Introduction

Cytomegalovirus retinitis (CMVR) is a sight-threatening condition usually affecting immunosuppressed individuals but few cases of CMVR have been reported in immunocompetent patients [1]. Herein, we report an immunocompetent patient with unsynchronized bilateral involvement without a previous predisposing factor for acquiring CMVR.

Case presentation

A 68-year-old woman without any history of systemic diseases was referred to the emergency ward of Farabi eye hospital with a two-week history of decreased vision in her left eye. At presentation, her best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was hand motions in her left eye and no light perception in the right eye. On the slit-lamp examination, the left eye had fine diffuse keratic precipitates and 1+ anterior chamber cells. Also, fundoscopy revealed mild venous tortuosity, hemorrhagic retinitis within the macula, and papillitis (Fig. 1). The first episode of CMVR has been occurred in the right eye about 2 years ago which complicated with the rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) after 3 months treatment with valganciclovir and underwent pars planavitrectomy with silicone oil injection. Current fundus examination of the right eye revealed pale optic disc, occluded retinal vessels, and diffuse chorioretinal atrophy (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Fundoscopy of the left eye: mild venous tortuosity, hemorrhagic retinitis within the macula, and papillitis

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Fundoscopy of the right eye: Silicone oil-filled vitreous, pale optic disk, occluded retinal vessels, and diffuse chorioretinal atrophy

Full size image

The referring ophthalmologist confirmed the diagnosis of CMVR in the right eye after vitreous sampling and CMV PCR assessment. The patient had close follow up visits and immunologic status including complete blood cell count and lymphocytes count have been checked out frequently without any sign of immunosuppression. Upon initiating symptoms in the left eye, the patient was referred to our center for more assessments.

Due to unusual presentations of patient, infectious and hematologic consultations and vitreous sampling were scheduled. The requested laboratory tests including complete blood count (CBC), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), C-Reactive Protein, absolute count of lymphocytes, CD3+, CD4+ (609 cells/μl), CD8+, CD16+ and CD56+ lymphocyte count, complement system function, autoimmune antibodies like Anti – Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (C-ANCA, P-ANCA), Anti-Nuclear Antibody (ANA), and Rheumatoid Factor (RF), Veneral Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL), Fluorescent Treponemal Antibody Absorption (FTA-ABS), liver function tests, creatinine, Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS), Purified Protein Derivative (PPD), Hepatitis B virus antigen (HBs Ag), Hepatitis C virus antibody (HCV Ab), anti-HIV antibody, all were in normal laboratory ranges. DNA PCR of Varicella-zoster Virus (VZV), Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV), and CMV on either whole blood or vitreous samples were negative except positive CMV DNA PCR of the vitreous sample. Also, requested consultations did not reveal any underlying immunodeficiency and malignancy evaluation was negative.

Because of clinical features and previous history of CMVR, treatment has been started against CMV. The devastating course of the disease in the fellow eye and involvement of the posterior pole and optic disk persuasive us for aggressive treatment. So we started the treatment with intravenous ganciclovir 10 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks and 2 mg injections of intravitreal ganciclovir (twice weekly) for 1 week. The treatment followed by 900 mg daily oral valganciclovir as maintenance therapy for 6 months. During the treatment, her visual acuity improved from hand motions to 20/100, and patches of retinitis start to fade from the macula (Fig. 3). Forty-five days after stopping maintenance therapy with valganciclovir retinitis recurred in the left eye and visual acuity dropped to counting fingers at 3 m (Fig. 4), so we started the treatment again to stabilize the patient. She is currently maintained on valganciclovir 900 mg daily without recurrence for 9 months with 20/100 visual acuity.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Fundoscopy of the left eye after the treatment

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Fundoscopy of the left eye, recurrence after stopping maintenance therapy

Full size image

Discussion

CMVR accounts as the most common opportunistic viral infection in HIV patients which often manifests in CD4+ counts lower than 50/μl [1]. Also, the other immunosuppressive conditions like leukemia, lymphoma, and organ transplant surgery may prone the patient to this form of posterior uveitis [1]. Few reports of CMVR in immunocompetent patients can be found in the literature. However, the majority of these cases have been suffered from subclinical immunosuppression such as diabetes mellitus (DM) [2,3,4,5,6].

Moreover, the role of intravitreal injections is considerable; there are several reports of developing CMVR after intravitreal injection of corticosteroids such as triamcinolone acetonide (TA) [2, 3, 5]. Also,Witmer et al. [7] reported this condition after the administration of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in an immunocompetent old woman. The interesting point is available reports of CMVR after intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs) like bevacizumab [4, 6]. Although the immunosuppressive effects of corticosteroids may justify the occurrence of this condition, anti-VEGF drugs have not this property. We speculated the disruption of the blood-retinal barrier and subclinical immunosuppression by diabetic retinopathy is the main predisposing factor for the occurrence of CMVR in these cases and considering a separate role for intravitreal injections is difficult. Similar to our case, the majority of previous studies have reported the CMVR in old aged immunocompetent patients. Thus, we think old ages may be associated with higher rates of CMVR. However, Hosseini et al. [8] reported CMVR in a 4-month-old healthy infant recently. A brief review of some of the recent reports of CMV retinitis in immunocompetent patients and issues including age, laterality of involvement, risk factors, manifestations, treatment, and the visual outcome are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 A brief review of some of the recent reports of CMV retinitis in immunocompetent patients. (Abbreviations: Diabetes mellitus (DM), injection of triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA), central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO))
Full size table

To the best of the author’s knowledge and database searches like PubMed, few cases of CMVR have been reported in patients without any type of systemic immunosuppression. The physiopathology of developing CMVR in completely immunocompetent patients is not clear. We hypothesized maybe genetic susceptibility acts as a predisposing factor in these cases, similar to the patients with AIDS [12].

CMVR should be differentiated from acute retinal necrosis (ARN), progressive outer retinal necrosis (PORN), toxoplasmosis, and syphilis [13]. History of this form of posterior uveitis, clinical characteristics, and also positive PCR sampling were differentiating points in this case. It is noticeable up to 24% of CMVR cases may lead to RRD as happened in the right eye of the current case we reported [1].

Unsynchronized bilateral involvement is a remarkable aspect of this case. Another unique aspect of this case is recurrence after stopping valganciclovir that debates a challenging question about the duration of prophylaxis in patients without immunosuppression. The answer to this question is not clear and none of the previous reports discussed this issue. Previously, CMVR in an HIV patient indicated life-long anti-CMV therapy. However, development of new treatment options made discontinuation of maintenance therapy safe in these patients due to quantitative immune recovery in low counts of CD4+ lymphocytes as the predisposing factor. According to CDC guidelines maintenance therapy or secondary prophylaxis in AIDS-related CMV retinitis should be continued until reaching to adequate immune recovery which defines as sustained raise of CD4+ cell counts to above 100 cells/μl for at least 3–6 months with inactive CMVR characterized by retinal scarring. These guidelines also mentioned that valganciclovir primary prophylaxis against CMVR is not neccessary once CMVR treatment is successfully completed unless CD4+ count has decreased to < 100 cells/μL [14]. It seems in patients without clear predisposing factor discontinuing of the treatment is not rational and routine ophthalmic monitoring appears useful.

Conclusion

This report targets bringing issues to light that CMVR can recur in the same or contralateral eye of immunocompetent patients, especially without prophylactic medication.