BMC Plant Biology

, 18:59 | Cite as

Analyses of starch biosynthetic protein complexes and starch properties from developing mutant rice seeds with minimal starch synthase activities

  • Mari Hayashi
  • Naoko Crofts
  • Naoko F. Oitome
  • Naoko Fujita
Open Access
Research article
  • 139 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Biochemistry and physiology

Abstract

Background

Starch is the major component of cereal grains and is composed of essentially linear amylose and highly branched amylopectin. The properties and composition of starch determine the use and value of grains and their products. Starch synthase (SS) I, SSIIa, and SSIIIa play central roles in amylopectin biosynthesis. These three SS isozymes also affect seed development, as complete loss of both SSI and SSIIIa under reduced SSIIa activity in rice lead to sterility, whereas presence of minimal SSI or SSIIIa activity is sufficient for generating fertile seeds. SSs, branching enzymes, and/or debranching enzymes form protein complexes in cereal. However, the relationship between starch properties and the formation of protein complexes remain largely unknown. To better understand this phenomenon, properties of starch and protein complex formation were analyzed using developing mutant rice seeds (ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a) in which all three major SS activities were reduced.

Results

The SS activity of ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a was 25%–30% that of the wild-type. However, the grain weight of ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a was 89% of the wild-type, 55% of which was starch, showing considerable starch synthesis. The reduction of soluble SS activity in ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a resulted in increased levels of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase and granule-bound starch synthase I, which are responsible for substrate synthesis and amylose synthesis, respectively. Together, these features led to an increase in apparent amylose content (34%) in ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a compared with wild-type (20%). Gel filtration chromatography of the soluble proteins in ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a showed that the majority of the starch biosynthetic enzymes maintained the similar elution patterns as wild-type, except that the amounts of high-molecular-weight SSI (> 300 kDa) were reduced and SSIIa of approximately 200–300 kDa were present instead of those > 440 kDa, which predominate in wild-type. Immuno-precipitation analyses suggested that the interaction between the starch biosynthetic enzymes maybe reduced or weaker than in wild-type.

Conclusions

Although major SS isozymes were simultaneously reduced in ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a rice, active protein complexes were formed with a slightly altered pattern, suggesting that the assembly of protein complexes may be complemented among the SS isozymes. In addition, ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a maintained the ability to synthesize starch and accumulated less amylopectin and more amylose in starch.

Keywords

Amylopectin Amylose Starch synthase Protein complexes Rice (Oryza sativa

Abbreviations

ADP-glucose

Adenosine diphosphate-glucose

AGPase

ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase

BE

Starch branching enzyme

DAF

Days after flowering

DBE

Debranching enzymes

DP

Degree of polymerization

Fr

Fraction

GBSSI

Granule-bound starch synthase I

ISA

Isoamylase

PAGE

Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

Pho

Phosphorylase

PUL

Pullulanase

SDS

Sodium dodecyl sulfate

SNPs

Single nucleotide polymorphisms

SS

Starch synthase

Background

Starch is a high-molecular-weight glucose polymer consisting of essentially linear amylose and highly branched amylopectin. Starch utilized for food and industrial applications is primarily accumulated in the storage tissues of green plants. In cereals, starch accumulation is directly associated with yield and is the most important agricultural trait. Starch is synthesized through the concerted activities of at least four classes of enzymes [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]: starch synthase (SS; EC 2.4.1.21), which functions in the elongation of α-1,4 linear chains of starch using adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-glucose as a substrate produced by ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase; EC 2.7.7.27); starch branching enzyme (BE; EC 2.4.1.18), which forms α-1,6 branch points of amylopectin; debranching enzymes (DBE), which removes improper branches in amylopectin such as isoamylase (ISA; EC 3.2.1.68) and pullulanase (PUL; EC 3.2.1.41). In addition to these enzymes, phosphorylase (Pho; EC 2.4.1.1) is thought to be involved in the initiation process of starch biosynthesis [6, 7, 8]. Multiple isozymes are present in these four classes of enzymes in higher plants.

The SS family has the largest number of isozymes encoded by eleven different genes in most rice cultivars. Among these, SSI, SSIIa, SSIIIa, and GBSSI are highly expressed in the developing rice endosperm [9, 10]. Rice cultivars are divided into two groups; indica and japonica cultivars. The activity of SSIIa in the japonica cultivars is only 10% of that of the indica cultivar due to the three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the gene [11]. Since SSIIa is almost inactive in japonica cultivars (SS1/ss2a L /SS3a) [11], SSI and SSIIIa account for 60% and 30% of the SS activity, respectively, in the soluble fraction of the developing endosperm. Thus, SSI and SSIIIa are mainly responsible for elongation of amylopectin chains in japonica cultivars [12]. We have isolated multiple allelic ss1 mutant lines from a retrotransposon (Tos17) insertion line derived from the japonica rice cultivar, Nipponbare (SS1/ss2a L /SS3a). Among these, the ss1 null mutant (e7: ss1/ss2a L /SS3a) has no SSI activity due to the insertion of Tos17 into exon 7 of the SSI gene, and the ss1 leaky mutant (ss1 L ) (i2–1: ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a) has only 20% of the SSI activity of the wild-type (SS1/ss2a L /SS3a) due to the insertion of Tos17 into intron 2 of the SSI gene [12]. We have also isolated the ss3a null mutant line (e1: SS1/ss2a L /ss3a), which has no SSIIIa activity due to the insertion of Tos17 into exon 1 of the SSIIIa gene [13]. A complete deficiency of both SSI and SSIIIa activities in the rice ss1/ss3a null double mutant (e7 x e1: ss1/ss2a L /ss3a) led to sterility. However, opaque seeds were obtained in mutants heterozygous for one of these genes (ss1ss1/ ss2a L ss2a L /SS3ass3a or SS1ss1/ ss2a L ss2a L /ss3ass3a) [14]. These findings suggest that either SSI or SSIII is essential for starch biosynthesis in conditions of low SSIIa activity such as occurs in japonica rice endosperm. Moreover, the double recessive mutant line produced by crossing the leaky ss1 mutant [12] with the ss3a null mutant (i2–1 x e1) [13] was fertile [14]. The endosperm starch granules of this mutant were round in comparison to the parent mutant lines and wild-type, with several gaps between the starch granules and amyloplasts [15]. The chain-length profile of ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a endosperm starch by capillary electrophoresis was essentially similar to that of SS1/ss2a L /ss3a [14, 15]; the levels of amylopectin branch chains with DP ≤10 and 30 ≤ DP ≤60 were reduced, and the levels of chains with 11 ≤ DP ≤15 were higher, compared with wild-type (SS1/ss2a L /SS3a). By contrast, the levels of chains with 16 ≤ DP ≤24 were also higher in ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a than in wild-type (SS1/ss2a L /SS3a), indicating that the chain-length distribution pattern of the double mutant is an additive trait from both parent mutant lines [14]. However, the alteration in the chain-length profile of ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a was more pronounced in the range of DP ≤20 than that calculated by adding the profiles of the ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a and SS1/ss2a L /ss3a lines, indicating that the reduced SSI activity has an additive effect on the chain-length distribution of amylopectin in the SS1/ss2a L /ss3a background, with a slight synergistic enhancement [14, 15]. The gelatinization temperature of ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a starch was 3 °C higher than that of wild-type (SS1/ss2a L /SS3a), and the viscosity of gelatinized starch was lower than that of wild-type (SS1/ss2a L /SS3a) [15].

Starch biosynthetic enzymes in developing cereal endosperms have been shown to associate as protein-protein complexes [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23], and some of those interactions are regulated in a phosphorylation-dependent manner [24]. SS isozymes, including SSI, SSIIa and SSIIIa, in developing rice endosperm also form high-molecular-weight protein complexes with starch biosynthesis activities [23]. The analyses of protein complex formation from reduced SS activities should provide valuable information for understanding the relationships between protein complex formation and starch biosynthesis.

In the present study, we analyzed the detailed structure of endosperm starch by gel-filtration chromatography in the ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a, as well as the effects of low SS activity in the soluble fraction on the protein complex component during starch biosynthesis and the activities of other starch biosynthetic enzymes.

Methods

Plant materials

The ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a [14] was generated by crossing a leaky mutant for SSI activity (ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a, i2–1) [12] with a null mutant for SSIIIa activity (SS1/ss2a L /ss3a, e1) [13]. The parental cultivar Nipponbare (SS1/ss2a L /SS3a, Nip) and parental mutant lines (ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a and SS1/ss2a L /ss3a) were also used in the experiments. Rice plants were grown during the summer of 2009 (for gel filtration chromatography of starch) and 2013 (for all experiments) in an experimental paddy field at Akita Prefectural University, Japan, under natural environmental conditions.

Starch granule purification

Starch granules were purified from polished mature rice seeds free of embryos using the cold-alkali method [25, 26].

Starch contents in grains

The starch contents of rice seeds were measured using the methods of Fujita et al. [27].

Native-PAGE/activity staining

Native-PAGE/activity staining of SS and DBE were performed as described by Abe et al. [28]. BE activity staining was performed on 5% (w/v) acrylamide slab gels containing 0.0001% (w/v) oyster glycogen (G8751, Sigma) according to Abe et al. [28], with the addition of glucose-1-phosphate at a final concentration of 0.1 M. AGPase activity was quantified as described previously [29].

Enzyme assays

Total SS activities in the soluble proteins were measured as described by Nishi et al. [30] with some modifications. The initial SS reaction was performed in a total volume of 80 μL consisting 50 mM bicine-NaOH, pH 7.4, 0 or 250 mM citrate-NaOH, pH 7.5, 20 mM DTT, 8 mM ADP-glucose, 0 or 2 mg/mL oyster glycogen, and 8 μL of soluble extract prepared by extracting approximately 12 mg of developing rice endosperm with 100 μL of buffer containing 50 mM imidazole-HCl, pH 7.4, 8 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTT, and 10 μL/mL protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma). Reactions were performed at 30 °C and terminated at 0 or 20 min by boiling. Secondary reactions were performed in a total volume of 400 μL containing 12.5 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.4, 2.5 mM phosphocreatine, 50 mM KCl, 25 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTT, 0.3 units of creatine kinase, and the SS reaction. The final citrate concentration was equalized since the presence of citrate interferes with the secondary reaction. The mixture was incubated at 37 °C overnight, terminated by boiling and centrifuged. The final reactions were performed in 500 μL containing 300 μL of the second reaction and 50 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.4, 8 mM MgCl2, 4 mM glucose, and 0.4 mM NADP+. The maximum O.D. at 340 nm was measured after addition of hexokinase (0.5 U) and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (1.5 μg).

Immuno-blotting

Immuno-blotting was performed as described by Crofts et al. [23, 31] using antiserum raised against SSI, SSIIa, SSIIIa, SSIVb, GBSSI, BEI, BEIIa, BEIIb, ISA1, PUL, and Pho1.

Gel filtration chromatography of proteins and immuno-precipitation

Gel filtration chromatography was performed using mid-developing seeds (DAF12–15) as described [23]. The eluted materials were analyzed by zymogram and immuno-blotting after Native-PAGE and SDS-PAGE as described [23]. Immuno-precipitation was also performed as described [23]. The control experiments were performed using pre-immune serum.

Size fractionation of starch and amylose content analysis

Gel filtration chromatography of debranched starch was performed as described [31].

Results

Estimation of the remaining soluble SS activity in the double mutant by Native-PAGE

To estimate the remaining soluble SS activity in the double mutant, two distinct methods were utilized. First, semi-quantitative native-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) was performed using the soluble protein fraction from developing endosperm at 12 days after flowering (DAF) (Fig. 1a). This method visualizes the activities of specific SS isozymes, particularly SSI and SSIIIa. Lanes marked “a” contain twice the amount of samples in lanes marked “b” and four times the amount in lanes marked “c”. The intensity of the SSI activity band of ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a in “a” was similar to that of wild-type in “b”, although “b” contained only half of the volume of soluble protein loaded onto lane “a”, indicating that the SSI activity of ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a was ca. 50% of wild-type. The SSIIIa activity band was completely absent in ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a. SSI and SSIIIa activities in developing endosperm of wild-type japonica rice (SS1/ss2a L /SS3a) analyzed by zymogram are estimated to be 50%–60% and 30% of the total SS activities, respectively [13, 14]. Therefore, the remaining SS activity in ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a was estimated to be approximately 25%–30% of the total SS activity of the wild-type (SS1/ss2a L /SS3a).
Fig. 1

Zymograms of soluble starch biosynthetic enzyme activities. Native-PAGE/activity staining of starch synthases (SSs; Panel a), branching enzymes (BEs; Panel b), and debranching enzymes (DBEs; Panel c) using developing endosperm of double mutant, parental mutant, and wild-type lines. Black arrowheads and brackets indicate SSI, SSIIIa, BEI, BEIIa, BEIIb, ISA (isoamylase), PUL (pullulanase), and Pho1 (phosphorylase) activity bands. Gray arrowheads in A indicate glycosyl hydrolase or transferase activities. Soluble protein extracts were prepared from developing endosperm at 12 days after flowering. The volumes of crude extract applied to the native gels in section ‘a’ were 2-fold and 4-fold greater than those applied in sections ‘b’ and ‘c’, respectively

Estimating the remaining soluble SS activity in the double mutant by measuring total SS activity

The bulk of the SS activity in the soluble extract from developing endosperm was measured in the test tubes in the presence or absence of citrate and/or glycogen (Table 1) because citrate stimulates SSI and SSIIa, but not SSIIIa [32, 33, 34], and glucan primers are necessary for SSIIIa, but not for SSI [12, 34]. The requirements of citrate and glucan primers for other SS isozymes are currently unknown. The results showed that total SS activities were higher for all lines in the presence of both citrate and glycogen in comparison to the absence of either citrate or glycogen.
Table 1

Starch synthase and AGPase activity in developing seeds (10–15 days after flowering) of double mutants, their parental lines, and wild-type

 

Starch synthase

AGPase

Line

μmol min−1 endosperm-1 a

μmol min− 1 endosperm-1, a

+ Citrate

+Glycogen

+ Citrate

-Glycogen

- Citrate

+ Glycogen

SS1/ss2a L /SS3a (Wild-type; Nipponbare)

11.09 ± 1.2

(100) b

2.22 ± 0

(100) c

1.17 ± 0

(100) d

0.259 ± 0.020 **

(100) e

ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a

(i2–1)

5.28 ± 0.1

(48)

N.D.

(0)

1.04 ± 0.2

(89)

0.245 ± 0.014**

(95)

SS1/ss2a L /ss3a

(e1)

13.23 ± 0.5

(119)

5.36 ± 0.1

(241)

1.62 ± 0.1

(139)

0.324 ± 0.006*, **

(125)

ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a

(#6002)

6.67 ± 0.6

(60)

N.D.

(0)

0.76 ± 0.4

(73)

0.506 ± 0.031*

(196)

ND, Not detected

aMean ± SE. n = 3 for all lines

b, c, d, ePercentage of wild-type, Nipponbare

*Significant differences between Nipponbare and mutant lines by the t-test at P < 0.05

**Significant differences between double mutant line and the other lines by the t-test at P < 0.05

In the presence of both citrate and glycogen, the total SS activity of ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a was 48% of wild-type, while that of SS1/ss2a L /ss3a and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a was 119% and 60% of wild-type, respectively (Table 1). SS activity of ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a was 1.2-fold higher than that of ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a.

In the presence of citrate and the absence of glycogen—in which most of the SS activity is derived from SSI—, SS activities of ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a were below the detection limit, perhaps due to low abundance of SSI, while that of SS1/ss2a L /ss3a was 241% of wild-type (Table 1). These findings were consistent with an earlier observation [12]. In the absence of citrate and the presence of glucan primer—in which most of the SS activities derived from SSIIIa but also minor SSI activity, is detected —, SS activities of SS1/ss2a L /ss3a were 139% of wild-type, while that of ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a (73% of the wild-type) was lower than ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a (89% of wild-type) (Table 1).

The effects of reduced SS activity on other starch biosynthetic enzymes

Next, the effects of the reduced SS activity in the soluble protein fraction on the activities of other starch biosynthetic enzymes were analyzed by semi-quantitative native-PAGE/activity staining (Fig. 1b; c). The activities of BEs (BEI, BEIIa and BEIIb), DBEs (ISA1 and PUL), and Pho1 in ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a were not significantly different from those of wild-type. By contrast, the AGPase activity of SS1/ss2a L /ss3a and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a was 1.25- and 1.96-times higher than that of wild-type, respectively (Table 1).

Expression levels of starch biosynthetic enzymes in developing rice seeds and the degree of binding to starch granules

To further examine the expression of starch biosynthetic isozymes in the rice endosperm and the degree of starch granule binding, total protein, soluble protein, loosely bound protein, and tightly bound protein were extracted from the developing rice seeds (see Methods) and analyzed by immuno-blotting using antiserum against each starch biosynthetic enzyme (Fig. 2). The results of immuno-blotting of total and soluble fractions using SSI antibodies were correlated to the strength of SSI activity from the soluble protein fractions (Fig. 1a); that is, the strongest and weakest SSI bands were detected in SS1/ss2a L /ss3a and ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a, respectively, among the four lines examined, and the bands from ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a were slightly more intense than those from ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a (Fig. 2). SSIIa bands from the total protein fractions of the three mutant lines were more intense than those of wild-type. Among the soluble protein fractions, the SSIIa band from ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a was the most intense, followed by ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a. Among the tightly bound protein fractions, the SSIIa band from ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a was extremely intense, whereas SSIIa levels in the loosely bound protein fractions were similar in all four lines. These results implied that some SSIIa protein in the double mutant was tightly bound to starch granules. SSIIIa was absent from SS1/ss2a L /ss3a and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a, and was not detected in the tightly bound protein fractions. Most of the GBSSI protein was detected in the tightly bound protein fractions, and the GBSSI bands were stronger in SS1/ss2a L /ss3a and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a than in wild-type and ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a. BEI bands were detected in the soluble protein and loosely bound protein fractions. The BEI band in the loosely bound protein fraction was weaker in ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a than in the other lines. BEIIb bands were detected in every fraction. Among the tightly bound protein fractions, the BEIIb band in ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a was more intense than those of wild-type and SS1/ss2a L /ss3a. By contrast, among loosely bound protein fractions, the PUL band from ss3a was more intense than those of the other lines. There was no significant difference in the levels of the other isozymes (SSIVb, BEIIa, ISA1, and Pho1) among the four lines in all fractions examined (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Enzyme distributions in protein fractions from developing endosperm. Immuno-blotting of total protein extract, the soluble protein fraction, the loosely bound protein fraction, and the tightly bound protein fraction from developing endosperm at 12 days after flowering using the indicated antibodies

Molecular weight distributions of starch biosynthetic protein complexes in rice lines with reduced SS activity

To determine the effects of the SSIIIa deficiency and reduced SSI and SSIIa activities on the protein-protein complex formation of starch biosynthetic enzymes, crude extract from developing endosperm from ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a and the parental lines was subjected to gel filtration chromatography. The fractions were analyzed by denaturing SDS-PAGE, native-PAGE activity staining and their respective immuno-blotting (Figs. 3 and 4, Additional file 1).
Fig. 3

Molecular weight distributions of SS isozymes from developing rice endosperm determined by gel filtration chromatography. Soluble proteins were separated by gel filtration chromatography. Fractions were denatured and separated by SDS-PAGE, and immuno-blotting was performed using the indicated antibodies

Fig. 4

SS activities were visualized by non-denaturing zymograms using rice starch biosynthetic enzymes separated by gel filtration chromatography. Black arrowheads show the activities of the indicated SS isozymes. Gray arrowheads represent glycosyl hydrolase or glucan transferase activities. White arrowheads are SS activity bands found only in ss3a

To determine the size distributions of specific starch biosynthetic enzymes present in the protein complexes of developing rice endosperm, the eluted materials from gel filtration chromatography were denatured, separated by SDS-PAGE and detected using isozyme specific antibodies (Fig. 3 and Additional file 1). The strength of the immuno-blot signals on the different membranes was equalized using the loading control to compare the signals from the different lines.

The elution patterns and amounts of SSI were considerably different among the analyzed lines (Fig. 3). ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a had lower SSI signals in all fractions compared with wild-type, particularly in Fr. 4 to 8 (< 700 kDa), while SS1/ss2a L /ss3a showed stronger SSI signals, particularly in Fr. 2–5 (> 700 kDa) (Fig. 3). The elution patterns of SSIIa in ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a were similar to those of wild-type, while those of SS1/ss2a L /ss3a and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a were different (Fig. 3). The SSIIa signal of SS1/ss2a L /ss3a in Fr. 4 was increased, but those of Fr. 5 and 6 were decreased (Fig. 3). The amount of SSIIa in the soluble fraction was increased in ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a compared with wild-type (Fig. 2, Soluble protein). However, the majority of SSIIa was eluted in Fr. 8 to 10 (Fig. 3). SSIIIa was eluted in Fr. 2 to 6 (> 440 kDa) in wild-type and ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a, but it was absent in SS1/ss2a L /ss3a and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a as expected (Fig. 3). SSIIIa signals were detected as multiple bands, but all of these bands were absent in SS1/ss2a L /ss3a and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a, confirming that the bands were derived from SSIIIa (Fig. 3). The elution patterns of SSIVb in ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a, SS1/ss2a L /ss3a and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a were shifted towards a high molecular weight. The amount of SSIVb in Fr. 3 and 4 (> 700 kDa) in SS1/ss2a L /ss3a and in Fr. 4 to 6 in ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a were increased (Fig. 3). The elution patterns of BEs and DBEs were similar among wild-type, ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a and SS1/ss2a L /ss3a, but the amounts of these enzymes in ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a were slightly reduced (Additional file 1). Overall, a reduction of major SS activities, namely, SSI and SSIIIa, under a low SSIIa background altered complex formation of SS isozymes such as SSI, SSIIa, and SSIVb.

Native-PAGE/activity staining and immuno-blotting of protein complexes separated by gel filtration chromatography

To assess whether starch biosynthetic enzymes eluted in the high-molecular-weight fractions retained their activities, the fractions eluted from the gel filtration column were concentrated and analyzed by Native-PAGE activity staining (Fig. 4).

SSI activity was observed in Fr. 6 to 13 (43 to 440 kDa) in wild-type and SS1/ss2a L /ss3a, and the activity of SSI in those fractions was higher in SS1/ss2a L /ss3a compared with wild-type (Fig. 4). SSI activity in ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a was barely detectable in Fr. 9 to 13 (43–153 kDa) (Fig. 4). SSI activity was correlated to the amounts of SSI in each fraction (Figs. 3 and 4) and the expression levels of SSI in each line (Fig. 2). SSIIIa activity was observed in Fr. 2 to 5 (> 440 kDa) in wild-type and ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a, and SSIIIa activity of ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a in Fr. 3 and 4 was stronger than that of wild-type (Fig. 4). SSIIIa activity was absent in SS1/ss2a L /ss3a and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a as expected (Fig. 4). Brown activity bands indicated in gray were also detected in the absence of ADP-glucose (Additional file 2), suggesting that they were the outcome of the activities of glycosyl hydrolase or glucan transferase, not starch synthase [23]. SS1/ss2a L /ss3a had additional SS activity bands indicated with white arrowheads, and these were likely to be protein complexes containing SSI as confirmed by immunoblotting (Fig. 4, Additional file 3). Immuno-blotting of the corresponding SS Native-PAGE gel confirmed that the indicated activity bands were SSI and SSIIIa (Additional file 3). Multiple SSI immuno-blot signals were detected in Fr. 5–9 (153–440 kDa) of SS1/ss2a L /ss3a (white arrowheads in Additional file 3). Although SSIIa and SSIVb activity could not be detected by zymogram (Fig. 4), both proteins were present on the native-PAGE gel (Additional file 3). SSIVb migrated closely to the very fast migrating band indicated in gray (Additional file 3). The activities of BEs, DBEs and Pho1 on the native-PAGE gel and their corresponding immuno-blotting of all lines were essentially the same as wild-type [23] (data not shown). Differences in western blotting patterns after native-PAGE and SDS-PAGE may be a result of less abundant differentially migrating proteins on native-PAGE that were below the detection limit of western blotting.

Co-immuno-precipitation analyses to determine the association of starch biosynthetic enzymes in developing rice endosperm

To assess the differences in compositions of starch biosynthetic protein complexes, co-immuno-precipitation experiments were performed using soluble proteins obtained from developing rice seeds of wild-type, ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a, SS1/ss2a L /ss3a, ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a, and isozyme specific antibodies. The control experiments were performed using pre-immune serum. The results obtained for wild-type were generally consistent with a previous study showing the interaction of SSI-SSIIa, SSIIa-SSIIIa, and BEIIb-SSIIa, (Fig. 5 and [23]); however, the associations of SS isozymes with other isozymes were not detected in ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a, SS1/ss2a L /ss3a and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a (Fig. 5). The interactions between BEI-BEIIb, BEI-PUL and Pho1-BEIIa in all lines were essentially the same as in wild-type [23] (Additional file 4). The immuno-precipitation results suggested alterations in protein complex formation, with potentially weaker interactions in the mutant lines.
Fig. 5

Analyses of protein-protein interactions between rice starch biosynthetic isozymes by co-immunoprecipitation. Immuno-precipitation experiments were performed using the isozyme specific antibodies indicated above and the soluble protein extract from wild-type, ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a, SS1/ss2a L /ss3a and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a. Immuno-blotting was performed using the antibodies indicated on the right

The effects of reduced SS activity on seed morphology, grain weight, and starch contents

Wild-type and ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a and SS1/ss2a L /ss3a seeds exhibited a translucent and white core morphology, respectively [12, 13]. By contrast, ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a seeds were opaque, as were the seeds of lines that were heterozygous for one of these genes (ss1ss1/SS3ass3a or SS1ss1/ss3ass3a) (Fig. 6 and [13]).
Fig. 6

Seed morphologies of mutant and wild-type lines. The morphology of mature rice seeds was observed using a stereomicroscope with an overhead light (upper panels) and on a light box (lower panels)

The grain weight of ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a and SS1/ss2a L /ss3a was 100% and 93%, respectively, of wild-type (Table 2). However, while the grain weight of ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a was 89% of wild-type, the SS activity in the soluble fraction of this mutant was only 20% of wild-type (Fig. 1). The starch contents of ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a, SS1/ss2a L /ss3a, and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a were 58%, 54%, and 55% of the total grain weight, respectively, whereas that of wild-type was 74% (Table 2).
Table 2

Dehulled grain weight and starch content in mutant rice lines

Line

Grain weighta per grain (mg)

Starch contentb

per grain (mg)

SS1/ss2a L /SS3a

(Wild-type; Nipponbare)

20.3 ± 0.2**

(100)c

15.1 ± 1.1**

(74)d

ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a

(i2–1)

20.2 ± 0.2**

(100)c

11.8 ± 0.5**

(58)d

SS1/ss2a L /ss3a

(e1)

18.8 ± 0.2*,**

(93)c

10.2 ± 0.8*

(54)d

ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a

(#6002)

18.0 ± 0.2*

(89)c

9.9 ± 0.4*

(55)d

aMean ± SE of 50 seeds

bMean ± SE of three seeds

cPercentage of the wild-type

dPercentage of grain weight

*Significant differences between Nipponbare and mutant lines by the t-test at P < 0.05

**Significant differences between double mutant line and the other lines by the t-test at P < 0.05

The effects of reduced SS activity on starch structure

Analyses of differences in the chain-length distribution patterns among the mutant lines and wild-type by performing capillary electrophoresis showed that the reduced SSI activity had an additive effect on the chain-length distribution of amylopectin in the SS1/ss2a L /ss3a background, with a slight synergistic enhancement [14, 15]. To further investigate the structure of starch in the double mutant lines, we subjected the debranched starch and purified amylopectin to gel filtration chromatography and calculated the apparent amylose content, extra-long chain content, and true amylose content, as well as the proportion of long chains and short chains of amylopectin (Table 3). Amylose plus extra-long chain, amylopectin long chains, and amylopectin short chains were eluted in Fractions I, II, and III, respectively, by chromatography (Additional file 5). The true amylose content was calculated by subtracting the extra-long chain content from the apparent amylose content (Table 3). Since amylose content is affected by temperature during seed development [35], we analyzed samples from two different years (2009 and 2013; Table 3).
Table 3

Composition of carbohydrate (weight %) in endosperm starch fractions separated by gel filtration chromatography

  

Fr. I (%)a

Fr. II (%)

Fr. III (%)

III/II

Apparent amylose content (%)e

Apparent amylose content (mg/grain)f

True amylose content (%)h

Line

 

2009

2013

2009

2013

2009

2013

2009

2013

SS1/ss2a L /SS3a

(wild-type; Nipponbare)

Starchb

20.3 ± 0.4d

18.8 ± 0.5

20.4 ± 0.2

22.5 ± 0.4

59.2 ± 0.5

58.7 ± 0.4

2.9 ± 0.1

2.6 ± 0.1

18.8

2.84 (100)g

17.1

Amylopectinc

1.7 ± 0.3

21.5 ± 0.7

57.7 ± 1.0

2.7 ± 0.1

ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a

(i2–1)

Starch

No data

21.5 ± 0.6 *, **

No data

21.2 ± 0.8 **

No data

57.3 ± 0.5 **

No data

2.7 ± 0.1 **

21.5

2.54 (89) g

19.9

Amylopectin

1.6 ± 0.1 **

20.9 ± 0.6 *, **

57.2 ± 0.5 **

2.7 ± 0.1 **

SS1/ss2a L /ss3a

(e1)

Starch

29.8 ± 0.2 *, **

29.4 ± 0.6 *

13.0 ± 0.2 *

13.0 ± 0.3 *, **

57.2 ± 0.4 *, **

57.7 ± 0.3 **

4.4 ± 0.1 *, **

4.5 ± 0.1 *, **

29.4

3.00 (106) g

27.4

Amylopectin

2.0 ± 0.1 *, **

12.8 ± 0.5 *

56.4 ± 0.7

4.4 ± 0.1 *, **

ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a

(#6002)

Starch

34.0 ± 0.9 *

30.3 ± 0.3 *

13.8 ± 0.6 *

14.8 ± 0.5 *

52.2 ± 0.4 *

54.9 ± 0.4 *

3.8 ± 0.1 *

3.7 ± 0.1 *

30.3

3.00 (106) g

27.1

Amylopectin

3.2 ± 0.2 *

14.2 ± 0.6 *

54.5 ± 0.3 *

3.8 ± 0.2 *

aThree fractions (Fr. I, II, and III) were divided at troughs of the carbohydrate content curve, as detected by refractive index detectors (Fig. 5)

bTotal carbohydrate content = 100%

cAreas of Fr. II and Fr. III of amylopectin were superimposed onto those of the starch, and the amount of amylopectin (extra-long chain) in Fr. I was calculated

dMean ± SE of three replicates

eApparent amylose content (%) = Fr. I of starch in 2013

fApparent amylose content (mg/grain) = (starch content (mg/grain) in Table 2) x (Apparent amylose content (%) in 2013, Table 3)

gPercentage of the wild-type

hTrue amylose content (%) = apparent amylose content (Fr. I of starch in 2013) – extra-long chains (Fr. I of amylopectin in 2013)

*Significant differences between Nipponbare and mutant lines by the t-test at P < 0.05

**Significant differences between double mutant line and the other lines by the t-test at P < 0.05

The apparent amylose content of ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a (21.5%) was slightly higher than that of wild-type (18.8%), whereas the apparent amylose content of SS1/ss2a L /ss3a was 1.6 times higher than that of wild-type (Table 3). These results are consistent with previous reports [13, 14, 36]. The apparent amylose content of ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a from 2013 was slightly higher than that of SS1/ss2a L /ss3a, but this different was not significant. The extra-long chain content of ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a was significantly higher than that of the other lines (Table 3).

SSIIIa elongates amylopectin long chains connecting clusters of amylopectin, as the levels of these chains with DP ≥30 are significantly reduced in ss3a [13]. The ratio of short to long chains of amylopectin (Fraction III/Fraction II) in endosperm starch was highest in SS1/ss2a L /ss3a among the lines tested in both years examined. This ratio was significantly higher in ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a than in wild-type and ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a but lower than that of SS1/ss2a L /ss3a (Table 3).

Discussion

Reduction of three major SS isozymes responsible for amylopectin synthesis in rice endosperm increased the levels of AGPase and GBSSI, which raised the amylose content.

SSI, SSIIa and SSIIIa are the major SS isozymes responsible for amylopectin biosynthesis in rice endosperm and are also commonly found in cereal grains [3]. The rice mutant lacks both SSI and SSIIIa and possesses low SSIIa activity (ss1/ss2a L /ss3a) and was previously shown to be sterile, while rice plants with either SSI or SSIIIa generated heterozygous seeds [14]. In this study, the rice mutant line (ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a), which has low SSI and SSIIa activities and lacks SSIIIa, was analyzed for its starch properties, pleiotropic effects of other starch biosynthetic enzymes, and their interactions.

ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a yielded opaque mature seeds (Fig. 6) and maintained 89% of the seed weight of wild-type (Table 2). Although the amount of starch was slightly decreased, the apparent amylose content within starch increased to 30–34% compared with that of wild-type (ca. 20%) and the parental lines (ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a was 22% and SS1/ss2a L /ss3a was ca. 30%; Table 3). Weight of apparent amylose content per grain was calculated by (starch content; Table 2) x (apparent amylose content %; Table 3) and that 2.84 mg in wild-type, 2.54 mg in ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a, and 3.00 mg (106% of wild-type) in SS1/ss2a L /ss3a and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a (Table 3). These suggest that both amylose and ELC biosynthesis were enhanced in SS1/ss2a L /ss3a and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a.

An increase in amylose content is often considered the outcome of reduced amylopectin synthesis, which leads to an increase in the substrate providing AGPase and favors amylose synthesis by GBSSI [13, 14, 31, 36]. The AGPase activity in a maize SSIII-deficient mutant (du1) is higher than that of wild-type [37]. In rice, SSI, SSIIIa, and BEIIb deficiencies lead to increased AGPase activity [13, 14, 28, 36]. The present study also showed increased AGPase and GBSSI amounts (Fig. 2) and AGPase activity (Table 1) in SS1/ss2a L /ss3a, consistent with a previous study [14], and in ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a. The increase in the amount of AGPase and GBSSI protein (Fig. 2) suggests that these enzymes are regulated at the transcriptional level.

GBSSI is responsible for amylose biosynthesis, and typical japonica rice cultivars contain a SNP at the boundary between exon 1 and intron 1 of the GBSSI gene compared with the indica rice cultivars. This SNP results in incorrect splicing of intron 1 and produces incomplete GBSSI mRNAs [38]. The mRNA processing efficiency of GBSSI has been demonstrated to respond differently to the temperature during seed development [39]. It is known that the amounts of mature GBSSI mRNA decrease at high temperatures (32 °C) compared with the normal (25 °C) temperature during seed development, resulting in a low amylose content in the endosperm starch compared with that grown at a low temperature (18 °C) [40]. The average temperature at 30 days after flowering in the study area, Akita, was 18.8 °C and 21.4 °C in 2009 and 2013, respectively [41]. The apparent amylose content of every rice line harvested in 2009 was higher than that in 2013 (Table 3). In particular, the apparent amylose content of ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a (34.0%) was significantly higher than that of SS1/ss2a L /ss3a (29.8%; Table 3 in 2009). The significantly higher AGPase activity resulting from the reduction of SSI activity and SSIIIa deficiency (Table 1) should lead to a high concentration of ADP-glucose in the amyloplast, although we did not estimate the level of ADP-glucose. GBSSI has a higher Km for ADP-glucose than the other soluble SS isozymes in potato [42]. If this is the same in the case of rice, amylose synthesis would also be enhanced in rice endosperm. We suspect that the high GBSSI expression in ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a amyloplasts under high ADP-glucose concentrations leads to efficient amylose biosynthesis, which occurs when temperatures are not high during seed development.

Reduction of major SS isozymes in rice endosperm and the pleiotropic effects of other starch biosynthetic enzymes and their interactions

Starch biosynthetic enzymes in cereal are known to interact with each other and to form protein-protein complexes [16, 18, 19, 21, 23, 43]. SSI forms protein complexes with SSIIa and BEI or BEIIb in developing seeds of rice, wheat, maize and barley [16, 17, 20, 21, 22, 23]. The mutual and synergistic interaction of SSI with BE isozymes has also been shown via in vitro studies of recombinant enzymes in rice [34] and Arabidopsis [44]. SSIIIa forms high-molecular-weight protein complexes (> 700 kDa) and interacts with SSIIa, BEI and BEIIb in the developing endosperm of wild-type rice [23]. SSIII (corresponding to rice SSIIIa) in maize developing kernels is also known to form protein complexes containing plastidial AGPase, pyruvate orthophosphate dikinase, SSIIa, and BE II isozymes [19].

The present study compared the elution patterns (Fig. 3 and Additional file 1) and activities (Fig. 4 and Additional file 2) of starch biosynthetic proteins separated by gel filtration chromatography using soluble extract from the developing rice seeds of ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a, ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a, SS1/ss2a L /ss3a, and wild-type (SS1/ss2a L /SS3a). The amounts and activity of SSI in the eluted fractions from gel filtration column were generally correlated (Figs. 3 and 4); the highest level of SSI was found in SS1/ss2a L /ss3a, followed by wild-type, ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a, and ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a was the lowest. More specifically, greater amounts and activities of SSI were found at a high molecular weight (> 300 kDa: Fr. 2–8) in SS1/ss2a L /ss3a compared with the other lines (Figs. 3 and 4). This finding suggests that SSI may be incorporated into the high-molecular-weight protein complexes (> 440 kDa), in which SSIIIa was eluted in wild-type, possibly to compensate for the absence of SSIIIa. Considering that the expression levels and activities of SSI were significantly lower in ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a compared with wild-type (Figs. 1 and 2), the ratio of SSI eluted in Fr. 8–12 was higher than that in Fr.4–7 in ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a (Fig. 3). Since maize SSI is known to form an approximately 230 kDa trimeric SSI-SSIIa-BE protein complex [21], it is possible that SSI may be enriched in Fr. 8–12 in ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a to form a similar type of protein complex.

Unlike in ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a, SS1/ss2a L /ss3a, and wild-type, SSIIa was enriched in Fr. 8–10 but depleted in Fr.2–6 of ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a (Fig. 3). In the absence of SSIIIa and reduction of SSI in ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a, SSIIa may not be able to form high-molecular-weight complexes, which would elute in Fr. 1–7. Although it is yet to be investigated, it is possible that the SSIIa eluted in Fr. 8–10 of ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a may present alternative protein complexes such as the SSIIa-SSIIa-BE trimeric complex.

The SSIIa used in the present study was of japonica rice origin, which has four SNPs and shows less than 10% of the activity compared to indica type SSIIa [11].These results suggest that the presence rather than the activity of SSIIa may be important for the formation of protein-protein complexes.

Co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed that the association of BEI-BEIIb, BEIIa-Pho, BEI-PUL were observed in all the analyzed rice lines (Additional file 4); however, the interaction of SSI and SSIIa with other starch biosynthetic enzymes was reduced in ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a, SS1/ss2a L /ss3a, and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a compared with wild–type (Fig. 5). Since gel filtration chromatography suggested the assembly of protein complexes for the remaining SS isozymes in all analyzed rice lines, there is some possibility that alternatively assembled protein complexes with SS isozymes in ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a, SS1/ss2a L /ss3a, and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a may be more susceptible in the current experimental conditions.

Concurrently, the location and type of amino acid substitution in the specific starch biosynthetic enzymes likely have different effect on protein complex formation, depending on the protein structure of the counterpart enzymes.

Altered branch structures of amylopectin in ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a, ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a, and SS1/ss2a L /ss3a shown by capillary electrophoresis suggest [13] that alternatively formed protein complexes may not perfectly mimic the choice of glucan primers and the final length of amylopectin branches; the latter may be more dependent on the three-dimensional structure of individual SS isozymes. Future analyses of the reconstitution of protein complexes using purified recombinant enzymes are necessary.

Speculation regarding the alternatively formed protein–protein complexes in mutant rice endosperms

Possible combinations of starch biosynthetic protein complexes in SS1/ss2a L /SS3a, ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a, SS1/ss2a L /ss3a, and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a were speculated (Fig. 7) using the results of gel filtration chromatography (Fig. 3, Additional file 1, and [23]), although some of the interactions were yet to be confirmed in the current immuno-precipitation condition (Fig. 5, Additional file 4, and [23]). The selected predicted protein–protein complexes found in developing seed of wild-type japonica rice (SS1/ss2a L /SS3a) [23] are shown in Fig. 7a. Multiple types of protein complexes with different sizes are predicted to form in the wild-type, such as low-molecular-weight protein complexes (approximately 200–300 kDa) containing SSI-SSIIa-BEIIb (Fig. 7) [23].
Fig. 7

Schematics of speculated starch biosynthetic protein complexes in wild-type (SS1/ss2a L /SS3a), ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a, SS1/ss2a L /ss3a and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a. Selected combinations of predicted protein-protein complexes in developing seed of japonica rice (SS1/ss2a L /SS3a) [23] are shown as wild-type (a). Alterations of protein complexes in ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a (b), SS1/ss2a L /ss3a (c) and ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a (d) are illustrated. Boxes indicate an altered protein complex. SS isozymes that were missing or reduced compared with wild-type are indicated in gray. Newly recruited speculated SS isozymes are indicated with a bold oval. Black arrows indicate a reduced molecular weight due to missing enzymes. Gray arrows indicate recruitment of enzymes. Note that all lines used in this study have low SSIIa activity

Alteration of the protein complexes in ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a is outlined in Fig. 7b. When the expression of SSI was reduced, the amounts of SSI in both high and low-molecular-weight fractions reduced, whereas the amounts of SSIVb > 700 kDa increased (Fig. 3). It is speculated that the reduction of SSI in high-molecular-weight complexes could potentially be complemented by SSIVb in ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a to form alternative protein complexes (Fig. 7b). The amounts of SSI-SSIIa-BEIIb trimeric complex could also be reduced in ss1 L /ss2a L /SS3a (Fig. 7b).

Loss of SSIIIa led to increased expression of SSI in SS1/ss2a L /ss3a. The amount of SSI > 440 kDa noticeably increased in SS1/ss2a L /ss3a compared to that in wild-type (Fig. 3). The elution of SSIIa and SSIVb > 700 kDa was also increased in SS1/ss2a L /ss3a (Fig. 3). This suggests that alternative high-molecular-weight protein complexes enriched with SSI, SSIIa, and/or SSIVb were assembled in SS1/ss2a L /ss3a (Fig. 7c).

Reduction of SSI and loss of SSIIIa in ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a led to a considerable decrease in the amounts of eluted SSI and SSIIa > 440 kDa (Fig. 3). This suggests that high-molecular-weight protein complexes were not assembled in ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a, and alternatively, protein complexes with a lower molecular weight, such as the PUL-BEI-BEIIb and/or SSIIa-SSIIa-BEIIb complex, might be formed in ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a (Fig. 7d).

Taken together, when either SSI and/or SSIIIa were absent in the conditions of low SSIIa activity in developing rice seed, the composition of starch biosynthetic enzyme complexes involved in amylopectin biosynthesis were complemented in SS isozymes to form altered protein complexes. Hence, ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a was able to minimize the reduction of carbon storage and avoided sterility, although the branch length of amylopectin was different from that of the wild-type.

Conclusions

Although the simultaneous reduction of three major SSs, SSI, SSIIa and SSIIIa, resulted in less amylopectin in ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a endosperm, a significant amount of amylopectin was synthesized and amylose content was increased in ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a. Protein complex formation of starch biosynthetic enzymes was altered in terms of the size of the protein complexes containing SSI, SSIIa, and SSIVb, as determined by gel filtration chromatography. In addition, co-immuno-precipitation analyses showed that the associations of SS isozymes with other starch biosynthetic enzymes were weaker or reduced in the current experimental conditions.

The present study indicated the importance of formation of starch biosynthetic protein complexes in developing rice endosperms, even when there is a deficiency of essential SS isozymes, by exchanging and complementing the composition of protein complexes within the same enzyme family (SS isozyme) to maximize the storage of photosynthetic products as starch. The substitution of starch biosynthetic protein complexes in BE isozymes seen in maize developing kernels that lack BEIIb could also be a similar phenomenon [20, 24]. Therefore, the present study enhances our understanding of the control of the amount and structure of starch in relation to the formation of starch biosynthetic protein complexes..

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ms. Yuko Nakaizumi (Akita Prefectural University) for growing the rice plants. The authors are grateful to Prof. Michael Emes (University of Guelph) for his valuable advice and discussions.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the Program for the Promotion of Basic and Applied Research for Innovations in Bio-oriented Industry (NF; 25033AB, 28029C), a grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) from the Ministry of Education, Sports, and Culture of Japan (19380007; NF), President’s fund of Akita prefectural University (NF), Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows (NC; #15 J40176) and JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (NC; #16 K18571).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its additional files.

Authors’ contributions

MH performed the seed weight measurements, starch content measurement, native-PAGE/activity staining, immunoblotting, gel filtration of starch and protein, and immunoprecipitation. NC performed the starch synthase activity assay, western blotting of gel filtration samples, and wrote the manuscript. NOF prepared samples for gel filtration of starch. NF planned, supervised, coordinated the project, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

12870_2018_1270_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (903 kb)
Additional file 1: Molecular weight distributions of BE isozymes from developing rice endosperm determined by gel filtration chromatography. Soluble proteins were separated by gel filtration chromatography. Fractions were denatured and separated by SDS-PAGE, and immuno-blotting was performed using the indicated antibodies. (PDF 903 kb)
12870_2018_1270_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (904 kb)
Additional file 2: SS activities were visualized by non-denaturing zymograms using rice starch biosynthetic enzymes separated by gel filtration chromatography from SS1/ss2aL/ss3a. Gel was incubated in the presence of 1 mM ADP-glucose (A) and in the absence of ADP-glucose (B). Black arrowhead shows the SSI activity. Gray arrowheads represent glycosyl hydrolase or glucan transferase activities. White arrowheads are SS activity bands found only in ss3a. (PDF 903 kb)
12870_2018_1270_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (902 kb)
Additional file 3: Immuno-blotting of SS isozymes resolved by non-denaturing PAGE using the fractions obtained from gel filtration chromatography. Antibodies used for immuno-blotting are indicated. Black arrowheads indicate the same migration distances as the main stained activity bands shown in Fig. 4, and white arrowheads correspond to the activity bands found in the zymogram of SS1/ss2aL/ss3a in Fig. 4. (PDF 902 kb)
12870_2018_1270_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (903 kb)
Additional file 4: Analyses of protein-protein interactions between rice starch biosynthetic isozymes by co-immunoprecipitation. Immuno-precipitation experiments were performed using the isozyme specific antibodies indicated above and the soluble protein extract from SS1/ss2aL/SS3a (WT), ss1L/ss2aL/SS3a, SS1/ss2aL/ss3a and ss1L/ss2aL/ss3a. Immuno-blotting was performed using the antibodies indicated on the right. (PDF 903 kb)
12870_2018_1270_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (901 kb)
Additional file 5: Size separation of debranched endosperm starch and purified amylopectin by gel filtration showing the amylose content in fraction I.Gel filtration chromatography was performed for debranched endosperm starch and purified amylopectin using the SS1/ss2aL/SS3a (Nipponbare; A), ss1L/ss2aL/SS3a (B), SS1/ss2aL/ss3a (C), and ss1L/ss2aL/ss3a (D) harvested in 2013. Each graph shows typical elution profiles of isoamylase-debranched starch (blue lines) and purified amylopectin (red lines). Each fraction (Fr. I, II, and III) is separated according to the carbohydrate content curve determined by refractive index detectors (left Y-axis). The panels show one typical data set (of at least three replicates prepared from starch and purified amylopectin). (PDF 901 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Smith AM, Denyer K, Martin C. The synthesis of the starch granule. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Mol Biol. 1997;48:67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Myers AM, Morell MK, James MG, Ball SG. Recent progress toward understanding biosynthesis of the amylopectin crystal. Plant Physiol. 2000;122:989–97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nakamura Y. Towards a better understanding of the metabolic system for amylopectin biosynthesis in plants: rice endosperm as a model tissue. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002;43:718–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ball SG, Morell MK. From bacterial glycogen to starch: understanding the biogenesis of the plant starch granule. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2003;54:207–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fujita N. Starch biosynthesis in rice endosperm. Agri-Biosci Monogr. 2014;4:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Satoh H, Shibahara K, Tokunaga T, Nishi A, Tasaki M, Hwang SK, Okita TW, Kaneko N, Fujita N, Yoshida M, Hosaka Y, Sato A, Utsumi Y, Ohdan T, Nakamura Y. Plastidic α-glucan phosphorylase mutation dramatically affects the synthesis and structure of starch in rice endosperm. Plant Cell. 2008;20:1833–49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jeon JS, Ryoo N, Hahn TR, Walia H, Nakamura Y. Starch biosynthesis in cereal endosperm. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010;48:383–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nakamura Y, Ono M, Utsumi C, Steup M. Functional interaction between plastidial starch phosphorylase and starch branching enzymes from rice during the synthesis of branched maltodextrins. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012;53:869–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hirose T, Terao T. A comprehensive expression analysis of the starch synthase gene family in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Planta. 2004;220:9–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ohdan T, Francisco PBJ, Sawada T, Hirose T, Terao T, Satoh H, Nakamura Y. Expression profiling of genes involved in starch synthesis in sink and source organs of rice. J Exp Bot. 2005;56:3229–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nakamura Y, Francisco PBJ, Hosaka Y, Satoh A, Sawada T, Kubo A, Fujita N. Essential amino acids of starch synthase IIa differentiate amylopectin structure and starch quality between japonica and indica rice cultivars. Plant Mol Biol. 2005;58:213–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fujita N, Yoshida M, Asakura N, Ohdan T, Miyao A, Hirochika H, Nakamura Y. Function and characterization of starch synthase I using mutants in rice. Plant Physiol. 2006;140:1070–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fujita N, Yoshida M, Kondo T, Saito K, Utsumi Y, Tokunaga T, Nishi A, Satoh H, Park JH, Jane JL, Miyao A, Hirochika H, Nakamura Y. Characterization of SSIIIa-deficient mutants of rice: the function of SSIIIa and pleiotropic effects by SSIIIa deficiency in the rice endosperm. Plant Physiol. 2007;144:2009–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fujita N, Satoh R, Hayashi A, Kodama M, Itoh R, Aihara S, Nakamura Y. Starch biosynthesis in rice endosperm requires the presence of either starch synthase I or IIIa. J Exp Bot. 2011;62:4819–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hayashi M, Kodama M, Nakamura Y, Fujita N. Thermal and pasting properties, morphology of starch granules, and crystallinity of endosperm starch in the rice SSI and SSIIIa double-mutant. J Appl Glycosci. 2015;62:81–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tetlow IJ, Wait R, Lu Z, Akkasaeng R, Bowsher CG, Esposito S, Kosar-Hashemi B, Morell MK, Emes MJ. Protein phosphorylation in amyloplasts regulates starch branching enzyme activity and protein-protein interactions. Plant Cell. 2004;16:694–708.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tetlow IJ, Beisel KG, Cameron S, Makhmoudova A, Liu F, Bresolin NS, Wait R, Morell MK, Emes MJ. Analysis of protein complexes in wheat amyloplasts reveals functional interactions among starch biosynthetic enzymes. Plant Physiol. 2008;146:1878–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hennen-Bierwagen TA, Liu F, Marsh RS, Kim S, Gan Q, Tetlow IJ, Emes MJ, James MG, Myers AM. Starch biosynthetic enzymes from developing maize endosperm associate in multisubunit complexes. Plant Physiol. 2008;146:1892–908.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hennen-Bierwagen TA, Lin Q, Grimaud F, Planchot V, Keeling PL, James MG, Myers AM. Proteins from multiple metabolic pathways associate with starch biosynthetic enzymes in high molecular weight complexes: a model for regulation of carbon allocation in maize amyloplasts. Plant Physiol. 2009;149:1541–59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu F, Ahmed Z, Lee EA, Donner E, Liu Q, Ahmed R, Morell MK, Emes MJ, Tetlow IJ. Allelic variants of the amylose extender mutation of maize demonstrate phenotypic variation in starch structure resulting from modified protein-protein interactions. J Exp Bot. 2012;63:1167–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu F, Romanova N, Lee EA, Ahmed R, Evans M, Gilbert EP, Morell MK, Emes MJ, Tetlow IJ. Glucan affinity of starch synthase IIa determines binding of starch synthase I and starch-branching enzyme IIb to starch granules. Biochem J. 2012;448:373–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ahmed Z, Tetlow IJ, Ahmed R, Morell MK, Emes MJ. Protein-protein interactions among enzymes of starch biosynthesis in high-amylose barley genotypes reveals differential roles of heteromeric enzyme complexes in the synthesis of a and B granules. Plant Sci. 2015;233:95–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Crofts N, Abe N, Oitome NF, Matsushima R, Tetlow IJ, Emes MJ, Nakamura Y, Fujita N. Amylopectin biosynthetic enzymes from developing rice seed form enzymatically active protein complexes. J Exp Bot. 2015;66:4469–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu F, Makhmoudova A, Lee EA, Wait R, Emes MJ, Tetlow IJ. The amylose extender mutant of maize conditions novel protein-protein interactions between starch biosynthetic enzymes in amyloplasts. J Exp Bot. 2009;60:4423–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yamamoto K, Sawada S, Onogaki I. Properties of rice starch prepared by alkali method with various condition. J Jap Soc Starch Sci. 1973;20:99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yamamoto K, Sawada S, Onogaki I. Effects of quality and quantity of alkali solution on the properties of rice starch. J Jap Soc Starch Sci. 1981;28:241–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fujita N, Kubo A, Suh DS, Wong KS, Jane JL, Ozawa K, Takaiwa F, Inaba Y, Nakamura Y. Antisense inhibition of isoamylase alters the structure of amylopectin and the physicochemical properties of starch in rice endosperm. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003;44:607–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Abe N, Asai H, Yago H, Oitome NF, Itoh R, Crofts N, Nakamura Y, Fujita N. Relationships between starch synthase I and branching enzyme isozymes determined using double mutant rice lines. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:80–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nakamura Y, Yuki K, Park SY, Ohya T. Carbohydrate metabolism in the developing endosperm of rice grains. Plant Cell Physiol. 1989;30:833–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nishi A, Nakamura Y, Tanaka N, Satoh H. Biochemical and genetic analysis of the effects of amylose-extender mutation in rice endosperm. Plant Physiol. 2001;127:459–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Crofts N, Abe K, Ihara S, Itoh R, Nakamura Y, Itoh K, Fujita N. Lack of starch synthase IIIa and high expression of granule-bound starch synthase I synergistically increase the apparent amylose content in rice endosperm. Plant Sci. 2012;193-194:62–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Boyer CD, Preiss J. Properties of citrate-stimulated starch synthesis catalyzed by starch synthase I of developing maize kernels. Plant Physiol. 1979;64:1039–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cao H, Imparl-Radosevich J, Guan H, Keeling PL, James MG, Myers AM. Identification of the soluble starch synthase activities of maize endosperm. Plant Physiol. 1999;120:205–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nakamura Y, Aihara S, Crofts N, Sawada T, Fujita N. In vitro studies of enzymatic properties of starch synthases and interactions between starch synthase I and starch branching enzymes from rice. Plant Sci. 2014;224:1–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hirano HY, Sano Y. Enhancement of Wx gene expression and the accumulation of amylose in response to cool temperatures during seed development in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 1998;39:807–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Asai H, Abe N, Matsushima R, Crofts N, Oitome NF, Nakamura Y, Fujita N. Deficiencies in both starch synthase IIIa and branching enzyme IIb lead to a significant increase in amylose in SSIIa inactive japonica rice seeds. J Exp Bot. 2014;65:5497–507.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Singletary GW, Banisadr R, Keeling PL. Influence of gene dosage on carbohydrate synthesis and enzymatic activities in endosperm of starch-deficient mutants of maize. Plant Physiol. 1997;113:293–304.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Isshiki M, Morino K, Nakajima M, Okagaki RJ, Wessler SR, Izawa T, Shimamoto K. A naturally occurring functional allele of the rice waxy locus has a GT to TT mutation at the 5’ splice site of the first intron. Plant J. 1998;15:133–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Larkin PD, Park WD. Transcript accumulation and utilization of alternate and non-consensus splice sites in rice granule-bound starch synthase are temperature-sensitive and controlled by a single-nucleotide polymorphism. Plant Mol Biol. 1999;4:719–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhang H, Duan L, Dai JS, Zhang J, Li CQ, Gu MH, Liu QQ, Zhu Y. Major QTLs reduce the deleterious effects of high temperature on rice amylose content by increasing splicing efficiency of Wx pre-mRNA. Theor Appl Genet. 2014;127:273–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Japan Meteorological Agency. http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/index.html.
  42. 42.
    Clarke BR, Denyer K, Jenner CF, Smith AM. The relationship between the rate of starch synthesis, the adenosine 5′-diphosphoglucose concentration and the amylose content of starch in developing pea embryos. Planta. 1999;209:324–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tetlow IJ, Emes MJ. A review of starch-branching enzymes and their role in amylopectin biosynthesis. IUBMB Life. 2014;66:546–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Brust H, Lehmann T, D'Hulst C, Fettke J. Analysis of the functional interaction of Arabidopsis starch synthase and branching enzyme isoforms reveals that the cooperative action of SSI and BEs results in glucans with polymodal chain length distribution similar to amylopectin. PLoS One. 2014;9:e102364.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological ProductionAkita Prefectural UniversityAkita CityJapan

Personalised recommendations