|
Adejumo 2020 [40]
|
x
|
x
| | | |
x
|
x
|
B
|
|
Ajayi 2013 [38]
|
x
|
x
|
x
| |
x
|
x
|
x
|
A
|
|
Bieh et al., 2017 [41]
|
x
|
x
|
x
| |
x
|
x
|
x
|
A
|
|
Ogbuabor 2020 [42]
|
x
|
x
| | |
x
|
x
|
x
|
B
|
|
Olukolade et al., 2017 [43]
|
x
|
x
| | |
x
|
x
| |
B
|
|
Okeibunor et al., 2006 [44]
|
x
|
x
| | |
x
|
x
|
x
|
B
|
|
Onyeneho 2010 [45]
|
x
|
x
| | |
x
|
x
|
x
|
B
|
|
Oshi et al., 2016 [46]
|
x
|
x
| | |
x
|
x
|
x
|
B
|
|
Ushie & Jegede 2012 [47]
|
x
|
x
| | |
x
|
x
|
x
|
B
|
|
Ukwaja et al 2017 [48]
|
x
|
x
|
x
| |
x
|
x
|
x
|
A
|
|
1-2 points = C, 3-5 points = B and 6-7 points = A
|
|
Quality assessment questions
|
|
Credibility
|
|
Data collection
|
• Were explanations of sampling strategies and data collection methods provided?
|
|
Auditability
|
• Was the method of data analysis described and enough data displayed to allow the reader to determine whether the interpretations made by the researcher is supported by the data?
|
|
Reflexivity
|
• Did the authors acknowledge the influence of the research process and the presence of the researcher including the role of prior biases, assumptions and experience, on the collected data?
|
|
Negative cases
|
• Has appropriate attention been given to contradictory data? Are negative cases taken into account?
|
|
Fair dealing
|
• Did the authors explore alternative, plausible explanations for the data collected and incorporate a range of different perspectives?
|
|
Relevance
|
|
Transferability
|
• Did the authors provide information regarding participants, setting and context so that the reader might be able to determine the relevance of the findings to other settings (transferability)?
|
|
Analytic generalization
|
• Did the authors discuss findings within a broader context, propose generalization of findings and/or suggest a direction for future research?
|
