Neurological adverse events in patients receiving anti-TNF therapy: a prospective imaging and electrophysiological study
The aim was to investigate the frequency of neurological adverse events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondylarthropathies (SpA) treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α antagonists.
Seventy-seven patients eligible for anti-TNFα therapy were evaluated. There were 36 patients with RA, 41 with SpA [24 psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and 17 with ankylosing spondylitis (AS)]. All patients had a complete physical and neurological examination. Brain and cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and neurophysiological tests were performed in all patients before the initiation of anti-TNFα therapy and after a mean of 18 months or when clinical symptoms and signs indicated a neurological disease. Exclusion criteria included hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, heart arrhythmias, atherothrombotic events, vitamin B12 and iron deficiency, head and neck trauma and neurological surgeries.
Two patients did not receive anti-TNFα therapy because brain MRIs at baseline revealed lesions compatible with demyelinating diseases. Thus, 75 patients received anti-TNFα (38 infliximab, 19 adalimumab and 18 etanercept). Three patients developed neurological adverse events. A 35-year-old man with PsA after 8 months of infliximab therapy presented with paresis of the left facial nerve and brain MRI showed demyelinating lesions. Infliximab was discontinued and he was treated with pulses of corticosteroids recovering completely after two months. The second patient was a 45-year-old woman with RA who after 6 months of adalimumab therapy presented with optic neuritis. The third patient was a 50-year-old woman with AS, whom after 25 months of infliximab therapy, presented with tingling and numbness of the lower extremities and neurophysiological tests revealed peripheral neuropathy. In both patients anti-TNF were discontinued and they improved without treatment after 2 months. The rest of our patients showed no symptoms and MRIs showed no abnormalities. The estimated rate of neurological adverse events in patients treated with anti-TNF therapy is 4% (3/75).
Neurological adverse events after anti-TNFα therapy were observed in our patient. Brain MRI and neurophysiological tests are essential tools to discriminate neurological diseases.
KeywordsMultiple Sclerosis Infliximab Ankylose Spondylitis Etanercept Adalimumab
American College of Rheumatology
Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society
central nervous system
disease-modifying antirheumatic drug
fluid attenuated inversion recovery
field of view
magnetic resonance imaging
radiologically isolated syndrome
soluble tumor necrosis factor α
transmembrane precursor protein
tumor necrosis factor
tumor necrosis factor receptor
TNFα antagonists are a significant advantage for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthropathies (SpA), and other inflammatory diseases . These agents have proven to be more effective than traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and may prevent development of structural damage [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. However, their increasing use during the last decade has revealed a variety of immune-mediated adverse events . Clinical signs of autoimmune diseases, such as urticaria, psoriasis, lupus-like syndrome, diabetes mellitus type I and others have been reported [10, 11, 12, 13]. In addition, numerous reports and case series of neurological adverse events due to anti-TNFα blockers have been reported. These include demyelinating conditions, optic neuritis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, mononeuritis multiplex, Guillain-Barré syndrome and others [14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41]. However, there is debate about whether treatment with anti-TNFα blockers unmasks preexisting demyelinating disorders such as multiple sclerosis (MS) or induces de novo demyelination of the central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system. On the other hand, patients with RA and SpA may develop neurological manifestations mostly due to cervical spine involvement and CNS disease due to vasculitis or amyloidosis [42, 43]. In addition patients with RA may develop peripheral nervous system involvement such as sensorimotor neuropathy or mononeuritis multiplex (42).
To date, only case reports and case series have been reported. For this reason we undertook a prospective study using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and neurophysiological tests in patients with RA and SpA receiving anti-TNFα antagonists.
Materials and methods
Patients with RA and SpA who were followed up at a single tertiary Rheumatology center, and who were eligible for anti-TNFα treatment between May 2009 and December 2011 were included. Patients with RA fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1987 for the disease  and patients with SpA fulfilled the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria . Exclusion criteria included severe uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, atherothrombotic events, heart arrhythmias, vitamin B12 and iron deficiency, as well as head and neck trauma, neurological surgery or any other neurological conditions. All patients underwent complete physical examination and detailed neurological evaluation which included also brain and cervical spine MRI as well as neurophysiology testing with nerve conduction velocity and needle electromyography (EMG). Neurological evaluation and neurophysiologial tests were performed by an expert neurologist (SK), who was unaware of patient history. Patients received anti-TNFα therapy and were followed up every 2 to 3 months with appropriate laboratory monitoring, as well as with complete physical examination. MRI and neurophysiology testing were repeated after a mean period of 18 months after treatment or when clinical symptoms and signs indicated neurological disease.
All MRI was performed on the same 1.5 T unit (Gyroscan Intera; Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) by using a quadrature head coil. The imaging protocol consisted of: (i) T1-weighted high resolution (1 × 1 × 1 mm) three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo sequence (repetition time (TR), 25 ms; echo time (TE), 4.6 ms; acquisition matrix, 256 × 228; field of view (FOV), 220 mm; number of signal intensity averages, 1), which was used for structural imaging; (ii) axial T2-weighted sequence (TR, 3,000 ms; TE, 90 ms; FOV, 250 mm; matrix, 276 × 176; section thickness, 6 mm; number of signal intensity averages, 2; intersection gap, 0.6; and (iii) a sagittal fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence (TR, 6,300 ms; TE, 120 ms; FOV: 250 mm; matrix, 256 × 256; section thickness, 6 mm; intersection gap, 0.6; number of signal intensity averages, 2), which was used for evaluation of white-matter hyper-intensity. Study subjects' informed consent and approval from the institutional ethical committee (University Hospital of Ioannina) were obtained. All MRI scans were read by two expert radiologists (AKZ) and (MIA) who were also unaware of the patients' history.
Finally, all patients had an immunologic evaluation before initiating anti-TNFα therapy, which included antinuclear antibodies (ANA), antibodies to double-stranded DNA, anticardiolipin antibodies (ACL), and antibodies to β2GPI as well as lupus anticoagulant (LA).
Demographic characteristics of patients eligible for anti-TNF therapy
Average age, years, n (SD)
Rheumatoid arthritis patients, n (%)
Psoriatic arthritis patients, n (%)
Ankylosing spondylitis patients, n (%)
DMARDs intake, n (%)
Methotrexate, n (%)
Cyclosporin, n (%)
Leflunomide, n (%)
Steroids intake, n (%)
Anti-TNF intake, n (%)
Infliximab, n (%)
Adalimumab, n (%)
Etanercept, n (%)
Antinuclear antibodies positivity, n (%)*
Rheumatic factor positivity, n (%)*
Anti-citrullinated antibodies positivity, n (%)*
Examples of specific cases are as follows.
A 45-year-old woman with RA after 6 months of adalimumab treatment presented with a reduction of visual acuity on the right eye, and ocular pain mainly on eye movements. Neurological examination was normal. Fundoscopic examination showed no abnormalities. A diagnosis of right-sided optic neuritis was done and adalimumab was discontinued. Brain MRI revealed no abnormalities and the patient recovered gradually without treatment. After 2 months the patient had a complete recovery. However, the patient had a flare of RA symptoms; therefore adalimumab was restarted after informed consent. A second episode of optic neuritis this time in the left eye was manifested after two adalimumab injections and the drug was stopped permanently. A new brain MRI revealed no abnormalities. The patient declined CSF tap and she had a close follow up without treatment. Results of laboratory and immunology tests (ANA, ACL, β2GPI, LA) were within normal limits or negative. She recovered completely after 2 months.
A 50-year-old woman suffering from AS and Crohn’s disease was treated with infliximab with significant improvement of both diseases. After 25 months of infliximab therapy, she presented with tingling and numbness affecting both legs. Neurological examination revealed bilateral decrease of deep tendon reflexes of the lower limbs as well as hypoesthesia below the knees. Brain MRI showed no pathological findings, while neurophysiology testing revealed a significant reduction in sensory nerve conduction velocity in the lower extremities. Infliximab was discontinued and gabapentin 1,600 mg/day was started, with partial improvement of the sensory symptoms. After 3 months of infliximab discontinuation, and after the patient’s informed consent, infliximab was re-administered. However, after the first re-infusion, neurological symptoms (tingling, numbness and dysesthesias) reappeared in the lower extremities and the drug was discontinued. Routine laboratory and immunological evaluation (ANA, ACL, β2GPI, LA) showed no abnormalities.
We investigated the characteristics and frequency of neurological adverse events in patients with rheumatic diseases treated with TNFα antagonists in a prospective study using MRI and neurophysiological tests before the initiation of anti-TNFα therapy. We described three cases with neurological adverse events, the first showing CNS demyelinating disease and peripheral neuropathy, the second with recurrent optic neuritis and the third with peripheral neuropathy. TNFα blockers are known to potentially cause neurological adverse events, which may be part of an MS-like syndrome or represent new inflammatory demyelinating disease. However, there is a question as to whether this association actually represents an unmasking of preexisting, presymptomatic MS or the onset of new demyelinating disease.
Interestingly, using MRI we identified two patients before the initiation of anti-TNFα therapy as having features of demyelination in the CNS. These two patients never received anti-TNF blockers and no neurological symptoms had developed after 2 years of follow up. On the other hand, if these two patients had been treated with TNFα antagonists without having MRI at baseline, they might have developed symptoms and signs of demyelinating disease, but equally they may not have. These two patients represent a population of patients with a preexisting, asymptomatic demyelinating disease, which may become manifest after anti-TNFα therapy. In this situation, the preexisting evaluation with MRI is highly important.
Unexpected incidental MRI findings suggestive of MS without typical MS symptoms, is now a well-recognized condition known as radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS). This has led to an increased awareness of this condition and studies by several groups have shown that there is a close association between RIS and MS, such that in some cases RIS may be considered to be preclinical MS .
Three more patients developed neurological adverse events after anti-TNFα treatment. These cases were new-onset diseases (CNS demyelination, optic neuritis and peripheral neuropathy). The question arises as to how this happened.
The mechanisms underlying the predisposition to demyelination or exacerbation of demyelination in patients treated with TNFα antagonists is not well-understood. Several hypotheses have been proposed . TNFα has a critical role in MS. It is clearly a pro-inflammatory cytokine during the acute phase of the disease and participates in the demyelinating process. On the other hand, TNFα also has immunosuppressive properties during the later phase of the disease. These properties are related to TNF receptors (TNFR)1 and 2, which mediate differential biological responses of TNFα. Within CNS, TNFα is produced by microglia, astrocytes or other cells as a monomeric transmembrane precursor protein (tmTNF). The cytoplasmic tail is then cleaved by the TNFα converting enzyme, releasing the soluble form of TNFα (sTNFα). To perform their biological function, tmTNF and sTNF monomerics must aggregate to form homotrimers. Both TNFα (sTNF and tmTNF) can bind to both TNFR1 and TNFR2; sTNFα shows greater affinity for TNFR1 than TNFR2 causing inflammatory responses, leading to apoptosis, while tmTNFα acts mainly on TNFR2 leading to activation and cell survival. Isolated expression of the tmTNF in the transgenic mice can suppress the initiation and progression of experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE) and at the same time maintains the properties of autotolerance and resistance to infection. Thus, selective inhibition of sTNF/TNFR1 signaling might be used as a therapeutic strategy for prevention or relapsing MS .
Several theories have been proposed to explain a potential biologic relationship between TNFα antagonists and demyelinating disease: (a) TNFα blockers do not penetrate the blood–brain barrier, but enhance disease activity via an increase in peripheral T-cell autoreactive cells, which can penetrate into CNS ; (b) down regulation of TNFR2 necessary for the proliferation of oligodendrocytes and damage repair [17, 23]; (c) down regulation of downstream production of cytokines such as IL-10 and up regulation of IL-12 and IFN-γ associated with demyelinating disease process [48, 49]; (d) TNFα antagonists could unmask a latent infection critical to inciting an autoimmune demyelinating process .
It has been suggested that TNFα antagonists may increase the risk of demyelinating diseases in patients with RA by about 30% , however, these data are not supported by others . The overall prevalence of RA and MS is 0.6% and 0.05% respectively . The occurrence of both diseases in the same patient has been reported . This coincidence should be not surprising because both RA and MS share pathogenetic and genetic similarities . In this context patients having one autoimmune disease are at increased risk of developing another. In favor of this, is the existence in our study of two patients with preexisting MS-like lesions.
The development of central and peripheral nervous system demyelinating lesions after the introduction of anti-TNF in three of our patients supports the idea of anti-TNF evoking demyelination. The fact that in two out of three patients the symptoms improved with cessation of anti-TNF and re-emerged with reintroduction of anti-TNF clearly supports the theory of anti-TNF-evoked pathophysiology. Thus, patients who already are at increased risk (due to a genetic predisposition) of developing immune-mediated demyelination, may be at increased risk of developing neurological diseases after the introduction of anti-TNF. In our study, the estimated rate of neurological adverse events in patients with inflammatory arthritides treated with anti-TNF therapy is 4% (3/75). Our results differ somewhat from previous studies. In RA patients, a frequency of 30% of adverse events, mostly peripheral polyneuropathy, has been reported after anti-TNF therapy , while other studies have not supported these results . However, our study is the only prospective study in which all patients had neurophysiological tests and MRI before and after anti-TNF therapy. This might explain the different frequency of neurological adverse events found in our study. Therefore, further prospective well-controlled studies are needed to confirm our results.
In summary, the estimated rate of neurological adverse events in patients with rheumatic diseases treated with TNFα antagonists is 4%. Brain MRI and neurophysiology testing are essential tools to discriminate subclinical preexisting demyelinating diseases. In patients who are candidates for anti-TNFα therapy a detail clinical and neurological examination is necessary. Finally, close follow up and appropriate monitoring are essential and when the patients develop symptoms or signs of neurological adverse events, TNFα antagonists should be discontinued and appropriate tests should be performed.
The development of central and peripheral nervous system adverse events after the introduction of anti-TNF in three of our patients supports the notion of anti-TNF-evoked demyelination.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of their individual details and accompanying images in this manuscript. The consent form is held by the authors in the patients clinical notes and is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief.
- 8.Flouri I, Markatseli TE, Voulgari PV, Boki KA, Papadopoulos I, Settas L, Zisopoulos D, Skopouli FN, Iliopoulos A, Bertsias GK, Geborek P, Drosos AA, Boumpas DT, Sidiropoulos P: Comparative effectiveness and survival of infliximab, adalimumab, and etanercept for rheumatoid arthritis patients in the Hellenic Registry of Biologics: Low rates of remission and 5-year drug survival. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014, 43: 447-457.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.van Oosten BW, Barkhof F, Truyen L, Boringa JB, Bertelsmann FW, von Blomberg BM, Woody JN, Hartung HP, Polman CH: Increased MRI activity and immune activation in two multiple sclerosis patients treated with the monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor antibody cA2. Neurology. 1996, 47: 1531-1534.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Robinson WH, Genovese MC, Moreland LW: Demyelinating and neurologic events reported in association with tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonism: by what mechanisms could tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists improve rheumatoid arthritis but exacerbate multiple sclerosis?. Arthritis Rheum. 2001, 44: 1977-1983.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Cisternas M, Gutiérrez M, Jacobelli S: Successful rechallenge with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha for psoriatic arthritis after development of demyelinating nervous system disease during initial treatment: comment on the article by Mohan et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2002, 46: 3107-3108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Toussirot E, Pertuiset E, Martin A, Melac-Ducamp S, Alcalay M, Grardel B, Seror P, Perdriger A, Wendling D, Mulleman D, Beraneck L, Mariette X, Club Rheumatismes et Inflammation: Association of rheumatoid arthritis with multiple sclerosis: report of 14 cases and discussion of its significance. J Rheumatol. 2006, 33: 1027-1028.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 38.Fernández-Espartero MC, Pérez-Zafrilla B, Naranjo A, Esteban C, Ortiz AM, Gómez-Reino JJ, Carmona L, BIOBADASER Study Group: Demyelinating disease in patients treated with TNF antagonists in rheumatology: data from BIOBADASER, a pharmacovigilance database, and a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011, 40: 330-337.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Andreadou E, Kemanetzoglou E, Brokalaki C, Evangelopoulos ME, Kilidireas C, Rombos A, Stamboulis E: Demyelinating disease following anti-TNFa treatment: a causal or coincidental association? Report of four cases and review of the literature. Case Rep Neurol Med. 2013, 2013: 671935-PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 42.Tehlirian CV, Bathon JM: Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clinical and Laboratory Manifestations. Chapter 6. Primer on the Rheumatic Diseases. Edited by: Klippel JH, Stone JH, Crofford LJ, White PH. 2008, New York, USA: Springer, 114-121. 13Google Scholar
- 44.Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, Healey LA, Kaplan SR, Liang MH, Luthra HS, Medsger TA, Mitchell DM, Neustadt DH, Pinals RS, Schaller JG, Sharp JT, Wilder RL, Hunder GG: The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988, 31: 315-324.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 45.Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Listing J, Akkoc N, Brandt J, Braun J, Chou CT, Collantes-Estevez E, Dougados M, Huang F, Gu J, Khan MA, Kirazli Y, Maksymowych WP, Mielants H, Sørensen IJ, Ozgocmen S, Roussou E, Valle-Oñate R, Weber U, Wei J, Sieper J: The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009, 68: 777-783.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 49.van Boxel-Dezaire AH, Hoff SC, van Oosten BW, Verweij CL, Dräger AM, Adèr HJ, van Houwelingen JC, Barkhof F, Polman CH, Nagelkerken L: Decreased interleukin-10 and increased interleukin-12p40 mRNA are associated with disease activity and characterize different disease stages in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 1999, 45: 695-703.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.