Peer Review reports

From: Mutational concordance analysis provides supportive information for double cancer diagnosis

Original Submission
14 Nov 2020 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Dec 2020 Author responded Author comments - Keiichi Hatakeyama
25 Nov 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Petros Christopoulos
3 Dec 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Dec 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Jan 2021 Author responded Author comments - Keiichi Hatakeyama
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Jan 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 4
7 Jan 2021 Author responded Author comments - Keiichi Hatakeyama
Resubmission - Version 5
7 Jan 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 5
7 Jan 2021 Author responded Author comments - Keiichi Hatakeyama
Resubmission - Version 6
7 Jan 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 6
11 Jan 2021 Author responded Author comments - Keiichi Hatakeyama
Resubmission - Version 7
11 Jan 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 7
14 Jan 2021 Author responded Author comments - Keiichi Hatakeyama
Resubmission - Version 8
14 Jan 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 8
14 Jan 2021 Author responded Author comments - Keiichi Hatakeyama
Resubmission - Version 9
14 Jan 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 9
6 Feb 2021 Author responded Author comments - Keiichi Hatakeyama
18 Jan 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Petros Christopoulos
1 Feb 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 10
6 Feb 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
9 Feb 2021 Editorially accepted
19 Feb 2021 Article published 10.1186/s12885-021-07899-1

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page