obesity was defined as a waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) of > 0.85. Visceral obesity was defined as the presence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and increased pericardial fat volume (PFV).

Results

The numbers of women in the menstrual, menopausal transition, and postmenopausal periods were 2807 (52.2%), 675 (12.6%) and 1891 (35.2%), respectively. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for central obesity among women in the menopausal transition and postmenopausal periods compared with women in the menstrual period were 0.99 (0.82–1.19) and 1.52 (1.26–1.84), respectively. The OR for NAFLD among postmenopausal women was 1.78 (1.44–2.20). The adjusted β-coefficient (standard error, SE) for PFV among postmenopausal women was 41.25 (7.49). The adjusted OR for general obesity among postmenopausal women was 1.01 (0.77–1.34).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that menopause is an independent risk factor for central and visceral obesity but not general obesity.

Peer Review reports

Background

Obesity is a common risk factor for many diseases, such as metabolic syndrome, coronary heart disease, and type 2 diabetes [1, 2]. The global incidence of obesity is 13%, and the number of obese people has increased rapidly in China, gravely impacting the health of the Chinese population [3, 4]. Obesity is caused by excessive accumulation of fat and can be classified according to the location of fat accumulation as general obesity, central obesity or visceral obesity. General obesity reflects the overall body mass, i.e., a large lean (muscle) mass. Central obesity has been shown to be an accurate measure of abdominal fat accumulation and a better predictor of morbidity and mortality than general obesity [5]. Visceral obesity is a well-known risk factor for many diseases, such as metabolic disease, hemodynamic disease, type 2 diabetes, and stroke [6, 7].

Menstrual changes are natural physiological processes in women and include the menstrual period, the menopausal transition period and the postmenopausal period. Women in different stages of menstruation undergo different physical and psychological changes [8]. Compared to women in the other two periods, women in the postmenopausal period tend to have a higher risk of disease, probably due to a sharp decrease in the levels of sex hormones after menopause [9]. Increased oestrogen levels have been reported to affect weight gain by increasing energy expenditure and by regulating metabolism and the distribution of adipose tissue [10].

Several studies have reported associations between obesity and menstrual status [11, 12]. To our knowledge, no previous study has evaluated the association of menstrual status with different obesity phenotypes. This study aimed to explore the associations between menstrual status and the locations of fat deposits in Chinese women, thereby improving and promoting women’s health.

Methods

Study design and population

The participants in this study were recruited from the Kailuan and Jidong communities in Tangshan City (Hebei Province, northern China) from June 2010 to August 2014. The geographic locations of Kailuan and Jidong are shown in Figure S1. Kailuan General Hospital conducted a health examination on the employees (including those who were retired) of the Kailuan (Group) Co. Ltd. (a large coal mining industry) and their dependents, and finally, 5440 people agreed to the study and completed the questionnaire. Jidong Oilfield Hospital provided the same health examination to the employees (including retirees) of Jidong Oilfield Inc. (a large oilfield) and their families, and 9078 participants agreed to the study and completed the questionnaire. A total of 14,518 people participated in the cohort study. After a detailed evaluation according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 5373 women were included in this study, 1360 of whom underwent pericardial fat volume (PFV) testing. The exclusion criteria for this study population were as follows: (I) male sex; (II) a lack of reported menstruation information; (III) incomplete information regarding nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); (IV) hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positivity; and (V) excessive alcohol consumption (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Flowchart of the study. Abbreviation: NAFLD: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Assessment of obesity

All participants underwent height, weight, waist circumference (WC) and hip circumference (HC) measurement and abdominal ultrasonography by an experienced physician who was blinded to the clinical presentation and laboratory findings. The body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the weight (in kg) divided by the square of the height (in m2) and was used to define general obesity (BMI ≥28 kg/m2). The waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) was calculated as the WC divided by the HC and was used to assess central obesity (defined as a WHR of > 0.85 for women) according to the criteria proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) [13]. According to information from the Chinese Association for the Study of Liver Disease and the Asia-Pacific Working Party on NAFLD, diagnosis of NAFLD was based on the presence of at least two of the following three abnormal findings [14, 15]: diffusely increased echogenicity of the liver relative to the kidney, poor visualization of intrahepatic structures, or ultrasound beam attenuation after ruling out excessive alcohol consumption and other liver diseases. Abdominal ultrasonography was performed with a high-resolution B-mode topographic ultrasound system with a 3.5 MHz probe (ACUSON X300, Siemens, Germany) by radiologists who were blinded to the laboratory examination findings. A total of 1360 participants underwent noncontrast chest computed tomography (NCCT) for the quantification of PFV [16]. Visceral obesity was defined as the presence of NAFLD and increased PFV.

Assessment of menstrual status

Menstrual status was classified into the menstrual period, menopause transition period and postmenopausal period. The 3 periods were defined as follows [17]: the menstrual period was defined as the presence of regular menstrual cycles with ≤7 days of menstruation within a span of 22 to 35 days; the menopause transition period was defined as a change in the length of the menstrual cycle such that menstruation occurred for ≥7 days for at least two consecutive menstrual cycles or amenorrhea was experienced for 3 to 11 months; and the postmenopausal period was defined as the presence of spontaneous or surgical menopause for more than 1 year. The information on menstruation status was collected based on the participants’ self-reports.

Covariates

Questionnaires were used to collect demographic information, history of disease, lifestyle information, and drug history. Clinical characteristics and biochemical indicators were assessed at Jidong and Kailuan General Hospital. The covariates included age, sex, education level, per capita monthly income, marital status, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity level, age at menarche, oestrogen replacement therapy status, parity, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose (FBG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and triglycerides (TG). Methods for assessing covariates have been described in a previous study [18]. Hypertension was diagnosed as a diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg or systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg, use of antihypertensive drugs or a self-reported history. Dyslipidaemia was defined as current treatment with lipid-lowering drugs, a history of dyslipidaemia, or serum levels of TC ≥ 5.18 mmol/L, TG ≥ 1.7 mmol/L, HDL-C < 1.04 mmol/L, or LDL-C ≥ 3.37 mmol/L. Diabetes mellitus was defined as current use of insulin or oral hypoglycaemic therapy, a self-reported history, or FBG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L (126 mg/dL).

Implementation

Before conducting this study, we recruited investigators and physicians in advance. In order to ensure objectivity and authenticity, all investigators and physical examination doctors received strict and standardized professional training before the implementation of the project. An investigator or doctor was assigned to each survey item, and all survey subjects were selected strictly in accordance with the random sampling method.

Statistical analyses

All continuous variables in our study were normally distributed. Continuous variables are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) and were compared using one-way ANOVA. Categorical variables are described as frequencies and percentages and were evaluated with chi-square tests. Logistic regression was used to analyze the associations between general obesity, central obesity or NAFLD and menstrual status with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The association between PFV and menstrual status was determined by linear regression with an unstandardized β-coefficient and the standard error (SE). The adjusted variables included age, education level, per capita monthly income, marital status, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity level, age at menarche, oestrogen replacement therapy status, parity, hypertension status, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, and TC, TG, HDL-C and LDL-C levels.

All statistical tests were 2-sided, and statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for statistical analyses.

Results

Participant characteristics

Of the 5373 participants in the study, the proportions of women in the menstrual, menopausal transition, and postmenopausal periods were 52.2, 12.6 and 35.2%, respectively. The characteristics of the participants are summarized in Table 1. Age, education level, per capita monthly income, marital status, physical activity level, smoking status, age at menarche, oestrogen replacement therapy status and parity significantly differed among women in the different menstrual status groups (P < 0.001). The prevalence rates of hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidaemia were higher in postmenopausal women than in women in the other two groups (P < 0.001). Women in the postmenopausal and menopausal transition groups had a higher BMI, WC, HC, WHR, and PFV, along with higher levels of TC, TG and LDL-C than premenopausal women (P < 0.001).

Table 1 Basic characteristics of the participants stratified by menstrual status

The numbers of participants with general obesity and central obesity were 607 and 2577, respectively. The prevalence of general obesity, central obesity and NAFLD were higher in the postmenopausal group than in the other groups (17.13, 65.42 and 49.14%, respectively) (all P < 0.001) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Prevalence of general obesity, central obesity and NAFLD in women with different menstrual statuses. †: prevalence of general obesity, central obesity or NAFLD. * denotes a significance level of P < 0.05. NAFLD = nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Association of menopausal status with obesity

Figure 3 shows the association of menopausal status with general obesity and central obesity. The OR for general obesity in postmenopausal women was 2.62 (95% CI: 2.18–3.16) in the unadjusted model and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.77–1.34) in the fully adjusted model. In the unadjusted model, for women in the menopausal transition period and postmenopausal period, the ORs for central obesity were 1.24 (95% CI, 1.05–1.47) and 3.16 (95% CI, 2.79–3.56), respectively. In the adjusted model, the ORs were 0.99 (0.82–1.19) and 1.52 (1.26–1.84), respectively.

Fig. 3
figure3

Associations of menstrual status with general obesity and central obesity. The adjusted model included the following covariates: age, education level, income, alcohol consumption, smoking status, physical activity level, marital status, hypertension, diabetes, and TC, TG, LD-C and HDL-C levels

The association between menstrual status and visceral obesity is shown in Fig. 4. After fully adjusting for the potential covariates, women in the menopausal transition period and postmenopausal period had higher risks of NAFLD (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.08–1.68; OR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.44–2.20, respectively). Menopause was a risk factor for increased PFV (β = 41.25, SE: 7.49), but a similar association was not observed for the menopausal transition period (P > 0.05).

Fig. 4
figure4

Associations of menstrual status with NAFLD and PFV. NAFLD = non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; PFV = pericardial fat volume. The adjusted model contained the following covariates: age, education level, income, alcohol consumption, smoking status, physical activity level, marital status, hypertension, diabetes, and TC, TG, LD-C and HDL-C levels

Discussion

The findings of this community-based study showed that menstruation status was associated with central obesity and visceral obesity. The risk of central obesity was increased approximately 50% in postmenopausal women compared to women in the menstrual period. Postmenopausal women had an increased risk of visceral obesity. However, menstrual status was not associated with general obesity, although the prevalence of general obesity progressively increased with progressive menstrual status.

One previous study indicated that as women’s menstrual status changes, their weight may increase or decrease, but no association was found between menstruation and the distribution of abdominal fat [19]. However, our findings contradict this research and suggest a positive association between changes in menstrual status and central obesity. A possible reason for this finding is the large sample size in the current study, which might increase the reliability of the results. Similarly, Tremollieres et al. and Ley et al. reported that the amount of abdominal fat increases after menopause and that dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans showed that postmenopausal women exhibit more abdominal fat than premenopausal women [20, 21].

We observed that the risk of visceral obesity was significantly higher in postmenopausal women than in women in the menopausal transition and menstrual periods. Lovejoy et al. showed that all women gained fat over time, but only postmenopausal women had a significant increase in visceral fat [22]. Our findings were consistent with the conclusion of that study. In addition, the effect of sex hormones on the distribution of visceral fat in women was consistent with the findings of other epidemiological reports [23].

Several previous studies have assessed the relationship between menstrual status and general obesity [17, 24]. Kim et al. showed a higher prevalence of general obesity in postmenopausal women than in premenopausal women and demonstrated that the serum level of osteocalcin is associated with insulin resistance in postmenopausal women but not in premenopausal women [24]. A longitudinal study also demonstrated a significant association between general obesity and hormone changes in women with different menstruation statuses independent of age, race and smoking status, in contrast to our study results [17]. The participants in that longitudinal study were from the Penn Ovarian Aging cohort, which included a small number of participants, while the participants in the present study were from the Jidong community, and the sample size was larger. Therefore, the differences in the results of these two studies may be due to inconsistencies in the study populations.

The results of previous studies showed that only central obesity and visceral obesity were associated with impaired carbohydrate metabolism, as shown by the higher insulin and glucose levels in obese women than in nonobese women [25, 26]. The evidence regarding the underlying physiological and cellular processes includes the regulation of energy balance and body fat by oestrogen-dependent processes [27]. Oestrogen deficiency and increased androgen activity lead to an imbalance in glucose homeostasis and insulin resistance in postmenopausal women [28, 29]. After menopause, the reduction in the oestrogen level increases the total adiposity and reduces the lean body mass [30]. Therefore, postmenopausal women with low sex hormone levels have an increased likelihood of accumulating body fat [31].

The strengths of our study include the multidimensional evaluation in a community-based cross-sectional study, the large sample size and the investigation of different obesity phenotypes categorized by various sites of fat accumulation. However, some limitations of our study should be noted. First, this cross-sectional study could not identify a causal relationship between menstrual status and obesity. Second, the participants were from the Jidong and Kailuan communities, and residents of these communities have a relatively higher income level than the general Chinese population. The income of these residents has an important influence on their lifestyle, and we did not investigate and analyze calorie consumption and type of diet, which may have increased data deviations and influenced the accuracy of the results. Finally, the Jidong and Kailuan communities are located in a coastal area, and the specific environment may influence obesity and menstrual status.

Conclusions

The present study demonstrated that menopause is associated with central and visceral obesity and indicated that fat in postmenopausal women is more likely to be deposited in the abdomen and around internal organs than distributed throughout the body. Our study suggests that postmenopausal women should be more conscious of central and visceral obesity and improve their overall health after menopause.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Lassale C, Tzoulaki I, Moons K, et al. Separate and combined associations of obesity and metabolic health with coronary heart disease: a pan-European case-cohort analysis. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(5):397–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Carvalho LP, Di Thommazo-Luporini L, Mendes RG, et al. Metabolic syndrome impact on cardiac autonomic modulation and exercise capacity in obese adults. Auton Neurosci. 2018;213:43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Yi X, Liu YH, Zhou XF, et al. The influence of abdominal and ectopic fat accumulation on carotid intima-media thickness: a Chongqing study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27(7):1992–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Chigbu CO, Parhofer KG, Aniebue UU, Berger U. Prevalence and sociodemographic determinants of adult obesity: a large representative household survey in a resource-constrained African setting with double burden of undernutrition and overnutrition. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018;72(8):702–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Turcotte M, Abadi A, Peralta-Romero J, Suarez F, Reddon H, Gomez-Zamudio J, et al. Genetic contribution to waist-to-hip ratio in Mexican children and adolescents based on 12 loci validated in European adults. Int J Obes. 2019;43(1):13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Dankner RSM, LA Roth J, Lubin FCA. Sex and ethnicorigin specific BMI cut points improve prediction of 40-year mortality. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2015;31(5):530–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Jiwon Yang KWP, Cho S. Inhibition of CD36 reduces visceral fat accumulation and improves insulin resistance in dietinduced obese BDNF Val66Met mice. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(34):13338–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Zhou YWD, Yang XWA, Gao XGY, Wu SZX. Effect of menopausal status on carotid intima-media thickness and presence of carotid plaque in Chinese women generation population. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8076.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kozakowski J, Gietka-Czernel M, Leszczyńska D, Majos A. Obesity in menopause - our negligence or an unfortunate inevitability. Prz Menopauzalny. 2017;16(2):61–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chang E, Varghese M, Singer K. Gender and sex differences in adipose tissue. Curr Diab Rep. 2018;18(9):69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jung AN, Park JH, Kim J, et al. Detrimental effects of higher body mass index and smoking habits on menstrual cycles in Korean women. J Women's Health (Larchmt). 2017;26(1):83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Jacobsen BK, Knutsen SF, Oda K, Fraser GE. Obesity at age 20 and the risk of miscarriages, irregular periods and reported problems of becoming pregnant: the Adventist health Study-2. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012;27(12):923–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bowman K, Atkins JL, Delgado J, et al. Central adiposity and the overweight risk paradox in aging: follow-up of 130,473 UK biobank participants. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;106(1):130–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Liu H, Yao Y, Wang Y, Ma L, Liu X, Guo S, et al. Ideal cardiovascular health metrics and the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a cross-sectional study in northern China. Liver Int. 2019;39(5):950–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Fan JG, Jia JD, Li YM, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: update 2010: (published in Chinese on Chinese journal of hepatology 2010; 18:163-166). J Dig Dis. 2011;12(1):38–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Shan DK, Zhou Y, Wang YX, Gao X, Wang W, Yang JJ, et al. Population-based cohort study in outcome of phased progression of atherosclerosis in China (PERSUADE): objective, rationale and design. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2017;14(8):491–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Freeman EW, Sammel MD, Lin H, Gracia CR. Obesity and reproductive hormone levels in the transition to menopause. Menopause. 2010;17(4):718–26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Chen Y, Huang Q, Ai P, Liu H, Chen X, Xu X, et al. Association between serum uric acid and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease according to different menstrual status groups. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;2019:2763093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Franklin RM, Ploutz-Snyder L, Kanaley JA. Longitudinal changes in abdominal fat distribution with menopause. Metabolism. 2009;58(3):311–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    He Z, Rankinen T, Leon AS, Skinner JS, Tchernof A, Bouchard C. Plasma steroids, body composition, and fat distribution: effects of age, sex, and exercise training. Int J Obes. 2018;42(7):1366–77.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Trémollieres FA, Pouilles JM, Ribot CA. Relative influence of age and menopause on total and regional body composition changes in postmenopausal women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(6):1594–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lovejoy JC, Champagne CM, de Jonge L, Xie H, Smith SR. Increased visceral fat and decreased energy expenditure during the menopausal transition. Int J Obes. 2008;32(6):949–58.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sowers M, Zheng H, Tomey K, et al. Changes in body composition in women over six years at midlife: ovarian and chronological aging. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(3):895–901.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kim S, Lee JY, Im JA, et al. Association between serum osteocalcin and insulin resistance in postmenopausal, but not premenopausal, women in Korea. Menopause. 2013;20(10):1061–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Goh V, Hart WG. Excess fat in the abdomen but not general obesity is associated with poorer metabolic and cardiovascular health in premenopausal and postmenopausal Asian women. Maturitas. 2018;107:33–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    de Mutsert R, Gast K, Widya R, et al. Associations of abdominal subcutaneous and visceral fat with insulin resistance and secretion differ between men and women: the Netherlands epidemiology of obesity study. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2018;16(1):54–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Shi H, Kumar SP, Liu X. G protein-coupled estrogen receptor in energy homeostasis and obesity pathogenesis. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2013;114:193–250.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Clegg D, Hevener AL, Moreau KL, et al. Sex hormones and Cardiometabolic health: role of estrogen and estrogen receptors. Endocrinology. 2017;158(5):1095–105.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Yan F, Liu J, Zhao X, et al. Association of the Number of years since menopause with metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance in Chinese urban women. J Women's Health (Larchmt). 2015;24(10):843–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Leeners B, Geary N, Tobler PN, Asarian L. Ovarian hormones and obesity. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(3):300–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lizcano F, Guzmán G. Estrogen deficiency and the origin of obesity during menopause. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:757461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Jidong and Kailuan communities for their collaboration, especially the dedicated participants and all of the research staff involved in the study.

Funding

Funding was provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant/award number: 81773527, 81973138), Academic promotion programme of Shandong First Medical University (grant/award number: 2019RC010) and National Key Research and Development Project (grant/award number: 2017YFE0118800).

The funding body played a role in the design of the study, statistical analysis and writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors critically reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the final version for submission. DL, HX and XYC designed the study. XYC, DL, HML and LJ undertook the statistical analysis and drafting of the manuscript. Field surveys and data collection were performed by WHL, YRC, XHW, WRZ, FXS, XXS, XJW and HTZ.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration and approved by the ethics committee of Jidong Oilfield Inc. Medical Centers and Kailuan General Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors confirm that there are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, X., Xi, H., Ji, L. et al. Relationships between menstrual status and obesity phenotypes in women: a cross-sectional study in northern China. BMC Endocr Disord 20, 91 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-020-00577-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Menstruation
  • Obesity
  • Phenotypes
  • Postmenopausal