Genome-wide association study of reproductive traits in Nellore heifers using Bayesian inference
- 2k Downloads
- 8 Citations
Abstract
Background
An important goal of Zebu breeding programs is to improve reproductive performance. A major problem faced with the genetic improvement of reproductive traits is that recording the time for an animal to reach sexual maturity is costly. Another issue is that accurate estimates of breeding values are obtained only a long time after the young bulls have gone through selection. An alternative to overcome these problems is to use traits that are indicators of the reproductive efficiency of the herd and are easier to measure, such as age at first calving. Another problem is that heifers that have conceived once may fail to conceive in the next breeding season, which increases production costs. Thus, increasing heifer’s rebreeding rates should improve the economic efficiency of the herd. Response to selection for these traits tends to be slow, since they have a low heritability and phenotypic information is provided only later in the life of the animal. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are useful to investigate the genetic mechanisms that underlie these traits by identifying the genes and metabolic pathways involved.
Results
Data from 1853 females belonging to the Agricultural Jacarezinho LTDA were used. Genotyping was performed using the BovineHD BeadChip (777 962 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) according to the protocol of Illumina - Infinium Assay II ® Multi-Sample HiScan with the unit SQ ™ System. After quality control, 305 348 SNPs were used for GWAS. Forty-two and 19 SNPs had a Bayes factor greater than 150 for heifer rebreeding and age at first calving, respectively. All significant SNPs for age at first calving were significant for heifer rebreeding. These 42 SNPs were next or within 35 genes that were distributed over 18 chromosomes and comprised 27 protein-encoding genes, six pseudogenes and two miscellaneous noncoding RNAs.
Conclusions
The use of Bayes factor to determine the significance of SNPs allowed us to identify two sets of 42 and 19 significant SNPs for heifer rebreeding and age at first calving, respectively, which explain 11.35 % and 6.42 % of their phenotypic variance, respectively. These SNPs provide relevant information to help elucidate which genes affect these traits.
Keywords
Quantitative Trait Locus Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Beef Cattle Reproductive Trait Significant SNPsBackground
In tropical regions, Zebu cattle are the main breed used for beef production since they are better adapted to the climate and more resistant to parasites than taurine breeds. One factor that increases production costs is the late onset of reproduction in Zebu females. According to Brummati et al. [1], for beef cattle that are raised in tropical production systems, reproductive traits possess a high economic value and are up to 13 times economically more important than growth and carcass traits. Advancing the start of the reproductive cycle brings economic benefits to the producer and increases profitability.
In Brazil, beef cattle breeding programs have put emphasis mainly on traits such as growth and weight gain and little attention has been paid to reproductive traits, in spite of the considerable influence that these traits have on the productivity and reproductive efficiency of herds [2, 3, 4]. According to Evans [5], females of breeding age account for about 70 % of the costs of the beef cattle production system.
Heifer rebreeding (HR) refers to the calving success of cows that have already calved once. The success rate of rebreeding after first calving is a major issue in beef cattle farming. Several studies have reported significant reductions in calving rates between the first and second services [6, 7, 8]. Mercadante et al. [9] observed reductions of up to 20 % in calving rates from the first to the second conception of Nellore females. Therefore, improving the rebreeding rate of heifers should increase the economic efficiency of beef cattle production.
Since age at first calving (AFC) is easily measured and is a good indicator of female sexual precocity, this trait has been included as a selection objective in breeding programs [10]. However, direct selection for lower AFC is not simple since some producers delay the entry of females into breeding programs, which determines the age or weight at which reproductive activity begins and impairs the identification of sexually precocious females. Furthermore, the heritability estimates of this trait are generally low to moderate (0.09 to 0.28) [2, 10, 11, 12], which suggests that response to selection for AFC is a slow process.
Female reproductive traits are measured only on females and late in life, and generally have low heritability. As a consequence, a large number of individuals need to be analyzed for sufficiently accurate genetic evaluations. The advantage of genomic selection to estimate such reproductive traits is that, unlike traditional selection based on pedigree information and phenotypes only, it allows to select animals accurately without their own phenotypic measurements or those of their relatives and thus, genetic gains are increased compared to that obtained with traditional evaluation methods [13].
Usually, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of traits of economic interest using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels aim at identifying regions that can explain the inheritance of the traits [14]. GWAS results allow the identification of candidate regions that can then be used for genomic selection.
GWAS were first performed using the least square method, by applying Bonferroni correction to make inferences about the significance of individual SNPs. According to Peters [15], the main problems that are encountered with this method are high rates of false positives and overestimation of the effects of quantitative trait loci (QTL) and SNPs. One alternative to overcome these problems is to estimate SNP effects by Bayesian inference for which all SNPs are considered simultaneously.
The objective of this study was to perform a GWAS using a Bayesian approach to identify candidate genes that influence reproductive traits. Candidate genes are the target for future fine-mapping studies to search for causal mutations. Causal mutations that explain more than 1 % of the phenotypic variance are useful for inclusion in commercial low-density SNP arrays because since they are causal and are not in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with nearby SNPs, they are more cost-effective and informative, contribute information for the estimation of breeding values and it is not necessary to revalidate their SNP effects at each generation.
Methods
Phenotypic data
We used data from Nellore females that belonged to the company Agropecuária Jacarezinho Ltda. Heifers were born either in Valparaiso-SP or in Cotegipe-BA, Brazil. Bos indicus reaches puberty later in life than Bos taurus. In order to detect sexually precocious heifers, Agropecuária Jacarezinho Ltda. performs two breeding seasons. During the early breeding season, which occurs between February and April and lasts approximately 60 days, heifers are exposed to bulls at an early age (14 to 16 months). All heifers are exposed to bulls, irrespective of weight and body condition. Artificial insemination, controlled breeding or multiple-sire breeding, with a bull:cow ratio of 1:30, is used. Pregnancy is confirmed about 60 days after the end of the anticipated breeding season. Heifers that did not conceive during their first breeding season are exposed again to bulls at 2 years of age. The criteria for culling of females are: failure to conceive before 2 years of age, inability to conceive in any subsequent year, and low progeny performance. A small percentage of females are culled due to health problems. Close to the expected calving date, females are moved to calving paddocks. After calving, calves are divided according to sex and age and are transferred to another pasture together with their mothers where they remain until weaning. The calves are weaned at 7 months and grouped together until yearling age (18 months).
Heifer rebreeding (HR) is a binary trait and was defined by attributing a value of 2 (success) or 1 (failure) to females that calved or not, respectively, given that they had calved once. Age at first calving, measured in days, was obtained as the difference between the date of first calving and the date of birth of the heifer.
The contemporary group (CG) for HR was defined by farm, year and season of birth of the cow, and calf sex. Contemporary groups without variability in HR, i.e., groups in which all animals showed the same response category (1 or 2) were eliminated. For AFC, the CG was formed by farm, year and season of birth, and management group at birth, weaning and yearling. Phenotypic data outside the intervals given by the mean of the CG ± 3 standard deviations were also excluded. Fifteen CG were formed for HR with an average of 92 animals in each group, and 17 CG were formed for AFC with an average of 89 animals in each group. Age at first calving varied between 748 and 1253 days, with a mean of 1049 ± 141.3 days. The percentage of success in HR was equal to 72,42 % ± 19,21.
Genotypic data
Data from 2056 females born between 2007 and 2009, which were genotyped with the Illumina Bovine HD assay (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), were used. The quality control (QC) of genotypes was performed iteratively according to the following criteria: we excluded 22 851 SNPs in non-autosomal regions, 32 856 SNPs with a gene call score less than 0.70, 18 982 SNPs with a call rate less than 0.98, 362 148 SNPs with a minor allele frequency (MAF) less than 0.02, 9466 SNPs with a p-value for the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test less than 10−5 and 26 341 SNPs that were highly correlated (r2 > 0.995) with other SNPs from the same window that contained 100 consecutive SNPs. Samples with a call rate less than 0.90 were also excluded from the analysis. The QC process was repeated until no further SNP or sample was excluded which resulted in a final dataset of 1853 heifer and 305 348 SNPs.
Data analysis
SNP effects were estimated using the BAYESCπ method [16] in which they have a common variance, follow a scaled inverted chi-square distribution a priori, with νg degrees of freedom and a scale parameter S g 2. Thus, the effect of an SNP with probability (1-π) is a univariate Student’s t (0, νg, S g 2) distribution. In this study, νg was set to 4.2 and S g 2 was calculated based on additive genetic variance according to Habier et al. [17].
The analyses were performed using the GS3 software developed by Legarra et al. (2011; http://snp.tolouse.inra.fr/~alegarra). A total of 300 000 MCMC iterations were used, with a burn-in period of 30 000 cycles and the results were saved every 30 cycles. Convergence was assessed by visual inspection of trace plots of the posterior density of genetic and residual variances.
-
if BF are between 3 and 20, they provide suggestive evidence;
-
if BF are between 20 and 150, they provide strong evidence;
-
and if BF are greater than 150, they provide very strong evidence.
When BF are used, there is no need for Bonferroni correction because all the SNPs are introduced simultaneously in the analysis, and their estimates are already penalized by their prior information. In this study, SNPs with a BF greater than 150 were considered significant.
Identification of genes
The Map Viewer tool of the bovine genome (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/mapview/map_search.cgi?taxid=9913&build=6) was used to determine the location of the significant SNPs on the genome. Genes that contained significant SNPs were listed. For SNPs that were not located within genes, the closest gene (either on the 5’ or 3’ end) was recorded with the distance between gene and SNP.
Results and discussion
Manhattan plot for age at first calving. The y- and x-axes indicate the logarithm (base 10) of Bayes factor and chromosome number, respectively
Manhattan plot for heifer rebreeding. The y- and x-axes indicate the logarithm (base 10) of Bayes factor and chromosome number, respectively
Significant SNPs for heifer rebreeding and age at first calving
| SNP | BTA | Position on the chromosome | Gene | Distance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BovineHD0200019275 | 2 | 66 618 544 | LOC781274 | 32 131 |
| BovineHD0300002153 | 3 | 6 820 16 | DDR2 | 0 |
| BovineHD0300004387 | 3 | 13 529 885 | LOC787257 | 97 632 |
| BovineHD0300017549 | 3 | 58 324 511 | COL24A1 | 0 |
| BovineHD0400035711 | 4 | 65 529 242 | NEUROD6 | 36 652 |
| BovineHD0400020154a | 4 | 72 761 718 | ADAM22 | 0 |
| BovineHD0700027122 | 7 | 92 796 302 | GPR98 | 0 |
| BovineHD0800023325 | 8 | 77 860 555 | FRMD3 | 32 334 |
| BovineHD0900024229a | 9 | 86 427 969 | LOC784274 | 58 945 |
| BovineHD0900024233a | 9 | 86 443 282 | LOC784274 | 74 258 |
| BovineHD0900024387a | 9 | 86 9312 92 | SASH1 | 0 |
| BovineHD0900024630a | 9 | 87 622 468 | LOC100847971 | 132 138 |
| BovineHD1000022473 | 10 | 78 547 946 | LOC785763 | 83 898 |
| BovineHD1000027195a | 10 | 94 149 370 | SEL1L | 184 234 |
| BovineHD1000027196a | 10 | 94 150 213 | SEL1L | 185 077 |
| BovineHD1000029149a | 10 | 100 682 598 | GALC | 50 483 |
| BovineHD1000029156 | 10 | 100 692 866 | GALC | 40 215 |
| BovineHD1100007588 | 11 | 25 331 444 | HAAO | 129 881 |
| BovineHD1300002848a | 13 | 10 469 479 | KIF16B | 230 839 |
| BovineHD1300003397a | 13 | 12 043 707 | CAMK1D | 83 121 |
| BovineHD1300003401 | 13 | 12 047 548 | CAMK1D | 86 962 |
| BovineHD1300010715a | 13 | 37 037 785 | ARMC4 | 0 |
| BovineHD1300010716 | 13 | 37 041 136 | ARMC4 | 0 |
| BovineHD1400008910a | 14 | 30 847 011 | MIR124A-2 | 31 490 |
| BovineHD1400008946a | 14 | 30 992 834 | CYP7B1 | 0 |
| BovineHD1400015365a | 14 | 54 735 529 | LOC782102 | 1 572 261 |
| BovineHD1600009851 | 16 | 34 426 540 | SDCCAG8 | 0 |
| BovineHD1600009861 | 16 | 34 439 744 | SDCCAG8 | 0 |
| BovineHD1800012552 | 18 | 42 481 407 | LOC783434 | 109 417 |
| BovineHD2000003208a | 20 | 10 148 419 | GTF2H2 | 0 |
| BovineHD2000003210 | 20 | 10 153 352 | OCLN | 1 557 |
| BovineHD2000003214 | 20 | 10 160 002 | OCLN | 0 |
| BovineHD2000003968 | 20 | 12 416 566 | LOC529061 | 0 |
| BovineHD2100018913 | 21 | 64 294 259 | LOC100847341 | 592 456 |
| BovineHD2200012027a | 22 | 41 764 132 | FHIT | 0 |
| BovineHD2300006979 | 23 | 25 155 638 | ELOVL5 | 104 |
| BovineHD2300008276a | 23 | 29 144 150 | LOC514434 | 0 |
| BovineHD2500000286a | 25 | 1 323 539 | MAPK8IP3 | 0 |
| BovineHD2500001186a | 25 | 5 120 120 | RBFOX1 | 297 144 |
| BovineHD2700001047 | 27 | 3 081 686 | LOC782601 | 69 309 |
| BovineHD2700003551 | 27 | 12 300 159 | ODZ3 | 56 728 |
| BovineHD2700012809 | 27 | 44 150 097 | ZNF385D | 0 |
Gene symbols and full names
| Gene symbol | Gene name |
|---|---|
| LOC781274 | protein O-mannose kinase-like |
| DDR2 | discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinase 2 |
| LOC787257 | rab GDP dissociation inhibitor beta-like |
| COL24A1 | collagen, type XXIV, alpha 1 |
| NEUROD6 | neuronal differentiation 6 |
| ADAM22 | ADAM metallopeptidase domain 22 |
| GPR98 | G protein-coupled receptor 98 |
| FRMD3 | FERM domain containing 3 |
| LOC784274 | kidney mitochondrial carrier protein 1 |
| SASH1 | SAM and SH3 domain containing 1 |
| LOC100847971 | 60S ribosomal protein L30-like |
| LOC785763 | 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate mutase pseudogene |
| SEL1L | sel-1 suppressor of lin-12-like |
| GALC | galactosylceramidase |
| HAAO | 3-hydroxyanthranilate 3,4-dioxygenase |
| KIF16B | kinesin family member 16B |
| CAMK1D | calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase ID |
| ARMC4 | armadillo repeat containing 4 |
| MIR124A-2 | microRNA mir-124a-2 |
| CYP7B1 | cytochrome P450, family 7, subfamily B, polypeptide 1 |
| LOC782102 | UDP-GlcNAc:betaGal beta-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 2 |
| SDCCAG8 | serologically defined colon cancer antigen 8 |
| LOC783434 | serine/threonine-protein kinase pim-1 pseudogene |
| GTF2H2 | general transcription factor IIH, polypeptide 2 |
| OCLN | occludin |
| LOC529061 | microtubule associated serine/threonine kinase family member 4 |
| LOC100847341 | uncharacterized LOC100847341 |
| FHIT | fragile histidine triad |
| ELOVL5 | ELOVL fatty acid elongase 5 |
| LOC514434 | olfactory receptor 5 V1 |
| MAPK8IP3 | mitogen-activated protein kinase 8 interacting protein 3 |
| RBFOX1 | RNA binding protein, fox-1 homolog |
| LOC782601 | histone H3-like centromeric protein A |
| ODZ3 | teneurin transmembrane protein 3 |
| ZNF385D | zinc finger protein 385D |
The 42 SNPs that were significant for HR are located within or next to 35 genes that are distributed over 18 chromosomes; of these, 27 are protein-encoding genes, six are pseudogenes, and two are miscellaneous noncoding (nc) RNAs. A pseudogene is a nucleotide sequence that is similar to a normal gene, but is not expressed. Miscellaneous nc RNAs are small noncoding RNAs sequences that do not carry information for producing proteins but can have various important functions in the cell.
Genes that contained significant SNPs were listed (distance = 0); if the SNPs were not located within genes, the closest gene (either on the 5’ or 3’ end) was identified with the distance between SNP and gene. Espigolan et al. [20] reported that since LD in Nellore cattle was lower than in Bos taurus breeds, a distance of less than 30 kb was required for genomic prediction/association. However, in our study, although some genes were more than 30 kb away from a significant SNP, they were retained because they were the closest annotated genes.
The identified genes can be grouped according to metabolic function, including groups of genes that are involved in the formation and physiology of the central nervous system (LOC781274, NEUROD6, GPR98, GALC, MIR124A-2, MAPK8IP3, RBFOX1, and ODZ3); in the formation and physiology of the female reproductive system (FMRD3, CYP7B1, and LOC782102); in lipid metabolism (ELOVOL5) and in bone growth (DDR2 and COL24A1); genes that act as olfactory receptors (LOC514434) and genes involved in basal metabolism (LOC787257, ADAM22, LOC100295124, LOC100847971, LOC785763, SEL1L, HAAO, KIF16B, CAMK1D, ARMC4, SDCCAG8, LOC783434, GTF2H2, OCLN, LOC529061, LOC529061, FHIT, and LOC782601). The last group of genes plays a role in different metabolic pathways, including cell-cell signaling, protein synthesis and transport, oxygen transport, cell proliferation and survival, transcription and metabolism of nucleotides and histones, membrane transport, and the formation of the cell membrane and its receptors, among others.
Genes that are involved in the formation and physiology of the central nervous system play a role in reproduction, since they influence neuronal formation, differentiation and communication and the synthesis of reproductive hormones of the hypothalamus-pituitary axis by acting on the hormone cascade that coordinates the estrous cycle in females. Thus, because the genomic regions that are described here are biologically relevant to animal physiology, they are good candidates for marker-assisted selection. Fortes et al. [21, 22, 23] and Hawken et al. [24] identified other genes that belong to the same group, i.e., genes acting on the central nervous system, associated with puberty and fertility traits in Brahman cattle and tropical composite breeds.
Similarly, genes that are involved in the formation and physiology of the female reproductive system should affect the onset of the estrous cycle, conception, pregnancy establishment and maintenance, and calving. In general, the genes of this group that were detected here act on the formation of specific tissues and hormone synthesis. One example is the LOC782102 gene which encodes a component of the egg membrane that is responsible for sperm attraction. Polymorphisms in LOC782102 may result in a protein that is more or less functional for spermatozoid recognition and thus pregnancy will be either facilitated or impaired.
Lipid metabolism is intimately related to reproduction and according to [25], in dairy cattle, the success of postpartum rebreeding depends on the accumulation of fat reserves in the animal, which permits the cow to start cycling again. During the postpartum period, dairy cows enter a state of negative energy balance and mobilize body fat for milk production since they are unable to meet their energy requirement solely through feeding. As a consequence, the presence of favorable alleles of genes related to energy metabolism may be associated with better reproductive performance. Many genes related to fat metabolism and, consequently, to reproduction have been described in dairy cattle [26, 27]. This mechanism has already been demonstrated in beef cattle and genes that are part of this metabolic pathway have been reported [21].
It is known that growth influences reproduction as demonstrated by the observation that heavier animals reach sexual maturity later in life [28]. Growth-related genes have been associated with fertility and puberty in Zebu and tropical composite breeds [23, 24], in agreement with the results obtained here for genes related to bone growth.
Our results on the chromosome location of the identified SNPs are similar to those of previous investigations on the association between SNPs and reproductive traits. Sahana et al. [29] detected SNPs for fertility traits on most of the chromosomes in Danish and Swedish Holstein females, which were associated with pregnancy rate, interval from first to last insemination in cows, number of inseminations per conception in cows, and interval from calving to first insemination. The authors reported the presence of significant SNPs in a region between 28.5 and 68.06 Mb on BTA13 (BTA for Bos taurus chromosome), which is larger than the region that we identified here. However, the SNPs that we found significant for AFC and HR are within the region reported in [29].
Schulman et al. [30] identified significant SNPs on BTA27 between 6.08 and 21.65 Mb, which were associated with non-return rate for heifers in Finnish Ayrshire heifers. Here, we detected three significant SNPs on BTA27 in the region between 3.08 and 44.15 Mb, which, although much larger than that reported in [30], contains an SNP at 12.3 Mb very close to the SNP identified by [30], i.e., at 11.2 Mb. This result suggests the presence of a QTL on this chromosome.
Pausch et al. [31] described three significant SNPs for calving ease on BTA21 in Fleckvieh females at 2.15, 2.33, and 2.38 Mb. Although we also detected one SNP on BTA21, it is located at quite a large distance from those reported by Pausch et al. [31].
Hawken et al. [24] reported 66 significant SNPs (P < 0.001) for postpartum anestrous interval in Brahman cattle. Although their results showed that BTA3 and 14 contained the largest numbers of SNPs, the most significant SNP was on BTA6 at 118 Mb. In our case, we found no significant SNP on BTA6. The same authors also described 68 significant SNPs for first postpartum ovulation before weaning mainly on BTA3, 6, 14, 17 and 21 in Brahman cattle. The most significant SNP was at 112.3 Mb on BTA3. In our case, three significant SNPs were detected on BTA3, but in the region between 6.8 and 58.3 Mb.
Although several studies have reported significant SNPs associated with fertility traits in cattle on BTA14 [23, 24, 29, 30, 31], we did not detect any significant SNP associated with HR and AFC on this chromosome. This may be due to genetic differences between Bos taurus and Bos indicus, since Bos indicus females reach puberty later than Bos taurus females. Evidence from Hawken et al. [23], who reported that the number of significant SNPs on BTA14 associated with fertility traits was much smaller in Brahman cattle than that from other studies in Bos taurus [29, 30, 31], supports this hypothesis.
Significant SNPs for heifer rebreeding with chromosome number, percentage of phenotypic variance explained by the SNP (%PV) and cumulative percentage (%CPV)
| SNP | BTA | %PV | %CPV |
|---|---|---|---|
| BovineHD1000022473 | 10 | 1.45 | 1.45 |
| BovineHD0900024233 | 9 | 1.25 | 2.70 |
| BovineHD1400008910 | 14 | 1.08 | 3.78 |
| BovineHD0300017549 | 3 | 1.02 | 4.80 |
| BovineHD1600009861 | 16 | 0.69 | 5.49 |
| BovineHD1000029156 | 10 | 0.55 | 6.04 |
| BovineHD1300002848 | 13 | 0.37 | 6.41 |
| BovineHD1300010716 | 13 | 0.37 | 6.78 |
| BovineHD2500001186 | 25 | 0.35 | 7.13 |
| BovineHD1400015365 | 14 | 0.34 | 7.47 |
| BovineHD2700003551 | 27 | 0.31 | 7.78 |
| BovineHD1600009851 | 16 | 0.3 | 8.08 |
| BovineHD2000003210 | 20 | 0.27 | 8.35 |
| BovineHD2200012027 | 22 | 0.26 | 8.61 |
| BovineHD2300006979 | 23 | 0.25 | 8.86 |
| BovineHD2000003214 | 20 | 0.24 | 9.10 |
| BovineHD1300003397 | 13 | 0.22 | 9.32 |
| BovineHD1300010715 | 13 | 0.22 | 9.54 |
| BovineHD2700012809 | 27 | 0.21 | 9.75 |
| BovineHD1400008946 | 14 | 0.19 | 9.94 |
| BovineHD0900024387 | 9 | 0.17 | 10.11 |
| BovineHD1300003401 | 13 | 0.16 | 10.27 |
| BovineHD0900024630 | 9 | 0.15 | 10.42 |
| BovineHD2000003208 | 20 | 0.15 | 10.57 |
| BovineHD2700001047 | 27 | 0.09 | 10.66 |
| BovineHD0800023325 | 8 | 0.08 | 10.74 |
| BovineHD0900024229 | 9 | 0.08 | 10.82 |
| BovineHD1000029149 | 10 | 0.08 | 10.9 |
| BovineHD0700027122 | 7 | 0.07 | 10.97 |
| BovineHD0300004387 | 3 | 0.05 | 11.02 |
| BovineHD0400020154 | 4 | 0.05 | 11.07 |
| BovineHD1000027195 | 10 | 0.05 | 11.12 |
| BovineHD1800012552 | 18 | 0.05 | 11.17 |
| BovineHD1000027196 | 10 | 0.04 | 11.21 |
| BovineHD2500000286 | 25 | 0.04 | 11.25 |
| BovineHD0200019275 | 2 | 0.03 | 11.28 |
| BovineHD2000003968 | 20 | 0.03 | 11.31 |
| BovineHD1100007588 | 11 | 0.02 | 11.33 |
| BovineHD0300002153 | 3 | 0.01 | 11.34 |
| BovineHD0400035711 | 4 | 0.01 | 11.35 |
| BovineHD2100018913 | 21 | 0 | 11.35 |
| BovineHD2300008276 | 23 | 0 | 11.35 |
Significant SNPs for age at first calving with chromosome number, percentage of phenotypic variance explained by the SNP (%PV) and cumulative percentage (%CPV)
| SNP | BTA | %PV | %CPV |
|---|---|---|---|
| BovineHD0900024233 | 9 | 1.02 | 1.02 |
| BovineHD1400008910 | 14 | 0.82 | 1.84 |
| BovineHD2500001186 | 25 | 0.82 | 2.66 |
| BovineHD1000029149 | 10 | 0.61 | 3.27 |
| BovineHD0900024630 | 9 | 0.52 | 3.79 |
| BovineHD1300010715 | 13 | 0.51 | 4.30 |
| BovineHD2500000286 | 25 | 0.37 | 4.67 |
| BovineHD1300003397 | 13 | 0.25 | 4.92 |
| BovineHD2000003208 | 20 | 0.22 | 5.14 |
| BovineHD0400020154 | 4 | 0.21 | 5.35 |
| BovineHD1000027195 | 10 | 0.21 | 5.56 |
| BovineHD0900024229 | 9 | 0.15 | 5.71 |
| BovineHD1300002848 | 13 | 0.14 | 5.85 |
| BovineHD1400015365 | 14 | 0.14 | 5.99 |
| BovineHD2200012027 | 22 | 0.12 | 6.11 |
| BovineHD2300008276 | 23 | 0.09 | 6.20 |
| BovineHD1400008946 | 14 | 0.08 | 6.28 |
| BovineHD0900024387 | 9 | 0.07 | 6.35 |
| BovineHD1000027196 | 10 | 0.07 | 6.42 |
Conclusions
The use of Bayes factors to determine the significance of SNPs allowed us to identify two sets of significant SNPs, i.e., 42 for HR and 19 for AFC that explain 11.35 % and 6.42 % of their phenotypic variance, respectively. These SNPs provide relevant information about HR and AFC that will contribute to elucidate which genes affect these traits. Our results led us to suggest a list of candidate genes for reproductive traits in beef cattle.
Notes
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), Brazil (Grant numbers: 2011/01811-7 and 2009/16118-5).
References
- 1.Brumatti RC, Ferraz JBS, Eler JP, Formigonni IB. Desenvolvimento de índices de seleção em gado de corte sob enfoque de um modelo bioeconômico. Arch Zootec. 2011;60:205–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Boligon AA, Albuquerque LG. Genetic parameters and relationships of heifer pregnancy and age at first calving with weight gain, yearling and mature weight in Nellore cattle. Livest Sci. 2011;141:12–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Formigoni IB, Ferraz JBS, Silva JAIIV, Eler JP, Brumatti RC. Valores econômicos para habilidade de permanência e probabilidade de prenhez aos 14 meses em bovinos de corte. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 2005;57:220–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Shiotsuki L, Silva 2nd JAV, Tonhati H, Albuquerque LG. Genetic associations of sexual precocity with growth traits and visual scores of conformation, finishing, and muscling in Nellore cattle. J Anim Sci. 2009;87:1591–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Evans ACO. Ovarian follicle growth and consequences for fertility in sheep. Anim Reprod Sci. 2003;78:289–306.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Fahmy MH, Lalande G, Hidiroglou M. Reproductive performance and growth of Shorthorn purebred and crossbred cows. Anim Prod. 1971;13:7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Rovira J. Reproduccion y manejo de los rodeos de cria. Hemisferio Sur: Montevideo; 1974.Google Scholar
- 8.Gottschall C, Ferreira E, Canellas L, Bittencourt HR. Perdas reprodutivas e reconcepção em bovinos de corte segundo a idade ao acasalamento. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 2008;60:414–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Mercadante MEZ, Packer IU, Razook AG, Cyrillo JNSG, Figueiredo LA. Direct and correlated responses to selection for yearling weight on reproductive performance of Nellore cows. J Anim Sci. 2003;81:376–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Dias LT, El Faro L, Albuquerque LG. Estimativas de herdabilidade para idade ao primeiro parto de novilhas da raça Nellore. Rev Bras Zootec. 2004;33:97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Mercadante MEZ, Lôbo RB, Oliveira HN. Estimativas de (co)variâncias entre características de reprodução e de crescimento em fêmeas de um rebanho Nellore. Rev Bras Zootec. 2000;29:997–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Pereira E, Eler JP, Ferraz JBS. Correlação genética entre perímetro escrotal e algumas características reprodutivas na raça Nellore. Rev Bras Zootec. 2000;29:1676–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Vitezica ZG, Aguilar I, Misztal I, Legarra A. Bias in genomic prediction in populations under selection. Genet Res (Camb). 2011;93:357–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Maher B. Personal genomes. The case of the missing heritability. Nature. 2008;456:18–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Peters SO, Kizilkaya K, Garrick DJ, Fernando RL, Reecy JM, Weaber RL, et al. Bayesian genome-wide association analyses of growth and yearling ultrasound measures of carcass traits in Brangus heifers. J Anim Sci. 2012;90:3398–409.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Varona L, Garcia-Cortes LA, Perez-Enciso M. Bayes factors for detection of quantitative trait loci. Genet Sel Evol. 2001;33:133–52.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Habier D, Fernando RL, Kizilkaya K, Garrick DJ. Extension of the Bayesian alphabet for genomic selection. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:186.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Kass RE, Raftery AE. Bayes factors. J Am Statist Assoc. 1995;90:773–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Vidal O, Noguera JL, Amills M, Varona L, Gil M, Jiménez N, et al. Identification of carcass and meat quality quantitative trait loci in a Landrace pig population selected for growth and leanness. J Anim Sci. 2005;83:293–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Espigolan R, Baldi F, Boligon AA, Souza FRP, Gordo DGM, Tonussi RL, et al. Study of whole genome linkage disequilibrium in Nellore cattle. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:305.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Fortes MRS, Reverter A, Zhang Y, Collis E, Nagaraj SH, Jonsson NN, et al. Association weight matrix for the genetic dissection of puberty in beef cattle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:13642–7.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Fortes MRS, Reverter A, Nagaraj SH, Zhang Y, Jonsson NN, Barris W, et al. A single nucleotide polymorphism-derived regulatory gene network underlying puberty in 2 tropical breeds of beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 2011;89:1669–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Fortes MRS, Li Y, Collis E, Zhang Y, Hawken RJ. The IGF1 pathway genes and their association with age of puberty in cattle. Anim Genet. 2012;44:9–5.Google Scholar
- 24.Hawken RJ, Zhang YD, Fortes MR, Collis E, Barris WC, Corbet NJ, et al. Genome-wide association studies of female reproduction in tropically adapted beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 2012;90:1398–410.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Wathes DC, Clempson AM, Pollot GE. Associations between lipid metabolism and fertility in the dairy cow. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2013;25:48–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Clempson AM, Pollott GE, Brickell JS, Bourne NE, Munce N, Wathes DC. Polymorphisms in the autosomal genes for mitochondrial function TFAM and UCP2 are associated with performance and longevity in dairy cows. Animal. 2011;5:1335–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Clempson AM, Pollott GE, Brickell JS, Bourne NE, Munce N, Wathes DC. Evidence that leptin genotype is associated with fertility, growth, and milk production in Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94:3618–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Silva JAV, Van Melis MH, Eler JP, Ferraz JBS. Estimação de parâmetros genéticos para probabilidade de prenhez aos 14 meses e altura na garupa em bovinos da raça Nellore. Rev Bras Zootec. 2003;32:1141–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Sahana G, Guldbrandtsen B, Bendixen C, Lund MS. Genome-wide association mapping for female fertility traits in Danish and Swedish Holstein cattle. Anim Genet. 2010;41:579–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Schulman NF, Sahana G, Iso-Touru T, McKay SD, Schnabel RD, Lund MS, et al. Mapping of fertility traits in Finnish Ayrshire by genome-wide association analysis. Anim Genet. 2011;42:263–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Pausch H, Flisikowski K, Jung S, Emmerling R, Edel C, Götz KU, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies two major loci affecting calving ease and growth-related traits in cattle. Genetics. 2011;187:289–97.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.