The records of the 2,534 individual attendees who attended the HIV outpatient clinic between January 1st and December 31st, 2018, were included in this study. Table 1 shows the baseline demographics of the attendees.
Table 1 Baseline attendee demographics of the entire cohort The cohort comprised of 1854 male (73%) and 680 (27%) female attendees. Attendees ranged in age from 18 to 84 years. The median age was 42 years with an interquartile range of 35–50 years. Of the 680 female attendees, 362 (53%) were originally from Africa.
Regarding mode of HIV acquisition, MSM accounted for the largest cohort of attendees at 1220 (48% overall and 66% of men), followed by heterosexual acquisition 907 (36%), injection drug use 359 (14%) and the remaining 2% of cases comprising of 23 cases of infection acquisition from vertical transmissions, 15 from contaminated blood products, 8 from needlestick injuries and 2 with unknown modes of acquisition. Two attendees whose HIV acquisition risk was classed as MSM identified as female.
The median age of attendees whose mode of HIV acquisition was defined as heterosexual or PWID (people who inject drugs) was 44 years while in those whose acquisition status was defined as MSM or Other it was 39 and 31 years, respectively. Median age differed by region of origin. The region with the oldest median age of attendees was Ireland at 46 years. The region with the youngest median age of attendees was South America at 33 years.
Table 2 compares the census of attendees attending the clinic in 2013 with the clinic’s 2018 attendee census. The clinic cohort grew by more than one third (35%) between 2013 and 2018 (Table 2). The MSM cohort increased by 495 (68%) during this time. By 2018, 48% of attendees identified as MSM compared to 39% in 2013. There was a substantial increase in attendees from South America (increased by 284%), North and Central America (increased by 122%) and Europe (increased by 62%), with South American attendees accounting for more than 10% of all attendees in 2018 (this figure was 4% in 2013). MSM was the identified acquisition risk for 84% of the South American cohort. 1,193 (47%) of attendees in 2018 were originally from Ireland, 554 (22%) from Africa, 373 (15%) from Europe, 280 (11%) from South America, 87 (3%) from Asia and Australasia (3%) and 40 (2%) from North & Central America.
Table 2 Change in demographics of clinic attendees in 2013 compared to 2018 attendees Table 3 examines the demographics of 2018 attendee attendees by year of their first clinic attendance. Attendees were split into two groups; (1) attendees who first attended between 1987 (when the clinic was founded) and 2013 inclusive, and (2) attendees who first attended between 2014 and 2018 inclusive. Those who first attended from 2014 onwards were older at their first visit compared to those who first attended from 1987 to 2013 (mean age 35.7 vs. 32.9 years, p < 0.001). A higher proportion of attendees who first attended from 2014 onwards were male (84 vs. 66%, p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in attendees whose acquisition risk was identified as MSM (68 vs. 36%, p < 0.001), but a decrease in those whose acquisition risk was heterosexual (25% v 42%, p < 0.001) and PWID (5 vs. 20%, p < 0.001). No significant change was seen in those from the “other” category.
Table 3 Age, gender and acquisition risk factors of 2018 attendees, analysed by their date of first clinic attendance—sub-analysis Table 4 explores the change in reported regions of origin of 2018 attendees over time by year of first clinic attendance. In comparison to attendees who first attended between 1987 and 2013 inclusive, attendees whose first attendance was from 2014 onwards were less likely to be originally from Ireland (32 vs. 56%, p < 0.001), and Africa (15 vs. 26%, p < 0.001), but more likely to be from South America (25 vs. 3%, p < 0.001), Europe (20 vs. 12%, p < 0.001), Asia and Australasia (5 vs. 3%, p = 0.007) and North America (3 vs. 1%, p < 0.001).
Table 4 Region of origin of 2018 attendees, analysed by their date of first clinic attendance—sub-analysis Table 5 shows the available baseline measles (n = 990), mumps (n = 998), rubella (n = 997) and VZV (n = 1522) IgG serology results of our clinic attendees, along with univariate analysis of these figures. As can be seen from this table, a significant proportion of attendees were seronegative at baseline for measles (16%), mumps (17%) and rubella IgG (11%). 329 (33%) of attendees were seronegative for one or more of measles, mumps and rubella IgG. 5% of the cohort with available results were seronegative for VZV IgG.
Table 5 Breakdown of measles, mumps, rubella and VZV IgG results with associated univariate variable p values On univariate analysis, male gender (p = 0.007), MSM (p < 0.001), belonging to the “other” acquisition risk category group (p = 0.035), being originally from Europe (p < 0.001) and South America (p < 0.001) were associated with measles IgG seronegativity. Female gender (p = 0.007), heterosexual acquisition risk category (p < 0.001), being originally from Ireland (p < 0.001), Africa (p < 0.001), Asia & Australasia (p = 0 0.017) and older age (p < 0.001) were associated with measles IgG seropositivity. MSM acquisition risk (p = 0.012), being in the “other” acquisition risk category (p = 0.045) and being originally from South America (p = 0.002) were associated with mumps IgG seronegativity on univariate analysis. Belonging to the heterosexual acquisition risk category (p = 0.042), PWID status (p = 0.013), being originally from Africa (p = 0.005) and older age (p < 0.001) were associated with mumps IgG positivity. Belonging to the “other” acquisition risk category (p = 0.018), being originally from North America (p = 0.011) and Asia & Australasia (p = 0.047) were associated with rubella IgG seronegativity on univariate analysis. Being originally from Ireland (p = 0.011) and older age (p < 0.001) were associated with rubella IgG seropositivity. Being originally from Ireland (p = 0.025) and older age (p = 0.008) were associated with VZV IgG seropositivity on univariate analysis.
Table 6 examines measles, mumps, rubella and VZV IgG seropositivity of 2018 attendees, stratified into two groups; those whose first attendance was between 1987 and 2013 inclusive, and those whose first attendance was between 2014 and 2018 inclusive. Those who first attended from 2014 onwards were significantly less likely to exhibit measles IgG positivity (81 vs. 94%, p < 0.001), but more likely to exhibit VZV IgG positivity (96% v 94%, p = 0.045). No significant difference was seen in mumps IgG or rubella IgG seropositivity.
Table 6 Measles, mumps, rubella and VZV IgG serology results of 2018 attendees, analysed by their date of first clinic attendance–sub-analysis Univariate variables with p < 0.2 were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model for further analysis. The acquisition risk category “other” was omitted from Measles IgG and Mumps IgG multivariate analysis due to collinearity. On multivariate analysis (Table 9), older attendees were less likely to exhibit seronegativity for measles IgG (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.88–0.94, p < 0.001), mumps IgG (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95–0.99, p = 0.001), rubella IgG (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94–0.98, p = 0.001) and VZV IgG (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94–0.99, p = 0.007). Age was the only statistically significant variable seen on multivariate analysis for measles IgG among the measured variables. MSM (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09–0.91, p = 0.034) and PWID attendees (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01–0.45, p = 0.005) were significantly less likely to exhibit mumps IgG seronegativity on multivariate analysis, along with attendees of African origin (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21–0.82, p = 0.012). Gender was significantly associated with rubella IgG results, with female attendees more likely to be seronegative compared to their male counterparts (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.02–2.61, p = 0.042). Those of North American (OR 3.37, 95% CI 1.34–8.47, p = 0.010) and Asian & Australasian origin (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.05–4.72, p = 0.036) origin were more likely to exhibit Rubella IgG seronegativity. In relation to VZV IgG status, those whose HIV acquisition risk was deemed to be PWID (OR 3.11, 95% CI 1.32–7.31, p = 0.009) were more likely to exhibit VZV IgG seronegativity.
Table 7 shows results and univariate analysis for available hepatitis A IgG, hepatitis B sAg, cAb and sAb results.
Table 7 Breakdown of hepatitis A IgG, hepatitis B sAg, hepatitis B cAb and hepatitis C Ab results with associated univariate variable p values 21% of 2018 attendees with available baseline Hepatitis A IgG results (n = 2294) were seronegative (Table 7). Male gender (p < 0.001), MSM (p < 0.001), being originally from Europe (p < 0.001) and South America (p < 0.001) were associated with hepatitis A IgG seronegativity on univariate analysis. Female gender (p < 0.001), PWID (p < 0.001), heterosexuals (p < 0.001), being originally from Ireland (p = 0.015), from Africa (p < 0.001) and older age (p < 0.001) were associated with hepatitis A IgG seropositivity. 3% of the 2322 attendees with available baseline Hepatitis B sAg results were positive for Hepatitis B sAg. MSM (p < 0.001), being originally from Ireland (p < 0.001) and South America (p = 0.031) were associated with hepatitis B sAg seronegativity on univariate analysis. Heterosexual status (p < 0.001) and being originally from Africa were significantly associated with hepatitis B sAg seropositivity. Of attendees with available baseline hepatitis B cAb results (n = 1879), 32% exhibited seropositivity. Male gender (p < 0.001), MSM (p < 0.001), being originally from Ireland (p = 0.004) and South America (p < 0.001) were associated with hepatitis B cAb seronegativity on univariate analysis. Female gender (p < 0.001), heterosexual status (p = 0.001), PWID (p < 0.001), being from Africa (p < 0.001) and older age (p < 0.001) were associated with hepatitis B cAb seropositivity. 64% of clinic attendees were classed as having hepatitis B sAb results ≥ 10mIU. Female gender (p = 0.001), heterosexual status (p < 0.001), PWID (p = 0.004) and being from Africa was associated with hepatitis B sAb levels < 10mIU. Male gender (p = 0.001), MSM status (p < 0.001) and being from South America (p = 0.017) was associated with hepatitis B sAb levels ≥ 10mIU.
Table 8 examines the 2018 attendees when they are split into two groups: those who first attended the clinic from its inception in 1987 up to and including 2013, and those who first attended the clinic from 2014 onwards. The analyses in this table demonstrates how 2018 attendees who first attended the clinic from 2014 onwards were less likely to exhibit hepatitis A IgG positivity (66% v 88%, p < 0.001), less likely to demonstrate hepatitis B sAg positivity (2% v 4%, p = 0.026) and less likely to demonstrate hepatitis B cAb positivity (25% v 39%, p < 0.001) in comparison to those who first attended the clinic between 1987 and 2013. No statistically significant difference was exhibited among the two groups in terms of hepatitis B sAb response, with a similar proportion of both groups demonstrating hepatitis B sAb ≥ 10mIU (65% v 62%, p = 0.167).
Table 8 Hepatitis A IgG, hepatitis B sAg, hepatitis B cAb and hepatitis b sAb results from 2018 attendees, analysed by their date of first clinic attendance—sub-analysis Table 9 Multivariate analysis of serological results incorporating univariate variables with p < 0.2 On multivariate analysis (Table 9), older clinic attendees (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.93–0.96, p < 0.001), attendees whose HIV acquisition risk was classed as PWID (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.09–0.57, p = 0.001) and those originally of African origin (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.06–0.24, p < 0.001) were significantly less likely to exhibit hepatitis A IgG seronegativity. Being originally of European (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.13–3.01, p = 0.015) and South American (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.00–2.76, p = 0.048) origin was significantly associated with hepatitis A IgG seronegativity.
Multivariate analysis revealed statistically significant associations between seropositivity and increasing age (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.05–1.08, P < 0.001), PWID status (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.92–11.01, p = 0.001) and being originally of African origin (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.92–11.01, p < 0.001). Those of Irish origin were statistically less likely to exhibit Hepatitis B cAb seropositivity (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.33–0.59, P < 0.001).
No variables were significantly associated with hepatitis B cAb seropositivity or hepatitis B immunity on multivariate analysis.