Critical Care

, 18:P328 | Cite as

National UK survey: a review of percutaneous tracheostomy and auxiliary subglottic suction port use

  • J Rees
  • R McCartney
  • S Saha
  • T Wickrama
Open Access
Poster presentation

Keywords

Endotracheal Tube Large Unit Tracheostomy Tube Normal Practice Percutaneous Technique 

Introduction

The tracheostomy is an ancient technique that more recently has developed a percutaneous technique. Percutaneous tracheostomies (PCT) have been shown to be safer and reduce infection, cost and other complications over surgical techniques [1, 2, 3]. Ventilator- associated pneumonia (VAP) is a serious complication resulting from the use of endotracheal tubes (ETT) and tracheostomies. Changes in design of these tubes by the addition of a subglottic suction port have been shown to improve VAP rates in mechanically ventilated patients [4],[5]. A large meta-analysis review showed that subglottic drainage reduced the number of days of mechanical ventilation required and reduced the number of days stayed on the ICU [4].

Methods

We contacted all ICUs in the UK by telephone and spoke to the nurse-in-charge to ascertain their normal practice with regards to PCT and subglottic suction use.

Results

We contacted a total of 246 general ICUs, 72% of which we received a response. The average number of beds per ICU from all units who responded was 11. Ninety-eight per cent of ICUs that we questioned did use PCT. For three units, the average bed number per unit was 11 and the other 2% of ICUs who did not use PCT had five beds per unit on average. The proportion of ICUs that employed subglottic suction ports on their ETTs was 43% having on average 11 beds per unit, whilst the proportion of ICUs that did not employ subglottic suction ports was 57%, also with 11 beds per unit on average. Regarding PCT subglottic suction ports, 38% of ICUs did utilise these tubes whilst 62% did not. Of the group of ICUs that did use subglottic suction ports on their tracheostomy tubes, the average beds per unit was 12. Of the group of ICUs that did not use subglottic suction ports on their tracheostomy tubes, the average beds per unit was 10.

Conclusion

Significant differences in practise exist with PCT and subglottic suction ports on tubes. The size of the ICUs in these groups is variable. The larger units are more likely to use PCT over the smaller units. Regarding subglottic suction ports on ETT and tracheostomy tubes, the size of the ICU does not necessarily dictate their use. We propose that all ICUs review their policy on the use of PCT and subglottic suction-assisted tubes to help improve surgical complications, cost, VAP rates and ICU stays.

References

  1. 1.
    Baumann HJ, et al.: Pneumologie. 2010, 64: 769-776. 10.1055/s-0030-1255743CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Engels PT, et al.: Can JSurg. 2009, 52: 427-433.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Muscedere J, et al.: Crit Care Med. 2011, 39: 1985-1991. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318218a4d9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bouza E, et al.: Chest. 2008, 134: 938-946. 10.1378/chest.08-0103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smulders K, et al.: Chest. 2002, 121: 858-862. 10.1378/chest.121.3.858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Rees et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2014 and co-published as a series in Critical Care. Other articles in the series can be found online at http://ccforum.com/series/annualupdate2014. Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/8901.

Authors and Affiliations

  • J Rees
    • 1
  • R McCartney
    • 1
  • S Saha
    • 1
  • T Wickrama
    • 1
  1. 1.Queen's HospitalRomfordUK

Personalised recommendations