Nanoscale Research Letters

, 11:317 | Cite as

Simulation and Experimental Study on Anti-reflection Characteristics of Nano-patterned Si Structures for Si Quantum Dot-Based Light-Emitting Devices

  • Wenyi Shao
  • Peng Lu
  • Wei Li
  • Jun Xu
  • Ling Xu
  • Kunji Chen
Open Access
Nano Express


Surface-textured structure is currently an interesting topic since it can efficiently reduce the optical losses in advanced optoelectronic devices via light management. In this work, we built a model in finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) solutions by setting the simulation parameters based on the morphology of the Si nanostructures and compared with the experimental results in order to study the anti-reflection behaviors of the present nano-patterned structures. It is found that the reflectance is gradually reduced by increasing the depth of Si nanostructures which is in well agreement with the experimental observations. The reflectance can be lower than 10 % in the light range from 400 to 850 nm for Si nano-patterned structures with a depth of 150 nm despite the quite low aspect ratio, which can be understood as the formation of gradually changed index layer and the scattering effect of Si nano-patterned structures. By depositing the Si quantum dots/SiO2 multilayers on nano-patterned Si substrate, the reflectance can be further suppressed and the luminescence intensity centered at 820 nm from Si quantum dots is enhanced by 6.6-fold compared with that of flat one, which can be attributed to the improved light extraction efficiency. However, the further etch time causes the reduction of luminescence intensity from Si quantum dots which may ascribe to the serious surface recombination of carriers.


Si nano-patterned structures Anti-reflection Photoluminescence 


Crystalline Si plays a crucial role in today’s microelectronics industry, but it is hard to be utilized in optoelectronic devices because of its indirect band gap. The indirect band gap can cause low light-emitting efficiency and low absorption coefficient, which impede the improvement of device properties [1, 2]. Compared with the bulk Si materials, Si quantum dot (Si QD)-based materials exhibit the efficient light emission ability due to the enhanced recombination efficiency of electron-hole pairs in quantum-confined system [3]. So far, Si QD-based materials such as Si QDs/SiO2, Si QDs/SiNx, and Si QDs/SiCx structures have been fabricated, and the photoluminescence and photovoltaic properties have been studied extensively [4, 5, 6]. However, the large index difference between Si and Si-based dielectric materials (SiO2, SiNx, or SiCx) causes strong light reflection which generates the optical losses in Si-based photo-electronic devices. For example, it was reported that in the Al2O3/ZnS:Mn system, though the index difference is relatively small (1.6 vs. 2.5), only 7.4 % light can be extracted from the front surface of the device [7]. It is reasonable to imagine that the situation will become more serious in Si/SiO2 system.

Recently, surface-textured structure using the nano-sphere lithography technique is currently an interesting topic since it can efficiently reduce the optical losses in advanced optoelectronic devices such as light-emitting diodes and solar cells via light management [8, 9, 10, 11]. For example, Hsieh et al. fabricated textured GaN-based light-emitting diodes (LEDs) by nano-sphere lithography technique which obviously improved the device performance [9]. They have achieved an average of 38.5 % efficiency improvement of the textured p-GaN LED over the conventional device at a bias current of 20 mA. In our previous work, nano-sphere lithography technique was used to prepare nano-patterned Si structures. It was demonstrated that nano-patterned structures can improve the property of light-emitting devices as well as the heterojunction Si thin film solar cells [12, 13, 14]. In order to further understand the light management behaviors of Si-based nanostructures and to improve the device performance, it is necessary to systematically study the anti-reflection characteristics as a function of the parameters of the formed nanostructures. In the present work, both the simulation and experimental characterization is used to study the anti-reflection characteristics of periodically Si nano-patterned structures prepared by nano-sphere lithography technique. Based on the structural parameters extracted from atomic force microscopy (AFM) results, we built a model in finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) solutions. The influences of structural parameters on the optical properties of Si-nano-patterned structures were simulated and compared with the experimental results. Furthermore, we deposited Si quantum dots/SiO2 multilayers on the Si nano-patterned structures, and the luminescence intensity is enhanced by 6.6-folds.


Nano-sphere lithography technique is used to fabricate Si nano-patterned structures. Before the fabrication process, p-Si substrates are cleaned by standard RCA process. As shown in Fig. 1, a small amount of the suspension of polystyrene (PS) nano-spheres and ethyl alcohol was first applied onto the surface of a clean silicon wafer. Subsequently, the silicon wafer was immersed into the deionized water to transfer the nano-spheres to the surface of water. Dodecyl sodium sulfate solution was added to control the surface tension. After setting quietly for 10 min, a monolayer of nano-sphere array with closed packed structures can be self-assembly formed on the water surface. Then, the monolayer was transferred to the surface of 1 cm × 1 cm flat Si substrate. The diameter of PS nano-spheres is about 300 nm, and the size of the monolayer on the water surface is about 3 cm × 5 cm. The Si substrates with coating by the PS nano-sphere array are then etched in reactive ion etching system by using PS nano-sphere monolayer as a mask [15]. During the etching process, CF4 is used as etching gas and the etching power is kept at 50 W. By controlling the etching time, the nano-patterned structures with various depths can be obtained. Finally, the PS nano-spheres on the Si substrates are removed by using ultrasonic cleaning technique in tetrahydrofuran [16].
Fig. 1

Fabrication process of nano-patterned Si structures

The surface morphology of Si nano-patterned structures is characterized by AFM microscopy. Figure 2a shows the top morphology of the formed Si nano-patterned structures prepared by using 300 nm nano-spheres. A periodic and uniform structure can be identified in the AFM image. Figure 2b is the cross-section picture, which shows that the periodicity of nano-patterned structures is 300 nm and the depth is about 51 nm so that the aspect ratio defined as the ratio of depth (H) to diameter (D) (H/D) is less than unity. Figure 2c shows the relationship between the depth of nano-patterned structures and the etching time. The linear relationship indicates that the surface morphology of nano-patterned structures can be well controlled by changing the etching parameters. The reflection spectra of the prepared Si nano-patterned structures were measured by Shimadzu UV-3600 spectrophotometer in the range of 400–800 nm.
Fig. 2

a AFM image and b cross-section picture of nano-patterned Si structures. c Linear fit of the relationship between etching time and height of Si nanostructures

Furthermore, Si QDs/SiO2 multilayers (MLs) are fabricated on the Si nano-patterned structures by annealing amorphous Si/SiO2 stacked layers at 1000 °C for 1 h. The average size of Si QDs is about 2 nm, and the thickness of SiO2 layers is 2 nm too. The detailed fabrication process and conditions of Si QDs/SiO2 multilayers and TEM images can be found elsewhere in [16]. Room temperature photoluminescence measurements are performed by excited He–Cd laser with wavelength of 325 nm. As a reference, the Si QDs/SiO2 MLs are also prepared on a flat Si substrate for comparison.

Results and Discussion

The optical reflection behaviors of formed nano-patterned structures are studied both theoretically and experimentally. Finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) solutions are used to simulate the reflection spectra of Si nano-patterned structures with variety morphologies by resolving 3D Maxwell’s equations. As shown in Fig. 3, the structural model with closed packed paraboloid array is built. Our model structure is more close to the experimental results by using a nano-sphere lithography technique as revealed by the AFM observations, which is different from the previous work by using a structure of poly-Si film textured by the hemispherical nanopit array [17]. During the simulation, the incident light is normally to the front surface of nano-patterned structures and the far-field reflection is calculated at the top situation.
Fig. 3

Schematic diagram of structural model for simulation

The influence of depth (H) and diameter (D) on the reflection behaviors of Si nano-patterned structures are simulated and studied. Figure 4a is the simulated reflectance spectra of Si nano-patterned structures with various depths by keeping the diameter (D) at 300 nm. It is found that the reflectance is quite high for flat Si substrates, which exceeds 35 % in the whole spectral range (400–850 nm). By forming the Si nano-patterned structures, the reflectance is gradually reduced by increasing the etching depth. The simulation results indicate that the broad-band anti-reflection ability of the Si nanostructures can be obtained by controlling the parameters of the formed Si. The reflectance can be lower than 10 % in the visible light range for Si nano-patterned structures with depth of 150 nm even if the aspect ratio of present Si nanostructures was quite small. The experimental data of the reflection from 400 to 850 nm are given in Fig. 4b to compare with the simulation results. It can be proved in both experimental and simulation results that the reflection will decrease as the increasing of depth. It is worth noting that the reflectance in the experiment decreases much faster as the depth increases. One of the possible reasons is that the surface topography will deviate from the paraboloid model when the depth increases. Since we treated the structures with the smooth surface, but the real surface after RIE etching is still quite rough. It was reported that the compound random nanostructures can significantly reduce the reflection compared with that of simple nanostructures [18].
Fig. 4

a Simulated reflection spectra and b experimental reflection spectra of samples with same diameter (D = 300 nm) and different depths (from 0 to 150 nm)

The etched deep hole between the Si nano-patterned structures may also contributed to the anti-reflection behaviors. Usually, chemical etching methods were used to fabricate nano-hole structures [19]. The etching rate is very fast, and the depth of nano-holes usually exceeds 200 nm and the aspect ratio of nano-holes is much larger than 1. In our case, the aspect ratio of height/diameter is no more than 0.5 and the hole is not so deep to influence the observed anti-reflection characteristics strongly, though we cannot completely rule out of the contribution from nano-hole structures.

Figure 5 shows the simulation results of reflection spectra of Si nano-patterned structures with various diameters (D) by keeping the depth at 91 nm. When the aspect ratio is high (D = 200 nm, H = 91 nm), the reflectance is lower than 25 % in the whole spectral range (400–850 nm). By changing the diameter from 200 to 500 nm, the reflectance from 500 to 850 nm does not change very much (less than 10 %). It means that if the aspect ratio is low, the reflectance of this nanostructure in the long-wavelength region is mainly influenced by the depth (H) and changing diameter just cause a little difference.
Fig. 5

Simulated reflection spectra of samples with same height (H = 91 nm) and different diameters (from 200 to 500 nm)

The anti-reflection behavior of Si-nano-patterned structures can be understood as below. First, the Si nano-patterned structures can be considered as a graded-index layer between the Si substrates and air due to the gradually changed volume ratio. The graded index layer can effectively eliminate the light reflection as revealed by Fresnel theory [20]. Second, the suppression of light reflection can also be attributed to the strong scattering between the incident light and formed nano-patterned structures because the light wavelength is comparable with the geometric size of Si nanostructures. According to Mie’s scattering theory, the strong forward scattering results in the enhanced optical absorption of incident light which can significantly reduce the surface reflection [21]. With increasing the depth of Si nano-patterned structures, the incident light can be trapped more effectively which improves the anti-reflection behaviors as shown in our simulation results. If the depth remains constant, which indicates the thickness of the graded index layer does not change. However, if the diameter of Si nano-patterned structures becomes small, the scattering between the incident light and nano-patterned structures is enhanced. Therefore, the reflectance is decreased in the whole spectral range as shown in Fig. 5. Usually, the significantly anti-reflection behaviors were usually realized in the nanostructures with high aspect ratio. Our simulation results suggest that the good anti-reflection characteristics can also be achieved by using Si nanostructures with lower aspect ratio, which is in well agreement with the previous work [17], in which, they found that the optical absorption can be obviously enhanced by forming low aspect ratio hemispherical nanopit structures. It is worth noticing that the reflectance will be strongly suppressed when the wavelength is comparable with diameter (Fig. 5 D = 400 nm, 500 nm), and the possible reason may due to the strongest resonant scattering effect when the size is equal to the wavelength of the incident light and it is needed to be further clarified in our future work.

In order to demonstrate the effect of formed Si nano-patterned structures on the device performance, we fabricate the light emission devices based on Si QDs/SiO2 multilayers on the nano-patterned structures with various depths. The surface morphology of samples after depositing Si QDs/SiO2 multilayers is checked by AFM technique. As shown in the inset of Fig. 6a, the periodic nano-patterned structures are still kept which indicates the good conformal film deposition characteristics by using the Si nanostructures with low aspect ratio.
Fig. 6

a Room temperature photoluminescence of Si QDs/SiO2 multilayers on flat and nano-patterned substrates under the excitation of He–Cd laser (325 nm). b Integrated PL intensity of samples. c Reflectance at 820 nm of different samples

Figure 6a shows the room temperature photoluminescence (PL) spectra from Si QDs/SiO2 multilayers on flat and nano-patterned structures excited by Hd–Cd laser with wavelength of 325 nm. The PL peak is centered at around 820 nm. The origin of 750–850 nm emission is still under the debate. Some groups attributed it to the quantum confinement effect, and the others believed it is due to the radiative recombination of photo-excited electron-hole pairs via interface states [22, 23, 24, 25, 26]. For example, Franzò et al. reported that their EL peak is due to electron-hole recombination in the Si nanocrystals and not to defects [23], but N. Daldosso et al. concluded that the PL of Si/SiO2 system is surface related [24]. Since we have measured the PL spectra from Si QDs-based multilayers with various dot sizes and we found that the peaks position is size independent, which is contrary to the quantum confinement expect. We attribute the 820 nm emission in our case mainly to the recombination of electron-hole pairs via the interface states on the Si nanocrystal, though we cannot completely rule out of the contribution from the band-to-band recombination within the Si QDs due to the quite broad PL band. Qin et al. also attributed the observed visible light emission to the nc-Si/SiO2 interfacial states based on their experimental results although the excitation of electrons and holes occurred within the Si QDs [22].

It is clearly shown that the PL intensity is obviously enhanced by using nano-patterned structures. With increasing the etching depth, the PL intensity is first enhanced and then decreased. The results are shown in Fig. 6b, and the maximum PL intensity can be obtained by using nanostructures with depth of 91 nm, which is improved by 6.6-fold compared with that of flat one. The enhanced PL intensity can be explained in terms of the improved light-extraction efficiency due to the reduction of the optical reflection on the surface of samples and interfaces between Si QDs and SiO2 layers by using nanostructures. As in the flat sample, the light is emitted under the all directions and only a part of light whose incident angle is less than angle of total reflection. However, the nanostructure can approximately be seen as a graded-index layer. More light can travel through a graded-index layer than that of the flat samples. The greater the H is, the index of this layer changes more slowly. The reflection spectra are measured and reflectance at 820 nm are given in Fig. 6c as a function of etching depth. It is found that the reflectance of Si QDs/SiO2 multilayers is decreased from 38.8 % for flat one to 3.6 % for sample on nano-patterned structures with depth of 150 nm. However, further increasing the etching depth causes the reduction of PL intensity, though the surface reflection becomes much lower. The possible reason is that the surface recombination will become more serious which may influence the luminescence efficiency as seen in our case. Since the thickness of SiO2 in our present work is about 2 nm and the total thickness of Si QDs/SiO2 multilayers is about 40 nm, it is possible that the part of the photo-excited carriers can tunnel through the ultrathin SiO2 layer to the surface of Si substrates, where they recombine via the surface states and result in the reduced photoluminescence intensity as we observed experimentally. It looks like that the improved device performance will be limited by the surface states by using Si nano-patterned structures which determines the optimum size parameters of nanostructures.


In summary, the anti-reflection behaviors of Si nano-patterned structures prepared by nano-sphere lithography technique are studied via FDTD solutions as well as experimental observations. It is found that a good anti-reflection characteristic can be achieved by using Si nano-patterned structures even if they have the low aspect ratio which can be attributed to the graded-index as well as the strong scattering effect. With increasing the etching depth from 0 to 150 nm and reducing the diameter of nanostructures from 500 to 200 nm, the surface reflection can be obviously suppressed. In the experiment, we fabricated substrates with diameter of 300 nm and depths of 51, 91, 115, and 150 nm, and the reflectance is lower than 10 % in the measurement spectral range which is consistent with the simulation results. By depositing Si QDs/SiO2 multilayers on the nano-patterned structures, the reflectance can be further reduced and the reflectance at 820 nm can be as low as 3.6 %. The maximum PL intensity of quantum dots can be achieved and is improved by 6.6-folds for samples deposited on the nano-patterned structures with depth of 91 nm compared with that of flat one. However, further increasing the etching depth results in the reduction of PL intensity although the surface reflection is still reduced, which can be ascribed to the strong surface recombination of carriers. Our results demonstrate that the performance of Si-based photonic devices can be improved by optimizing the Si-based light trapping structures.



This work is supported by the “973” project (2007CB613401) and PAPD.


  1. 1.
    Qin GG, Ran RZ, Sun K, Xu HJ (2010) Light emission from nanoscale Si/Si oxide materials. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 10(3):1584–1595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pavesi L, Negro LD, Mazzoleni C, Franzò G, Priolo F (2000) Optical gain in silicon nanocrystals. Nature 408(6811):440–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Soref R (2006) The past, present, and future of silicon photonics. IEEE J Sel Top Quant 12(6):1678–1687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mu WW, Zhang P, Xu J, Sun SH, Xu J, Li W, Chen KJ (2014) Direct-current and alternating-current driving Si quantum dots-based light emitting device. IEEE J Sel Top Quant 20(4):8200106–8200106Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gourbilleau F, Ternon C, Maestre D, Palais O, Dufour C (2009) Silicon-rich SiO2/SiO2 multilayers: a promising material for the third generation of solar cell. J Appl Phys 106(1):013501–013501-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhou J, Chen GR, Liu Y, Xu J, Wang T, Wan N, Ma ZY, Li W, Song C, Chen KJ (2009) Electroluminescent devices based on amorphous SiN/Si quantum dots/amorphous SiN sandwiched structures. Opt Express 17(1):156–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Do YR, Kim YC, Cho SH, Ahn JH, Lee JG (2003) Improved output coupling efficiency of a ZnS:Mn thin-film electroluminescent device with addition of a two-dimensional SiO2 corrugated substrate. Appl Phys Lett 82(23):4172–4174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mochizuki Y, Fujii M, Hayashi S, Tsuruoka T (2009) Enhancement of photoluminescence from silicon nanocrystals by metal nanostructures made by nanosphere lithography. J Appl Phys 106(1):013517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hsieh MY, Wang CY, Chen LY, Lin TP, Ke MY, Cheng YW, Yu YC, Chen CP, Yeh DM, Lu CF, Huang CF, Yang CC, Huang JJ (2008) Improvement of external extraction efficiency in GaN-based LEDs by nanosphere lithography. IEEE Electr Device L 29(7):658–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tanaka H, Horn MW, Weiss PS (2006) A method for the fabrication of sculptured thin films of periodic arrays of standing nanorods. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 6(12):3799–3802(4)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lu P, Xu J, Cao YQ, Lai J, Xu L, Chen KJ (2014) Preparation of nano-patterned Si structures for hetero-junction solar cells. Appl Surf Sci 334:123–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sun SH, Lu P, Xu J, Xu L, Chen KJ, Wang QM, Zuo YH (2013) Fabrication of anti-reflecting Si nano-structures with low aspect ratio by nano-sphere lithography technique. Nano-Micro Lett 5(1):18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen DY, Liu Y, Xu J, Wei D, Sun H, Xu L, Wang T, Li W, Chen KJ (2010) Improved emission efficiency of electroluminescent device containing nc-Si/SiO2 multilayers by using nano-patterned substrate. Opt Express 18(2):917–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu Y, Sun SH, Xu J, Zhao L, Sun HC, Li J, Mu WW, Xu L, Chen KJ (2011) Broadband antireflection and absorption enhancement by forming nano-patterned Si structures for solar cells. Opt Express 19(19):A1051–A1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kempa K, Kimball B, Rybczynski J, Huang ZP, Wu PF, Steeves D, Sennett M, Giersig M, Rao DVGLN, Carnahan DL, Wang DZ, Lao JY, Li WZ, Ren ZF (2002) Photonic crystals based on periodic arrays of aligned carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett 3(1):13–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xu J, Sun SH, Cao YQ, Lu P, Li W, Chen KJ (2014) Light trapping and down-shifting effect of periodically nanopatterned Si-quantum-dot-based structures for enhanced photovoltaic properties. Part Part Syst Char 31(4):459–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li JS, Yu HY, Li YL, Wang F, MF Y, Wong SM (2011) Low aspect-ratio hemispherical nanopit surface texturing for enhancing light absorption in crystalline Si thin film-based solar cells. Appl Phys Lett 98(2):021905–021905-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang L, Xuan Y (2015) Broadband and multi angle enhanced antireflection of silicon solar cells by compound random nanostructures. J Quant Spectrosc Ra 151:5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Han SE, Chen G (2010) Optical absorption enhancement in silicon nanohole arrays for solar photovoltaics. Nano Lett 10(3):1012–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Boutry GA (1948) Augustin Fresnel: his time, life and work, 1788–1827. Sci Prog 36(144):587–604Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wiscombe WJ (1980) Improved mie scattering algorithms. Appl Optics 19(9):1505–1509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Qin GG, Ma SY, Ma ZC, Zong WH, Liping Y (1998) Electroluminescence from amorphous Si/SiO2 superlattices. Solid State Commun 106:329–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Franzò G, Irrera A, Moreira EC, Miritello M, Iacona F, Sanfilippo D, Stefano GD, Fallica PG, Priolo F (2001) Electroluminescence of silicon nanocrystals in MOS structures. Appl Phys A Mater 74(1):1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Daldosso N, Luppi M, Ossicini S, Degoli E, Magri R, Dalba G, Fornasini P, Grisenti R, Rocca F, Pavesi L, Boninelli S, Priolo F, Spinella C, Iacona F (2003) Role of the interface region on the optoelectronic properties of silicon nanocrystals embedded in SiO2. Phys Rev B 68(8):338-344Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sykora M, Mangolini L, Schaller RD, Kortshagen U, Jurbergs D, Klimov VI (2008) Size-dependent intrinsic radiative decay rates of silicon nanocrystals at large confinement energies. Phys Rev Lett 100(6):1431–1432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Godefroo S, Hayne M, Jivanescu M, Stesmans A, Zacharias M, Lebedev OI, Tendeloo GV, Moshchalkov VV (2008) Classification and control of the origin of photoluminescence from Si nanocrystals. Nat Nanotechnol 3(3):174–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2016

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wenyi Shao
    • 1
  • Peng Lu
    • 1
  • Wei Li
    • 1
  • Jun Xu
    • 1
  • Ling Xu
    • 1
  • Kunji Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures and Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Advanced Photonic and Electronic Materials, School of Electronic Science and Engineering and Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced MicrostructuresNanjing UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations