Nanoscale Research Letters

, 11:304 | Cite as

Utilizing Gold Nanoparticle Probes to Visually Detect DNA Methylation

  • Kui Chen
  • Mingyi Zhang
  • Ya-Nan Chang
  • Lin Xia
  • Weihong Gu
  • Yanxia Qin
  • Juan Li
  • Suxia Cui
  • Gengmei Xing
Open Access
Nano Express


The surface plasmon resonance (SPR) effect endows gold nanoparticles (GNPs) with the ability to visualize biomolecules. In the present study, we designed and constructed a GNP probe to allow the semi-quantitative analysis of methylated tumor suppressor genes in cultured cells. To construct the probe, the GNP surfaces were coated with single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) by forming Au–S bonds. The ssDNA contains a thiolated 5′-end, a regulatory domain of 12 adenine nucleotides, and a functional domain with absolute pairing with methylated p16 sequence (Met-p16). The probe, paired with Met-p16, clearly changed the color of aggregating GNPs probe in 5 mol/L NaCl solution. Utilizing the probe, p16 gene methylation in HCT116 cells was semi-quantified. Further, the methylation of E-cadherin, p15, and p16 gene in Caco2, HepG2, and HCT116 cell lines were detected by the corresponding probes, constructed with three domains. This simple and cost-effective method was useful for the diagnosis of DNA methylation-related diseases.


DNA methylation Gold nanoparticles probe Surface plasmon resonance Visual detection Semi-quantitative assay 


DNA methylation is an important regulator of gene expression, and its role in tumorigenesis has been a central topic in the last few decades [1]. Many studies have indicated that hypermethylated CpG islands in tumor suppressor gene promoter sites can increase chromosome coiling and gene silencing, and this process occurs prior to malignant cell growth [2, 3]. As site-specific methylation occurs early and can be detected even in body fluid, it is regarded as a potential biomarker for early tumor detection and determining prognosis [4, 5, 6].

To date, numerous techniques have been developed for DNA methylation detection [7, 8]. Due to the particular physicochemical property of nanoscale materials, nano-based DNA methylation detection has emerged as an important option. The specific optical properties of nanomaterials change the very foundation of traditional DNA methylation sensing [9, 10, 11]. Among the abundant types of nanomaterials, gold nanoparticles (GNPs) are most extensively applied due to their unique chemical and physical properties that are strongly dependent on their size, shape, and degree of aggregation [12]. Colorimetric assays based on GNP surface plasmon resonance are more applicable as clinical markers because they only require a UV/vis spectrometer. Most studies have concentrated on indirect methods to detect DNA methyltransferases or DNA methylases based on GNPs [13, 14, 15]. Zeng’s group used antibody-conjugated magnetic microspheres to capture methylated DNA [16]. After their release from the microsphere by heat denaturation, methylated DNA was added to unmodified GNPs to prevent GNPs from aggregating in the salt solution, whereas the non-methylated group cannot be captured, and no DNA was released into the GNP solution. One limitation of this method is the need of an antibody to recognize the methylated DNA sequence. In this work, we tried to construct a highly sensitive single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-GNP probe to detect DNA methylation in cultured cells.

p16 are tumor suppressor genes and their transcription activities can be inhibited by hypermethylation in the promoter site. Therefore, the small CpG region in the promoter site was selected as the target to test the probe and achieve semi-quantitative detection of DNA methylation. We designed an ssDNA-GNP probe to target and visually detect the CpG region of the tumor suppressor genes by introducing a colorimetric method to modify an existing bisulfite-based method that measures CpG region methylation. After the sequence was treated with bisulfate, the 5′-ends were C-CH3 and U in the methylated and non-methylated DNA sequences, respectively. Their polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products (Met-p16 and Dem-p16, respectively) were used as standard sequences in the following experiment to test the probe and calculate a standard curve for semi-quantitative detection of intracellular DNA methylation (Table 1). We applied the aggregation principle reported by Sato et al. [17] and Liu and Lu [18] to construct an ssDNA-GNP probe. The probe contained a sequence that absolutely paired with Met-p16 but mismatched Dem-p16 at the terminal base. This assay consisted of two steps (Fig. 1a, b): (a) the target sequences (Met-p16 and Dem-p16) were added to the ssDNA-GNP probe solution and incubated on ice for 1 h, and then Tris-acetate buffer containing NaCl was used to regulate the salt concentration of the final colloidal solution of GNPs and (b) GNP aggregation behavior was investigated by observing the solution color and monitoring the UV-vis absorption spectrum. We then drew a standard curve of correlation between the Met-p16 content and the UV-vis spectra of A 620 nm/A 520 nm in the probe solution. Following the process, p16, E-cadherin, and p15 ssDNA-GNP probe with three domains were constructed and utilized to assay the methylation of these tumor suppressor genes in three cancer cell lines. The results show that the ssDNA-GNP probe can semi-quantitatively detect DNA methylation. Moreover, the ssDNA-GNP probe can be designed to pair with various oligonucleotides for the specific detection of different (and even multiple) methylated target genes.
Table 1

Sequences of oligonucleotides used in the assay


cgc cac cac cct cca acc t


tgc cac cac cct cca acc t


SH-(CH2)3-aaa aaa aaa aaa tta ttt agg ttg gag ggt ggt ggc g


SH-(CH2)3-aaa aaa tta ttt agg ttg gag ggt ggt ggc g


SH-(CH2)3-tta ttt agg ttg gag ggt ggt ggc g

MPs p16

gtt ttt tag aat gtt ggg att ata ga

MPa p16

ctc aaa aaa cta aaa caa aaa aat c


ttg tta ttt agg ttg gag ggt ggt

PC p16

tta ttt agg ttg gag ggt ggt ggc gcg att tcg gtt tat tgt aat ttt tgt ttt tcg gg

NC p16

tta ttt agg ttg gag ggt ggt ggt gtg att tcg gtt tat tgt aat ttt tgt ttt tcg gg

Probe E-cad

SH-(CH2)3-aaa aaa tta ggt tag agg gtt atc g

MPs E-cad

ttt agt aat ttt agg tta gag ggt tat

MPa E-cad

aaa ctc aca aat act tta caa ttc c

PC E-cad

taa ttt tag gtt aga ggg tta tcg cgt tta tgc gag gtc ggg tgg gcg ggt cgt tag

NC E-cad

taa ttt tag gtt aga ggg tta ttg tgt tta tgc gag gtc ggg tgg gcg ggt cgt tag

Probe p15

SH-(CH2)3-aaa aaa gat tat tcg ggt cgt tgc g

MPs p15

agg aga ata agg gta tgt tta gtg g

MPa p15

ccc taa aac ccc aac tac cta aat

PC p15

acg gtg gat tat tcg ggt cgt tgc gcg ttt ggg ggt tgc gga atg cgc

NC p15

acg gtg gat tat tcg ggt cgt tgt gtg ttt ggg ggt tgc gga atg cgc

Note: Met-p16 and Dem-p16 correspond to a partial methylated and demethylated DNA sequence of p16, respectively. A partial E-cadherin, p15, and p16 sequences were amplified with MPs E-cad and MPa E-cad, MPs p15 and MPa p15, MPs p16 and MPa p16 primers, respectively, that were identified from Methprimer. NPs and P16MPa primers were used to perform nested PCR. PC and NC sequences were all dsDNA. The special cutting site for BstUI could be found in the PC group but not in the NC group. Thus, PC E-cad, NC E-cad, PC p15, NC p15, PC p16, and NC p16 sequences were used as positive and negative controls during the DNA methylation detection of E-cadherin, p15 and p16, respectively

Fig. 1

The principle of DNA methylation detection by GNPs based on the SPR effect (a, b) and a schematic illustration of the composition of ssDNA-GNP probe (c)


Reagents and Chemicals

Chloroauric acid (HAuCl4·4H2O) and trisodium citrate were obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Beijing Company Limited (Beijing, China). Tris (2-carboxyethyl) phosphine (TCEP) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All oligonucleotides designed in this study were synthesized by Sangon Biotech Company Limited (Shanghai, China). The sequences of oligonucleotides are presented in Table 1. Other reagents were all of analytical grade.

GNP Synthesis and ssDNA-GNP Construction

GNPs (~13 nm) were synthesized using a citrate reduction method [19]. Briefly, 200 mL of 1 % (wt) HAuCl4 was brought to boil in a 250-mL flask. Next, 1.2 mL 5 % (wt) sodium citrate was added under rapid stirring with a magnetic stir bar. After the solution color turned from purple to red, the boiling and stirring were allowed to continue for 5 min. When the solution was cooled to room temperature, GNP aliquots were centrifuged at 7000g and resuspended in ddH2O. The GNP concentration was determined by UV-vis spectrophotometer [20].

The ssDNA-GNP probes were constructed as described by Liu and Lu [18]. First, thiolated ssDNA was activated by freshly prepared TCEP (10 mM in acetate buffer, pH 5.2), and 30 μL ssDNA (100 μM) was added into 1 mL GNP solution (57 nM). The reaction solution was incubated at room temperature for at least 16 h with gentle shaking. Then, Tris-acetate buffer (500 mM, pH 8.2) and 100 μL NaCl (1 M) was added to the tubes dropwise with gentle shaking until the concentration of Tris-acetate reached 5 mM. The synthesized ssDNA-GNP probes were stored in the dark for 24 h, and then collected by centrifugation at 8000g at room temperature for 15 min.

GNPs and ssDNA-GNP Characterization

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed on a Hitachi S-4800 analyzer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), and particle size distributions were evaluated using a NicompTM 380 DLS particle size analyzer (Nicomp, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). Agarose gel electrophoresis assays were performed to assess the dispersal of GNP and ssDNA-GNP probes [21]. After mixing 5 μL GNP or ssDNA-GNP samples with 1 μL glycerol and 4 μL ultrapure water, the mixtures were loaded on a 1 % agarose gel buffered with 1 × TAE (Tris-acetate-EDTA, pH 8.3). Agarose gel electrophoresis was run in 1× TAE buffer at a constant 120-V voltage for 20 min. The electrophoresis results were imaged with a digital camera (OLYMPUS E-520, Tokyo, Japan).

To determine the number of ssDNA per GNP, DTT was added into the probe solution to release the immobilized ssDNA. The probe solution was incubated at room temperature for 10 min, and the GNPs rapidly aggregated. After removing the GNPs by centrifugation at 14,000g for 5 min, the released ssDNA in the supernatant was quantified using QuantiFluor ssDNA system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA).

To compare the stability of nude GNPs and the ssDNA-GNP probe, we prepared Tris-acetate buffers containing NaCl concentrations from 0.1 to 2.5 M. Next, 10 μL GNPs or probes (200 nM) were added to 300 μL Tris-acetate buffers and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. The absorbance spectra of GNP solution and probe solution were recorded from 400 to 800 nm on a UV-vis spectrometer (Persee General, Beijing, China).

Testing of the Probe and Drawing of Standard Curve

Two ssDNA samples (Met-p16 and Dem-p16, Table 1) were applied as substrates and diluted to 100 μM. Each DNA sample (2 μL) was mixed with Tris-acetate buffer containing 0.1 M NaCl and 200 nM probes to a total volume of 1 mL. The solutions were firstly incubated on ice for 1 h and then incubated at room temperature for 10 min. After removing residual DNA samples by centrifugation at 8000g (20 min at 4 °C), the precipitation was resuspended in Tris-acetate buffer containing NaCl (concentration range from 0.1 to 5.0 M) and incubated at room temperature for 5 min. The absorbance spectra of the products were recorded from 400 to 800 nm on a UV-vis spectrometer. We then prepared sample solutions containing different ratios of Met-p16 (0–100 μM) and Dem-p16 (0–100 μM). The final products were resuspended in Tris-acetate buffer containing 5.0 M NaCl. Other protocols were followed as mentioned above. Based on these results, we drew a standard curve of correlation between Met-p16 level and the probe solution’s UV-vis absorption spectrum at A 620 nm/A 520 nm.

The ssDNA-GNP Probe of E-cadherin and p15 Gene

To detect DNA methylation of E-cadherin and p15 gene, the ssDNA-GNP probe was constructed. Based on the result of the probe of p16 gene, the ssDNA contain three domains: a hybridization sequence for targeting the promoter site of E-cadherin and p15 suppressor gene; a mercapto group at the 5′-end for linking ssDNA onto GNPs with an Au-S bond; and a regulatory region of 12A to avoid the unspecific adsorption between Au and those elements. Using freshly prepared TCEP (10 mM in acetate buffer, pH 5.2) to activate thiolated ssDNA was the first step. Then, 30 μL ssDNA (100 μM) was added into 1 mL GNP solution (57 nM), and the mixed solution was incubated at 37 °C for 16 h under gentle shaking. Next, Tris-acetate buffer (500 mM, pH 8.2) and NaCl (1 M) were dropwise added into the reaction tubes to regulate the concentration of Tris-acetate to 5 mM. The synthesized ssDNA-GNP probes were stored in the dark for 24 h, and then collected by centrifugation at 8000g at room temperature for 15 min.

Genomic DNA Extraction and Bisulfite Treatment

Genomic DNA from CaCo2 (human colon cancer cell line), HepG2 (human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line), and HCT116 cells (human colon cancer cell line, China Infrastructure of Cell Line Resources; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China) were extracted using a genomic DNA extraction kit according to the manufacturer (TIANGEN, Beijing, China). Bisulfite treatment DNA was accomplished by an EZ DNA methylation kit according to the manufacturer (Zymo, Irvine, CA, USA).

PCR Amplification and Digestion with BstUI

E-cadherin, p15, and p16 were amplified with bisulfite primers (Table 1) from bisulfite treatment DNA. PCR conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 5 min; then 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s; and finally, 5 min at 72 °C. To obtain products for detection (p16), a second round of PCR was performed with a pair of nested primers (Table 1) under the same conditions.

The PCR product was digested by BstUI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) overnight according to the manufacturer’s protocol. To facilitate comparison, negative and positive controls (NC and PC seq, respectively; Table. 1) were also digested. The NC seq could not be digested by BstUI, but the PC seq with a special site (CGCG) could be digested.

DNA Methylation Detection in Cultured Cell Lines

The mixtures produced with the above-described treatment were denatured at 95 °C, and then were added to the ssDNA-GNP probe solution. The reaction was performed according to the program, which was published in the probe testing system. After 5 min, the products’ absorption spectra from 400 to 800 nm were measured, and images of the solution were captured.


All results were calculated as mean ± SD unless otherwise specified. Data are reported as biological replicates except for hydrodynamic size analysis, where technical replicates from a representative experiment were used. Data were analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics (Chicago, US) using one-way analysis at P < 0.05.

Results and Discussion

Linking ssDNA onto GNPs

Functionalizing 13-nm GNPs with ssDNA was a crucial step in constructing the probe used in our experiment. The specially designed oligonucleotides included a hybridization domain that targeted a sequence in the promoter site of the p16 tumor suppressor gene and a mercapto group at the 5′-end. Linking ssDNA onto GNPs with an Au–S bond was carried out at 4 or 37 °C. Then, agarose electrophoresis and SEM were used to evaluate and compare the stabilities of these ssDNA-GNPs in 0.1 mol/L NaCl solution (Fig. 2). The bands of samples present different colors from red to blue and various migration distances in agarose gel electrophoresis. The blue was induced by particle aggregation and was associated with short migration distance (Fig. 2a). Functionalized GNPs with ssDNA were red in the gel, indicating that linking ssDNA onto the GNPs improve their stability. The ssDNA-GNPs synthesized at 37 °C (Fig. 2b) performed more monodispersity and more stability than ssDNA-GNPs synthesized at 4 °C (Fig. 2c). We also evaluated the stability of ssDNA-GNPs generated at 50 °C. Both agarose electrophoresis and SEM illustrated that these ssDNA-GNPs were less stable and had poorer monodispersal (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Compared with other particles, the ssDNA-GNPs synthesized at 37 °C had the best stability, so this temperature was used to construct probes for the remaining experiments.
Fig. 2

Influence of temperature on ssDNA-GNP stability. a Agarose gel images of different ssDNA-GNP samples. b, c SEM images of ssDNA-GNPs synthesized at 37 and 4 °C, scale bar = 100 μm

Construction and Characterization of the ssDNA-GNP Probe

The GNP probe structure is shown in Fig. 1c. Besides the mercapto group and hybridization domain, the specially designed ssDNA in the probe included a regulatory domain. We designed three probes with different numbers of adenine nucleotide (A) in the regulatory domains (12, 6, and 0 in probes 1, 2, and 3, respectively) and visually evaluated their stability in 0.1 and 5.0 mol/L NaCl solution. The regulatory domain plays a key role in GNP stability by affecting the double electrode layer [12]. ssDNA with different regulatory domains were linked onto the GNPs at the optimal temperature (37 °C) by Au–S bonds. These ssDNA-GNPs were added into saline solution to observe their stability. The colors of probes 1 and 2 were red in 0.1 mol/L NaCl, and there was no broadening in their UV/vis absorption peaks (Additional file 1: Figure S2a, b). The aggregation of probe 1 was induced by the hybridization of targeted DNA and appeared blue in the 5.0 mol/L NaCl solution. Probe 1 was much more sensitive than probe 2, because the latter was dispersible, and the solution was still red in the same condition. Therefore, we hypothesize that the repeated As in the regulatory domain influenced probe stability and further impacted the ability of the probe to assay the targeted sequences in the salt solution. Besides, phosphate, oxygen, and nitrogen in deoxyribonucleic can also form coordinate bonds with Au [22, 23]. The regulatory region may assist to avoid the unspecific adsorption between Au and those elements. Thus, we determined that the optimal regulatory domain was 12A in probe 1.

The probe was also characterized by dynamic light scattering (DLS). The results showed that the probe had excellent monodispersity and uniform particle structure. The hydrated particle size of the probes was 38.3 ± 4.4 nm (Fig. 3a). The amount of ssDNA coupled to the GNPs was also determined by UV analysis [24]. The molar ratio of GNPs and ssDNA was 1:18 ± 1 in the probe under the optimum synthesis condition (Fig. 3b).
Fig. 3

Characteristics of ssDNA-GNP probes. a The hydrate particle size was determined by DLS. b Estimation of the ratio of immobilized ssDNA on pre-GNPs. The stability of nude GNPs (c) and ssDNA-GNPs (e) in various concentrations of salt solution. Changes in UV-spectrum (d, f)

The accurate stability and monodispersity of the ssDNA-GNP probes was further evaluated for their usefulness in detecting DNA methylation. When the probe was added into different NaCl solution concentrations (0.1, 0.25, and 0.5 mol/L), the solution color remained red. A gradual change in solution color from red to purple and finally to blue was observed with increased NaCl concentration from 0.75 to 2.5 mol/L (Fig. 3c–f). In contrast, the color of the nude GNPs instantaneously changed from red to blue even at a low NaCl concentration (0.1 mol/L). In addition, the aggregation of the nude GNPs induced a broadening absorption peak and a 144-nm red shift in the UV/vis spectrum. As a result, the probe was more stable in the salt solution. A previous study showed that the ssDNA-GNP probe with 159 DNA sequence on one nanoparticle was stable but not sufficient sensitive [17]. Therefore, it was our goal to construct a probe with an appropriate balance of stability and sensitivity.

Standard Curve to Assay DNA Methylation

We utilized p16 probe 1 to detect methylated DNA. The probes manifested different colors after incubation and annealing with Met-p16 or Dem-p16 because the distinct structures of the two dsDNA-GNPs induced variable particle aggregation in salt solution after ssDNA pairing (Fig. 4 and Additional file 1: Figure S3). The dsDNA-GNPs from the pairing probe with Dem-p16 were stable in the NaCl solution from 0.1 to 5.0 mol/L (Fig. 4a and Additional file 1: Figure S3a), and the absorbance spectra showed litter change in both groups (Fig. 4b and Additional file 1: Figure S3b). In contrast, dsDNA-GNPs paired with Met-p16 aggregated in the 5.0 mol/L NaCl solution (Fig. 4c and Additional file 1: Figure S3c), with the color changing from red to blue. The obvious peak broadening and red shift (from 522 to 575 nm) were noted in the UV/vis absorbance spectra (Fig. 4d). However, probe 2 did not induce a change in solution color or a pronounced red shift of the absorbance spectra peak (from 522 to 544 nm) when it formed dsDNA-GNPs with Met-p16 in the salt solution (Additional file 1: Figure S3d). The final ssDNA-GNP probe architecture contained a thiolated 5′-end, a regulatory domain of 12A nucleotides, and a functional domain with absolutely pairing match with Met-p16.
Fig. 4

Visual determination of DNA methylation in the mimic system. Visual detection of Dem-p16 (a) and Met-p16 (c) in various salt concentrations. Changes in UV-spectrum (b, d)

Though the interpretation of the phenomenon was not clear, we hypothesized that a single-base mismatch at the outermost position of the ssDNA-GNP probes may induce a repulsive interaction [17]. The repulsive interaction was amplified by the GNPs’ huge specific surface area. Ultimately, the variable stability between these two dsDNA-GNPs was large enough to be observed by the naked eye.

The probe was incubated with mixtures containing different ratios of Met-p16 and Dem-p16. After annealing, the mixtures were transferred into the 5.0 mol/L NaCl solution. The solution color changed from red to purple and finally to blue when the Met-p16 ratio increased from 0 to 100 % in the mixture (Fig. 5a). Furthermore, the absorption peak in the UV/vis spectra of GNPs shifted and broadened to a higher wavelength (from 522 to 558 ± 13 nm) with an increasing ratio of Met-p16 (Fig. 5b). We used A 620 nm/A 520 nm as the index to indicate the dsDNA-GNP aggregation level [14, 25, 26] and found that there was not a linear correlation between A 620 nm/A 520 nm values and Met-p16 quantities (Fig. 5c). Whereas the A 620 nm/A 520 nm value of a sample with 20 % Met-p16 was significantly different compared with the control (0 % Met-p16 sample) (P < 0.05), and the results were even more significant when comparing the 40 % Met-p16 sample and the control (P < 0.01, Additional file 1: Figure S4). Statistical analysis indicated that the relationship between DNA methylation quantity and A 620 nm/A 520 nm values followed the functional equation:
$$ y=1.15-0.85\times {0.18}^x\kern1em {R}^2=0.98 $$
Fig 5

Semi-quantitative detection and analysis of DNA methylation degree in the mimic system. The application of ssDNA-GNP probes for the visual detection of DNA methylation in 5 mol/L NaCl (a) and the corresponding UV-vis spectrum (b). Curve fitting results of A 620 nm/A 520 nm value to DNA methylation degree: Y = abX + c, a = −0.85, b = 0.18, c = 1.15, R 2 = 0.98. Y is the A 620nm/A 520nm value and X is the Met-p16 concentration (c)

Here, y is the normalized to the A 620 nm/A 520 nm value and x is the Met-p16 ratio.

According to the study by Drexler, the methylation frequency of tumor suppressor gene promoter sites was over 40 % in cancer patients [27]. Jamese et al. investigated aberrant CpG islands in p16 in 13 colon cancer cell lines and found that the methylation level was as high as 92 % [28]. The detection limit of the constructed probe in the present study was 20 %; thus, the probe has an effective detection range for DNA methylation in HCT116 cells.

Semi-quantitative Detection of DNA Methylation in Cancer Cell Lines

The targeted sequence (p16 seq) in the promoter site was achieved through a series of experiments including genomic DNA extraction, bisulfite treatment, PCR amplification (Additional file 1: Figure S5a, c, e, f), endonuclease digestion (Additional file 1: Figure S5b, d, g) and denaturation. Meanwhile, the PC and NC seqs were BstUI digested and then denatured. The mixtures containing p16 seq were added into the probe solution. Mixtures of PC and NC seq were also treated. After incubating for 5 min at room temperature, the probe solution mixtures were transferred to 5.0 mol/L NaCl solution. The solution color of the p16 seq group changed from red to violet, as did that in the PC seq group. In the NC seq group, the solution color was red throughout the experiment (Fig. 6a). The UV-vis absorption spectra of the solution showed obvious peak broadening and a red shift from 522 to 641 nm in the p16 gene seq group. A similar phenomenon was observed for the PC seq; the red shift was from 522 to 633 nm. For the NC seq, there was no UV-vis peak broadening, and the red shift was only 15 nm (Fig. 6b). According to the standard curve (Fig. 5c), y = 1.15 − 0.85 × 0.18 x (y is the normalized A 620 nm/A 520 nm value, x is the Met-p16 ratio), the DNA methylation level of the p16 gene in HCT116 cell was detected and semi-quantitatively measured. In our assay, the A 620 nm/A 520 nm values were 1.11 and 1.13 in the p16 seq and PC seq groups, respectively, and the normalized A 620 nm/A 520 nm of p16 seq was 0.98. The calculated DNA methylation in the p16 promoter site was 91 % in HCT116 cells.
Fig 6

Visual determination of DNA methylation of p16 in HCT116 cell line. Visual detection of negative and positive controls and the p16 sample in 5.0 mol/L NaCl solution (a). Changes in the UV-spectrum (b). NC negative control, PC positive control, p16 p16 sample

As mentioned above, semi-quantitatively assay was broadened to detect the methylation level of E-cadherin and p15 genes in CaCo2, HepG2, and HCT116 cell lines. Meanwhile, DNA methylation of p16 genes in CaCo2 and HepG2 was also detected. The varied solution color and the corresponding UV-vis absorption spectra were recorded by camera and spectrometer (Fig. 7a, b). According to the normalized A 620 nm/A 520 nm values, the methylation level was calculated. In the order of CaCo2, HepG2, and HCT116 cell lines, methylation level of E-cadherin was 49, 76, and 57 %; p15 was 52, 34, 79 %; and p16 was 77, 36, and 91 %. The certain gene in different cancer cell lines was with distinct degree of methylation.
Fig 7

Visual detection of DNA methylation of E-cadherin, p15, and p16 in CaCo2, HepG2, and HCT116 cell lines. Visual detection of different samples in 5.0 mol/L NaCl solution (a). Changes in UV-spectra (b)


Based on the SPR characteristics of GNPs, we constructed a GNP probe modified with thiolated ssDNA. The stability and sensitivity of the monodispersed probe was assayed in a mimic condition, and its standard curve was obtained (Fig. 4c, y = 1.15 − 0.85 × 0.18 x , y is the normalized A 620 nm/A 520 nm value, x is the Met-p16 ratio). We used the probe to detect and semi-quantify DNA methylation at the promoter site in three tumor suppressor genes (E-cadherin, p15, and p16) in CaCo2, HepG2, and HCT116 cancer cell lines. The result showed that the ssDNA-GNP probes were with the capacity to semi-quantitatively assay methylation levels of tumor suppressor gene in cancer cell lines.

The probe had several advantages. It provides a simple and rapid method for detecting DNA methylation, it has high sensitivity to simultaneously detect methylation in multiple target genes, the reaction endpoint is visually detectable, and DNA methylation can be measured with the corresponding standard curve. We expect that GNP probes might be applied as a novel choice for the early diagnosis of DNA methylation-related diseases.



This work was supported financially by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (Nos. 2015CB932104, 2013CB932703) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11405185).

Authors’ contributions

KC, MZ, SC, and GX designed the experiments and analyzed the data. YC synthesized the gold nanoparticles and constructed the ssDNA-GNPs. WG collected and analyzed the data of the scanning electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering. LX collected images of the agarose gel electrophoresis and analyzed the result of the ssDNA quantitation. YQ collected the images of the semi-quantitative detection of the DNA methylation. JL collected the related details found in the supplementary information. KC and GX wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

11671_2016_1487_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (392 kb)
Additional file 1: Figure S1. Characterization of ssDNA-GNPs constructed at 50 °C. The agarose gel images of ssDNAGNP samples synthesized at 37 °C and 50 °C (a). The SEM images of ssDNA-GNPs synthesized at 50 °C (b). Figure S2. (a) The stability of ssDNA-GNPs probes with different lengths of regulatory domains in 0.1 M NaClsolution. (b) The UV-Vis spectra of three specimens. Figure S3. After incubated with Dem-p16 (a) and Met-p16 (c), aggregation of the probe 2 in different concentration NaCl solution at room temperature. (b) and (d) are UV-Vis spectrum corresponding to the treated group of Dem-p16 and Met-p16. Figure S4. The relationship of Met-p16 ratio and A620nm/A520nm, error bars represent mean ± SD (n=3),*p <0.05, **p <0.01. Figure S5. (a,c,e) Bisulfite PCR amplification of E-cadherin, p15 and p16 sequences in CaCo2, HepG2 and HCT116 cell, (f) Nest PCR amplification, (b,d,g) endonuclease digestion with BstUI.


  1. 1.
    Das PM, Singal R (2004) DNA methylation and cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:4632–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Curradi M, Izzo A, Badaracco G, Landsberger N (2002) Molecular mechanisms of gene silencing mediated by DNA methylation. Mol Cell Biol 22:3157–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Merlo A, Herman JG, Mao L, Lee DJ, Gabrielson E, Burger PC, Baylin SB, Sidransky D (1995) 5′CpG island methylation is associated with transcriptional silencing of the tumour suppressor p16/CDKN2/MTS1 in human cancers. Nat Med 1:686–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nuovo GJ, Plaia TW, Belinsky SA, Baylin SB, Herman JG (1999) In situ detection of the hypermethylation-induced inactivation of the p16 gene as an early event in oncogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96:12754–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cui H, Horon IL, Ohlsson R, Hamilton SR, Feinberg AP (1998) Loss of imprinting in normal tissue of colorectal cancer patients with microsatellite instability. Nat Med 4:1276–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paliwal A, Vaissière T, Herceg Z (2010) Quantitative detection of DNA methylation states in minute amounts of DNA from body fluids. Methods 52:242–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shames DS, Minna JD, Gazdar AF (2007) Methods for detecting DNA methylation in tumors: from bench to bedside. Cancer Lett 251:187–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ushijima T (2005) Detection and interpretation of altered methylation patterns in cancer cells. Nat Rev Cancer 5:223–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ouyang XY, Liu JH, Li JS, Yang RH (2012) A carbon nanoparticle-based low-background biosensing platform for sensitive and label-free fluorescent assay of DNA methylation. Chem Commun 48:88–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dadmehr M, Hosseini M, Hosseinkhani S, Ganjali M, Khoobi M, Behzadi H, Hamedani M, Sheikhnejad R (2014) DNA methylation detection by a novel fluorimetric nanobiosensor for early cancer diagnosis. Biosens Bioelectron 60:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jing X, Cao X, Wang L, Lan T, Li Y, Xie G (2014) DNA-AuNPs based signal amplification for highly sensitive detection of DNA methylation, methyltransferase activity and inhibitor screening. Biosens Bioelectron 58:40–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Daniel MC, Astruc D (2004) Gold nanoparticles: assembly, supramolecular chemistry, quantum-size-related properties, and applications toward biology, catalysis, and nanotechnology. Chem Rev 104:293–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wu Z, Wu Z-K, Tang H, Tang L-J, Jiang J-H (2013) Activity-based DNA-gold nanoparticle probe as colorimetric biosensor for DNA methyltransferase/glycosylase assay. Anal Chem 85:4376–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu T, Zhao J, Zhang D, Li G (2010) Novel method to detect DNA methylation using gold nanoparticles coupled with enzyme-linkage reactions. Anal Chem 82:229–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Song G, Chen C, Ren J, Qu X (2009) A simple, universal colorimetric assay for endonuclease/methyltransferase activity and inhibition based on an enzyme-responsive nanoparticle system. ACS Nano 3:1183–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ge C, Fang Z, Chen J, Liu J, Lu X, Zeng L (2012) A simple colorimetric detection of DNA methylation. Analyst 137:2032–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sato K, Hosokawa K, Maeda M (2003) Rapid aggregation of gold nanoparticles induced by non-cross-linking DNA hybridization. J Am Chem Soc 125:8102–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu J, Lu Y (2006) Preparation of aptamer-linked gold nanoparticle purple aggregates for colorimetric sensing of analytes. Nat Protoc 1:246–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lubin AA, Plaxco KW (2010) Folding-based electrochemical biosensors: the case for responsive nucleic acid architectures. Acc Chem Res 43:496–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Haiss W, Thanh NT, Aveyard J, Fernig DG (2007) Determination of size and concentration of gold nanoparticles from UV-vis spectra. Anal Chem 79:4215–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xiangsheng L, Qiao J, Ying J, Jian J (2012) Minimizing nonspecific phagocytic uptake of biocompatible gold nanoparticles with mixed charged zwitterionic surface modification. J Mater Chem 22:1916–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weare WW, Reed SM, Warner MG, Hutchison JE (2000) Improved synthesis of small (d(CORE) approximate to 1.5 nm) phosphine-stabilized gold nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 122:12890–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gomez S, Philippot K, Colliere V, Chaudret B, Senocq F, Lecante P (2000) Gold nanoparticles from self-assembled gold(I) amine precursors. Chem Commun 1945-6Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sato K, Hosokawa K, Maeda M (2005) Non-cross-linking gold nanoparticle aggregation as a detection method for single-base substitutions. Nucleic Acids Res 33:e4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liu P, Yang X, Sun S, Wang Q, Wang K, Huang J, Liu J, He L (2013) Enzyme-free colorimetric detection of DNA by using gold nanoparticles and hybridization chain reaction amplification. Anal Chem 85:7689–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ren J, Wang J, Wang J, Wang E (2013) Colorimetric enantiorecognition of oligopeptide and logic gate construction based on DNA aptamer-ligand-gold nanoparticle interactions. Chemistry 19:478–82Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Drexler HG (1998) Review of alterations of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor INK4 family genes p15, p16, p18 and p19 in human leukemia-lymphoma cells. Leukemia 12:845–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Herman JG, Merlo A, Mao L, Lapidus RG, Issa J-PJ, Davidson NE, Sidransky D, Baylin SB (1995) Inactivation of the CDKN2/p16/MTS1 gene is frequently associated with aberrant DNA methylation in all common human cancers. Cancer Res 55:4525–30Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2016

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kui Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mingyi Zhang
    • 1
  • Ya-Nan Chang
    • 1
  • Lin Xia
    • 1
  • Weihong Gu
    • 1
  • Yanxia Qin
    • 1
  • Juan Li
    • 1
  • Suxia Cui
    • 2
  • Gengmei Xing
    • 1
  1. 1.CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy PhysicsChinese Academy of Science (CAS)BeijingChina
  2. 2.School of Life SciencesCapital Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations