Posterior decompression and occipitocervical fixation followed by intraoperative vertebroplasty for metastatic involvement of the axis

  • Xinjie Wu
  • Mingsheng Tan
  • Yingna Qi
  • Ping Yi
  • Feng Yang
  • Xiangsheng Tang
  • Qingying Hao
Open Access
Technical advance
  • 211 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Orthopedics and biomechanics

Abstract

Background

Metastases to the upper cervical spine were rarely reported in the literature. However, metastases to this area may cause spinal instability and cord compression, which in turn can result in respiratory failure and neurological dysfunction. The present study investigated the efficacy and safety of posterior decompression and occipitocervical fixation followed by intraoperative vertebroplasty for this disease.

Methods

This was a retrospective study that included 10 patients with metastatic involvement of the axis from March 2002 to May 2014. All cases presented with occipitocervical pain: 5 patients with compressive myelopathy and 6 patients with radiculopathy. Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the improvement of neurological function and pain intensity, respectively.

Results

All patients underwent posterior decompression and occipitocervical fixation followed by intraoperative vertebroplasty. The VAS scores and JOA scores both improved postoperatively, from 8.2 ± 0.4 to 2.3 ± 0.2 and from 10.1 ± 2.2 to 14.2 ± 2.9, respectively. Additionally, the improvement rate of JOA was 52.4 ± 1.8%. The mean overall survival was 12.8 months. The median survival time was 7 months. The 6-month and 12-month survival rates were 70% and 40%, respectively. The mean duration of operation was 182 min and blood loss was 450 mL. The mean volume of bone cement injected was 4.0 mL. The cement extravasation was observed in only 1 patient without clinical symptoms. One patient developed tumour recurrence and died 1 month later.

Conclusions

Posterior decompression and occipitocervical fixation followed by intraoperative vertebroplasty was a safe and valuable palliative method with relatively less invasion to treat metastatic involvement of the axis.

Keywords

Vertebroplasty Occipitocervical fixation Axis Metastasis 

Abbreviations

PMMA

Polymethylmethacrylate

PVP

Percutaneous vertebroplasty

SINS

Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score

TES

Total en bloc spondylectomy

VA

Vertebral artery

Background

The spine ranks first in the list of cancer metastasis in the skeletal system. Approximately 8-20% of metastases occur in the cervical spine [1, 2, 3]. However, metastases to the upper cervical spine were rarely reported in the literature [4, 5]. Due to the importance of this area, metastatic involvement of the axis may cause spinal instability and cord compression, which in turn can result in respiratory failure and neurological dysfunction. For advanced patients, the aim of surgical intervention was not to cure the disease but to relieve the pain and spinal cord compression, reconstruct spinal stability, and improve the quality of remaining life. The treatments included external immobilization, conventional surgical resection and percutaneous cement augmentation. However, conventional surgical treatment itself had risks of mixed infection, speech change, tongue oedema, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, etc., due to poor clinical conditions, comorbidities, and its transoral approach, while percutaneous vertebroplasty in this area was challenging [6, 7].

Therefore, combining intraoperative vertebroplasty and posterior decompression and occipitocervical fixation may be advisable, which is less invasive and could provide strong stability. To our knowledge, palliative surgical treatment of such disease has rarely been reported. This palliative method was used to treat 10 patients with metastatic involvement of the axis in our study and produced desirable outcomes.

Methods

Patients

Between March 2002 and May 2014, 10 patients (7 males, 3 females) with metastatic involvement of C2 who underwent surgery were retrospectively analysed. The mean age was 68.9 years, ranging from 49 to 82. In this study, all cases presented with occipitocervical pain: 5 patients with compressive myelopathy, and 6 patients with radiculopathy. The clinical data of the patients are displayed in Table 1.
Table 1

Clinical data of patients

Parameters

n (total 10 patients)

Average age

68.9

Sex ratio (male/female)

7/3

Primary tumor

 Lung

4

 Breast

2

 Prostate

2

 Kidney

1

 Unknown

1

Clinical symptom

 Occipitocervical pain

10

 Compressive myelopathy

5

 Radiculopathy

6

Complication

 Cement extravasation

1

 Tumor recurrence

1

Surgical indication and contraindication

The indications for surgery were intractable pain resistant to nonsurgical treatment, instability, progressive neurologic dysfunction, and expected survival time>3 months. The contraindication included intolerance to surgery; severe heart, lung, liver or kidney diseases; and extensively widespread metastasis. Four patients were excluded from the study due to short life expectancy or poor conditions. Preoperatively, the Modified Tokuhashi Scoring System [8] was used to predict the survival period for the patients. Four patients had a score of 0-8 (life expectancy<6 months), while 6 patients had a score between 9 and 11 (life expectancy>6 months). Furthermore, the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) [9] was employed to determine spinal instability. Five patients had a SINS of 7-12 (indicating impending instability) and 5 patients had a SINS of 13-18 (indicating an unstable spine).

Surgery preparation

All 10 patients underwent meticulous oncological examination preoperatively. The radiological data were evaluated using X-ray, CT scans and MRIs. In addition, radionuclide bone scanning was performed to further identify the location of the primary neoplasm and metastases. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon (M.S. Tan).

Procedure

Neurological function was monitored by intraoperative somatosensory-evoked potentials. After endotracheal intubation and general anaesthesia, the patient was placed in the prone position with his or her head immobilized and slightly flexed by a Mayfield head holder. After disinfecting and routine draping, a standard midline incision was made to expose the posterior structure of the occipitocervical area. The laminar ligaments and muscles were dissected. Then, laminectomy and removing the superior and inferior facet joints and pedicle were performed using a high-speed burr and rongeur. The spinal cord, nerve root and vertebral artery were protected carefully during procedures. Transpedicular vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) was performed during surgery using a C-arm image intensifier (Fig. 1). Intraoperative vertebroplasty was accurate and visual to inject bone cement. The leakage of bone cement could be detected and cleared in time. The PMMA was injected at high viscosity. Under C-arm guidance, the occipital plate and lateral mass screws or pedicle screws were placed and connected with a pre-curved rod bilaterally (O-C5) (Fig. 2). After irrigation, the incision was closed in layers and a drainage tube was placed inside.
Fig. 1

The surgical process. a Posterior decompression. b Intraoperative vertebroplasty via the transpedicular approach. c and d Intraoperative vertebroplasty under C-arm guidance

Fig. 2

A 78-year-old female with a C2 metastatic tumour, presenting with occipitocervical pain and quadriplegia, was treated with intraoperative vertebroplasty combined with posterior decompression and occipitocervical fixation in 2012. a and b Preoperative and postoperative axial CT scans. c and d Postoperative anterior, posterior and lateral radiographs. e The muscle power of the patient returned to normal and pain was completely relieved

Postoperatively, all patients were transferred to the oncology department for further treatment, such as radiotherapy or chemotherapy, as decided by the medical oncologists.

Evaluation indexes

Postoperative outcomes were obtained and evaluated both clinically and radiologically. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score was used to assess the improvement of neurological function. The formula of improvement rate of JOA was as follows: postoperative improvement rate = (postoperative score – preoperative score) / (17 – preoperative score) × 100%. The pain intensity was compared before and after operation by the VAS score, which had a scale of 0-10. Moreover, the dose of painkillers before and after the intervention was also recorded. For the radiological follow-up, plain X-ray film and CT scans were performed to evaluate the status of internal fixators and cement leakage, and MRIs were used to assess tumour recurrence. In addition, overall patient survival was calculated.

Statistical analysis

Paired t test was used to compare changes before and after the operation with parametric values. The t test was considered significant if the P value level was less than 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 software.

Results

Surgical result

The mean duration of operation was 182 min (range 120-255) and intraoperative blood loss ranged from 250 to 850 mL (mean 450). The mean volume of bone cement injected was 4.0 mL, ranging from 3.0 to 5.0 mL. The amount of bone cement injected was calculated by measuring the remaining amount in the syringe. The cement extravasation was observed in only 1 patient according to postoperative CT scans. However, the cement leakage event was not related to clinical symptoms.

None of the significant complications, i.e., vertebral artery (VA) or spinal cord injuries, occurred during the operation or the follow-up period. Surgical site infection was not seen in our study. One patient had a pulmonary infection that resolved with antibiotic therapy. Similarly, no hardware failure or neurological worsening occurred during the whole follow-up period. However, 1 patient developed tumour recurrence and died 1 month later.

Functional result

All patients received various extents of pain relief, which were sustained to the final follow-up period. Symptoms of myelopathy were presented in 5 patients, improved in 4 cases and remained unchanged in only 1 patient. All 6 patients who presented with radiculopathy obtained complete relief. The VAS scores and JOA scores both demonstrated improvement postoperatively (Table 2). In addition, the improvement rate of JOA was 52.4% (range: 49.6% to 57.1%). Due to the advanced stage of the tumours, all patients were prescribed oral morphine to relieve pain. The average preoperative daily dose was 125 mg (range: 80-150 mg), which decreased to an average of 60 mg (range: 50-100 mg) (P<0.001). The surgery significantly reduced the daily use of painkillers.
Table 2

VAS and JOA outcome

n = 10

Pre-op

Final follow-up

P value

VAS

8 (1)

2 (1)

P < 0.001

JOA

10 (2)

14 (2)

P = 0.003

Note: All data were expressed in median (interquartile range)

Overall survival

All patients were followed up, until they died, for an average of 12.8 (range: 3 to 29) months. The overall median survival time was 7 months. The 6-month and 12-month survival rates were 70% and 40%, respectively. Furthermore, the mean overall survival period was 6.8 months for prostate cancer, followed by lung (7.4 months), kidney (10 months), unknown (10 months), and breast (27.5 months).

Discussion

Metastasis to the spine are commonly spread through the Batson plexus, a valveless vertebral venous complex. Additionally, the vertebral body is the most common site to be affected compared with the posterior elements [10]. In our study, all cases had an affected vertebral body of C2. The clinical picture of metastatic involvement of the upper cervical region ranges from localized pain to a variable extent of the neurological deficits and even death induced by spinal cord compression [11, 12]. Occipitocervical pain occurred in approximately 89% to 100% of patients, was not linked to daily activities and worsened in the night [13, 14, 15]. All patients in our study presented with occipitocervical pain. Furthermore, given the relatively larger sagittal diameter of the C1 and C2 level compared to the counterpart of the subaxial cervical spine, the neurological deficit was overt only in the later stages. Hence, the preoperative JOA score was 10.1 ± 2.2 in our study.

With the development of internal fixators and surgical techniques, more invasive approaches were recommended for patients with upper cervical metastases who met strict selective criteria. The aim of the surgery for upper cervical metastases was to decompress the spinal cord, reconstruct spinal stability and obtain pain relief. The main goal was improving the quality of the remaining life rather than cure the disease. Previous studies suggested that metastases to the cervical spine have a worse prognosis than metastases to other sites [16, 17]. However, a recent matched pair analysis showed that metastatic spinal cord compression had similar clinical outcomes to those of thoracic and lumbar spine metastasis in terms of postoperative survival, surgery-related complication, and pain outcome [18].

Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) was widely used to avoid local recurrence of spinal metastases. However, TES also had adverse aspects, such as a longer operation time, massive blood loss and difficulty to perform in the upper cervical spine because of the distinct anatomy of the vertebral arteries and the complex bony architecture. In addition, the transoral approach to the operative field was deep and narrow and many complications may occur, such as mixed infection, speech change, tongue oedema, retropharyngeal haematoma or cerebrospinal fluid leakage [6]. Sakaura et al. [19] described that the recurrence rate was similar for palliative surgery compared with TES. In our study, we only observed one patient with recurrence.

Vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty was widely used on spinal metastases and had gained effective clinical results in patients with osteolytic spinal metastases. Recently, kyphoplasty was even applied in osteoblastic spinal metastases and caused a significant reduction of pain [20]. The mechanism of pain relief was thought to be that bone cement stopped vertebral micro- or macromovement and the destruction of pain receptors through exothermic reactions and chemical and toxic effects [21]. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) has a shorter operation period, minimal blood loss, rare intra-operative injuries and low cost [22]. The relief of pain was commensurate with an increase in activity, which in turn decreased the risk of concomitant infections and the need for further hospitalization. In our study, all patients experienced a certain extent improvement in occipitocervical pain and a decrease in VAS from 8.2 ± 0.4 to 2.3 ± 0.2. However, this method could not address the problem of spinal cord compression. Interestingly, several studies demonstrated that PMMA had an antitumoural effect, which may be due to the cytotoxicity, thermal effects and ischaemic effects [23, 24]. However, others proposed that the low recurrence rate was attributed to the short survival time rather than the antitumoural effect. Hence, the antitumoural effect needs further study. In addition, transoral PVP also had the demerits itself.

Therefore, posterior surgery combined with intraoperative vertebroplasty may be a feasible and less invasive method. Intraoperative vertebroplasty was accurate and visual to inject bone cement. In our study, cement extravasation was only detected in 1 case, but with no clinical significance (10%).This was overtly lower than PVP (51%) [25]. According to our experience, it was important that the cement injection was under high viscosity, with intraoperative fluoroscopy and preoperative evaluation of the integrity of the vertebral endplates and posterior wall of the vertebrae. Furthermore, laminectomy and removing the pedicles could provide a better way to perform vertebroplasty and the possibility of an immediate clearing of the leaked bone cement.

In our study, our patients had either impending instability or an unstable spine according to SINS, of which sensitivity and specificity was 96% and 80%, respectively [26]. If patients were in good clinical and stable oncological condition, extended posterior fixation (O-C5) was highly recommended [14]. Patients in our study were long-term bedridden and malnourished, with a mean age of 68.9 years. In addition, the upper cervical spine lacked the support of ribs, which was different from the thoracic spine. Thus, all these factors contributed to the decision to perform an extended posterior fixation. This could achieve the maximum and most long-lasting stability. The shorter posterior fixation might later become insufficient and increases the risk of reoperation. Due to the nature of palliative surgery, we do not ordinarily perform a bone graft. This was consistent with a previous study [27].

Lung, breast and prostate cancer were the 3 main tumours that metastasized to the spine [28, 29], which accounted for 80% in our study. The average survival time of our study was 12.8 months, which was within the range of previous studies, 3-18 months [2, 30]. Patients with primary tumours from lung and prostate had the worst prognosis and a relatively shorter survival time. This was consistent with previous studies [31]. It was worth noting that postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy were also important in terms of prolonging life and improving the quality of life. Treatment of spinal metastases is challenging and needs multidisciplinary collaboration.

There were several limitations. First, there was the nature of the retrospective study. Second, the number of patients included was relatively limited due to the rarity of this disease. Third, there was the absence of the control group. A larger controlled study is required to identify the efficacy of this method.

Conclusion

Posterior decompression and occipitocervical fixation followed by intraoperative vertebroplasty was a safe and valuable palliative method with relatively less invasion to treat metastatic involvement of the axis.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Capital Characteristic Clinical project of Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission.

Availability of data and materials

Data can be made available upon request to the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

MS T and XJ W participated in concept development, data generation, quality control of data, data analysis and interpretation, and writing of the manuscript. YN Q, FY and P Y were responsible for data analysis and participated in the interpretation and presentation of the data. XS T and QY H were involved in concept development, quality control of data and data analysis and interpretation. All authors have read and approved the final version of the submitted manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the local Medical Ethics Committee of China-Japan Friendship Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

The authors have received written consent from participants to publish individual patient data (clinical information and images).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    Ibrahim A, Crockard A, Antonietti P, Boriani S, Bunger C, Gasbarrini A, Grejs A, Harms J, Kawahara N, Mazel C, et al. Does spinal surgery improve the quality of life for those with extradural (spinal) osseous metastases? An international multicenter prospective observational study of 223 patients. Invited submission from the joint section meeting on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves, March 2007. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;8(3):271–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, Oda H, Oshima M, Ryu J. A revised scoring system for preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis. Spine. 2005;30(19):2186–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fehlings MG, David KS, Vialle L, Vialle E, Setzer M, Vrionis FD. Decision making in the surgical treatment of cervical spine metastases. Spine. 2009;34(22 Suppl):S108–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fourney DR, York JE, Cohen ZR, Suki D, Rhines LD, Gokaslan ZL. Management of atlantoaxial metastases with posterior occipitocervical stabilization. J Neurosurg. 2003;98(2 Suppl):165–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fung KY, Law SW. Management of malignant atlanto-axial tumours. J Orthop Surg. 2005;13(3):232–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frempong-Boadu AK, Faunce WA, Fessler RG. Endoscopically assisted transoral-transpharyngeal approach to the craniovertebral junction. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(5 Suppl):S60–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mont'Alverne F, Vallee JN, Cormier E, Guillevin R, Barragan H, Jean B, Rose M, Chiras J. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for metastatic involvement of the axis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26(7):1641–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rimondi E, Rossi G, Bartalena T, Ciminari R, Alberghini M, Ruggieri P, Errani C, Angelini A, Calabro T, Abati CN, et al. Percutaneous CT-guided biopsy of the musculoskeletal system: results of 2027 cases. Eur J Radiol. 2011;77(1):34–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kawahara N, Tomita K, Murakami H, Demura S. Total en bloc spondylectomy for spinal tumors: surgical techniques and related basic background. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009;40(1):47–63. viCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eleraky M, Setzer M, Vrionis FD. Posterior transpedicular corpectomy for malignant cervical spine tumors. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(2):257–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sciubba DM, Petteys RJ, Dekutoski MB, Fisher CG, Fehlings MG, Ondra SL, Rhines LD, Gokaslan ZL. Diagnosis and management of metastatic spine disease. A review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;13(1):94–108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Phillips E, Levine AM. Metastatic lesions of the upper cervical spine. Spine. 1989;14(10):1071–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mazel C, Balabaud L, Bennis S, Hansen S. Cervical and thoracic spine tumor management: surgical indications, techniques, and outcomes. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009;40(1):75–92. vi-viiCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Papp Z, Marosfoi M, Szikora I, Banczerowski P. Treatment of C-2 metastatic tumors with intraoperative transoral or transpedicular vertebroplasty and occipitocervical posterior fixation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21(6):886–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wu X, Ye Z, Pu F, Chen S, Wang B, Zhang Z, Yang C, Yang S, Shao Z. Palliative surgery in treating painful metastases of the upper cervical spine: case report and review of the literature. Medicine. 2016;95(18):e3558.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bartels RH, Feuth T, van der Maazen R, Verbeek AL, Kappelle AC, Andre Grotenhuis J, Leer JW. Development of a model with which to predict the life expectancy of patients with spinal epidural metastasis. Cancer. 2007;110(9):2042–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sciubba DM, Gokaslan ZL, Suk I, Suki D, Maldaun MV, McCutcheon IE, Nader R, Theriault R, Rhines LD, Shehadi JA. Positive and negative prognostic variables for patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic breast disease. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(10):1659–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lei M, Liu Y, Yan L, Tang C, Liu S, Zhou S. Posterior decompression and spine stabilization for metastatic spinal cord compression in the cervical spine. A matched pair analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41(12):1691–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Ishii T, Yonenobu K, Yoshikawa H. Outcome of total en bloc spondylectomy for solitary metastasis of the thoracolumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004;17(4):297–300.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang HT, Chen GD, Yang HL, Luo ZP. Percutaneous Kyphoplasty in the Treatment of Osteoblastic-related Spinal Metastases. Clin spine Surg. 2017;30:80–4.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Muijs SP, van Erkel AR, Dijkstra PD. Treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a brief review of the evidence for percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(9):1149–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Quraishi NA, Arealis G, Salem KM, Purushothamdas S, Edwards KL, Boszczyk BM. The surgical management of metastatic spinal tumors based on an Epidural Spinal Cord Compression (ESCC) scale. Spine J. 2015;15(8):1738–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    San Millan Ruiz D, Burkhardt K, Jean B, Muster M, Martin JB, Bouvier J, Fasel JH, Rufenacht DA, Kurt AM. Pathology findings with acrylic implants. Bone. 1999;25(2 Suppl):85S–90S.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brahimi Y, Antoni D, Buy X, Gangi A, Noel G. Bone metastases relapse after cementoplasty: case report and discussion about the combination of radiotherapy and cementoplasty. Cancer Radiother. 2016;20(2):109–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Potet J, Weber-Donat G, Curis E, Arnaud FX, Thome A, Valbousquet L, Peroux E, Geffroy Y, Bouzad C, Kervella Y, et al. Incidence of pulmonary cement embolism after real-time CT fluoroscopy-guided vertebroplasty. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(12):1853–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fourney DR, Frangou EM, Ryken TC, Dipaola CP, Shaffrey CI, Berven SH, Bilsky MH, Harrop JS, Fehlings MG, Boriani S, et al. Spinal instability neoplastic score: an analysis of reliability and validity from the spine oncology study group. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(22):3072–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Quan GM, Vital JM, Pointillart V. Outcomes of palliative surgery in metastatic disease of the cervical and cervicothoracic spine. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14(5):612–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sundaresan N, Boriani S, Rothman A, Holtzman R. Tumors of the osseous spine. J Neuro-Oncol. 2004;69(1-3):273–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mesfin A, Buchowski JM, Gokaslan ZL, Bird JE. Management of metastatic cervical spine tumors. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23(1):38–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Perrin RG, Laxton AW. Metastatic spine disease: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and evaluation of patients. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2004;15(4):365–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Leithner A, Radl R, Gruber G, Hochegger M, Leithner K, Welkerling H, Rehak P, Windhager R. Predictive value of seven preoperative prognostic scoring systems for spinal metastases. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(11):1488–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xinjie Wu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mingsheng Tan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yingna Qi
    • 1
    • 3
  • Ping Yi
    • 1
  • Feng Yang
    • 1
  • Xiangsheng Tang
    • 1
  • Qingying Hao
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Spinal SurgeryChina-Japan Friendship HospitalBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Graduate School of Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Graduate School of Beijing University of Chinese MedicineBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations