Critical Care

, 15:P448 | Cite as

Muscular compartment syndrome and in vivo optical spectroscopy monitoring: a new model

  • F Ponchon
  • P Forget
  • M Vanhoonacker
  • G Stoquart
  • T Lejeune
  • F Lois
  • D Kahn
  • M De Kock
Poster presentation
  • 565 Downloads

Keywords

Mean Arterial Pressure Optical Spectroscopy Compartment Syndrome Conduction Block Sensory Deficit 

Introduction

The muscular compartment syndrome (MCS) is consecutive to an increase in intramuscular compartment pressures [1].This is a rare but serious postoperative complication. In vivo optical spectroscopy (INVOS) monitors tissular oxygenation continuously and non-invasively. Our objective was to develop a model mimicking the physiopathology of MCS and to assess the interest of the INVOS in this case [1, 2, 3].

Methods

After approval of the ethics committee, we inflated a tourniquet in nine healthy volunteers at a pressure equal to the mean arterial pressure (MAP), obtaining a model of slight venous congestion and arterial hypoperfusion. The INVOS monitoring was compared with sensory deficits, pain, motor activity, electromyography and invasive pressure.

Results

A profound motor nerve conduction block (>30% decrease in action potential amplitude from baseline) was observed in the seven volunteers completing the protocol, immediately reversible after releasing the external pressure. At baseline, the values of MAP, INVOS and intracompartmental pressure (ICP) were respectively 94.3 ± 6.5 mmHg, 73.3 ± 8.9% and 16.9 ± 8.6 mmHg. At the time of appearance of a significant block, the values of INVOS were 46.4 ± 10.9%; the absolute decrease of INVOS was 28.7 ± 10.6% and the ICP values were 70.0 ± 5.5 mmHg. The times to reach this significant block from baseline and from the time of an absolute INVOS decrease of 10% were respectively 33.0 ± 10.9 minutes and 27.43 ± 10.4 minutes (Figure 1).
Figure 1

(abstract P448)

Conclusions

Our model is appropriate since it mimics perfectly MCS [3]. The time after achieving an absolute decrease of the INVOS value of 10% from baseline is as accurate as the time of intracompartmental hyperpression to predict MCS (Figure 2).
Figure 2

(abstract P448)

References

  1. 1.
    Elliott , et al.: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003, 85: 625-632.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boushel , et al.: Acta Physiol Scand. 2000, 168: 615-622. 10.1046/j.1365-201x.2000.00713.xCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gentilello , et al.: J Trauma. 2001, 51: 1-9. 10.1097/00005373-200107000-00001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ponchon et al. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • F Ponchon
    • 1
  • P Forget
    • 1
  • M Vanhoonacker
    • 1
  • G Stoquart
    • 1
  • T Lejeune
    • 1
  • F Lois
    • 1
  • D Kahn
    • 1
  • M De Kock
    • 1
  1. 1.UCLBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations