Advertisement

Critical Care

, 10:P7 | Cite as

Automatic recruitment maneuvers in porcine acute lung injury based on online PaO2 measurements

  • H Luepschen
  • T Meier
  • M Großherr
  • T Leibecke
  • S Leonhardt
Poster presentation

Keywords

Acute Lung Injury Fuzzy Controller Recruitment Maneuver Peep Level Protective Ventilation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Introduction

The individualization of lung protective ventilation strategies (e.g. recruitment maneuvers [RM] and PEEP titration to keep the lungs open) requires careful bedside observations. Many parameters must be monitored, which calls for computer aid. A fuzzy-logic ventilation expert system has been tested regarding its ability to automatically conduct RMs based on the open lung concept (OLC).

Methods

Three pigs received lavages to induce ARDS and baseline ventilation of 8 ml/kg Vt, RR = 25, I:E = 1:1 and FiO2 = 1.0. The block diagram of the ventilation setup is depicted in Fig. 1a. It is capable of conducting automatic RMs while continuously recording pulmonary parameters. Fuzzy controllers handle the four phases of OLC-RM. They were fed with medical knowledge from experienced physicians. An electrical impedance tomograph (EIT) provided images of the ventilation distribution and CT scans were made. During phase 1 of RM, the controller increased the PEEP level (PCV, Pdelta = 8 cmH2O) until the lung was supposed to be open according to online PaO2 measurements (Paratrend 7). In the closing phase 2, PEEP was automatically titrated until PaO2 started to decrease. After re-opening, steady-state ventilation (phase 4) was established at a PEEP = 2 cmH2O above the closing pressure.
Figure 1

(a) Setup featuring sensor fusion and automatic ventilation control. (b) Pulmonary parameters during all phases of an automatic RM (FiO2 = 1.0). (c) CT scans and end-inspiratory EIT images before and after automatic RM.

Results

The pulmonary parameters of one pig during an RM cycle can be seen in Fig. 1b. After 20 min, PaO2, Vt and compliance Crs (= Pdelta/Vt) were significantly increased in all animals and PaCO2 reduced to normal values. Phases 1–3 of the RM process lasted approximately 5 min, partially due to the dynamic latency (15 s) of the measurement system. An optimization of the fuzzy PaO2 controller and additional sensors will shorten the execution time and reduce the heart's pressure load. Figure 1c shows the CT and EIT images before and after RM. Atelectases are removed and ventilation is increased, more evenly distributed and shifted from ventral to dorsal regions.

Conclusion

Automatic RM with a sustained improvement of PaO2 and Crs could be achieved. The EIT showed a high potential to visualize and assess RM with a high temporal resolution.

Copyright information

© BioMed Central Ltd 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • H Luepschen
    • 1
  • T Meier
    • 2
  • M Großherr
    • 2
  • T Leibecke
    • 3
  • S Leonhardt
    • 1
  1. 1.Medical Information Technology, RWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.Department of AnesthesiologyUniversity of LübeckGermany
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyUniversity of LübeckGermany

Personalised recommendations