Critical Care

, 17:P309 | Cite as

Primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty and therapeutic hypothermia in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

  • R Hunt
  • M Holl
  • A Bailey
  • P Macnaughton
Poster presentation


Cardiac Arrest Coronary Angioplasty Therapeutic Hypothermia Coronary Occlusion Percutaneous Intervention 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


The benefit of primary percutaneous intervention (PCI) in the management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is not clear cut [1]. It has historically been used in patients with ST elevation on post-resuscitation electrocardiogram (ECG) although this is a poor predictor of acute coronary occlusion after cardiac arrest [2]. This study investigates the benefit of PCI regardless of post-resuscitation ECG. Benefit is widely claimed for therapeutic hypothermia, so cooling parameters were included.


We analysed all 41 consecutive adults admitted post OHCA to a university hospital ICU between January 2010 and December 2011. Patients received PCI regardless of ECG changes. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the relationship between PCI, cooling and survival to discharge. Routinely collected data such as demographics and details of resuscitation (OHCA Utstein data) were also included.


Survival to hospital discharge was 41% with 29% of survivors discharged to a neurological rehabilitation centre. Multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model showed PCI to be an independent predictive factor of survival, unrelated to ECG (hazards ratio, 0.0583; 95% CI, 0.0076 to 0.4485). Cooling had no significant impact on patient survival. See Figure 1.


In this small retrospective study primary PCI appears to be an independent predictor of survival after OHCA. This is consistent with other studies suggesting benefit for primary PCI regardless of the post-resuscitation ECG [3]. Cooling was not found to improve survival to discharge but further analysis is required to determine impact on neurological function.
Figure 1

Comparison of hazards ratios post Cox analysis.


  1. 1.
    Kern KB: Optimal treatment of patients surviving out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2012, 5: 597-605.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spaulding CM, et al.: Immediate coronary angiography in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 1997, 336: 1629-1633. 10.1056/NEJM199706053362302CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dumas F, et al.: Immediate percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with better survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2010, 3: 200-207. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.913665CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hunt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • R Hunt
    • 1
  • M Holl
    • 1
  • A Bailey
    • 1
  • P Macnaughton
    • 1
  1. 1.Derriford HospitalPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations